Self-reported barriers to accessing infertility care: patient perspectives from urban gynecology clinics

"My Body is Betraying Me": Exploring the Stigma and Coping Strategies for Infertility Among Women Across Ethnic and Racial Groups

Female infertility remains a taboo and carries stigma across various ethnic/racial communities. Infertility-related stigma impairs women's mental well-being, strains their family relationships, and deters them from seeking treatment. In this article, we seek to understand the perceived/self-stigma of infertility and stigma management through in-depth interviews with 29 women (White, African American, and Hispanic) who were facing fertility challenges. Taking an intersectional approach, we focused on how these women's experience of infertility and their stigma coping were shaped by certain gendered, racial, and cultural ideologies deeply entrenched in contemporary U.S. society. Our findings uncovered shared stigmas and coping mechanisms as well as distinct variations that are specific to White, African American, and Hispanic women. The firsthand accounts from our participants revealed the distressing reality of marginalization and silencing of minority women's voices within their families, communities, and society at large. Furthermore, our study underscored how social interactions among women can foster competition, entrenching and bolstering hierarchical stigma power dynamics. This study contributes to the health disparity research by highlighting how women are stratified into different categories based on social class, ethnicity/race, and age. Such classifications ultimately result in differential access to health resources, perpetuating existing social inequality and division.

Racial disparities in the outcomes of euploid single frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles - analysis of the Clinical Outcome Reporting System of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology 2016-2018 data

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if in pregnancies conceived with the transfer of single genetically tested embryos, maternal race and ethnicity relate to pregnancy outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Data available in the Clinical Outcome Reporting System of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART-CORS) for years 2016-2018.

PATIENT(S)

Autologous frozen-thaw embryo transfer (FET) cycles with transfer of single genetically tested embryo in SART-CORS for years 2016-2018; cycles associated with diagnoses of recurrent pregnancy loss, gestational carrier, donor egg and donor embryo were excluded.

INTERVENTION(S)

Information on race and ethnicity linked with in vitro fertilization and FET cycles available in SART-CORS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Multivariable analyses using generalized estimating equation examined the relationship between categories of race and ethnicity with the following outcomes: Pregnancy positive β hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin), clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss (early [at gestation <13 weeks] and late [loss between ≥13 and <20 weeks]), preterm (<37 weeks), term (≥37 weeks) and live birth. Covariates adjusted for included age, body mass index, anti-Mullerian hormone, infertility diagnosis and smoking history.

RESULT(S)

Seventy-nine thousand four hundred and sixteen FET cycles met the eligibility criteria. Information on race and ethnicity was specified for 50,820 (64.0%) and was not known in 28,723 (36%) of the cycles. The population was predominantly non-Hispanic White (44%); non-Hispanic Black comprised 2.7%, Asian 12.3%, Hispanic 3.4%, and American Indian, Pacific Islander, Hawaiian, and Alaskan comprised 0.2% of the population. Nearly 1.0 % self-identified with more than one race. On multivariable analyses, pregnancies in non-Hispanic Black and in Hispanic women (compared with non-Hispanic Whites') were significantly more likely to result in in preterm birth. Compared with non-Hispanic White women, the likelihood of live birth was significantly lower in non-Hispanic Blacks, Asian, Hispanic, American Indian, Pacific Islander, Hawaiian, and Alaskan women. The likelihood for delivery by Cesarean was also disproportionately higher in the non Hispanic Black and, Hispanic women and in those identifying with more than one race (0.023) compared with non-Hispanic White women.

CONCLUSION(S)

Racial and ethnic differentials are apparent in the outcomes of FET conceived pregnancies resulting from the transfer of single genetically tested embryos.

Infertility Prevention and Health Promotion: The Role of Nurses in Public Health Initiatives

Infertility is a growing public health concern, affecting millions of individuals and couples worldwide. Despite advancements in medical treatments, prevention remains a critical strategy for reducing the burden of infertility. Nurses, as frontline healthcare providers, play a pivotal role in infertility prevention and health promotion, particularly through public health initiatives. This review aims to explore the diverse roles of nurses in infertility prevention and their contributions to public health strategies. A review of existing literature was conducted to examine the epidemiology of infertility, key risk factors, and the preventive measures that can be employed by nursing professionals. Emphasis is placed on the role of nurses in health education, screening, early detection, and community-based interventions, which are essential in reducing infertility rates. In addition, this review identifies barriers that impede effective nurse-led infertility prevention, such as disparities in access to care, cultural sensitivity challenges, and policy constraints. Evidence suggests that nurses are well-positioned to lead public health campaigns, conduct reproductive health counseling, and advocate for policy reforms to improve infertility prevention. The review concludes with recommendations for future research, suggesting enhanced nursing education and training, as well as the need for stronger integration of nurses into public health policy-making. This study underscores the critical role of nurses in promoting reproductive health and preventing infertility, advocating for their inclusion in comprehensive public health strategies aimed at addressing infertility on a global scale.

