Lipid and C-Reactive Protein Levels, Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Simvastatin Treatment in Brazilian Individuals

Lack of Efficacy of Simvastatin Adjunctive Therapy for Patients with Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

The adjunctive therapeutic potential of simvastatin in schizophrenia treatment has generated interest due to its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of simvastatin as an adjunct treatment for schizophrenia, synthesizing results from various controlled trials.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of simvastatin as an adjunct therapy in patients with schizophrenia. The primary outcome measures were improvements in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores. Secondary outcomes included changes in overall clinical condition and level of functioning. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed through I² statistics.

Results

The four RCTs included in the analysis represented 425 participants. The combined results demonstrated no significant advantage of simvastatin over placebo in reducing PANSS total scores with a pooled effect size (Standard Mean Difference, SMD) of -0.36 (95% Confidence Interval, CI: -0.82 to 0.11) at 1 month, and -1.80 (95% Confidence Interval, CI: -4.82 to 1.21) at 3 months, indicating minimal to no effect. Similarly, analyses of secondary outcomes showed no significant improvements in overall clinical condition and level of functioning. The studies exhibited low heterogeneity (I² = 0%).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis provides evidence that simvastatin, used as adjunctive therapy, does not significantly improve the symptomatic outcomes of schizophrenia compared to placebo. Although simvastatin is well-tolerated, its role in enhancing antipsychotic treatment efficacy in patients with schizophrenia appears limited. These findings suggest that simvastatin should not be recommended as an adjunctive treatment in the clinical management of schizophrenia. Further research may explore the potential subgroups that could benefit from such treatment or identify the biological reasons for the lack of efficacy.

A randomized controlled trial of add-on naproxen, simvastatin and their combination for the treatment of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

This large randomized controlled trial examined the effect of naproxen, simvastatin or both on patients with schizophrenia. This was a large multi-center, twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-arm clinical trial administering naproxen, simvastatin or both to 232 subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The primary outcome was change in PANSS total score. ANCOVA and mixed model analyses of the PANSS total score change showed no significant difference between naproxen and placebo (adjusted p = 0.78), simvastatin and placebo (adjusted p = 0.38) or the combination of naproxen and simvastatin compared to placebo (adjusted p = 0.72). No statistically significant drug-placebo differences were found in the PANSS subscales, CGI or BACS between all groups. There was a near significant improvement in negative symptoms (p = 0.06), and an analysis of the 5 factor PANSS factors analysis found a significant improvement in simvastatin above placebo in withdrawal (p = 0.03). These finding were not significant after correcting for multiple comparisons. A meta-analysis on changes in total PANSS scores in studies on statins in schizophrenia, including the present study together with six other studies showed a significant improvement for statins compared to placebo (Hedges' G of -0.245 (CI= -0.403, -0.086, p = 0.002). When one outlying study which showed particularly strong effects of statins was removed, part of the effect went away. In conclusion, in this study, naproxen and simvastatin alone or in combination were not efficacious in the treatment of symptoms in schizophrenia. However, the meta-analysis of all studies of simvastatin for schizophrenia indicates further research on this topic.

Augmentation Therapies as Treatments for Coexisting Somatic Problems in Schizophrenia-A Systematic Review

The aim of this review is to appraise the data from available randomized clinical trials (RCT) regarding the possible combinations of neuroleptic and non-antipsychotic treatment which could enhance antipsychotic therapy efficacy whilst simultaneously addressing somatic symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia. A systematic search of the PubMed database up to February 2022 was conducted. Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials using augmentation therapy in chronic schizophrenia in adults, written in English, and only studies with psychometric assessments of schizophrenia were incorporated. Exclusion criteria: non-clinical, first episode of schizophrenia, patients on medication other than antipsychotics augmented, and not adjunctive therapy. Overall, 37 studies of 1931 patients with schizophrenia who received a combination of antipsychotic medication with other drugs were selected. A statistically significant reduction of negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenia, measured with the PANSS scale, when using a combination of antipsychotic treatment along with aspirin, simvastatin, N-acetylcysteine, or pioglitazone was found. A combination of antipsychotic medication with aspirin, simvastatin, N-acetylcysteine, or pioglitazone seems to be effective in the reduction of symptoms of schizophrenia in adults, but long-term studies are required to confirm this effect.

Interoceptive pathways to understand and treat mental health conditions

An increasing recognition that brain and body are dynamically coupled has enriched our scientific understanding of mental health conditions. Peripheral signals interact centrally to influence how we think and feel, generating our sense of the internal condition of the body, a process known as interoception. Disruptions to this interoceptive system may contribute to clinical conditions, including anxiety, depression, and psychosis. After reviewing the nature of interoceptive disturbances in mental health conditions, this review focuses on interoceptive pathways of existing and putative mental health treatments. Emerging clinical interventions may target novel peripheral treatment mechanisms. Future treatment development requires forward- and back-translation to uncover and target specific interoceptive processes in mental health to elucidate their efficacy relative to interventions targeting other factors.

