1
|
Christensen LF, Hassing AK, Klefter ON, Vorum H. Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.19 mg Intravitreal Implant for the Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review of Real-World Evidence. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2025; 33:683-694. [PMID: 39630970 DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2024.2435472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2024] [Revised: 11/10/2024] [Accepted: 11/24/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the real-world efficacy and safety of the 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) sustained-release intravitreal implant for treating non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye (NIU-PS). Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, with the latest update on September 20, 2024. Twelve real-world studies involving a total of 382 patients (514 eyes) were included in the review. Compared to baseline, the studies consistently showed reduced mean central retinal thickness for up to 36 months post-FAc implantation, while mean visual acuity was stable or significantly improved. Intraocular inflammation, as per the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature grading system, was persistently absent or improved, with evidence extending to 12 months following implantation. While FAc generally showed potential to reduce or maintain systemic immunosuppressive treatments, this effect was not consistently observed, particularly in cases involving choroidal inflammation. Local rescue treatment was used in up to 24% of eyes. Mean intraocular pressure remained stable for 36 months with up to 38.5% of eyes requiring either supplemental or initial IOP-lowering medication. Limited data was available on cataract development. A few cases of hypotony as well as one case of retinal detachment were observed. Overall, current real-world evidence aligns with clinical trial findings, suggesting that the 0.19 mg FAc implant is an effective adjunctive maintenance treatment for NIU-PS with a consistent safety profile. Further studies are needed to refine treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Fischer Christensen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Oliver Niels Klefter
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Vorum
- Department of Ophthalmology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yeo S, Chung YR, Song JH, Bodaghi B, Touhami S. A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of the 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Non-Infectious Uveitis. Biomedicines 2025; 13:248. [PMID: 40002662 PMCID: PMC11852598 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2024] [Revised: 01/05/2025] [Accepted: 01/20/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAI) is an intravitreal corticosteroid implant designed to have a therapeutic effect lasting up to 3 years. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of the FAI (0.19 mg, releasing at 0.2 μg/day) in patients with non-infectious uveitis. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were last searched on 6 September 2024. Studies comparing FAI with sham injections were investigated. The primary outcome was the recurrence of uveitis. Secondary outcomes included visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and occurrence of cataracts. Results: Significantly more patients in the FAI group experienced no uveitis recurrence for up to 36 months compared to the sham group, with a relatively lower number of recurrences. Systemic adjuvant therapy was similar between groups, while fewer patients required local rescue injections in the FAI group (95% confidence interval (CI): -2.91 to -1.70). Visual acuity changes and the proportion of eyes with ≥15 letters gain were not significantly different between the groups. More patients needed cataract surgery in the FAI group (95% CI: 0.68-1.96). No differences were observed in IOP change, final IOP, or treatment-requiring events related to an increased IOP. However, more subjects experienced events of IOP > 25 mmHg with the FAI (95% CI: 0.73 to 2.14). Conclusions: The 0.19 mg FAI was effective in preventing uveitis recurrence, and reduced the need for local injections. No significant impacts were noted in terms of systemic therapy, visual improvement, or most IOP-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suji Yeo
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo-Ri Chung
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hun Song
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea
| | - Bahram Bodaghi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Sara Touhami
- Department of Ophthalmology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France
- Department of Ophthalmology, Tenon University Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shah SM, Prabhu P, Biswas J. Intravitreal steroid implants in the management of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis. Indian J Ophthalmol 2025; 73:S37-S46. [PMID: 39297478 PMCID: PMC11834921 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_712_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of intermediate and posterior uveitis poses a significant challenge of achieving adequate drug concentrations in the posterior segment over the chronic nature of the disease. Systemic agents seldom reach effective drug levels, and even with low maintenance or tapering doses, it is hard to avoid systemic toxicity. The use of intravitreal and periocular injections is often unable to prevent recurrences due to their short half-life. Since