Barriers and facilitators experienced by South Korean women undergoing fertility treatment: A qualitative socioecological study

The purpose of this qualitative study was to use interview data to identify and describe the intrapersonal, interpersonal, community, and policy barriers and facilitators experienced by South Korean women undergoing fertility treatment. The researchers conducted one-on-one interviews with 14 women who had undergone fertility treatment and then completed a thematic content analysis on the collected interview data. Guided by the socioecological model, the researchers explored the barriers and facilitators women experienced during fertility treatment. The participants described their struggles and -emotional distress as well as their coping mechanisms: addressing their physical and emotional stress; soliciting support from their husband, personal network, online peers, and healthcare team; and seeking government financial assistance. The information gained from this study can help healthcare providers and government agencies design effective psychosocial and national policies and interventions for this population.

Neighborhood deprivation and racial differences in in vitro fertilization outcomes

BACKGROUND

There are significant racial disparities in in vitro fertilization outcomes, which are poorly explained by individual-level characteristics. Environmental factors such as neighborhood-level socioeconomic factors may contribute to these disparities. However, few studies have directly addressed this research question in a large, racially diverse cohort.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether neighborhood deprivation is associated with differences in in vitro fertilization outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Our retrospective cohort study included 1110 patients who underwent 2254 autologous in vitro fertilization cycles between 2014 and 2019 at an academic fertility center in the Southeastern United States. Neighborhood deprivation was estimated using the Neighborhood Deprivation Index, a composite variable measuring community levels of material capital based on poverty, occupation, housing, and education domains. Using multivariable log-binomial generalized estimating equations with cluster weighting, risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for cycle cancellation, miscarriage (defined as spontaneous pregnancy loss before 20 weeks after a confirmed intrauterine gestation), and live birth according to patient Neighborhood Deprivation Index.

RESULTS

There were positive associations between increasing Neighborhood Deprivation Index (indicating worsening neighborhood deprivation) and body mass index, as well as increasing prevalence of tubal and uterine factor infertility diagnoses. The crude probability of live birth per cycle was lower among Black (24%) than among White patients (32%), and the crude probability of miscarriage per clinical pregnancy was higher among Black (22%) than among White patients (12%). After adjustment, the Neighborhood Deprivation Index was not significantly associated with risk of cycle cancellation or live birth. Results were consistent when analyses were stratified by race.

CONCLUSION

Our research demonstrates racial disparities between Black and White women in the incidence of miscarriage and live birth following in vitro fertilization. Although the level of neighborhood deprivation was closely related to race, it did not have strong associations with in vitro fertilization outcomes in our population as a whole or within strata of race.

The burden of very early dropout in infertility care: a nationwide population-based cohort study

STUDY QUESTION

What is the frequency and the associated factors of very early dropout following unsuccessful clomiphene citrate (CC)/gonadotropin treatment in the context of full coverage of treatment cost.

