Comparative evaluation of TonoPen AVIA, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry

Validation of intraocular pressure measurement using tonometer AVIA across different postures: A Bland Altman analysis

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

Tonometry is a fundamental procedure in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Different tonometers have been proposed but none are as accurate as the Goldman applanation tonometry (GAT). Nonetheless, due to the limitations of GAT, mobile tonometry methods became prevalent. This study aims to examine the reliability of the Tono-Pen AVIA® (TPA) in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) across different postures.

METHODS

A total of 196 eyes were prospectively examined for IOP changes using GAT and TPA. IOP measurements were taken across different postures using the TPA. Reliability of measurements was compared using interclass correlation coefficients (ICC), while agreement was represented using Bland-Altman analysis. Pearson r coefficient was used to measure correlations.

RESULTS

When compared to GAT (14.5 ± 4.4 mmHg), IOP readings were significantly higher for TPA at both seated (16.5 ± 4.5 mmHg; p < 0.001) and supine (16.9 ± 5.7; p < 0.001) positions. The ICC values for GAT and TPA among seated and supine patients were 0.79 (0.54-0.90) and 0.76 (0.48-0.87) indicating good reliability between the readings. There were significantly positive correlations between GAT and TPA at both seated (r = 0.626, p < 0.001) and supine (r = 0.727, p < 0.001) positions. Per Bland-Altman analysis, limits of agreement were -8.57 to 4.37 for GAT and seated TPA and -10.34 and 5.34 for GAT and supine TPA.

CONCLUSION

Good reliability exists between IOP measurements using GAT and TPA. However, the devices are not interchangeable and therefore cannot be used reciprocally in the same patient.

Real-world agreement of same-visit Tono-Pen vs Goldmann applanation intraocular pressure measurements using electronic health records

Purpose

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained with Tono-Pen (TP) and Goldmann applanation (GAT) using large-scale electronic health records (EHR).

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

A single pair of eligible TP/GAT IOP readings was randomly selected from the EHR for each ophthalmology patient at an academic ophthalmology center (2013-2022), yielding 4550 eligible measurements. We used Bland-Altman analysis to describe agreement between TP/GAT IOP differences and mean IOP measurements. We also used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with different IOP readings in the same eye, including demographics, glaucoma diagnosis, and central corneal thickness (CCT). Primary outcome metrics were discrepant measurements between TP and GAT as defined by two methods: Outcome A (normal TP despite elevated GAT measurements), and Outcome B (TP and GAT IOP differences ≥6 mmHg).

Result

The mean TP/GAT IOP difference was 0.15 mmHg ( ± 5.49 mmHg 95% CI). There was high correlation between the measurements (r = 0.790, p < 0.001). We found that TP overestimated pressures at IOP <16.5 mmHg and underestimated at IOP >16.5 mmHg (Fig. 4). Discrepant measurements accounted for 2.6% (N = 116) and 5.2% (N = 238) for outcomes A and B respectively. Patients with thinner CCT had higher odds of discrepant IOP (OR 0.88 per 25 μm increase, CI [0.84-0.92], p < 0.0001; OR 0.88 per 25 μm increase, CI [0.84-0.92], p < 0.0001 for outcomes A and B respectively).

Conclusion

In a real-world academic practice setting, TP and GAT IOP measurements demonstrated close agreement, although 2.6% of measurements showed elevated GAT IOP despite normal TP measurements, and 5.2% of measurements were ≥6 mmHg apart.

Early intraocular pressure changes following different keratoplasty techniques and association with cornea parameters and anterior chamber depth

Background:

Corneal transplantation surgery is associated with an increased risk of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. Increased IOP may cause irreversible vision loss and graft failure.

Objective:

We aimed to evaluate early IOP changes following different keratoplasty techniques and to investigate the relationship between corneal thickness (CT), keratometry values, anterior chamber depth (ACD), and IOP changes.

Methods:

We included patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in this observational study. ACD, CT, and keratometry measurements were repeated postoperatively at hour 24, week 1, and month 1. IOP measurements were repeated at postoperative hours 6 and 24, week 1, and month 1 by Tono-Pen XL.

Results:

In total, 22 patients underwent PK, 12 patients underwent DALK, and 19 patients underwent DMEK. The difference between the IOP preoperatively and postoperatively hour 6, and between the IOP preoperatively and postoperatively hour 24 was statistically significant in the three types of surgery ( p < 0.05 for each). The difference between preoperative and postoperative week 1 IOP was statistically significant only in the PK group ( p = 0.023). When the IOP was compared between the three types of surgeries, the IOP at postoperative week 1 in the PK group was significantly higher than the DALK and DMEK groups ( p = 0.021). There was no correlation between ACD, CT, K values, and IOP in any group.

