Magnetic-activated cell sorting is not completely effective at reducing sperm DNA fragmentation

Optimized sperm selection: a highly efficient device for the isolation of progressive motile sperm with low DNA fragmentation index

PURPOSE

To identify the sperm preparation procedure that selects the best sperm population for medically assisted reproduction.

METHODS

Prospective observational study comparing the effect of four different sperm selection procedures on various semen parameters. Unused raw semen after routine diagnostic analysis was split in four fractions and processed by four different methods: (1) density gradient centrifugation (DGC), (2) sperm wash (SW), (3) DGC followed by magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS), and (4) using a sperm separation device (SSD). Each fraction was analyzed for progressive motility, morphology, acrosome index (AI), and DNA fragmentation index (DFI).

RESULTS

With DGC as standard of care in intraclass correlation coefficient analysis, only SSD was in strong disagreement regarding progressive motility and DFI [0.26, 95%CI (- 0.2, 0.58), and 0.17, 95%CI (- 0.19, 0.45), respectively]. When controlling for abstinence duration, DFI was significantly lower after both MACS and SSD compared to DGC [- 0.27%, 95%CI (- 0.47, - 0.06), p = 0.01, and - 0.6%, 95%CI (- 0.80, - 0.41), p < 0.001, respectively]. Further comparisons between SSD and MACS indicate significantly less apoptotic cells [Median (IQR) 4 (5), 95%CI (4.1, - 6.8) vs Median (IQR) 5 (8), 95%CI (4.9, - 9.2), p < 0.001, respectively] and dead cells [Median (IQR) 9.5 (23.3), 95%CI (13.2, - 22.4) vs Median (IQR) 22 (28), 95%CI (23.1, - 36.8), p < 0.001, respectively] in the SSD group.

CONCLUSION

The selection of a population of highly motile spermatozoa with less damaged DNA from unprocessed semen is ideally performed with SSD. Question remains whether this method improves the embryological outcomes in the IVF laboratory.

Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction

This comprehensive review explores the evolving landscape of sperm selection techniques within the realm of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Our analysis delves into a range of methods from traditional approaches like density gradient centrifugation to advanced techniques such as Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) and Intracytoplasmic Morphologically Selected Sperm Injection (IMSI). We critically assess the efficacy of these methods in terms of sperm motility, morphology, DNA integrity, and other functional attributes, providing a detailed comparison of their clinical outcomes. We highlight the transition from conventional sperm selection methods, which primarily focus on physical characteristics, to more sophisticated techniques that offer a comprehensive evaluation of sperm molecular properties. This shift not only promises enhanced prediction of fertilization success but also has significant implications for improving embryo quality and increasing the chances of live birth. By synthesizing various studies and research papers, we present an in-depth analysis of the predictability of different sperm selection procedures in ART. The review also discusses the clinical applicability of these methods, emphasizing their potential in shaping the future of assisted reproduction. Our findings suggest that the integration of advanced sperm selection strategies in ART could lead to more cost-effective treatments with reduced duration and higher success rates. This review aims to provide clinicians and researchers in reproductive medicine with comprehensive insights into the current state and future prospects of sperm selection technologies in ART.

The Use of Non-Apoptotic Sperm Selected by Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) to Enhance Reproductive Outcomes: What the Evidence Says

Sperm selection of the most competent sperm is a promising way to enhance reproductive outcomes. Apoptosis is the programmed cell death process to maintain tissue homeostasis, and MACS sperm selection of non-apoptotic cells enables the removal of apoptotic sperm from an ejaculate, thus leaving the non-apoptotic available to be microinjected, but given the associated costs of adding these sperm selection steps to the routine practice, there is a need for a careful examination of the literature available to answer questions such as who can benefit from this MACS, how significant this improvement is, and how robust the evidence and data available supporting this choice are. Thus, the aim of this narrative review was to objectively evaluate the available evidence regarding the potential benefits of the use of MACS. From the literature, there are controversial results since its implementation as an in vitro fertilization add-on, and this may be explained in part by the low quality of the evidence available, wrong designs, or even inadequate statistical analyses. We concluded that the benefits of adding MACS are unclear, and further methodologically sound research on specific populations is much needed before offering it clinically.

