The results of pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade for endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections

Bacterial endophthalmitis following anti-VEGF intravitreal injections: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

To describe the incidence of endophthalmitis and the treatment outcomes of acute bacterial endophthalmitis following intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in a Brazilian hospital. The analysis was based on the timing of infection after intravitreal injection, culture results, visual acuity, and the presence of epiretinal membrane after a 1-year follow-up period, spanning nine years.

METHODS

This retrospective case series, conducted over a 9-year period, aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of acute endophthalmitis following intravitreal Bevacizumab injections. The inclusion criteria involved a chart review of 25 patients who presented clinical signs of acute endophthalmitis out of a total of 12,441 injections administered between January 2011 and December 2019. Negative culture results of vitreous samples or incomplete data were excluded. Ultimately, 23 patients were enrolled in the study. Eight patients were treated with intravitreal antibiotic injections (IVAI) using vancomycin 1.0 mg/0.05mL and ceftazidime 2.25 mg/0.05mL, while 15 patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) followed by intravitreal antibiotic injections at the end of surgery (IVAIES). The main outcome measures were the efficacy of controlling the infection with IVAI as a standalone therapy compared to early PPV followed by IVAIES. Data collected included pre-infection and one-year post-treatment best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) abnormalities, and enucleation/evisceration rates. To compare groups, Mann-Whitney and ANOVA tests were employed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of bacterial endophthalmitis was 0.185% (1/541 anti-VEGF injections), with the highest infection rates observed in 2014 and 2017. Patients presented clinical symptoms between 2 and 7 days after injection. The most common isolated organisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Streptococci spp. Treatment outcomes showed that both IVAI and PPV + IVAIES effectively controlled the infection and prevented globe atrophy. After one year, the PPV group with BCVA better than Light Perception had a significantly better BCVA compared to the IVAI group (p 0.003). However, PPV group had higher incidence of epiretinal membranes formation compared to the IVAI group. (P 0.035) CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGF injections carry a risk of developing acute bacterial endophthalmitis. Isolated antibiotic therapy could be an effective treatment to control the infection, but performing PPV + IVAIES as a primary treatment showed promising results in terms of improving BCVA after one year, despite a higher rate of epiretinal membrane formation. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Silicone oil tamponade in managing recalcitrant endophthalmitis after cataract surgery secondary to Clostridium intestinale

A woman presented two weeks after uncomplicated cataract surgery with decreased visual acuity from endophthalmitis. One week after initial management with intravitreal antibiotics, her visual acuity decreased further, undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal and intravenous antimicrobial coverage with preliminary improvement. Three days after vitrectomy, her vision decreased with recurrent inflammation. Initial cultures grew Clostridium intestinale She underwent repeat vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade with no subsequent recurrence. The silicone oil was removed after 4 months and her visual acuity returned to 20/20 after 1 month and through 1 year of follow-up. Postoperative endophthalmitis is rare, with cases due to Clostridium species particularly destructive. In this first reported case of C. intestinale endophthalmitis, conventional management did not achieve lasting quiescence until silicone oil tamponade was employed. Pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade should be considered in the management of recurrent endophthalmitis or endophthalmitis secondary to a recalcitrant microbe.

The Role of Silicone Oil in the Surgical Management of Endophthalmitis: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: We aimed to systematically review the current literature to evaluate if in patients with postoperative endophthalmitis treated with pars plana vitrectomy, silicone oil tamponade could provide a useful contribution to the control and eradication of infection and if it could influence anatomical recovery and functional outcome. (2) Randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, case series, and case reports published in the English language in peer-reviewed journals were included. No restriction was placed based on the study location. We used medical subject headings (MeSH) and text words. We searched MEDLINE (OVID and PubMed), Google Scholar, ISI Web of Science (Thom-on-Reuters), and the Cochrane Library (Wiley) from January 1995 to the present. To ensure literature saturation, we scanned the reference lists of included studies or relevant reviews identified through the search. Risk of Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for longitudinal studies and Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. (3) Results: abstracts of 75 articles were selected for full-text reading; after full-text reading, 44 articles were taken into consideration in the systematic review. 5 out of 7 in vitro experimental studies demonstrated antimicrobial activity against different species of bacteria and fungi. The use of SO as endotamponade associated with PPV led to better visual acuity and a lower rate of retinal detachment and the need for additional surgery. (4) Conclusions: Silicone oil reduces the risk of postoperative retinal detachment, especially in case of undetected retinal breaks, produces compartmentalization of the eye, may lead to early visual recovery, allows laser photocoagulation, prevents severe postoperative hypotony and has antimicrobic activity due to an inhibitory effect for several species of pathogens. Concerns regarding possible toxic effects on the retina and optic disc, compartmentalization and impaired washout of pathogen toxins have been reported. It may also influence intravitreal antibiotic distribution and clearance.