the emergence of intravitreal implants (Vitrasert, Retisert), it has become possible to circumvent these therapeutic challenges. A detailed review in the PubMed index yielded 155 articles, of which 22 were analyzed based on exclusion criteria. A recent shift from surgically sutured to minimally invasive injectable implants mainly indicated for noninfectious uveitis is evident from the literature. This review article also provides insights into dexamethasone (Ozurdex) and recent fluocinolone acetonide (Yutiq, Iluvien) implants with particular emphasis on their improved safety and efficacy. Dexamethasone implants favor the therapeutic goal of prevention of recurrences, whereas the use of fluocinolone implants helps to attain better visual outcomes due to their longer duration of action. Thus, the review provides recent literature supporting the role and indication of sustained release intravitreal implants in the management of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarjak M Shah
- Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Priya Prabhu
- Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Jyotirmay Biswas
- Department of Uveitis and Ocular Pathology, Sankara Nethralaya, Nungambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kechida M, Bazewicz M, Nabi W, Daadaa S, Willermain F, Abroug N, Makhoul D, Ksiaa I, Jelliti B, Khochtali S, Khairallah M. Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of Behçet’s syndrome uveitis. EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 2024; 19:423-442. [DOI: 10.1080/17469899.2024.2385652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Kechida
- Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Magdalena Bazewicz
- Department of Ophthalmology, St-Pierre and Brugmann University Hospitals, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wijdene Nabi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Syrine Daadaa
- Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - François Willermain
- Department of Ophthalmology, St-Pierre and Brugmann University Hospitals, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nesrine Abroug
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Dorine Makhoul
- Department of Ophthalmology, St-Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Imen Ksiaa
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Bechir Jelliti
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Sana Khochtali
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Moncef Khairallah
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pleyer U, Pavesio C, Miserocchi E, Heinz C, Devonport H, Llorenç V, Burke T, Nogueira V, Kodjikian L, Bodaghi B. Fluocinolone acetonide 0.2 µg/day intravitreal implant in non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment: EU expert user panel consensus-based clinical recommendations. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 2024; 14:22. [PMID: 38814386 PMCID: PMC11139823 DOI: 10.1186/s12348-024-00402-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye (NIU-PS) is an inflammatory disease, which can significantly impair visual acuity if not adequately treated. Fluocinolone-acetonide sustained-release-0.2 µg/day intravitreal (FAc) implants are indicated for prevention of relapse in recurrent NIU-PS. The aim here was to provide treating clinicians with some consensus-based-recommendations for the clinical management of patients with NIU-PS with 0.2 µg/day FAc implants. METHODS A European-clinical-expert-group agreed to develop a consensus report on different issues related to the use of FAc implants in patients with NIU-PS. RESULTS The Clinical-expert-panel provided specific recommendations focusing on clinical presentation (unilateral/bilateral) of the NIU-PS; systemic involvement of NIU-PS and the lens status. Treatment algorithms were developed; one that refers to the management of patients with NIU-PS in clinical practice and another that establishes the best clinical scenarios for the use of FAc implants, both as monotherapy and as adjuvant therapy. Additionally, the Clinical-expert-panel has provided recommendations about the use of the FAc implants in a clinical-setting. The Clinical-expert-panel also considered the safety profile of FAc implants and their possible implications in the daily practice. CONCLUSIONS As more clinical experience has been gained using FAc implants, it was necessary to update the clinical recommendations that guide patient management in the clinic. The current consensus document addresses relevant issues related to the use of FAc implants on different types of patients with various etiologies of NIU-PS, and was conducted to standardize approaches to help specialists obtain better clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Pleyer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Carlos Pavesio
- Department of Ophthalmology at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
| | - Elisabetta Miserocchi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Service, University Vita-Salute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carsten Heinz
- Department of Ophthalmology at St, Franziskus Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Helen Devonport
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Víctor Llorenç
- Clínic Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tomás Burke
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Vanda Nogueira
- Instituto de Oftalmologia Dr. Gama Pinto, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Laurent Kodjikian
