Spontaneous dislocation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens

Visual Improvement and Lowered Intraocular Pressure After Surgical Management of In-The-Bag Intraocular Lens Dislocation and Aphakia Correction; Retrospective Analysis of Scleral Suturing versus Retropupillary Fixated Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens During a 5-Year Period

Purpose

We compare and evaluate the visual outcome and complication rate of two different techniques of surgical management of in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation or aphakia correction. In addition, we evaluate possible risk factors for IOL dislocation or aphakia.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective case series reviewed medical records for all patients who had undergone surgery for IOL dislocation or aphakia during a 5-year period at a single ophthalmic center in Sweden. The two most common procedures, scleral suturing of dislocated in-the-bag IOL and retropupillary fixation of iris-claw IOL, were further analyzed. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), reoperations, and complications.

Results

The study comprised 110 eyes, including scleral suturing procedures (n=35) and retropupillary iris-claw IOL (n=75). There was a significantly higher rate of dense cataract (p=0.030) and posterior capsular rupture (PCR), (p=0.016) among iris-claw cases at the primary cataract extraction with pseudoexfoliations in about two-thirds of patients in both groups. All eyes in the scleral suturing group had an IOL dislocation. In the iris-claw group, 23 eyes (30.7%) were aphakic following complicated cataract surgery with PCR. No intraoperative complications occurred in any eyes during the secondary IOL procedure. Both groups showed significant improvement in BCVA, yet there was no significant difference between groups in postoperative BCVA (p=0.263). However, the scleral suturing group experienced a significantly larger improvement in BCVA due to worse BCVA preoperatively (p=0.005). Intraocular pressure decreased significantly after both repositioning and exchange surgery (p=0.002 and 0.010 respectively), but improvement between groups was not significantly different (p=0.264).

Conclusion

Both surgical methods resulted in significantly improved BCVA and lowering of IOP and can be considered safe with limited complications. The outcome was similar between groups. Pseudoexfoliation prevalence was high in both groups indicating that it may be a risk factor for either aphakia or late IOL dislocation.

[Secondary implantation of retropupillary fixated iris-claw intraocular lenses]

BACKGROUND

There is no standard for the treatment of functional aphakia in cases with a compromised capsular system. Retropupillary fixation of an Artisan iris-claw IOL ("Intraokularlinse") is one of the established procedures.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study was the evaluation of indications, visual and refractive long-term results and complication rates after retropupillary implantation of an iris-claw lens.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 366 eyes that received a retropupillary Artisan intraocular lens (IOL) in a single center between January 2009 and December 2019. The mean follow-up period was 249 days (8 months) ±516 days.

RESULTS

IOL dislocation (68%) was the most common reason for a retropupillary iris-claw implantation. Previous vitrectomy was a significant preoperative risk factor for IOL dislocation (p = 0.0001). Best corrected visual acuity improved from 0.65 ± 0.64 (logMAR) preoperatively to 0.57 ± 0.51 (logMAR) 4-6 weeks after the surgery. The mean deviation from the planned refraction was +0.40 ± 1.37 dpt and 73% of the patients had a deviation within ±1 dpt of the planned refraction. Relevant postoperative complications during the first 4 weeks were pupillary distortion (42%), ocular hypotony (15%) and transient hyphema (14%). Late complications (≥4 weeks after the surgery) included persistent pupillary distortion (20%), cystoid macular edema (13%) and iris-claw disenclavation (6%).

CONCLUSION

The retropupillary Artisan implantation is an efficient method for treating aphakia without capsular support and provides good visual and refractive results with an acceptable surgical risk profile.

Sudden Gross Visual Deterioration: Importance of Examining the Whole Eye

A 75-year-old caucasian female presented with sudden severe visual deterioration in one eye reduced from 6/9 to counting fingers (CF), with second eye reduction in vision from 6/9 to CF three months later. Past medical history included a background of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, uncontrolled blood pressure, and a 44-year history of poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Previous ocular history included bilateral pan-retinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, followed by bilateral vitrectomies, with subsequent bilateral cataract surgery with intraocular lens implants. A diagnosis of anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) was thought to be the most likely diagnosis due to sudden visual loss, pale discs, and previous long-term history of diabetes and blood pressure with variable control in the absence of a raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). However, at the time of the second eye visual loss, the inferior peripheral retina examination revealed bilateral pseudophakic intraocular lens dislocations. With spectacle correction of +11.50/-1.00 x 75 right eye and +11.50/-1.00 x 65 left eye, her visual acuities were 6/12 right eye and 6/9 left eye, and subsequent secondary intraocular lens insertion was planned. This case highlights the importance of a careful review of the whole eye to ensure that remediable causes of visual loss are not missed.