Pars-plana-vitrectomy for endophthalmitis treatment and the role of standardized ultrasound

PURPOSE

Endophthalmitis is a severe inflammation following surgery or endogenous spread of pathogens. Besides clinical signs and symptoms, standardized ultrasound might help to confirm the diagnosis. Thus, we analyzed 172 cases of endophthalmitis for pathogens, visual acuity (VA) and the predictive value of standardized ultrasound.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients treated with pars-plana-vitrectomy for endophthalmitis at the University Eye Hospital was performed. Sex, age, VA at presentation, first day after surgery, four weeks postoperatively, and at last follow-up, as well as pathogen culture, and presence of standardized ultrasound before vitrectomy were recorded. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used for groupwise comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients (male = 47.7%) with a median age of 76 years (IQR 65-82 years) treated for endophthalmitis (exogenous = 85.5%) were included. Median follow-up time was 65 days (IQR 12-274 days). Visual acuity at presentation was 2.30 logMAR (IQR 2.70-2.30 logMAR); it increased to 1.00 logMAR (1.4-0.40 logMAR) at last follow-up. A total of 79 patients (45.9%) underwent standardized ultrasound before vitrectomy. Patients with positive ultrasound criteria had a significantly decreased VA at presentation (p = 0.034). Positive microbiological cultures for Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus faecalis were associated with decreased VA (p = 0.028) at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Standardized ultrasound is an easy and robust tool in the diagnosis of endophthalmitis. Positive criteria are significantly associated with decreased VA at presentation. The recovery of VA depends on pathogens and is significantly worse for certain species (Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus faecalis).

Management Patterns and Outcomes for Intravitreal Injection–Related Endophthalmitis

Purpose:

This work describes the clinical management and outcomes in cases of presumed infectious endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection at a tertiary academic medical center.

Methods:

A retrospective review took place of eyes that presented to the Duke Eye Center over a 9-year period and were diagnosed with intravitreal injection–related endophthalmitis. Clinical presentation, management, microbiologic yield, visual outcomes, and complications were abstracted from medical records.

Results:

Of 23 eyes diagnosed with postinjection endophthalmitis, 52.2% underwent anterior chamber tap (33.3% of which first underwent dry needle vitreous tap), 47.8% underwent needle vitreous tap, 17.4% underwent neither, and none underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for initial management. Subsequent PPV was performed in 6 eyes (26.1%). Mean visual acuity (VA) improved by 50 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at 6 months. Eyes that underwent initial anterior chamber tap had worse presenting VA than those that did not ( P = .01). Eyes undergoing subsequent PPV had worse VA at presentation ( P = .02) and at 6 months ( P < .001). Eyes presenting with VA of hand motion (20/8000) or worse were more likely to undergo subsequent PPV ( P = .02).

Conclusions:

Eyes with intravitreal injection–related endophthalmitis presenting with VA of hand motion or worse were more likely to undergo subsequent PPV. Future studies with larger cohorts may reveal whether earlier vitrectomy should be considered in these patients.