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Universitaire de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69004, Lyon, France
- UMR5510 MATEIS, CNRS, INSA Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69100, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Bahram Bodaghi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abu Arif J, Knecht VA, Rübsam A, Lussac V, Jami Z, Pohlmann D, Müller B, Pleyer U. Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Uveitis: Dissecting Responder and Non-Responder Outcomes at a Tertiary Center. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1106. [PMID: 38791073 PMCID: PMC11117563 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12051106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Macular edema (ME) remains a primary cause of visual deterioration in uveitis. Visual acuity (VA) can often be maintained using corticosteroid depot systems. This study evaluated the efficacy of a fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®) in treating non-infectious uveitis using real-world data. This retrospective analysis included 135 eyes subdivided into responders and non-responders. Central retinal thickness (CRT), VA, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were followed over time. A significant decrease in CRT and an increase in VA were observed in all eyes throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.01). An IOP increase (p = 0.028) necessitated treatment in 43% of eyes by Month 6. Non-responders were older (p = 0.004) and had been treated with more dexamethasone (DEX) implants (p = 0.04); 89.3% had a defect in the external limiting membrane (ELM) and inner/outer segment (IS/OS) zone (p < 0.001). Immunomodulatory therapy had no impact on treatment response. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) patients had a mean CRT reduction of 47.55 µm and a reduced effect by Month 24 (p = 0.046) versus non-PPV patients. We conclude that the FAc implant achieves long-term control of CRT and improves VA. Increases in IOP were manageable. Eyes with a previous PPV showed milder results. Data showed a correlation between older age, a damaged ELM and IS/OS zone, frequent DEX inserts, and poorer outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmin Abu Arif
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (J.A.A.); (V.A.K.); (A.R.); (Z.J.); (D.P.); (B.M.)
| | - Vitus André Knecht
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (J.A.A.); (V.A.K.); (A.R.); (Z.J.); (D.P.); (B.M.)
| | - Anne Rübsam
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (J.A.A.); (V.A.K.); (A.R.); (Z.J.); (D.P.); (B.M.)
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Platz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Vanessa Lussac
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (J.A.A.); (V.A.K.); (A.R.); (Z.J.); (D.P.); (B.M.)
| | - Zohreh Jami
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (J.A.A.); (V.A.K.); (A.R.); (Z.J.); (D.P.); (B.M.)
| | - Dominika Pohlmann
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (J.A.A.); (V.A.K.); (A.R.); (Z.J.); (D.P.); (B.M.)
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Platz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Bert Müller
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (J.A.A.); (V.A.K.); (A.R.); (Z.J.); (D.P.); (B.M.)
| | - Uwe Pleyer
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (J.A.A.); (V.A.K.); (A.R.); (Z.J.); (D.P.); (B.M.)
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Platz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saigal K, Maleki A. Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.19 mg Implant in a Patient with Resistant Blau Syndrome: A Case Report. Case Rep Ophthalmol 2024; 15:63-70. [PMID: 38250196 PMCID: PMC10798681 DOI: 10.1159/000535984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Blau syndrome is a progressive disease with an unknown etiology and pathogenesis. It can cause severe damage, especially in the eye with severe involvement. Case Presentation A six-year-old female was referred to us complaining about blurry vision and floaters in both eyes for 1 year. She had been diagnosed with Blau syndrome and Blau syndrome-associated anterior uveitis. Her best-corrected visual acuity in the right and left eyes was 20/70 and 20/80, respectively. Slit-lamp exam revealed faint bilateral band keratopathy along with 1+ anterior chamber cells and posterior synechia 360° in both eyes. During dilated fundoscopy, 2+ haze in the media was observed, along with swollen and hyperemic disc OU. Based on changes in optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography, she was diagnosed with panuveitis and retinal vasculitis. Given her complicated history, we decided to proceed with an intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide 0.19 mg implant implantation in both eyes. During the 1-month follow-up visit, vitreous haze, retinal vasculitis, and active choroiditis were resolved. At 6-month follow-up visit, no changes were observed compared to the 1-month follow-up visit. Conclusion In cases of Blau syndrome that display resistance to systemic immunomodulatory therapies, the inclusion of local treatments, such as the intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide 0.19 mg implant, should be considered as an adjunctive therapeutic option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khushi Saigal
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Arash Maleki
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- The Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation, Waltham, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|