The impact of Alpha/ESHRE consensus regarding oocytes with aggregates of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SERa) on in vitro fertilization outcome

Smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates in oocytes associated with increased risk of neonatal birth defects: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have indicated the association between smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa+) and poorer medically assisted reproduction outcomes. However, the link between SERa+ and neonatal outcomes remains controversial and open for debate. A comprehensive meta-analysis on the relation between SERa+ and the risk of birth defects is needed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Libraries, Web of Science, and Chinese databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wan Fang from inception until July 2023. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by a fixed-effected model, while heterogeneity was assessed by forest plots and I2 statistic. Funnel plot was produced to assess publication bias. This meta-analysis has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022313387).

RESULTS

The search resulted in 122 studies, 14 of which met the inclusion criteria. The analysis of birth defects revealed a higher risk (RR = 2.17, 95%CI 1.24 to 3.81, p = 0.007) in children derived from SERa+ cycle compared to SERa- cycles (711 vs. 4633). Meanwhile, in a subgroup analysis, the risk of birth defects was significantly increased in the SERa+ oocytes group as compared with the sibling SERa- oocytes group (RR = 3.53, 95%CI 1.21 to 10.24, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, our analysis indicated that SERa+ cycles/oocytes may have a potential risk of increased additional major birth defects comparing with SERa- cycles/oocytes. This conclusion may provide evidence-based support for clinicians in IVF clinical guidance and embryologists in prudent embryo selection strategy.

The Relationship Between Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum Clusters in Metaphase II Oocytes and Embryological and Birth Outcomes in Infertile Couples

Background

To assess the relationship between oocytes with smooth endoplasmic reticulum cluster (SERc) and embryological and birth outcomes in infertile couples.

Methods

This was a descriptive study that included 231 infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with a total of 2447 mature oocytes (MII), of which 279 oocytes with SERc(+) from 100 patients, the remaining 2168 oocytes with SERc(-). Oocytes were evaluated for the presence or absence of the SERc simultaneously with intracytoplasmic sperm injection at 200x magnification using inverted microscopy - Observe D1.

Results

The mean age of patients was 32.05 ± 5.56 years. One hundred patients had at least one SERc(+) oocyte (with 279 SERc(+) and 956 SERc(-) oocytes). One hundred and thirty-one patients had 1212 SERc(-) oocytes. Fertilization outcomes and the rates of good-quality embryos on day 2 and day 5 did not differ between the SERc(+) and the SERc(-) groups. In the first frozen embryo transfer cycles, the clinical pregnancy rate in the group of patients with SERc(+) was not different with the SERc(-) group (61.1% vs 48.78%, p = 0.074, respectively). The live birth rate in the SERc(+) group was statistically significantly higher than the SERc(-) group (57.7% vs 43.9%, p = 0.045, respectively).

Conclusion

The fertilization rate, the quality of embryos on days 2 and 5 from oocytes with SERc(+) are similar to those with SERc(-). The live birth rate in the patients with SERc(+) group is statistically significantly higher than the SERc(-) group. There is no difference in clinical pregnancy rate between patients with and without SERc. Therefore, the exclusion of oocytes with SERc should not be recommended.

Oocyte Health and Quality: Implication of Mitochondria-related Organelle Interactions

Among factors like hormonal imbalance and uterine condition, oocyte quality is regarded as one of the key factors involved in age-related decline in the reproductive capacity. Here, are discussions about the functions played by organelles within the oocyte in forming the next generation that is more suitable for survival. Many insights on the adaptation to aging and maintenance of quality can be obtained from: interactions between mitochondria and other organelles that enable the long life of primordial oocytes; characteristics of organelle interactions after breaking dormancy from primary oocytes to mature oocytes; and characteristics of interactions between mitochondria and other organelles of aged oocytes collected during the ovulatory cycle from elderly individuals and animals. This information would potentially be beneficial to the development of future therapeutic methods or agents.