Early Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Acute Endophthalmitis: The Manchester Series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Current literature lacks good-quality evidence regarding the outcomes of early pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for acute exogenous endophthalmitis. The aim for this study was to analyze and discuss the outcomes of PPV for endophthalmitis in a UK tertiary hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective case series. The clinical records of consecutive patients who had PPV for acute exogenous endophthalmitis were reviewed. Demographic data, etiology, timing of onset, timing of PPV, intraand postoperative complications, baseline and final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), therapeutic regimens, and microbiology details were collected. Primary efficacy and safety outcome measures were BCVA improvement of two or more logMAR lines and intra- or postoperative complications, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients with a median age of 76 (interquartile range, 64 to 82) years were studied. The most common etiology was intravitreal injection (41%), followed by phacoemulsification (34%). Median interval to PPV was 1.0 (interquartile range, 1.0 to 3.0) days. In a multivariate model controlling for age, baseline BCVA, microbiology positivity, and etiology (post-intravitreal injection), PPV after 24 hours was seven times more likely to achieve significant BCVA improvement (odds ratio, 7.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 49.66; P = .038). PPV within 24 hours of presentation was associated with more intraoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable outcomes may be achieved with current antibiotic regimens and PPV for endophthalmitis. The series suggests that an early surgical intervention may be associated with poorer functional outcomes. Tap and inject at presentation, followed by a semi-urgent PPV as required, seems to be a sensible approach. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:96-102.].

Bilateral endogenous Trichoderma endophthalmitis in an immunocompromised host

Purpose

To report a case of bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis, caused by the Trichoderma species, in a severely immunocompromised patient.

Observations

A 39-year-old man with acute myeloid leukemia, in a relapsed state on high-dose chemotherapy, experienced profound neutropenia and immunosuppression. The patient reported two weeks of severe bilateral vision loss. The diagnosis of bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis was initially established based on the patient's history, immune status, clinical findings, and confirmed positive vitreous culture.

The patient was initially managed with vitreous tap, pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil injection in the left eye, and vitreous tap and antibiotic injection of the right eye. Eventually, the right eye underwent pars plana vitrectomy as well. Cultures of the vitreous sample grew a filamentous fungus, identified as the Trichoderma species. His blood and urine culture tested negative. The patient was kept on systemic amphotericin B over 52 weeks, and his condition improved dramatically. Three months post phacoemulsification and silicone oil removal, best-corrected visual acuity values were 20/50 in both eyes.

Conclusion and Importance

This is the first reported case of bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis, caused by the Trichoderma species, in an immunocompromised patient. Early recognition and intervention were associated with good functional and anatomical outcomes.

VISUAL OUTCOME OF EARLY VITRECTOMY AND INTRAVITREAL ANTIBIOTICS IN ACUTE POSTSURGICAL AND POSTINTRAVITREAL INJECTION ENDOPHTHALMITIS: European Vitreo-Retinal Society Endophthalmitis Study Report Two

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual outcome associated with intravitreal antibiotics (IVA) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for acute postprocedure endophthalmitis.

METHODS

Data from 237 eyes presenting with acute postprocedure endophthalmitis were collected from 57 retina specialists in 28 countries. All eyes were treated with IVA on the day of presentation. We classified eyes according to the method of treatment used as IVA and early PPV (IVA + PPV within 1 week of presentation) groups.

RESULTS

After exclusion of ineligible eyes, data from 204 eyes were analyzed. The mean (SD) age of patients was 62.7 (21.8) years and 69.3 (12.7) years in the IVA and PPV groups, respectively (P = 0.18). Endophthalmitis secondary to cataract, intravitreal injections, PPV, and other intraocular procedures represented 64.2%, 16.2%, 13.7%, and 5.9% of cases, respectively. Intravitreal antibiotics alone were administered in 55 eyes (27.0%), and early PPV was performed in 149 eyes (73.0%). No difference was found between groups in the final visual acuity of ≥20/60 (43.6%, 65 eyes vs. 34.5%, 19 eyes) and ≤counting fingers (30.9%, 46 eyes vs. 36.4%, 20 eyes) for IVA versus early PPV groups, respectively. Vision of light perception (odds ratio = 12.2; 95% confidence interval: 2.0-72.6) and retinal detachment (odds ratio = 7.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-409) at baseline were predictive of vision of ≤counting fingers. Retinal detachment at baseline (odds ratio = 20.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-372.1) was predictive of final retinal detachment status.