Effects of High- or Moderate-intensity Rosuvastatin on 1-year Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Post-percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: Although statins decrease mortality in coronary artery disease, the effect of high-dose statins and duration of therapy post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well addressed. Aim: To determine the effective dose of statin to prevent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularisation and cardiac death, after PCI in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Methods: In this randomised, double-blind clinical trial, all chronic coronary syndrome patients with a recent history of PCI were randomly divided into two groups after 1 month of high-dose rosuvastatin therapy. Over the next year, the first group received rosuvastatin 5 mg daily (moderate intensity), while the second received rosuvastatin 40 mg daily (high intensity). Participants were evaluated in terms of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and MACEs. Results: The 582 eligible patients were divided into group 1 (n=295) and group 2 (n=287). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sex, age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, previous history of PCI or history of coronary artery bypass grafting (p>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in MACE and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein after 1 year between the two groups (p=0.66). Conclusion: The high-dose group had lower LDL levels. However, given the lack of association between high-intensity statins and MACEs in the first year after PCI among chronic coronary syndrome patients, the use of moderate-intensity statins may be as effective as high-intensity statins, and treatment based on LDL targets may suffice.

Atypical Antipsychotics and Metabolic Syndrome: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Differences

Atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) are commonly prescribed medications to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorders and other psychotic disorders. However, they might cause metabolic syndrome (MetS) in terms of weight gain, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and high blood pressure, which are responsible for reduced life expectancy and poor adherence. Importantly, there is clear evidence that early metabolic disturbances can precede weight gain, even if the latter still remains the hallmark of AAPs use. In fact, AAPs interfere profoundly with glucose and lipid homeostasis acting mostly on hypothalamus, liver, pancreatic β-cells, adipose tissue, and skeletal muscle. Their actions on hypothalamic centers via dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and histamine receptors affect neuropeptides and 5'AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity, thus producing a supraphysiological sympathetic outflow augmenting levels of glucagon and hepatic glucose production. In addition, altered insulin secretion, dyslipidemia, fat deposition in the liver and adipose tissues, and insulin resistance become aggravating factors for MetS. In clinical practice, among AAPs, olanzapine and clozapine are associated with the highest risk of MetS, whereas quetiapine, risperidone, asenapine and amisulpride cause moderate alterations. The new AAPs such as ziprasidone, lurasidone and the partial agonist aripiprazole seem more tolerable on the metabolic profile. However, these aspects must be considered together with the differences among AAPs in terms of their efficacy, where clozapine still remains the most effective. Intriguingly, there seems to be a correlation between AAP's higher clinical efficacy and increase risk of metabolic alterations. Finally, a multidisciplinary approach combining psychoeducation and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is proposed as a first-line strategy to avoid the MetS. In addition, pharmacological treatments are discussed as well.

Endothelial dysfunction in neuroprogressive disorders-causes and suggested treatments

BACKGROUND

Potential routes whereby systemic inflammation, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction may drive the development of endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis, even in an environment of low cholesterol, are examined.

MAIN TEXT

Key molecular players involved in the regulation of endothelial cell function are described, including PECAM-1, VE-cadherin, VEGFRs, SFK, Rho GEF TRIO, RAC-1, ITAM, SHP-2, MAPK/ERK, STAT-3, NF-κB, PI3K/AKT, eNOS, nitric oxide, miRNAs, KLF-4 and KLF-2. The key roles of platelet activation, xanthene oxidase and myeloperoxidase in the genesis of endothelial cell dysfunction and activation are detailed. The following roles of circulating reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the development of endothelial cell dysfunction are then described: paracrine signalling by circulating hydrogen peroxide, inhibition of eNOS and increased levels of mitochondrial ROS, including compromised mitochondrial dynamics, loss of calcium ion homeostasis and inactivation of SIRT-1-mediated signalling pathways. Next, loss of cellular redox homeostasis is considered, including further aspects of the roles of hydrogen peroxide signalling, the pathological consequences of elevated NF-κB, compromised S-nitrosylation and the development of hypernitrosylation and increased transcription of atherogenic miRNAs. These molecular aspects are then applied to neuroprogressive disorders by considering the following potential generators of endothelial dysfunction and activation in major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: NF-κB; platelet activation; atherogenic miRs; myeloperoxidase; xanthene oxidase and uric acid; and inflammation, oxidative stress, nitrosative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Finally, on the basis of the above molecular mechanisms, details are given of potential treatment options for mitigating endothelial cell dysfunction and activation in neuroprogressive disorders.