Conclusion:

IOP may increase in all types of keratoplasty during the first hours after surgery, but PK has a risk of high IOP longer in the early postoperative period. PK patients should be followed more carefully during postoperative week 1 to check for an increase in IOP.

How should we measure intraocular pressure in the era of coronavirus disease 2019? Balancing infectious risk, cleaning requirements, and accuracy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Accurate and precise measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) is a vitally important component of the ophthalmic examination. There are multiple methods of tonometry, each of which has considerations in light of the ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. This review discusses these considerations and compares various tonometer methods with the gold standard of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).

RECENT FINDINGS

The SARS-CoV-2 virus may spread via droplets, microaerosols, or direct contact in the ophthalmology clinic. Tonometry poses a high risk of contamination. The accuracy and reliability of various methods of tonometry with single-use disposable equipment has been compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry.

SUMMARY

Goldmann applanation tonometry with disposable applanation tips, Tono-pen, and iCare employ single use tips to decrease the risk of cross-contamination of infectious agents. Review of the literature demonstrates good correlation between these devices and GAT, although the published level of agreement between devices varies.

Telehealth and Screening Strategies in the Diagnosis and Management of Glaucoma

Telehealth has become a viable option for glaucoma screening and glaucoma monitoring due to advances in technology. The ability to measure intraocular pressure without an anesthetic and to take optic nerve photographs without pharmacologic pupillary dilation using portable equipment have allowed glaucoma screening programs to generate enough data for assessment. At home, patients can perform visual acuity testing, web-based visual field testing, rebound tonometry, and video visits with the physician to monitor for glaucomatous progression. Artificial intelligence will enhance the accuracy of data interpretation and inspire confidence in popularizing telehealth for glaucoma.

Real-world comparison between the Tonopen and Goldmann applanation tonometry in a university glaucoma clinic

PURPOSE

To determine whether Tonopen intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Ophthalmic technicians are interchangeable with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) by a specialist in our glaucoma clinic.

METHODS

Ophthalmic technician Tonopen and glaucoma specialist GAT IOP measurements were performed on both undilated eyes of 300 consecutive patients during the same visit to our glaucoma clinic.

RESULTS

Among all 600 eyes of 300 patients (age 65.4, range: 23-92 years, male: 44.3%), Tonopen and GAT IOPs were similar (15.5 ± 0.6 vs. 15.4 ± 0.7 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.63) and directly correlated (r² = 0.58, p < 0.0001). However, among 120 patients with bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma GAT IOP was significantly higher than Tonopen in the right eyes (17.1 ± 1.1 vs. 16.2 ± 0.9 mmHg, p = 0.024) and in the left eyes (17.0 ± 1.0 vs. 16.3 ± 1.0 mmHg, p = 0.029). In all 300 right eyes, Tonopen underestimated IOP in 48.3% of eyes and overestimated in 39% (difference range: ( - )14 to ( + )12 mmHg), with IOP difference >  ± 3 mmHg in 34% of eyes. In eyes with GAT IOP ≥ 22 mmHg, Tonopen IOP was significantly lower (24.7 ± 2.6, range: 11-43 mmHg vs. 28.2 ± 2.2, range: 22-43 mmHg, p = 0.0002, mean difference: - 3.6 ± 1.7 mmHg), and the Tonopen measured IOP ≤ 21 mmHg in 33.3% of eyes. In eyes with Tonopen IOP ≤ 10 mmHg GAT measured IOP of 11-17 mmHg in 65.7% of eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Tonopen may mask a third of eyes with elevated IOP and two third of eyes with potentially above-goal IOP. The Tonopen may not be interchangeable with GAT or sufficiently reliable for patient management or screening in our glaucoma clinic. However, further study is recommended to assess the limitations of the Tonopen IOP measurements in eyes with higher or lower GAT IOPs.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

The Institutional review board, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY does not require this retrospective study to register.

Comparison of Tono-Pen Avia and Handheld Applanation Tonometry in Primary Congenital Glaucoma

PRCIS

Tono-Pen AVIA (TPA) intraocular pressure (IOP) values are different from those taken with handheld Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). These differences indicate both tonometers cannot be used interchangeably for measuring IOP in PCG.

PURPOSE

The aim was to compare IOP measurements obtained using TPA and a handheld version of GAT in children with PCG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two eyes from 23 patients were evaluated for central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length, biomicroscopy and IOP measurement with TPA and a handheld GAT under inhalation anesthesia. After 1 eye from each patient was randomized, paired the Student t-test and the Pearson correlation were used for analysis. Generalized linear mixed model was used to estimate the difference between tonometers.