Live birth rate per transfer is not impacted by the proportion of smooth endoplasmatic reticulum aggregates oocytes

BACKGROUND

Despite the data published to date, prognostic factors and the clinical impact of ICSI cycles with smooth endoplasmatic reticulum aggregates (SERa) positive oocytes remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Are the clinical outcomes of an ICSI cycle impacted by the proportion of oocytes with SERa?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study (2016-2019), including data from 2468 ovum pick-ups, performed in a tertiary university hospital. Cases are categorised based on the rate of SERa positive oocytes compared to the total number of MII oocytes: 0% (n=2097), <30% (n=262) and ≥30% (n=109).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient characteristics, cycle characteristics and clinical outcomes are compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Compared to SERa negative cycles, women with ≥30% SERa positive oocytes are older (36.2y vs. 34.5y, p<0.001), have lower anti-mullerian hormone levels (AMH) (1.6ng/ml vs. 2.3ng/ml, p<0.001), have received more gonadotropins (3227U vs. 2858IU, p=0.003), have a lower number of good quality day 5 blastocysts (1.2 vs. 2.3, p<0.001) and face more blastocyst transfer cancellation (47.7 vs. 23.7%, p<0.001). Women with <30% SERa positive oocytes are younger (33.8y, p=0.04), have higher AMH levels (2.6ng/ml, p<0.001), have more oocytes retrieved (15.1, p<0.001), have a higher number of good quality day 5 blastocysts (3.2, p<0.001) and have less transfer cancellations (14.9%, p<0.001) compared to SERa negative cycles A multivariate analysis shows no significant difference in cycle outcomes between the categories.

WHAT IS NEW?

Treatment cycles with ≥30% SERa positive oocytes are less likely to result in an embryo transfer when only non-SER oocytes are used. However, live birth rate per transfer is not affected by the proportion of SERa positive oocytes.

Does smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation in oocytes impact the chromosome aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos? A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

The appearance of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation (SERa) is one of the most common dysmorphic phenotypes of oocytes, however, the impact of SERa occurrence on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of SERa in oocytes on the aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos in IVF.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 114 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with the appearance of SERa undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) were enrolled, and among them there were 323 SERa(+) oocytes and 1253 sibling unaffected oocytes. The 907 PGT-A cycles without SERa during the same period were enrolled as controls. A propensity score matching of 1:1 ratio between these two groups resulted in 113 matched cycles. The outcome parameters between the SERa(+) cycles/oocytes and the controls were compared. IVF laboratory outcomes, PGT-A outcomes, and clinical and neonatal outcomes were the main outcomes.

RESULTS

Increased abnormal fertilization rate and reduced blastocyst formation rate can be observed in both SERa(+) cycles and oocytes, some other parameters on developmental potential, such as available embryo rate at Day 3 and available blastocyst rate, were also impaired in the case of SERa occurrences. Among the 910 blastocysts for PGT-A, the percentage of euploid embryos was similar between the matched cohorts, while an unpredicted increase of the proportions of euploid in the SERa(+) oocytes, compared to the SERa(-) oocytes. Moreover, there was no significance in terms of clinical and neonatal outcomes, such as implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate, regardless of the presence of SERa in cycles and oocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

The appearance of SERa within mature oocytes has no significant impact on the aneuploidy of subsequent blastocysts. It is recommended to utilize these oocytes, especially for those with few oocytes or advanced maternal age, which is likely to increase the cumulative pregnancy rate. This study may offer evidence to assist embryologists to make clinical decisions concerning SERa(+) oocytes more consciously and rationally.

The impact of oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates on assisted reproductive outcomes: a cohort study

Background

The impact of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes was still controversial. Our objective is to investigate the impact of the presence of SERa on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 1,090 fresh ICSI cycles from 944 patients between January 2016 and June 2020 were included. Outcomes from clinical, embryological and neonatal aspects were compared between SERa + and SERa- cycles as well as between SERa + and SERa- oocytes.

