Psoriatic arthritis: review of potential biomarkers predicting response to TNF inhibitors

Navigating Psoriatic Arthritis: Treatment Pathways and Patient-Specific Strategies for Improved Outcomes

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a multifaceted chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by joint, skin, nail and entheseal involvement, affecting approximately 0.3-1% of the global population. In recent years, the treatment options for PsA have expanded from traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to include biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Owing to the heterogeneity of the disease and prevalence of comorbidities, the selection and sequence of treatment are often unclear. In this narrative review, we outline the patient journey from diagnosis through various treatment lines, from conventional therapies to bDMARDS and tsDMARDs, and the considerations for treatment sequencing in patients who do not achieve an adequate response. We examine the factors influencing treatment response, such as disease severity, predominant disease domain, comorbidities, genetic variations, pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity issues. We highlight the importance of identifying robust biomarkers to predict response and the need to determine patient-specific factors, including the contribution of inflammatory mechanisms to disease activity, to inform treatment strategies and improve long-term outcomes. Promising results with more recently marketed biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs, and the use of combination treatment approaches, offer new options for managing treatment-experienced patients.

HMGB1: new biomarker and therapeutic target of autoimmune and autoinflammatory skin diseases

High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is expressed in almost all human cells. During cell activation and cell death, the nucleoprotein HMGB1 can translocate to the extracellular space, thus mediating the early inflammatory response as an alarmin or damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP). Extracellular HMGB1 interacts with immune cells by binding to pattern recognition Toll-like receptors (TLRs), including TLR2 and TLR4, and the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), thus mediating the immune response to protect the host against pathogens and maintain immune balance. HMGB1 is reportedly upregulated and is a critical biomarker for monitoring disease activity in several chronic inflammatory or autoimmune disorders, including multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus and vitiligo. Additionally, the inhibition of HMGB1 expression or its activity has beneficial effects on disease activity in animal models of autoimmune diseases. Thus, HMGB1 is an indispensable biomarker and an important therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases. This review provides a detailed summary of the biological function of HMGB1 and provides a comprehensive outlook in terms of HMGB-focused diagnostic and therapeutic applications in autoimmune skin diseases.

Precision Medicine in Rheumatology: The Role of Biomarkers in Diagnosis and Treatment Optimization

Rheumatic diseases encompass a wide range of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and systemic sclerosis (SSc). These conditions often result in chronic pain, disability, and reduced quality of life, with unpredictable disease courses that may lead to joint destruction, organ damage, or systemic complications. Biomarkers, defined as measurable indicators of biological processes or conditions, have the potential to transform clinical practice by improving disease diagnosis, monitoring, prognosis, and treatment decisions. While significant strides have been made in identifying and validating biomarkers in rheumatic diseases, challenges remain in their standardization, clinical utility, and integration into routine practice. This review provides an overview of the current state of biomarkers in rheumatic diseases, their roles in clinical settings, and the emerging advancements in the field.

Plasmonic Biosensors for Health Monitoring: Inflammation Biomarker Detection

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and localized SPR (LSPR) biosensors have emerged as viable technologies in the clinical detection of biomarkers for a wide array of health conditions. The success of SPR biosensors lies in their ability to monitor in real-time label-free biomarkers in complex biofluids. Recent breakthroughs in nanotechnology and surface chemistry have significantly improved this feature, notably from the incorporation of advanced nanomaterials including gold nanoparticles, graphene, and carbon nanotubes providing better SPR sensor performance in terms of detection limits, stability, and specificity. Recent progress in microfluidic integration has enabled SPR biosensors to detect multiple biomarkers simultaneously in complex biological samples. Taken together, these advances are closing the gap for their use in clinical diagnostics and point-of-care (POC) applications. While broadly applicable, the latest advancements in plasmonic biosensing are overviewed using inflammation biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukins (ILs), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), procalcitonin (PCT), ferritin, and fibrinogen for a series of conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune disorders, infections, and sepsis, as a key example of plasmonic biosensors for clinical applications. We highlight developments in sensor design, nanomaterial integration, surface functionalization, and multiplexing and provide a look forward to clinical applications by assessing the current limitations and exploring future directions for translating SPR biosensors for diagnostics and health monitoring. By enhancement of diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and accessibility, particularly in POC settings, SPR biosensors have the potential to significantly contribute to personalized healthcare and bring real-time, high-precision diagnostics to the forefront of clinical practice.

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Biologically Treated Psoriatic Arthritis and Atopic Dermatitis-A Single-Center Experience

(1) Background: Although the association between psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD) is reported in the literature, scarce data are known about the efficacy of biologic therapy (including TNF and IL-17 inhibitors) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and concomitant AD. (2) Objective: We aimed to explore AD in patients with PsA undergoing biologics for their active disease, focusing on prevalence and clinical and potential therapeutic implications. (3) Material and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 64 patients with PsA receiving various biological agents, followed-up in an academic outpatient rheumatology department up to 10 years. (4) Results: Atopic diseases were reported in about one third of cases, with a higher incidence of AD (10 cases; 52.6%) vs. atopic rhinitis (6 cases; 31.6%) and allergic asthma (3 cases; 15.8%). Three morphological patterns of AD were recognized including chronic prurigo (3 cases), a chronic lichen simplex (1 case), and eczemas (6 cases). All PsA with concomitant AD displayed a late onset of skin atopy (in their adult life) and demonstrated a specific profile (younger), from urban settings, equally distributed among genders, and requiring switching to a higher number of biologics to achieve disease control. (5) Conclusion: PsA and AD may coexist, requiring special attention when selecting the optimal biologic agent.

