Reproductive outcomes with donor sperm in couples with severe male-factor infertility after intracytoplasmic sperm injection failures

Effects of donor sperm on perinatal and neonatal outcomes resulting from in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The impact of donor sperm on pregnancy outcomes is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate whether donor sperm in in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment could reduce the rate of live births or increase the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes and birth defects in neonates.

Methods

This single-centre, retrospective cohort study included 1,559 patients with infertility who received donor sperm at our hospital from 2015 to 2019. All the patients received fresh embryos and underwent first-cycle transfer. After propensity score matching, 4,677 controls who received their partners’ sperm were matched at 1:3. Clinical pregnancy, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the donor sperm and partner sperm groups.

Results

The embryo development was better in the donor sperm group than in the partner sperm group. The high-quality embryo and available embryo rates were significantly higher in the donor sperm group (P<0.05 for both groups). The rate of high-quality embryos transferred from the donor sperm group was higher than that from the partner sperm group (P<0.05). The clinical pregnancy (62.99% vs. 59.65%; P=0.02) and live birth (54.65% vs. 51.59%; P=0.036) rates were higher in the donor sperm group. After adjusting for confounding factors, no significant difference in live birth rates was observed between the two groups (adjusted P=0.057). The low birthweight (18.21% vs. 21.39%; P=0.023) and small for gestational age (SGA) (7.60% vs. 11.97%; P<0.001) rates were lower in the donor sperm group. To exclude the effect of multiple pregnancies, we evaluated neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies. No significant differences were noted in preterm and very preterm birth, SGA, mean birthweight, high birthweight, and low birth weight (LBW) and very low birth weight (VLBW) rates (P>0.05 for both groups). Further, no significant between group differences were observed in the ectopic pregnancy rate, early and late spontaneous abortion rates, gestational age, rate of large for gestational age (LGA), and neonatal defects.

Conclusions

Compared with partner sperm, donor sperm did not reduce live birth rate and did not increase neonatal LBW or low birth defects.

Efficacy of intrauterine insemination in women with endometrioma-associated subfertility: analysis using propensity score matching

Background

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment is recommended in subfertile women with AFS/ASRM stage I/II endometriosis. However, the efficacy of IUI in women with ovarian endometriomas with tubal patency is uncertain. We explored the efficacy of IUI for the treatment of endometrioma-associated subfertility.

Methods

We performed a retrospective matched cohort study using propensity matching (PSM) analysis. Subfertile couples undergoing IUI with and without ovarian stimulation between January 1, 2015, and May 30, 2020 were reviewed.

Results

After PSM, 56 women with endometrioma alone were matched to 173 patients with unexplained subfertility. The per-cycle pregnancy rate (PR) was comparable between women with endometrioma-associated subfertility (n = 56, 87 cycles) and women with unexplained subfertility (n = 173, 280 cycles) (9.2% vs. 17.9%, OR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.21–1.03). Subgroup analyses based on IUI with or without stimulation also resulted in comparable results. A trend toward a lower cumulative pregnancy rates (CPRs) was seen in women with endometrioma (14.3%, 8/56) compared with women with unexplained subfertility (28.9%, 50/173), but the differences were not significant (HR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.23–1.15). However, patients with endometrioma were nearly twice as likely to converse to IVF treatment compared with those without the disease (60.7% versus 43.9%; OR 1.97; 95% CI, 1.07–3.65).

Conclusion

IUI may be a viable approach for subfertile women with endometrioma and no other identifiable infertility factor. More studies are needed to reassure the findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04342-y.