RESULTS

Mean age of children was 28.3±20.5 months. Mean axial length was 24.89±3.33 mm and mean CCT was 605.9±81.0 µm. Mean IOP was 22.1±9.6 for TPA and 14.0±4.5 mm Hg for GAT. There was a significant difference of 8.1±6.9 mm Hg between TPA IOP and GAT IOP (P<0.001). Each 6 months increase in age was associated with 1.32 mm Hg reduction in the difference between tonometers (P=0.002) and each 1 mm Hg higher of mean GAT IOP was associated with -0.73 mm Hg in the difference between TPA and GAT (P=0.002). Also, for every 20 µm increase in CCT an increase of 1.16 mm Hg in the difference between both devices was expected (P=0.003), after adjustment for potentially confounding variables.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant difference between TPA IOP and GAT IOP in PCG. The difference between TPA and GAT in PCG is influenced by CCT, age and GAT IOP value.

[Comparison of Goldmann tonometry with air-puff tonometry. A study of 159 patients in Abidjan]

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) values obtained with each of the tonometry methods as well as to study the effect of corneal pachymetry on the measurements obtained by each method.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We carried out a cross-sectional, descriptive, analytical, prospective study in the ophthalmology department of a multispecialty clinic in Abidjan (Ivory Coast) from April 2018 to August 2018. Patients aged 15 and over were included in the study. Over this period, IOP was measured by Goldman Applanation Tonometer (HaagStreit, AT 900, Switzerland) and air-puff Tonopachymeter (Nidek, NT 530 P, Japan), which also permitted measurement of central optical corneal pachymetry. The data analyzed focused on socio-demographic characteristics, ophthalmologic history, tonometry, and central corneal pachymetry. The comparison of the values obtained by both devices and the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on tonometry were analyzed using EpiDataAnalysis V2.2.2.183 software.

RESULTS

We examined 318 eyes of 159 patients whose mean age was 40±12.57 years, range 16 to 82 years. The gender ratio was 1. A past ophthalmologic history was noted in 79.2% of patients. The mean IOP by Goldmann applanation tonometry was 12.75±3.17mmHg, and that by non-contact air-puff tonometry was 13.83±3.80mmHg. The mean central corneal thickness was 530.50±32.61μm. The difference between IOP measured by non-contact tonometry and that measured by contact tonometry was statistically significant, with P=0.00. There was no statistically significant relationship between central corneal pachymetry and contact tonometry (P=0.80). However, there was a statistically significant relationship between non-contact tonometry and central pachymetry (P=0.00). The values obtained with the air-puff tonometer are more affected by central corneal thickness.

CONCLUSION

The values obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry are not equivalent to those obtained by non-contact air-puff tonopachymetry.

Prospective Comparative Analysis of 4 Different Intraocular Pressure Measurement Techniques and Their Effects on Pressure Readings

PURPOSE

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) without fluorescein, with fluorescein strips, with fluorescein droplets, and IOP measurement with Tono-Pen Avia (TPA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective comparative clinical analysis. It was performed in clinical practice. The study population consisted of 40 volunteer patients, 1 eye per patient. All patients who were 18 years and older having routine ophthalmological examination were eligible to participate. Active corneal abrasions and/or ulcers, previous glaucoma surgery, or prostheses interfering with GAT measurement were excluded. GAT IOP was measured first without fluorescein, then with fluorescein strip, then with fluorescein droplet, and finally with the TPA device. The main outcome measure was central corneal IOP.

RESULTS

Mean±SD IOP measurements for GAT without fluorescein, with fluorescein strip, with fluorescein droplet, and for TPA groups were 12.65±3.01, 14.70±2.82, 15.78±2.64, and 16.33±3.08 mm Hg, respectively. Repeated-measures analysis of variance corrected with the Greenhouse-Geisser estimate ([Latin Small Letter Open E]=0.732) showed that measuring technique had a significant effect on IOP measurements (F2.20,85.59=34.66, P<0.001). The pairwise post hoc testing showed statistically significant mean differences (P≤0.001) between all techniques except when GAT with fluorescein droplet was compared with TPA (P=0.222). The Bland-Altman analyses showed 95% limits of agreement maximum potential discrepancies in measurement ranging from 5.89 mm Hg in the GAT with fluorescein strip versus droplet compared with 11.83 mm Hg in the GAT with fluorescein strip versus TPA comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

IOP measurement technique significantly impacted the values obtained. The ophthalmologist should ensure consistent measurement technique to minimize variability when following patients.