MACS-DGC sperm preparation method resulted in high-quality sperm, top-quality embryo, and higher blastocyst rate in male factor infertile couples with high DNA fragmented sperm

Conventional sperm selection based on motility and morphology fails to provide detailed information on sperm functional and molecular status. Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) protocol aims to optimize this process by selecting apoptotic sperm cells. Phospholipase C zeta-1 (PLCz1) is a physiological stimulus for oocyte activation and early embryonic development. The purpose of this study was to examine seminal parameters, DNA fragmentation index (DFI), and PLCz1 expression levels in MACS-DGC sorted specimens (DFI > 30%) and assess early development in resulting embryos. Semen specimens from 60 patients diagnosed with male factor infertility were collected and processed by either density gradient centrifugation (DGC) or MACS-DGC protocols. Pre and post-preparation analysis was performed. PLCz1 expression was assessed using the RT-PCR method. Retrieved eggs from their partners were divided into two groups in which they were injected with different sorted sperm. The fertilization rate and embryonic development were evaluated. While sperm's progressive motility and morphology significantly improved, there was a substantial decline in DFI following MACS-DGC. Fertilization rates were almost the same between the groups, and the latter resulted in remarkably more top-quality embryos and more blastocysts. PLCz1 expression was considerably higher in the MACS-DGC group. By eliminating apoptotic cells, the MACS-DGC technique could sort highly PLCz1-expressed sperm, optimize sperm selection in individuals with elevated DFI, development of resulting embryos.

Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques

Sperm separation plays a critical role in assisted reproductive technology. Based on migration, density gradient centrifugation and filtration, a properly selected sperm could help in increasing assisted reproductive outcomes in teratozoospermia (TZs). The current study aimed to assess the prognostic value of four sperm selection techniques: density gradient centrifugation (DGC), swim-up (SU), DGC-SU and DGC followed by magnetic-activated cell sorting (DGC-MACS). These were evaluated using spermatozoa functional parameters. A total of 385 infertile couples underwent the procedure of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with an isolated teratozoospermia in the male partner. Semen samples were prepared by using one of the mentioned sperm preparation techniques. The improvements in the percentage of normal mature spermatozoa, rate of fertilization, cleavage, pregnancy and the number of live births were assessed. The normal morphology, spermatozoa DNA fragmentation (SDF) and chromatin maturity checked by using chromomycin A3 (CMA3) with DGC-MACS preparation were better compared to the other three methods. Embryo cleavage, clinical pregnancy and implantation were better improved in the DGC-MACS than in the other tested techniques. The DGC-MACS technique helped in the selection of an increased percentage of normal viable and mature sperm with intact chromatin integrity in patients with teratozoospermia.

Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting as a Method to Improve Necrozoospermia-Related Asthenozoospermic Samples

According to some statistics, absolute asthenozoospermia affects every 1 in 5000 men. Although this incidence rate does not appear to be too high, it is extremely important to address the phenomenon because it can drastically reduce the chances of pregnancy, even with assisted reproduction. The biggest problem with absolute asthenozoospermia is that it is difficult to distinguish between live and dead sperm cells, and fertilization with non-viable spermatozoa may contribute to the failure of an assisted reproduction cycle. Nowadays, DNA fragmentation (DF) is a crucial parameter of semen analysis, and in this paper, we provide evidence of the correlation between DF and vitality. For this purpose, the main semen parameters were investigated by a CASA system (concentration, motility, progressive motility, vitality and DF). In the necrozoospermic group (vitality < 58%), all the measured parameters showed significant differences compared to normal vitality. Concentration (30.1 M mL−1 vs. 13.6 M mL−1), motility (31.9% vs. 18.3%), and progressive motility (24.3% vs. 12.7%) were significantly decreased, while DF was significantly increased (17.4% vs. 23.7%). Based on the connection between vitality decrement and DF increment, DF lowering methods, such as magnetic-activated cell sorting, have been hypothesized as novel methods for the elimination of dead spermatozoa.

Cumulative live birth rates in donor oocyte ICSI cycles are not improved by magnetic-activated cell sorting sperm selection

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) for sperm selection increase cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) or improve clinical parameters of reproductive success in couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with donor oocytes?

DESIGN

Retrospective multicentre observational study including data compiled from unselected couples who underwent ICSI cycles with donated oocytes in 15 Spanish IVIRMA fertility clinics (January 2008 to February 2020). Patients were divided into reference (standard semen processing, n = 40,157) and MACS (additional sperm selection step by MACS, n = 1,240) groups. CLBR were plotted on Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the Mantel-Cox test. Proportions were compared with a generalized estimating equation model, and results were adjusted to clinically relevant variables.

RESULTS

The MACS group showed a 27.1% CLBR after one embryo was transferred and 81.6% after four; the reference group had CLBR of 19.6% and 78.5%, respectively. CLBR in the MACS group was 4.2% after five oocytes were used and 75.5% after 15; for the reference group, CLBR were 7.8% and 78.3%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves showed statistically significant differences in CLBR per number of embryos transferred and per number of donated metaphase II oocytes between the two groups (both P < 0.0001), but not for CLBR per embryo transfer. No significant differences between groups were found for classical clinical outcomes such as pregnancy and live birth rates per embryo transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MACS sperm selection slightly increased the CLBR per embryo transferred compared with the reference group, this change was not clinically meaningful. MACS should not be recommended indiscriminately to all infertile patients undergoing ICSI with donated oocytes as a sperm processing add-on.

