Optimized hormonal stimulation is critical for production of viable embryos and establishment of subsequent implantation

Early or late response in poor responders: does it make a difference in cycle outcome?

Ovarian response to stimulation mainly determines the length of stimulation. However, there is no clarity in the literature regarding the optimal duration required to achieve oocyte maturity in patients with the poor ovarian response (POR) defined by Bologna criteria. Therefore, a total of 267 cycles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected retrospectively. Group A constitute of patients with a stimulation period < 9 d (n = 70); and group B included patients with a stimulation period ≥ 9 d (n = 133). The results showed that antral follicle count (5.72 ± 1.82 vs. 5.10 ± 1.78, p = 0.023), serum oestradiol level on hCG day (1286.88 ± 778.18 pg/mL vs. 820.14 ± 479.04 pg/mL, p = 0.001), and total gonadotropin dose used (2949.53 ± 727.92 IU vs 2020.94 ± 415.17 IU, p = 0.0001) were higher in group B when compared to group A. Although the number of total (5.47 ± 3.32 vs 3.86 ± 2.15, p = 0.0001) and mature oocytes retrieved (4.34 ± 2.88 vs 2.84 ± 1.67, p = 0.0001) were higher in group B, no significant difference was observed in the pregnancy rates between groups (25.6 vs 15.7%, p > 0.05). In conclusion, no deleterious effect of a shorter duration of stimulation on cycle outcome was seen in patients with POR.

Stimulation Duration in Patients with Early Oocyte Maturation Triggering Criteria Does Not Impact IVF-ICSI Outcomes

Results from studies reporting the optimal stimulation duration of IVF-ICSI cycles are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to determine whether, in the presence of early ovulation-triggering criteria, prolonged ovarian stimulation modified the chances of a live birth. This cross-sectional study included 312 women presenting triggering criteria beginning from D8 of ovarian stimulation. Among the 312 women included in the study, 135 were triggered for ovulation before D9 (D ≤ nine group) and 177 after D9 (D > nine group). The issues of fresh +/− frozen embryo transfers were taken into consideration. Cumulative clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates after fresh +/− frozen embryo transfers were similar in both groups (37% versus 46.9%, p = 0.10 and 19.3% versus 28.2%, p = 0.09, respectively). No patient characteristics were found to be predictive of a live birth depending on the day of ovulation trigger. Postponing of ovulation trigger did not impact pregnancy or live-birth rates in early responders. A patient’s clinical characteristics should not influence the decision process of ovulation trigger day in early responders. Further prospective studies should be conducted to support these findings.

The different impact of stimulation duration on oocyte maturation and pregnancy outcome in fresh cycles with GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders and normal responders

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of stimulation duration on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) - embryo transfer (ET) outcome in poor and normal responders during controlled ovarian stimulation using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. There were 1481 women undergoing ICSI-ET cycles. Women with ovum pick-up number ≤3 were defined as poor responders (n = 235), and those with a number ≥4 were normal responders (n = 1246).

RESULTS

The mean stimulation duration was shorter in poor responders with pregnancy group as compared with normal responders with pregnancy group (7.8 ± 2.2 vs. 9.2 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.01). Poor responders with a shortest stimulation duration (≤6 days) appeared a higher live birth rate (≤6 days: 33.3%, 7-8 days: 20.0%, 9-10 days: 15.9%, and ≥11 days: 11.1%, p = 0.18). Normal responders with a shortest stimulation duration (≤6 days) appeared a lowest live birth rate (≤6 days: 28.6%, 7-8 days: 35.8%, 9-10 days: 33.6%, and ≥11 days: 29.3%, p = 0.61). Oocyte maturation rate was significantly lower at stimulation durations ≤6 days group (≤6 days: 67%, 7-8 days: 80%, 9-10 days: 85%, and ≥11 days: 87%, p = 0.02) in normal responders.

CONCLUSION

In ICSI-ET cycles, stimulation duration appears to have different impact on oocyte maturation, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in both poor and normal responders.

Multilevel model to assess sources of variation in follicular growth close to the time of ovulation in women with normal fertility: a multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

To assess the amount of variability in ovarian follicular growth rate and maximum follicular diameter related to different centers, women and cycles of the same women in a multicenter observational study of follicular growth.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study from eight centers in Europe. There were 533 ultrasound examinations in 282 cycles of 107 women with normal fertility. A random effects model with center, woman and cycle as hierarchical units of variation was used to analyze mean follicular diameter on days preceding ovulation.

RESULTS

Follicular growth did not differ by center. There was homogenous growth across women and cycles, and the maximum follicular diameter before ovulation varied substantially across cycles but not across women. Many (about 40%) women had small maximum follicular diameter on the day before ovulation (<19 mm). Pre-ovulatory cycle length was not related to maximum follicular diameter.

CONCLUSION

In normal fecundity, there is a substantial variation in maximum follicular diameter from cycle to cycle based on variation in the duration of follicular development, but the variation could not be explained by different characteristics of different women. Explanation of variation in follicular growth has to be found on the cycle level.