Results

The total gonadotropin (Gn) dose, number of oocytes retrieved, serum estradiol concentration and number of the available embryo were significantly higher in SERa + cycles than in SERa- cycles (P < 0.05). Comparable two pronuclei (2PN) fertilization rate and poly-pronucleus zygote rate were shown in SERa + and SERa- cycles (P > 0.05), but which were higher in SERa + oocytes than in SERa- oocytes (P < 0.05). No statistical difference in blastocyst formation rate was found in SERa + and SERa- cycles as well as in SERa + and SERa- oocytes (P > 0.05). Good-quality embryo rate was statistically higher in SERa- cycles than in SERa + cycles (P < 0.05), but the difference was comparable between SERa + and SERa- oocytes (P > 0.05). No statistical difference in clinical pregnancy rate, spontaneous abortion rate, live birth rate and premature delivery rate were found in SERa + and SERa- cycles as well as in SERa + and SERa- oocytes (P > 0.05). The implantation rate was comparable in SERa + and SERa- cycles (P > 0.05), but it is higher in the group of only SERa- embryo transfer when compared with the group of mixed SERa + and SERa- embryo transfer (P < 0.05). 159 newborns in SERa + cycles and 140 newborns in SERa- cycles were followed up. Comparable newborn malformation rate was observed between SERa + and SERa- cycles and oocytes (P > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed number of oocytes and total dose of Gn were risk factors for SERa occurrence (aOR = 1.05 and 1.55, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Oocyte's SERa is correlated with a number of oocytes retrieved and higher Gn dose, but it does not affect pregnancy outcomes and increase newborn malformation rate.

Oocytes With Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum Aggregates May Not Impact Blastocyst Euploidy Rate

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the euploidy rate of blastocysts derived from smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) positive cycles and oocytes are impacted.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A total of 601 preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles with at least one oocyte retrieved in our center between April 2017 and May 2021 were initially included in the study. Women>35 years and PGT cycles with chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) were excluded. Embryological and blastocyst ploidy outcomes were compared among SERa+ oocyte, sibling SERa- oocytes and oocytes in SERa- cycles.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed among the SERa+ oocyte group, sibling SERa- oocyte group, and SERa- cycle group in the normal fertilization rate (82.1% vs. 77.8% vs. 83.1%, respectively, P=0.061), blastocyst formation rate (71.0% vs. 72.5% vs. 68.4%, respectively, P=0.393), good quality blastocyst formation rate (46.4% vs. 48.3% vs. 42.6%, respectively, P=0.198). No significant difference was observed in the euploidy rate (50.0% vs. 62.5% vs. 63.3%, respectively, P=0.324), mosaic rate (12.5% vs. 9.7% vs. 13.4%, respectively, P=0.506), and aneuploidy rate (37.5% vs. 27.8% vs. 23.2%, respectively, P=0.137) among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the euploidy rate of blastocysts derived from SERa+ cycles and oocytes may not be impacted.

Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum Clusters in Oocytes From Patients Who Received Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injections Negatively Affect Blastocyst Quality and Speed of Blastocyst Development

Findings regarding the relationship between smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters (SERCs) in oocytes and blastocyst development have been conflicting. In this study, the effects of SERCs on blastocyst quality and the speed of blastocyst development were evaluated. Patients who received intracytoplasmic sperm injections (ICSI) at our reproductive center from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. SERC (+) oocytes (n = 217) and SERC (-) oocytes (n = 822), as well as SERC (+) cycles (n = 146) and SERC (-) cycles (n = 1,951) were compared. There was no significant difference in embryological, clinical, and neonatal outcomes between the SERC (+) and SERC (-) cycles. The fertilization rate (73.9%), good quality blastocyst rate (26.7%) and the speed of blastocyst development (44.4%) were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in SERC (+) oocytes than in unaffected counterparts (86.2%, 44.1% and 63.4%, respectively). Furthermore, the proportion of blastocysts with trophectoderm (TE) grade C was significantly higher in the SERC (+) oocyte group than in the SERC (-) oocyte group (73.3 vs. 55.9%, P < 0.05). After adjusting for age, years of infertility, endometriosis, stimulation protocols (GnRHa), and male infertility, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of SERCs in the oocytes significantly affected the speed of blastocyst development (odds ratio, 2.812; 95% CI, 1.257-6.292; P = 0.012). These findings suggest that the presence of SERCs in oocytes may negatively affect blastocyst quality and the speed of blastocyst development.