CONCLUSION

The current retrospective multicenter cohort of eyes with acute postprocedure endophthalmitis reports similar outcomes after treatment with IVA alone when compared with IVA and early PPV within 1 week of presentation.

[Treatment of postoperative endophthalmitis : Operate or only inject?]

BACKGROUND

Postoperative endophthalmitis is among the most feared complications encountered after intraocular surgery. A prompt diagnosis and initiation of treatment are crucial for the visual prognosis, which also depends on the causative microorganism. Despite advances in prevention and the availability of more epidemiological data, most of the evidence for treatment dates back to a single study, the early vitrectomy study (EVS) carried out in the early 1990s. The EVS showed that vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotics was superior to intravitreal antibiotics alone, only when visual acuity was light perception or below. The addition of systemic antibiotics did not have any benefits. Over the last 30 years, however, surgical techniques have continued to evolve and the medicinal options have also been expanded. Moreover, the EVS examined only endophthalmitis after cataract surgery and strictly speaking the results cannot be transferred to endophthalmitis from other causes.

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses the current evidence for the different treatment modalities of the most important types of postoperative endophthalmitis.

CONCLUSION

The EVS provided important guidelines for the initial management of endophthalmitis and these guidelines remain relevant to this day; however, in view of the refinement of surgical techniques, novel treatment options, especially the nowadays continuously growing number of intravitreal injections and even some new antibiotics, it would be desirable if new controlled trials addressing the treatment of endophthalmitis would be performed.

Long-Term Effect of Silicone Oil Tamponade for Postoperative and Posttraumatic Bacterial Endophthalmitis

Purpose

To compare clinical features and microbial profiles, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors of the eyes between postoperative and posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil (SO) tamponade.

Methods

Overall, 57 eyes of 57 patients who diagnosed exogenous bacterial endophthalmitis and underwent PPV with SO tamponade between 2000 and 2019 were reviewed. Causative microorganisms, culture positivity, change of mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and course of treatment were investigated between postoperative and posttraumatic groups, and relevant factors were analyzed according to the final BCVA.

Results

The mean BCVA change was not significantly different between groups. The positive rate of microorganisms was significantly higher in the postoperative group. The mean time to surgery over 48 hours, initial BCVA worse than hand motion, and additional surgery after initial vitrectomy were correlated with poor final BCVA worse than 20/200. There was significantly achieved final BCVA 20/200 or better in the Staphylococcus and Streptococcus group than the Enterococcus and Pseudomonas group.

Conclusion

PPV with SO tamponade may be an effective surgical treatment strategy for exogenous bacterial endophthalmitis. Final visual outcomes were not significantly different between postoperative and posttraumatic groups, and the mean time to surgery, initial visual acuity, additional surgery, and type of microorganism are significantly related to visual prognosis.

Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: an update on recent advances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Prevention and management of postcataract endophthalmitis remain quite relevant for anterior segment and vitreoretinal surgeons. Although the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study, published in 1996, remains the only level 1 evidence for the management of postcataract endophthalmitis, recent advances have resulted in an evolution of practice patterns. The aim of this review is to summarize the literature regarding postcataract endophthalmitis with a focus on the last 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

The IRIS registry indicates the rates of endophthalmitis are decreasing in the United States, and the outcomes appear to be improving. Intracameral moxifloxacin has become more widely accepted and intracameral vancomycin has been shown to be associated with retinal vasculitis. The role of systemic antibiotics and vitrectomy is unclear and practice patterns vary widely.

SUMMARY

Although practice patterns vary, prevention and treatment of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery continues to improve. More uniform guidelines regarding surgical and medical therapy are necessary but the standard of prompt referral to a vitreoretinal specialist for immediate intravitreal antibiotics remains the most important intervention in the management of postcataract endophthalmitis.

Factors affecting visual outcomes after treatment of infectious endophthalmitis in northeastern Thailand

Objective

To determine factors affecting visual outcomes after treatment of infectious endophthalmitis during 2012-2016 at a large referral eye center in northeastern Thailand.