Sperm Selection by Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting before Microinjection of Autologous Oocytes Increases Cumulative Live Birth Rates with Limited Clinical Impact: A Retrospective Study in Unselected Males

Simple Summary

Many couples attending infertility clinics still need to repeat treatments and undergo several failed attempts before achieving a healthy newborn, which leaves room for improvement in the techniques we currently use in the clinic. Among the different procedures susceptible to improvement, the selection of the most adequate sperm to be injected inside the egg is crucial to the cycle’s success. Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) is a technique that removes physiologically abnormal sperm that have started a programmed cell death (apoptotic) process from a semen sample. However, it is not recommended to all patients because there is no agreement between the published literature on whether it improves reproductive outcomes. This study used data from all intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles performed using the patient’s own oocytes in our clinics from January 2008 to February 2020. Our findings support that MACS should not be recommended to all infertile couples, since there was no significant difference in results compared to treatments in which MACS was not used. This study provides clinicians and patients with more accurate information on how MACS will impact their chances of pregnancy, and it will lead to studies focused on specific populations to which the technique can be particularly helpful.

Abstract

The application of MACS non-apoptotic sperm selection in infertility clinics is controversial since the published literature does not agree on its effect on reproductive outcomes. Therefore, it is not part of the routine clinical practice. Classical measures of reproductive success (pregnancy or live birth rates per ovarian stimulation) introduce a bias in the evaluation of a technique’s effect, since only the best embryo is transferred. This retrospective, multicenter, observational study evaluated the impact of MACS on reproductive outcomes, measuring results in classical parameters and cumulative live birth rates (CLBR). Data from ICSI cycles using autologous oocyte in Spanish IVIRMA fertility clinics from January 2008 to February 2020 were divided into two groups according to their semen processing: standard practice (reference: 46,807 patients) versus an added MACS sperm selection (1779 patients). Only when measured as CLBR per embryo transferred and per MII oocyte used was the difference between groups statistically significant. There were no significant differences between MACS and reference groups on pregnancy and live birth rates. In conclusion, results suggest that non-apoptotic sperm selection by MACS on unselected males prior to ICSI with autologous oocytes has limited clinical impact, showing a subtle increase in CLBR per embryo transferred.

A methodological validation of an easy one-step swimout semen preparation procedure for selecting DNA fragmentation-free spermatozoa for ICSI

The main purpose of this methodological paper was to describe a recently designed one-step ICSI semen preparation swim-out method (called swim-ICSI) and to compare its efficacy with our conventional two-step swim-out method for the selection of motile spermatozoa for ICSI with minimal DNA damage. In this observational cohort study, 42 fresh ejaculate sperm samples for ICSI were included to compare the new swim-ICSI with the conventional swim-out. In a sub-analysis (n = 20), both in-house designed ICSI preparation methods were compared with a commercial magnetic-activated cell sorting test (MACS^® ). Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF), using Halosperm^® , was determined at different time points during sperm preparation: on the native sample (a), after density gradient centrifugation (DG) (b), on the motile (A + B) spermatozoa selected with conventional swim-out post-DG (c) and selected with swim-ICSI method post-DG (d). For a subgroup (n = 20), SDF was also calculated after MACS (e). The mean SDF significantly reduced after EACH preparation step and reduced to almost zero in the recovered A + B spermatozoa when the semen prepared with DG was further processed for ICSI (swim-ICSI vs. swim-out, p = .001). In conclusion, the optimised one-step and fine-tuned swim-ICSI technique shows the possibility to select a population of spermatozoa with almost zero SDF to be used in ICSI treatments.

Sperm selection in IVF: the long and winding road from bench to bedside

Spermatozoa wage battle to conquer fertilization but the traits needed to succeed remain elusive. The natural advantageous qualities that enable only a few selected sperm cells to reach the site of fertilization remain unknown. Although in vitro fertilization (IVF) facilitates the job of spermatozoa, a universally acceptable means of sperm selection is yet to be developed. No objective or reliable sperm quality indicators have been established and sperm selection is, to a great extent, based on subjective qualitative evaluation. The best method for sperm selection in IVF presents several challenges: intrinsic sperm qualities cannot be evaluated and the ideal endpoint for these studies is debatable. An ideal method for sperm selection in ART should be noninvasive and cost-effective, and allow the identification of high-quality spermatozoa and yield better outcomes in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates. This narrative review included 85 papers and focused on the new available methods and technologies that might shed some light on sperm selection in IVF. It discusses the available data on microfluidic devices, omics profiling, micronuclei studies, sperm plasma membrane markers, and other techniques, such as Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACS), Raman micro-spectroscopy, and artificial intelligence systems. The new techniques herein reviewed offer fresh approaches to an old problem, for which a definite solution has yet to cross the bridge from bench to IVF clinics around the world, since clinical usefulness and application remain unproven.