Human Oocyte Morphology and Outcomes of Infertility Treatment: a Systematic Review

Oocyte morphology assessment is easy to implement in any laboratory with possible quality grading prior to fertilization. At present, comprehensive oocyte morphology scoring is not performed as a routine procedure. However, it may augment chances for successful treatment outcomes if a correlation with certain dysmorphisms can be proven. In order to determine a correlation between oocyte morphology and treatment outcome, we performed a systematic search in PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 52 articles out of 6,755 search results met the inclusion criteria. Dark colour of the cytoplasm (observed with an incidence rate of 7%), homogeneous granularity of the cytoplasm (19%) and ovoid shape of oocytes (7%) appeared to have no influence on treatment outcome. Abnormalities such as refractile bodies (10%), fragmented first polar body (37%), dark zona pellucida (9%), enlarged perivitelline space (18%) and debris in it (21%) are likely to affect the treatment outcome to some extent. Finally, cytoplasmic vacuoles (4%), centrally located cytoplasmic granularity (12%) and clusters of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (4%) negatively impact infertility treatment outcomes. Nonetheless, morphological assessment is informative rather than predictive. Adding oocyte morphology to the artificial intelligence (AI)-driven selection process may improve the precision of the algorithms. Oocyte morphology assessment can be especially useful in oocyte donation cycles, during oocyte freezing for fertility preservation and finally, objective oocyte scoring can be important in cases of very poor treatment outcome as a tool for explanation of results to the patient.

Occurrence of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates in metaphase II oocytes: relationship with stimulation protocols and outcome of ICSI and IVF cycles

STUDY QUESTION

Is there any association between the appearance of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) in oocytes and ovarian stimulation, embryological, clinical and neonatal outcomes of ICSI and IVF cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

A suboptimal prolonged ovarian stimulation is detrimental to oocytes by inducing the occurrence of SERa, which reduces the reproductive potential of oocytes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Controlled ovarian stimulation recruits oocytes of different qualities. Based on current evidence, it was agreed that non-homogeneous cytoplasm may represent the normal variability among oocytes rather than a dysmorphism with developmental significance. The only exception is the appearance of SERa within the ooplasm. Owing to the lack of univocal evidence in this literature about the safety of injecting oocytes with SERa and the mechanism responsible for the occurrence of SERa, this topic is still a matter of debate.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study performed at a tertiary level public infertility center. We included 1662 cycles (180 SERa+ and 1482 SERa-) from 1129 women (age: 20-44 years) who underwent IVF/ICSI treatments in 2012-2019. The SERa+ cycles had at least one SERa+ oocyte in the oocyte cohort. The SERa- cycles had morphologically unaffected oocytes.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We collected stimulation data and embryological, clinical, neonatal outcomes of SERa- and SERa+ cycles and oocytes.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Overall, 347 out of 12 436 metaphase II oocytes (2.8%) were affected by SER. We performed only 12 transfers involving at least one SERa+ embryo. Stimulation length (P = 0.002), serum progesterone (P = 0.004) and follicle size (P = 0.046) at trigger, number of retrieved (P = 0.004) and metaphase II (P = 0.0001) oocytes were significantly higher in SERa+ than SERa- cycles. Fertilization rate was significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced in SERa+ cycles and oocytes compared to SERa- counterparts. Embryos of SERa+ cycles had a lower blastocyst formation rate compared to embryos of SERa- cycles (P = 0.059). Statistical analysis according to a generalized estimating equation model performed at patient level demonstrated that the duration of ovarian stimulation was predictive of SERa+ oocytes appearance. The clinical success of SERa+ cycles was lower than SERa- cycles, although no differences in neonatal birthweights or malformations were recorded in sibling unaffected oocytes of SERa+ cycles.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Given that SERa+ oocytes were discarded in our center for years and transfers of embryos originating from affected oocytes were generally avoided, clinical outcomes of SERa+ cycles are largely attributable to the transfer of embryos derived from unaffected oocytes of SERa+ cycles and we did not have data about newborns from affected oocytes, since none of the transfers involving SERa+ embryos resulted in a progressive clinical pregnancy.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

For the first time, we speculate that the late-follicular phase elevated serum progesterone caused by a suboptimal prolonged ovarian stimulation may be detrimental to the oocytes by inducing the occurrence of SERa, resulting in negative effects on their reproductive potential. This raises the question of whether some stimulation regimens could be worse than others and a change in stimulation protocol would reduce the possibility of producing oocytes with suboptimal maturation. In particular, our data highlight the importance of correct timing of the trigger in order to maximize oocyte collection, not only in terms of numerosity but also their reproductive potential.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Meta-analysis of the effects of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation on birth outcome

BACKGROUND

Smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation (SERa, SER+) has been reported to increase the risk of birth malformations and other abnormal outcomes, miscarriage, and perinatal complications. Other studies, however, suggest that SER+ embryos may develop into healthy infants. One report indicates that 25% of in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers discard SER+ oocytes. Thus, we investigated the effect of SER+ on birth outcomes in IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

METHODS

We performed a literature search using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, Embase, Ovid, and Scopus. We found a total of 1500 relevant studies between 1978 and 2020 and conducted a meta-analysis to study the effects of SER+ on live births, birth weight, and the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved per cycle.