Determination of normal values of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in healthy premature infants-a prospective longitudinal study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the longitudinal change of intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) in healthy premature infants.

METHODS

Premature infants born at 28 weeks' gestational age were included in this prospective, single-center longitudinal study. IOP was measured by handheld applanation tonometer (Tono-Pen Avia); CCT measurements were performed by ultrasonic pachymeter. Examinations were held at 32 weeks' gestational age initially and at 2-week intervals thereafter for a total of 5 consecutive measurements by the same ophthalmologist.

RESULTS

A total of 110 right eyes of 110 healthy premature infants were analyzed. The mean IOP at 32 weeks' gestational age was 18.28 ± 2.78 mm Hg; mean CCT, 670.56 ± 55.72 μm. Mean IOP and CCT thereafter were 16.13 ± 2.20 mm Hg and 613.67 ± 48.11 μm in week 34, 14.67 ± 2.04 mm Hg and 579.24 ± 43.73 μm in week 36, 13.49 ± 2.08 mm Hg and 551.91 ± 40.75 μm in week 38, and 13.21 ± 1.94 mm Hg and 546.18 ± 38.70 μm in week 40. The longitudinal changes of mean IOP and CCT values between 5 consecutive measurements were statistically significant (P < 0.001, for each).

CONCLUSIONS

IOP and CCT values decrease longitudinally in healthy premature infants between 32 and 40 weeks' gestational age. Elevated IOP values, which were identified in the early premature period, seem to be associated with higher CCT values.

Effect of dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination prophylaxis on intraocular pressure spikes after intravitreal bevacizumab injection

AIM

To evaluate the effect of topical dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination prophylaxis on short term intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in patients who had intravitreal bevacizumab injection.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty one eyes of 151 patients which were followed up in retina clinic in Ulucanlar Eye Training and Research Hospital were evaluated in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consists of 75 patients who had topical dorzolamid-timolol medication two hours before injection; while Group 2 consists of 76 patients without prophylaxis. Demographic data, IOP measurements prior to the injection and one, thirty and sixty minutes and twenty-four hours after the injection were recorded. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

There were no significant difference between two groups in age, gender distrubition and indications for injections. The mean IOPs in Groups 1 and 2 prior to the injection (T0) were 17.84±0.43 and 18.15±0.43 mm Hg, one minute after the injection (T1) were 29.75±1.6 and 34.44±1.59 mm Hg, 30min after the injection (T30) were 20.06±0.6 and 21.71±0.59 mm Hg respectively. The mean IOPs were 18.26±0.56 mm Hg in Group 1 and 19.78±0.56 mm Hg in Group 2 sixty minutes after the injection (T60). All IOP values after the injection were compared between two groups, there was a significant difference between two groups only on T1; one minute after the injection (P=0.04). There were a statiscially significant difference between the baseline values and other recorded values; except on T60, in Groups 1 and 2 (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

After intravitreal bevacizumab injection; we observe a transient IOP elevation which normalizes about one hour after intravitreal injection. In patients who had topical dorzolamid-timolol combination prophylaxis before injections, a significant decrease is seen in IOP spikes due to this injection. The appropiate approach will monitor IOP after intravitreal injection and evaluate the using prophylactic antiglaucomatous drugs before the injection in patients with ganglion nerve cell damage.

Utility of the Tono-Pen in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Trinidad: A Cross-sectional Study

AIM

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Reichert™ Tono-Pen AVIA® when used by novice medical students in an ethnically diverse population in Trinidad.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

Participants were residents of Trinidad between the ages of 20 and 90 years attending the Ophthalmology Clinic at the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex (EWMSC). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (the gold standard) for ophthalmology clinic patients as part of their routine care. Intraocular pressure measurements were then taken using the Tono-Pen.

RESULTS

One hundred persons participated, consisting of Indo-Trinidadians (55%), Afro-Trinidadians (36%), Mixed (8%) and 1% of Caucasian descent. Fourteen per cent reported a diagnosis of glaucoma, with 70.6% of these being of African descent. One hundred and ninety-eight readings of IOP were taken. At a cut-off point of 21 mmHg, there were nine true positives, four false positives, seven false negatives and 178 true negatives. The sensitivity and specificity were found to be 56.3% (95% CI 33.2, 76.9) and 97.8% (95% CI 94.5, 99.1), respectively. The positive predictive value was calculated as 69.2% (95% CI 42.4, 87.3) while the negative predictive value was 96.2% (95% CI 92.4, 98.2). The prevalence of elevated IOP in this population was 8.1% (95% CI 4.8, 13.0). The likelihood ratio of a positive result was calculated to be 25.6 (95% CI 8.6, 73.9).