Patients and methods

Medical charts of patients with a diagnosis of infectious endophthalmitis including demographic data, types of endophthalmitis, causative organisms, methods of treatment, anatomical, and functional outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. Factors associated with improved visual outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Four hundred and eleven patients (417 eyes) were recruited for the study. The three most common types were post-traumatic (44.53%), post-operative (31.87%), and endogenous endophthalmitis (17.52%). Vitreous cultures revealed causative organisms in 41.25%. Most common Gram-positive organisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 30% (36/120), Bacillus spp. 20% (24/120), and Streptococcus pneumoniae 18.33% (20/120). Most common Gram-negatives were Pseudomonas spp. 24.32% (9/37), Klebsiella spp. 24.32% (9/37), and Enterobacter spp. 16.21% (6/37). Methods of treatment were medical treatment (18.71%) and surgical treatment (81.29%), including pars plana vitrectomy with or without silicone oil tamponade (62.59%) and destructive surgery (18.71%). After treatment, visual improvement was noted in 44.6%, stable vision in 18.47%, and worse vision in 36.93%. Factors associated with improved visual outcomes were post-operative endophthalmitis (P<0.001), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (P=0.003), and initial visual acuity before treatment of hand motion or better (P=0.017).

Conclusion

Most infectious endophthalmitis patients were post-traumatic, post-operative, and endogenous. The most common method of treatment was pars plana vitrectomy. Treatment could improve visual outcomes and at least stabilize the vision in 63.07%. Factors associated with improved visual outcomes were types of endophthalmitis, causative organisms, and initial visual acuity before treatment.

MICROBIOLOGIC SPECTRUM AND VISUAL OUTCOMES OF ACUTE-ONSET ENDOPHTHALMITIS UNDERGOING THERAPEUTIC PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY

PURPOSE

To report the clinical presentation, microbiologic spectrum, and visual outcomes associated with acute-onset infectious endophthalmitis undergoing therapeutic pars plana vitrectomy.

METHODS

Multicenter interventional retrospective noncomparative consecutive case series. Billing records were reviewed to identify all charts for patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy within 14 days of diagnosis of acute-onset infectious endophthalmitis over a 4-year period at 5 large tertiary referral retina practices. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for factors associated with visual outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were identified. The most common clinical setting was postcataract surgery (n = 20). Only 3 patients (4.3%) presented with 20/400 or better visual acuity (VA). Although most of the patients initially underwent vitreous tap and intravitreal antibiotic injection (n = 47, 67.1%), all patients eventually underwent pars plana vitrectomy within 14 days of presentation with 68.5% (48/70) of patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy within 48 hours of presentation. Positive intraocular cultures were obtained in 56 patients (80%). The most common identified organism was Streptococcus sp (n = 19). Visual acuity at last follow-up was 20/400 or better in 19 patients (27.1%). Three patients underwent evisceration or enucleation (4.3%). Last recorded postoperative VA (mean LogMAR 1.99 ± 0.94, Snellen VA equivalent finger count) improved from presenting VA (mean LogMAR 2.37 ± 0.38, Snellen VA hand motions) (P ≤ 0.001). There was no statistically significant correlation between the underlying etiology or the timing of surgery with this VA outcome.

CONCLUSION

Although less than one-third of patients achieved 20/400 or better VA, this VA often improved significantly from presenting VA.

Endophthalmitis Associated with Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

The use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents has led to a dramatic increase in the number of intravitreal injections. Endophthalmitis remains a rare but potentially vision-threatening complication of intravitreal injections. Recent large series have estimated this risk to be about one in 3,000 injections or less. Bevacizumab, which is generally prepared by a compounding pharmacy, is associated with additional risks of contamination. Although endophthalmitis cannot be prevented in all cases, certain risk reduction strategies have been proposed, including the use of an eyelid speculum, povidone iodine, avoidance of needle contact with the eyelid margin or eyelashes, and avoidance of routine post-injection antibiotics. Despite these precautions, some patients will develop endophthalmitis following intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, and outcomes may be poor despite prompt and appropriate therapy.