RESULTS

Eleven eligible studies were included. If the SER+ zygote was evaluated again at the embryo transfer (ET) stage, SER+ did not affect birth or infant body weight. Stimulated ovaries producing too many oocytes per cycle were positively correlated with SER+ (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.41-2.15; p = 0.004). SER+ was positively correlated with oocyte maturation rate, and observed heterogeneity in a previous meta-analysis was likely due to maternal age. Our data also showed that SER+ cycles produced more oocytes but achieved the same number of births from ET.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SER+ MII oocytes is rare, with the collection of many oocytes in 1 cycle potentially inducing SER+. SER+ may be more common than we originally thought, as some SER+ is found in all oocytes. Although SER+ positively affected oocyte maturation rate, it did not affect births. We hypothesized that this is because the best embryos are chosen at every step of the process, and the oocytes with the poorest characteristics are removed. We therefore suggest a standard method for measuring SER+. Although embryos produced from SER+ cycles can be used, they should only be transferred when no other suitable embryos are available over several cycles.

DYSMORPHISMS OF OOCYTES IN ART PROCEDURES. LITERATURE REVIEW

Currentliterature review presents the analysis of results of studies of morphological qualities and anomalies (dysmorphisms) of human oocytes in the field of assisted reproductive technologies. The variety of intracytoplasmic anomalies encountered in the clinical practice of in vitro fertilization, their effect on fertilization, cleavage, implantation frequency, clinical pregnancy rate were described. Moreover, the morphological characteristics of oocyte could be considered to use as biomarkers in predicting the quality of embryos and blastocysts, and further implantation potential.

Oocytes With Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum Aggregates Are Not Associated With Impaired Reproductive Outcomes: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the reproductive outcomes of oocytes with smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) are impaired.

METHODS

A total of 2893 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were performed between January 2010 and December 2019 in our center. In 43 transfer cycles, transferred embryos were totally derived from SERa+ oocytes. Each of the 43 cycles was matched with a separate control subject from SERa- patient of the same age ( ± 1 year), embryo condition, main causes of infertility, type of protocols used for fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles. The clinical pregnancy, implantation, ectopic pregnancy and live birth rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

43 embryo transfer cycles from SERa- patient were matched to the 43 transferred cycles with pure SERa+ oocytes derived embryos. No significant difference was observed in clinical pregnancy rate (55.81% vs. 65.11%, p=0.5081), implantation rate (47.89% vs. 50.70%, p=0.8667) and live birth rate (48.84% vs. 55.81%, p=0.6659) between the SERa+ oocyte group and the matched group. No congenital birth defects were found in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth and birth defects rate of embryos derived from oocytes with SERa are not impaired.

Selection of competent oocytes by morphological criteria for assisted reproductive technologies

Invasive and noninvasive methods are commonly used to select developmentally competent oocytes that can improve the take-home baby rates in assisted reproductive technology (ART) centers. One of the noninvasive methods conventionally utilized to determine competent oocytes is the morphological analysis of cumulus complex, first polar body, zona pellucida, perivitelline space, meiotic spindle, and ooplasm. Successful fertilization, early embryo development, uterine implantation, and healthy pregnancy depend on the quality of oocytes, and morphological evaluation is one of the options used to predict quality levels. In this review, the morphological criteria being utilized in certain ART centers are comprehensively evaluated with special references to their predictive values and potential contributions to selecting high-quality oocytes.

Is it time to reconsider how to manage oocytes affected by smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates?

STUDY QUESTION

Did the revised Alpha/ESHRE consensus (Vienna, 2017) bring a real answer on managing oocytes with aggregates of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SERa)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

According to the currently available literature, a case by case approach on the time of injecting/inseminating SERa+ oocytes may be not helpful for embryologists making a decision, so we suggest fertilizing both SERa+ and SERa- oocytes and prioritizing embryos derived from SERa- oocytes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?