Anti-inflammatory Strategies for Schizophrenia: A Review of Evidence for Therapeutic Applications and Drug Repurposing

Schizophrenia is a debilitating psychiatric disorder with a substantial socioeconomic and humanistic burden. Currently available treatment strategies mostly rely on antipsychotic drugs, which block dopaminergic effects in the mesolimbic pathway of the brain. Although antipsychotic drugs help relieve psychotic symptoms, a definitive cure for schizophrenia has yet to be achieved. Recent advances in neuroinflammation research suggest that proinflammatory processes in the brain could cause alterations in neurobehavioral development and increase vulnerability to schizophrenia. With a growing need for novel strategies in the treatment of schizophrenia, it would be meaningful to review the current evidence supporting the therapeutic potential of anti-inflammatory strategies. This review details the key findings of clinical trials that investigate the efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents as adjuvants to antipsychotic treatment. We further discuss the possibilities of repurposing anti-inflammatory agents and developing novel strategies for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Association of Hydroxylmethyl Glutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitors, L-Type Calcium Channel Antagonists, and Biguanides With Rates of Psychiatric Hospitalization and Self-Harm in Individuals With Serious Mental Illness

IMPORTANCE

Drug repurposing is potentially cost-effective, low risk, and necessary in psychiatric drug development. The availability of large, routine data sets provides the opportunity to evaluate the potential for currently used medication to benefit people with serious mental illness (SMI).

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether hydroxylmethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (HMG-CoA RIs), L-type calcium channel (LTCC) antagonists, and biguanides are associated with reduced psychiatric hospitalization and self-harm in individuals with SMI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

These within-individual cohort studies of patients with SMI compared rates of psychiatric hospitalization and self-harm during periods of exposure and nonexposure to the study drugs, with adjusting for a number of time-varying covariates. Participants included 142 691 individuals from the entire population of Sweden with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BPD), schizophrenia, or nonaffective psychosis (NAP) who were 15 years or older and who were treated with psychiatric medication from October 1, 2005, through December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from April 1 through August 31, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment with HMG-CoA RIs, LTCC antagonists, or biguanides.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Psychiatric hospitalizations and self-harm admissions.

RESULTS

Among the 142 691 eligible participants, the HMG-CoA RI exposure periods were associated with reduced rates of psychiatric hospitalization in BPD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; P < .001), schizophrenia (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71-0.79; P < .001), and NAP (aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.85; P < .001) and reduced self-harm rates in BPD (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.86; P < .001) and schizophrenia (aHR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.74; P < .001). Exposure to LTCC antagonists was associated with reduced rates of psychiatric hospitalization and self-harm in subgroups with BPD (aHRs, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.88-0.96; P < .001] and 0.81 [95% CI, 0.68-0.95; P = .01], respectively), schizophrenia (aHRs, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.74-0.85; P < .001] and 0.30 [95% CI, 0.18-0.48; P < .001], respectively), and NAP (aHRs, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.83-0.96; P = .002] and 0.56 [95% CI, 0.42-0.74; P < .001], respectively). During biguanide exposure, psychiatric hospitalization rates were reduced in subgroups with BPD (aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.84; P < .001), schizophrenia (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.77; P < .001), and NAP (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92; P < .001), and self-harm was reduced in BPD (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.84; P < .001) and schizophrenia (aHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.85; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study provides additional evidence that exposure to HMG-CoA RIs, LTCC antagonists, and biguanides might lead to improved outcomes for individuals with SMI. Given the well-known adverse event profiles of these agents, they should be further investigated as repurposed agents for psychiatric symptoms.

Adjunctive therapy with statins in schizophrenia patients: A meta-analysis and implications

There are some conflicting results regarding the benefit of adjunctive therapy with statins for severity of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. This study aimed to verify whether statins use for adjunctive therapy was indeed beneficial to improve psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia. The data were from CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase and MEDLINE. The Boolean search term used for the electronic database search was (statin OR simvastatin OR atorvastatin OR fluvastatin OR lovastatin OR mevastatin OR pitavastatin OR pravastatin OR rosuvastatin OR cerivastatin) and (schizophrenia OR schizoaffective disorder OR psychosis). Inclusion criteria were the following: RCTs, the adult schizophrenia patients, received antipsychotics plus statins or placebo, and the PANSS or SANS scores. Exclusion criteria were as follows: no data reported and multiple reports of the same study. A meta-analysis was used to compare psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia patients with or without statins adjunctive therapy. The 6 RCTs included in the analysis represented 339 participants (169 in treatment group versus 170 in placebo group). A test for overall effect demonstrated that the PANSS positive scale and negative scale significantly reduced in participants receiving compliant with statins. Our meta-analyses first clarified that adjunctive therapy with statins could improve psychiatric symptoms, either negative symptoms or positive symptoms.