Tuberculosis and Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections in Patients with Spondyloarthritis: A Population-Based Study

Background and Objectives: Tuberculosis is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), while nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) encompass a group of mycobacterial species that are distinct from the MTB complex and leprae. Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a group of chronic inflammatory diseases with shared clinical characteristics and is treated with biological agents; however, their use may elevate the risk of MTB and NTM infections. This study aimed to compare the incidence and risk of MTB and NTM infections in patients with SpA, including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), using a population-based approach. Materials and Methods: This study included 2333 patients with SpA and 9332 age- and sex-matched controls from the Korea National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database from 2002 to 2019. The patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases-10 codes for AS, PsA, MTB, and NTM. Results: The results showed that a negligible percentage of patients with SpA developed NTM (0.002%) and MTB (0.016%), with no significant difference in the incidence rate ratio (IRR) compared to controls. Among patients with SpA treated with biologics, the IRRs for NTM and MTB were 5.66 and 3.069, respectively; however, these were not statistically significant. No cases of NTM or MTB infection were reported in female patients with SpA treated with biologics. In both the SpA patient group and the control group, the incidence of MTB was higher in individuals over 60 years old compared to those under 60 years old. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed a significant adjusted hazard ratio of 1.479 for MTB in patients with SpA after adjusting for age, sex, smoking history, insurance level, and comorbidities. However, this significance was not maintained when biological therapy was further adjusted. Conclusions: Our study indicated that the risks of NTM and MTB infection are not elevated in patients with SpA. Although biological use may potentially increase the risk of MTB infection, it does not lead to a significant increase in incidence rates. Proactive screening for latent tuberculosis and adequate prophylaxis using biologics can effectively manage the risk of NTM and MTB infections.

Effect of guselkumab on serum biomarkers in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the COSMOS phase 3b study

BACKGROUND

Guselkumab is a selective interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor targeting the IL-23p19 subunit. In the phase 3b COSMOS trial, guselkumab demonstrated efficacy in treating participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response (IR; lack of efficacy or intolerance) to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).

METHODS

Adults with active PsA (≥ 3 swollen joints,  ≥ 3 tender joints) and IR to one or two TNFi (TNFi-IR) were randomized 2:1 to guselkumab at Weeks 0, 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W) or placebo➔guselkumab Q8W at Week 24 with possible early escape at Week 16. Levels of serum cytokines, including interferon ɣ (IFNɣ), IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα); T helper 17 (Th17) effector cytokines IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22; and acute phase proteins C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, and serum amyloid A (SAA), were assessed and compared with matched healthy controls; guselkumab pharmacodynamics through Week 24 were also assessed. Associations between baseline biomarker levels and 1) baseline disease activity (28-joint disease activity score using CRP [DAS28-CRP], psoriasis area and severity index [PASI], and % body surface area [BSA] affected by psoriasis) and 2) clinical response (including  ≥ 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria [ACR20] response) at Week 24 were assessed.

RESULTS

Baseline serum levels of IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, TNFα, and IFNɣ were significantly higher in COSMOS TNFi-IR participants than in matched healthy controls. Baseline IL-6, CRP, and SAA levels were associated with baseline DAS28-CRP. IL-17A and IL-17F levels were associated with baseline PASI score and psoriasis BSA. Baseline swollen or tender joint counts did not associate with baseline biomarker levels. At Week 24, significant decreases from baseline in CRP, SAA, IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22 levels were seen in guselkumab, but not placebo-, treated participants. IL-17F and IL-22 levels at Week 24 in guselkumab-treated participants did not significantly differ from those of matched healthy controls. Guselkumab-treated participants achieving ACR20 response at Week 24 exhibited higher baseline IL-22 and IFNɣ levels versus nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from COSMOS participants with active, TNFi-IR PsA suggest guselkumab reduces levels of effector cytokines associated with the IL-23/IL-17 pathway, including those associated with baseline arthritis and skin disease activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03796858.

The 2023 pipeline of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in clinical development for spondyloarthritis (including psoriatic arthritis): a systematic review of trials

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview of current developments and potentially available therapeutic options for spondyloarthritis (SpA) in the coming years.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of 17 national and international clinical trial databases for all disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for SpA that are already marketed, in clinical development or withdrawn. The search was performed on February 2023 with the keywords "spondyloarthritis", "ankylosing spondylitis" and "psoriatic arthritis". For each molecule, we only considered the study at the most advanced stage of clinical development.

RESULTS

Concerning axial SpA (axSpA), a total of 44 DMARDs were identified: 6 conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), 27 biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and 11 targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs). Among the 18 targeted treatments (b+tsDMARDs) in current development, corresponding trials reached phase I (n=1), II (n=10) and III (n=7). Ten molecules are IL-17 inhibitors, two Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and two granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor inhibitors; four have another mode of action. Concerning psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 44 DMARDs were identified: 5 csDMARDs, 27 bDMARDs and 12 tsDMARDs. Among the 15 molecules in current development, corresponding trials reached phase II (n=8) and III (n=7). Six molecules are JAK inhibitors, six IL-17 inhibitors and one an IL-23 inhibitor; two have another mode of action.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review identified 18 and 15 molecules in clinical development for axSpA and PsA, respectively, which suggests a strengthening of the therapeutic arsenal in the coming years. However, with so many DMARDs but low target diversity, we will need to develop strategies or biomarkers to help clinicians make informed treatment decisions.

[Research advances on severe burn infection and cytokine storm]

Mortality due to severe burns has always been at a high level. A large number of studies have shown that the rapid onset of infectious symptoms and rapid progression of severely burned patients are closely related to the occurrence of cytokine storm. However, in clinical practice, cytokine storm monitoring, early warning, and symptomatic treatment are still in exploratory stage. This article reviews the cytokine storm and its related cytokines, the mechanism, early warning, and treatment of cytokine storm induced by burn infection, aiming to provide clinical references for reducing infection and mortality in severely burned patients.