In 2011, the Istanbul consensus recommended not to inject/inseminate SER+ oocytes due to adverse foetal outcomes reported in literature. At the end of 2017, a panel of experts reconsidered this recommendation and advised a case by case approach. Hence, with a lack of clear recommendations, in-vitro fertilization practitioners still have heterogeneous attitudes when managing SERa+ oocytes. In this context of controversy, an updated review could be helpful in (i) forming a common language for managing cases of SERa+ oocytes and (ii) offering the most ethical practice and best care for patients seeking infertility treatment or fertility preservation.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This review (with a last literature search on 1 June 2018) evaluated the effect of the SER dysmorphism on embryological and neonatal outcomes.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Studies were considered for inclusion if they were prospective or retrospective cohort or case-control studies. Electronic searches of the Pubmed and Embase databases were done using the keyword combination: smooth endoplasmic reticulum, SER, oocyte and zygote. Abstracts and articles written in English and limited to humans were included.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The search returned a total of 726 studies among which 21 met the inclusion criteria. The literature does not unanimously support a negative association between SERa and embryogenesis, implantation or assisted reproductive therapy outcomes. The reviewed studies reported 112 neonatal outcomes after transfers where at least one embryo originated from oocyte affected by SERa. They included 101 healthy babies, three live births with malformations, three neonatal deaths, one stillbirth and four medical interruptions of pregnancy. After transfer of embryos exclusively derived from SERa+ oocytes, a total of 48 healthy newborns were reported along with four babies with perinatal complications (including one ventricular septal defect), one stillbirth, one neonatal death and one pregnancy termination for multiple malformations.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

As with any review, this review was limited by the quality of the included studies especially in terms of possible methodological limitations, the limited sample size and the retrospective aspect of the studies. Among the 21 selected studies, seven were abstracts and two were case reports. Of the remaining 14 studies, only three were prospective. The tools used in identifying SERa+ oocytes may have varied from one study to another and a consequent misclassification cannot be excluded. Considering the poor resolution of light microscopy in detecting SER aggregates, we are not sure that apparently SERa- oocytes do not really exhibit such a dysmorphism if they were analysed under electronic microscopy or a time lapse system.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

In the light of the existing data and the lack of a real link between fertilizing SERa+ oocytes and the occurrence of embryo aneuploidy/malformations, we think that discarding SERa+ oocytes may be not the most ethical approach even in patients with large cohorts on the day of oocyte retrieval. Avoiding the wastage of oocytes and embryos with respect to medical ethics remains a constant concern in daily IVF practice. Thus, we recommend that all mature oocytes could be fertilized and embryos originating from SERa- oocytes would be preferably transferred, even if they come from a cohort with SERa+ oocytes. The remaining embryos derived from SERa+ oocytes could be considered with a lower priority for transfer after obtaining consent from the couple if a strict follow-up of the pregnancy and the baby is performed.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

We have no conflict of interest to declare and no funding was received.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

The impact of letrozole administration on oocyte morphology in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation

Objective:

Patients submitted to oncological fertility preservation with letrozole and gonadotropins seem to present a higher rate of immature oocytes and lower fertilization rates in comparison to infertile patients submitted to IVF cycles with gonadotropins. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of letrozole on oocyte morphology in patients with breast cancer submitted to fertility preservation.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis performed at a public tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. The oocytes were retrieved from patients with breast cancer undergoing fertility preservation (n=69), and from infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (n=92). We evaluated 750 oocytes obtained from breast cancer patients submitted to ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins, and 699 oocytes from patients without breast cancer submitted to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization with gonadotropins only due to male factor infertility. The mature oocytes retrieved were analyzed for the presence of refractile bodies, ooplasm color and regularity, central granulation degree, cortical granules, zona pellucida staining and regularity, perivitelline space, presence of vacuoles or abnormal smooth-surfaced endoplasmic reticle and oocyte retraction.

Results:

There was a higher incidence of alterations in oocyte morphology in the letrozole group when compared to the control group: increased perivitelline space (p=0.007), irregular zona pellucida (p<0.001), refractile bodies (p<0.001), dark ooplasm (p<0.001), granular ooplasm (p<0.001), irregular ooplasm (p<0.001) and dense central granulation (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

Letrozole is a risk factor for worse oocyte morphology. However, the clinical impact of ovarian stimulation protocol with combined use of gonadotropins and letrozole for fertility preservation remains unclear in this setting. These data underline the importance of establishing the predictive potential of morphological dimorphisms of human oocytes in IVF outcomes.