CONCLUSION

The high specificity and negative predictive value suggests that the Tono-Pen can be used with minimal training, and can prove beneficial at the primary care level in the exclusion of increased IOP in an ethnically diverse high-risk Caribbean population.

Instability of 24-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation in healthy young subjects: a prospective, cross-sectional study

Background

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is a major risk factor for the development and/or progression of glaucoma, and a large diurnal IOP fluctuation has been identified as an independent risk factor of glaucoma progression. However, most previous studies have not considered the repeatability of 24-hour IOP measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the instability of 24-hour IOP fluctuations in healthy young subjects.

Methods

Ten healthy young volunteers participated in this prospective, cross-sectional study. Each subject underwent 24-hour IOP and systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) assessments both in sitting and supine positions every 3 hours, once a week for 5 consecutive weeks. Mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP) was then calculated for both positions. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of maximum, minimum, and fluctuation parameters were computed for IOP, SBP/DBP, and MOPP. Fluctuation was defined as the difference between maximum and minimum values during a day.

Results

Among the serial measurements taken over a 24-hour rhythm, the maximum/minimum values of IOP, as well as BP, showed excellent agreement: regardless of position, all ICC values were over 0.800. Most of the BP fluctuation values also showed excellent agreement. IOP fluctuation, however, did not show excellent agreement; the ICC of sitting IOP fluctuation was just 0.212. MOPP fluctuation also showed poor agreement, especially in the sitting position (ICC, 0.003).

Conclusion

On a day to day basis, 24-hour IOP fluctuations were not highly reproducible in healthy young volunteers. Our results imply that a single 24-hour IOP assessment may not be a sufficient or suitable way to characterize circadian IOP fluctuations for individual subjects.

Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with Icare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions

BACKGROUND

Icare PRO (ICP) is a new Rebound tonometer that is able to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) in both sitting and reclining positions. In this study, the gold standard Goldmann tonometer (GAT) was compared to ICP and Tono-Pen AVIA (TPA). Hypothesis was that repeatability of GAT is superior to ICP and TPA.

METHODS

36 eyes of 36 healthy caucasian individuals, 13 male and 26 females, 17 right and 19 left eyes have been included in this prospective, randomized, cross-sectional study. The study was conducted at a single site (Dept. of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland). Primary outcome measures were Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (COV) and test-retest repeatability as visualized by Bland-Altman analysis. Secondary outcome measures were IOP in sitting (GAT, ICP and TPA) and in reclining (ICP and TPA) position.

RESULTS

Mean IOP measured by GAT was 14.9 ± 3.5 mmHg. Mean IOP measured by ICP was 15.6 ± 3.1 mmHg (with TPA 14.8 ± 2.7 mmHg) in sitting and 16.5 ± 3.5 mmHg (with TPA 17.0 ± 3.0 mmHg) in reclining positions. COVs ranged from 2.9% (GAT) to 6.9% (ICP reclining) and ICCs from 0.819 (ICP reclining) to 0.972 (GAT).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeatability is good with all three devices. GAT has higher repeatability compared to the two tested hand-held devices with lowest COVs and highest ICCs. IOP was higher in the reclining compared to the sitting position.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered to the Clinical Trials Register of the US National Institute of Health, NCT01325324.

The difference in intraocular pressure readings between 3 applanation tonometers is independent of central corneal thickness, in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes

PURPOSE

To look at tonometry differences between 3 tonometers and to correlate this difference with central corneal thickness (CCT) in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes.

METHODS

A total of 145 patients were recruited (39 with glaucoma). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was carried out using the Tonosafe (TS), Tono-Pen XL (TP), and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). CCT was also performed using a digital pachymeter.

RESULTS

The TS underestimated IOP when compared with the GAT by a mean (±SD) of 1.03±2.14 mm Hg (P<0.001). The TP when compared to the GAT overestimated IOP by a mean (±SD) of +1.09±6.38 mm Hg (P=0.071). We found only 31% of TP readings to be within ±2 mm Hg of the GAT readings and only 60% to be within ±4 mm Hg of the GAT readings. Correlation was poor (F=0.247) between the GAT and TP with the coefficient of determination being 0.061. The difference in IOP was independent of CCT and a diagnosis of glaucoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The TS, when compared with the GAT, underestimates IOP with a tendency for this to increase in the higher range of IOP readings. The TP is poorly correlated with the GAT.