Intraocular lens dislocation: manifestation, ocular and systemic risk factors

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate ocular and systemic risk factors for posterior chamber intraocular lens dislocation, as well as forms of manifestation.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study were all patients presented in the period 2012-2016 having intraocular lens dislocation and being treated with implantation of an iris-fixated intraocular lens was conducted at the University Hospital Mainz. As controls, pseudophakic patients presenting for other reasons were included.

RESULTS

150 eyes of 150 patients (mean age 72.7 ± 12.4 years, range 24-93 years) with IOL dislocation and 150 eyes of 103 controls were included in this study. The average time between primary implantation and IOL luxation was 86 months (iQR: 39.25-127 months) for all dislocations. Previous pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) (crudeOR = 2.14 (95% CI 1.23, 3.72), p = 0.011) and PEX (crudeOR = 11.6 (4.79, 28.12), p < 0.001) was linked with a higher risk of IOL luxation. Luxation occurs also earlier in patients with previous PPV and PEX than in eyes with neither PEX nor previous PPV (82.2 vs. 127 months). Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was the major pathology that required a previous PPV for eyes with an IOL dislocation (57%). The average time between PPV and IOL dislocation was 74.67 months (range 0-186 months).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a coexistence of both: PEX and a previous PPV had an elevated risk of IOL dislocation, and also had a shorter time interval between primary IOL implantation and IOL dislocation followed by eyes with PEX only and eyes with only a previous PPV.

Late spontaneous posterior capsule rupture after hydrophilic intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE

To describe and discuss the presentation and management of 4 cases of late (17 to 20 years) postoperative spontaneous posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and intraocular lens (IOL) subluxation in eyes implanted with the same hydrophilic 1-piece IOL.

SETTING

Center for Applied Eye Research, Meir Medical Center and the Ein-Tal Eye Center, Israel.

DESIGN

Case series.

METHODS

Four patients presented with spontaneous rupture and posterior dislocation of the same design IOL (B-Lens) 17 to 20 years after implantation. No trauma or any other direct causative factor was identified in any of the cases.

RESULTS

Of the 4 cases reported, the IOLs were successfully repositioned to the ciliary sulcus and sutured to the scleral wall (1 case) or the iris (2 cases), and the IOL was stable in the sulcus without the need for further sutured fixation in 1 case, with effective vision restored in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous PCR is a rare postoperative complication and has not been reported, to the authors' knowledge, in cases without predisposing factors. A mechanism of late capsular tear was not confirmed, but the specific design of the IOL might have been a contributing factor.

Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation

This review aimed to evaluate the cumulative incidence, patient characteristics, predisposing conditions, and treatment outcomes for late in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation. Literature searches in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane Library Central database identified 1 randomized clinical trial, 1 prospective case series, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 36 retrospective studies of this condition, which showed that the cumulative incidence was 0.5% to 3%, it occurred on average 6 to 12 years after cataract surgery, and mean patient age was 65 to 85 years. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome, myopia, and previous vitreoretinal surgery were the most common predisposing conditions. Studies indicated that IOL repositioning and IOL exchange provided similar visual outcomes and were equally safe. The long-term visual outcome seemed satisfactory. However, the quality of evidence regarding treatment was in general quite low. More studies of late in-the-bag IOL dislocation are needed, and in particular, different surgical techniques should be included in high-quality clinical trials.

Risk factors of intraocular lens dislocation following routine cataract surgery: a case-control study

Clinical relevance: Intraocular lens dislocation usually causes severe visual symptoms and even blindness in patients. It is important for eye care practitioners to be able to identify patients susceptible to intraocular lens dislocation.Background: To investigate the risk factors of intraocular lens dislocation following routine cataract surgery.Methods: This retrospective case-control study included patients diagnosed with intraocular lens dislocation between January 2007 and March 2018. Controls matched to the cases by age and time of routine cataract surgery in a ratio of 3:1 were randomly selected from patients without intraocular lens dislocation. The medical records of the patients were reviewed and analysed. Independent t-test, chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis were employed to identify risk factors of intraocular lens dislocation.Results: In total, 127 cases (with intraocular lens dislocation) and 381 controls (without intraocular lens dislocation) were evaluated. Among cases, the proportion of men was significantly higher than that of women (p = 0.012). High myopia was significantly associated with all types of intraocular lens dislocation; it was also a risk factor for in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation. Lens subluxation was significantly associated with the in-the-bag and late intraocular lens dislocations. Intraoperative and post-operative vitrectomy, rather than pre-operative vitrectomy, were associated with intraocular lens dislocation. Post-operative trauma was significantly associated with in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation; pre-operative and post-operative trauma were significantly associated with out-of-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation. Male sex (odds ratio (OR) = 2.996, p = 0.006), pre-operative trauma (OR = 7.861, p = 0.014), high myopia (OR = 11.268, p < 0.001), and lens subluxation (OR = 13.431, p = 0.018) were the risk factors of intraocular lens dislocation.Conclusion: Male sex, pre-operative trauma, high myopia, and lens subluxation were the main predisposing factors for intraocular lens dislocation in Chinese Han population.

Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study

Background

Aiming at spectacle independence, conventional pseudophakic monovision has been widely used in myopia patients with bilateral monofocal intraocular lens implantation. However, the crossed monovision, which is to correct the dominant eye for near vision and the non-dominant eye for distant vision, has been mentioned preferable for high myopic cataract patients by some studies.

We have conducted this study to compare clinical results to assess the feasibility of conventional and crossed monovision for high myopic pseudophakic patients by comparing patient satisfaction, visual function and spectacle independence.

Method

Forty-sixth high myopia patients were divided into two groups: 22 in crossed monovision group with patients whose refraction targeted to − 2.00 diopters (D) in the dominant eye and − 0.50D in the non-dominant eye; 24 in conventional monovision group with patients whose refraction targeted to − 0.50D in the dominant eye and − 2.00D in the non-dominant eye. Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (BUDVA), binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (BUNVA), binocular corrected distant visual acuity (BCDVA), binocular corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA), contrast visual acuity and stereoacuity were examined at postoperative 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months. Questionnaires were completed by patients 3 months after binocular surgery to evaluate patients’ satisfaction and spectacle independence.

Results

The conventional monovision and the crossed monovision group showed no significant differences of mean BUDVA, BUNVA, BCDVA, BCNVA 2 weeks, 1 month or 3 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). There was no difference in the bilateral contrast sensitivity or stereoscopic function between the convention conventional and crossed monovision groups (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction with near and distant vision, as well as spectacle dependence did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Crossed pseudophakic monovision exhibited similar visual function when compared with conventional monovision technique, which indicates that it is an effective option to improve the visual functionality and quality of life for high myopic patients who considering bilateral cataract surgery.

Trial registration

The Institutional Review Board and Ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. The trial registration was submitted in September 2018 and passed on March 18, 2020, and the registration number is: ChiCTR2000030935.

Risk Factors for Intraocular Lens Dislocation After Phacoemulsification: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Few studies have measured the incidence and risk factors of intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation in the total population. We investigate the risk factors for IOL dislocation in a nationwide Korean cohort.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

National data on 2,162,191 subjects who underwent cataract surgery were collected from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment service database of health claims from 2009 to 2016. The Health Insurance Review and Assessment database was used to identify potential risk factors for IOL dislocation, including age, sex, and various pre- and postoperative ophthalmic conditions. The hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) of these risk factors were assessed with a multivariable-adjusted Cox regression model.

RESULTS

IOL dislocation occurred in 15,170 patients (0.7%) in the cataract surgery cohort (2,162,191 patients). The incidence rate of IOL dislocation peaked at 40-50 years of age, although the mean age of IOL dislocation was 65.25 ± 10.81 years. The average male:female ratio was 1.8. The adjusted HR for IOL dislocation in patients with partial vitrectomy was 11.93 (95% CI 10.95-12.99; P < .0001). Posterior capsulotomy performed within 1 year after the cataract surgery significantly decreased IOL dislocation, with an adjusted HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.44-0.51; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

IOL dislocation tended to occur in young males. Anterior vitrectomy was a significant risk factor for IOL dislocation, while posterior capsulotomy after surgery was associated with a decreased risk of IOL dislocation.

Case Series: Slight Intraocular Lens Malpositioning as a Potential Cause of Vision Loss

SIGNIFICANCE

The cases illustrate an insidious cause of decreased visual acuity after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify cases of postoperative vision loss caused by slight intraocular lens (IOL) malpositioning after cataract surgery.

CASE REPORTS

Three patients presented with visual acuity decreased after cataract surgery. Silt-lamp examination before mydriasis revealed no abnormalities in two of the patients; mild IOL inferonasal decentration was found by the trifocal IOL diffraction ring in the third patient. Manifest refraction of these patients showed remarkable astigmatism with low corneal astigmatism. After pupil dilation, slight IOL decentration and tilt were observed in all patients, which were further confirmed using the Scheimpflug imaging system. Wavefront aberrometry showed a high level of ocular higher-order aberrations, most of which were derived from intraocular aberrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Inconspicuous IOL malpositioning is one of the reasons responsible for decreased vision acuity after cataract surgery, which may not be easily identified by slit-lamp examination. High astigmatism and ocular higher-order aberrations derived from malpositioned IOL can be important clues.