Presence of aggregates of smooth endoplasmic reticulum in MII oocytes affects oocyte competence: molecular-based evidence

STUDY QUESTION

Does the presence of aggregates of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SERa) impact the transcriptome of human metaphase II (MII) oocytes?.

SUMMARY ANSWER

The presence of SERa alters the molecular status of human metaphase II oocytes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Oocytes presenting SERa are considered dysmorphic. Oocytes with SERa (SERa+) have been associated with reduced embryological outcome and increased risk of congenital anomalies, although some authors have reported that SERa+ oocytes can lead to healthy newborns. The question of whether or not SERa+ oocytes should be discarded is still open for debate, and no experimental information about the effect of the presence of SERa on the oocyte molecular status is available.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study included 28 women, aged <38 years, without any ovarian pathology, and undergoing IVF treatment. Supernumerary MII oocytes with no sign of morphological alterations as well as SERa+ oocytes were donated after written informed consent. A total of 31 oocytes without SERa (SERa-) and 24 SERa+ oocytes were analyzed.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Pools of 8-10 oocytes for both group were prepared. Total RNA was extracted from each pool, amplified, labeled and hybridized on oligonucleotide microarrays. Analyses were performed by R software using the limma package.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The expression profiles of SERa+ oocytes significantly differed from those of SERa- oocytes in 488 probe sets corresponding to 102 down-regulated and 283 up-regulated unique transcripts. Gene Ontology analysis by DAVID bioinformatics disclosed that genes involved in three main biological processes were significantly down-regulated in SERa+ oocytes respective to SERa- oocytes: (i) cell and mitotic/meiotic nuclear division, spindle assembly, chromosome partition and G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycle; (ii) organization of cytoskeleton and microtubules; and (iii) mitochondrial structure and activity. Among the transcripts up-regulated in SERa+ oocytes, the most significantly (P = 0.002) enriched GO term was 'GoLoco motif', including the RAP1GAP, GPSM3 and GPSM1 genes.

LARGE SCALE DATA

Raw microarray data are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE106222 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE106222).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Data validation in a larger cohort of samples would be beneficial, although we applied stringent criteria for gene selection (fold-change >3 or <1/3 and FDR < 0.1). Surveys on clinical outcomes, malformation rates and follow-up of babies born after transfer of embryos from SERa+ oocytes are necessary.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

We provide information on the molecular status of SERa+ oocytes, highlighting possible associations between presence of SERa, altered oocyte physiology and reduced developmental competence. Our study may offer further information that can assist embryologists to make decisions on whether, and with what possible implications, SERa+ oocytes should be used. We believe that the presence of SERa should be still a 'red flag' in IVF practices and that the decision to inseminate SERa+ oocytes should be discussed on a case-by-case basis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(s)

This study was partially supported by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Live Birth Rates in In vitro Fertilization Cycles with Oocytes Containing Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum Aggregates and Normal Oocytes

Aims:

The aims of this study were to compare the live birth, embryological and pregnancy outcomes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients who have oocytes with smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa+ cycles) and patients with normal oocytes and to compare the pregnancy outcomes based on the observed frequency of SERa.

Settings and Design:

The current study was a retrospective case record review of patients undergoing ICSI from 2012 to 2016 in a specialty fertility center.

Materials and Methods:

The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of SERa: patients with at least one oocyte containing SERa (SERa+ cycles) (n = 112) and patients with normal oocytes (n = 839). The primary outcome measure was live birth rate. The secondary outcome measures were fertilization rate, cleavage rate, blastocyst formation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and anomalies in children born.

Results:

Women with SERa+ cycles showed similar live birth rates, fertilization rates, cleavage rates, blastocyst formation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates, and abnormalities in children compared to women with normal oocytes. A gradual reduction in live birth rates was observed when the percentage of oocytes containing SERa increased. The group containing >50% of oocytes with SERa demonstrated no live births.

Conclusions:

Presence of SERa had no major overall negative impact on key embryological and live birth outcomes. A reduction in the live birth rate with increasing proportion of SERa oocytes was observed, with no live births in the group with >50% or all affected oocytes.

