Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in women with heart failure: a review of enrollment, adherence, and outcomes

The iATTEND Trial: A Trial Comparing Hybrid Versus Standard Cardiac Rehabilitation

The improving ATTENDance (iATTEND) to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) trial tested the hypotheses that hybrid CR (HYCR) (combination of virtual and in-facility CR sessions) would result in greater attendance compared with traditional, facility-based only CR (FBCR) and yield equivalent improvements in exercise capacity and health status. Patients were randomized to HYCR (n = 142) or FBCR (n = 140), stratified by gender and race. Attendance was assessed as number of CR sessions completed within 6 months (primary end point) and the percentage of patients completing 36 CR sessions. Other end points (tested for equivalency) included exercise capacity and self-reported health status. HYCR patients completed 1 to 12 sessions in-facility, with the balance completed virtually using synchronized, 2-way audiovisual technology. Neither total number of CR sessions completed within 6 months (29 ± 12 vs 28 ± 12 visits, adjusted p = 0.94) nor percentage of patients completing 36 sessions (59 ± 4% vs 51 ± 4%, adjusted p = 0.32) were significantly different between HYCR and FBCR, respectively. The between-group changes for exercise capacity (peak oxygen uptake, 6-minute walk distance) and health status were equivalent. Regarding safety, no sessions required physician involvement, there was 1 major adverse event after a virtual session, and no falls required medical attention. In conclusion, although we rejected our primary hypothesis that attendance would be greater with HYCR versus FBCR, we showed that FBCR and HYCR resulted in similar patient attendance patterns and equivalent improvements in exercise capacity and health status. HYCR which incorporates virtually supervised exercise should be considered an acceptable alternative to FBCR. NCT Identifier: 03646760; The Improving ATTENDance to Cardiac Rehabilitation Trial - Full-Text View - ClinicalTrials. gov; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03646760.

Muscular stress is equal when resistance exercise with blood flow restriction is matched in total work volume: A cross-sectional, cross-over study

AIM

We compared muscular metabolic stress during exercise performed at multiple intensities, from very low to moderate, with blood flow restriction (BFR) adjusted by the same work volume.

METHODS

Twenty-five healthy young adults performed unilateral plantar flexion at 1 repetition/2 s in a magnetic resonance system. The BFR exercise protocols were as follows: (A) exercise with 10% of one repetition maximum (1-RM) for 360 s, (B) 15% 1-RM for 240 s, (C) 20% 1-RM for 180 s, (D) 30% 1-RM for 120 s, and (E) 40% 1-RM for 90 s. All protocols had the same total work volume (load × repetitions = 1800). A high-intensity protocol at 65% 1-RM without BFR (60 s) was also performed for comparison. We used 31 P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy to evaluate the muscular metabolic stress in the subjects' calf muscle, defined as decreases in phosphocreatine and intramuscular pH.

RESULTS

The phosphocreatine depletion (A: 15.6 ± 0.7, B: 14.8 ± 0.8, C: 15.2 ± 0.6, D: 14.3 ± 0.6, E: 10.9 ± 0.5 mM; no significant difference [ns]) and the intramuscular pH decrease (A: 6.82 ± 0.02, B: 6.84 ± 0.01, C: 6.83 ± 0.02, D: 6.83 ± 0.02, E: 6.77 ± 0.02; ns) at the end of each exercise were similar and greater than those produced by the 65% 1-RM without BFR.

CONCLUSION

If the total work volumes are equal, the metabolic stress in exercising muscle may reach similar levels at the end of exercise with BFR and could provide similar successful training effects.