Oocytes with smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters originate blastocysts with impaired implantation potential

OBJECTIVE

To study whether embryos derived from oocytes presenting a smooth endoplasmic reticulum cluster (SERC) are less likely to develop into blastocysts and implant.

DESIGN

Transversal study.

SETTING

Private university-affiliated in vitro fertilization (IVF) center.

PATIENT(S)

Total of 7,609 oocytes obtained from 743 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

INTERVENTION(S)

Oocytes split between the SERC-positive cycles (with at least one SERC-positive oocyte) and the SERC-negative cycles (only oocytes free of SERC).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Embryo implantation.

RESULT(S)

A statistically significantly higher mean number of follicles (24.0 ± 10.5 vs. 19.6 ± 10.5), retrieved oocytes (17.8 ± 8.3 vs. 14.3 ± 8.0), and mature oocytes (13.5 ± 6.2 vs. 10.6 ± 5.9) were observed in the SERC-positive cycles as compared with SERC-negative cycles. The implantation rate was statistically significantly lower in SERC-positive cycles as compared with SERC-negative cycles (14.8% vs. 25.6%; odds ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.86). When only cycles with in which none (0) or all the blastocysts transferred had implanted (100%) were analyzed, the mean implantation rate per transferred blastocyst in the SERC-negative group was 20.5%; no blastocysts derived from SERC-positive oocytes implanted.

CONCLUSION(S)

The occurrence of SERC impairs embryo implantation. Careful oocyte observation that takes into account the presence of SERC should be part of embryo selection strategy before transfer.

Ultrastructural and cytogenetic analyses of mature human oocyte dysmorphisms with respect to clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

The study aimed to describe the ultrastructure of two human mature oocyte intracytoplasmic dysmorphisms, the bull-eye inclusion and the granular vacuole, with evaluation of clinical outcomes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 4099 consecutive ICSI cycles during the period 2003-2013. Three groups were compared: controls, those with a bulls-eye inclusion, and those with granular vacuoles. Oocyte dysmorphisms were evaluated by transmission electron microscopy and in situ fluorescence hybridization (FISH). Detailed data on demographic and stimulation characteristics, as well as on embryological, clinical, and newborn outcomes, are fully presented.

RESULTS

The bull-eye inclusion is a prominent smooth round structure containing trapped vesicles, being surrounded by lipid droplets. The presence of this dysmorphism in the oocyte cohort had no clinical impact except when transferred embryos were exclusively derived from dysmorphism oocytes. The granular vacuole is delimited by a discontinuous double membrane and contains lipid droplets and vesicles. As FISH analysis revealed the presence of chromosomes, they probably represent pyknotic nuclei. The presence of this dysmorphism in the oocyte cohort had no clinical impact except when at least one transferred embryo was derived from dimorphic oocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor clinical outcomes were observed with transfer of embryos derived from dysmorphism oocytes, although without causing gestation or newborn problems. The bull-eye inclusion and granular vacuoles may thus be new prognostic factors for clinical outcomes.

Oocytes affected by smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates: to discard or not to discard?

PURPOSE

Oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) have been associated with reduced fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates as well as compromised neonatal outcomes. It was therefore recommended by an Alpha-ESHRE Consensus to discard oocytes presenting this dysmorphism. The data in the literature are nevertheless conflicting and healthy babies have recently been obtained from affected oocytes. The objectives of this study were to compare clinical outcomes between ICSI cycles with and without oocytes affected by smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates and to confirm whether affected oocytes can produce healthy babies.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed comparing 714 SERa- ICSI cycles to 112 SERa+ cycles. Among the SERa+ cycles, 518 SERa- oocytes and 213 SERa+ oocytes were analyzed. Fertilization, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates as well as neonatal outcomes were compared between SERa+ and SERa- cycles as well as between SERa+ and SERa- oocytes.

RESULTS

The presence of SERa was not associated with an adverse effect on embryological, clinical or neonatal data for SERa+ cycles and oocytes. Seven healthy babies were born from embryos originating from SERa+ oocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are encouraging and might contribute in the future to a revision of the Alpha-ESHRE Consensus. Larger studies, including a correlation between frequency and size of SERa, clinical outcomes and malformation rates, as well as the follow-up of babies born are nevertheless necessary. In the meantime, the currently conflicting data requires caution when considering transfers of embryos affected by SERa.