SUMMARY ANSWER

Despite free treatment, almost one in four women had a very early dropout following unsuccessful CC/gonadotropin treatment, with patients below the poverty line being more likely to drop out early.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Success of infertility care is tarnished by very high dropout rates. Infertility care dropout has been considered as resulting principally from financial barriers because of the high cost of treatment. Nearly all previous work addressed dropout following IVF/ICSI. Factors associated with dropout following CC/gonadotropins may be different and also need to be investigated.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Nationwide population-based cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Using the French national health insurance and hospital databases, we included in the cohort 27 416 women aged 18-49 years unsuccessfully treated with CC/gonadotropins in 2017. The main outcome was very early dropout, defined as discontinuation of all infertility treatment after unsuccessful treatment for 1-3 months. Very early treatment dropout was analysed by multivariate logistic regression.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Among women unsuccessfully treated with CC/gonadotropins, 22% dropped out of infertility care within 3 months. In multivariate analysis, higher early dropout following unsuccessful CC/gonadotropin treatment was associated with older and younger ages (≥35 and <25 years), being below the poverty line, being treated with CC prescribed by a general practitioner and lack of infertility tests or monitoring.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study is based on health administrative data that do not include reasons for dropout and record only a limited amount of information. It is thus not possible to analyse the reason for early dropout.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Despite full coverage of all infertility treatment, women under the poverty line have a higher risk of very early dropout following unsuccessful CC/gonadotropin treatment. Better understanding is needed of the non-financial barriers and difficulties faced by these patients. To address disparities in infertility treatment, practitioner training could be reinforced to adapt to patients from different social and cultural backgrounds.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by the ANR StimHo project, grant ANR-17-CE36-0011-01 from the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Breaking Down Barriers: Advancing Toward Health Equity in Fertility Care for Black and Hispanic Patients

Infertility can affect all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. Barriers to quality fertility care include access, financial limitations, education, and social stigmas. Although racial disparities in outcomes of assisted reproductive technology can be largely attributed to the influences of systemic racism (not race), we can make changes to improve equity of care. We propose strategies in the areas of advocacy, clinical setting, community, and outcomes to address the racial disparities.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to and Outcomes of Infertility Treatment and Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States

Infertility disproportionately affects the minority, non-White populace, with Black women having twofold higher odds than White women. Despite higher infertility rates, minority racial and ethnic groups access and utilize fertility care less frequently. Even once care is accessed, racial and ethnic disparities exist in infertility treatment and ART outcomes. Preliminary studies indicate that Asian and American Indian women have lower intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates. Many robust studies indicate significant racial and ethnic disparities in rates of clinical pregnancy, live birth, pregnancy loss, and obstetrical complications following in vitro fertilization, with lower favorable outcomes in Black, Asian, and Hispanic women.

Ovulation induction with letrozole and dexamethasone in infertile patients with letrozole-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome

PURPOSE

To assess efficacy of adjuvant dexamethasone during letrozole cycles for ovulation induction (OI) in women with letrozole-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 42 cycles of OI from 28 infertile women with letrozole-resistant PCOS between September 2019 and November 2022. Letrozole was initiated on cycle day 3 for 5 days and increased via a stair-step approach to 7.5 mg as indicated. Patients were deemed letrozole-resistant if no dominant follicle was identified on transvaginal ultrasound following this dose. Resistant patients then received 5 additional days of letrozole 7.5 mg with low-dose dexamethasone 0.5 mg for 7 days and had a repeat ultrasound. The primary outcome was ovulation rate determined by the presence of a dominant follicle on ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included endometrial thickness, number of measurable follicles, and pregnancy outcomes among responders.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 28 (79%) letrozole-resistant PCOS patients had evidence of ovulation after the addition of dexamethasone in 35 out of 42 (83%) cycles. Clinical pregnancy occurred in 20% of ovulatory cycles with a cumulative rate of 32%. All clinical pregnancies resulted in a live birth. Patients who responded to adjuvant dexamethasone were more likely to have a shorter duration of infertility; however, there were no differences in other demographics, serum androgens including DHEA-S, or pretreatment glycemic status.

CONCLUSION

Adding dexamethasone to letrozole increased ovulation rates in letrozole-resistant PCOS patients undergoing OI with similar pregnancy outcomes to prior studies. The addition of dexamethasone is an effective, inexpensive, and safe option for PCOS patients otherwise at risk for cycle cancelation.

Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review

There is emergent scientific literature examining the disparities in reproductive care of women in the United States. Reproduction is a basic human right and there are unique challenges that racial and ethnic minorities face in accessing fertility care and assisted reproductive technology. The identification of these disparities can aid in identifying areas for interventions to improve and resolve, the inequities that exist in providing care for minority populations. A literature search was performed using PubMed to identify articles with data specific to racial and ethnic differences in study populations as it related to infertility, access to care, and treatment outcomes. The following review and collection of articles provide a comprehensive overview of the disparities that exist, the factors that contribute to these disparities, and recommendations for how providers and health care systems may begin to resolve the gaps in equitable care.

Inequity of Access: Scoping the Barriers to Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Infertility impacts millions of people of reproductive age worldwide, with approximately 10-15% of couples affected. When infertility is present, there are many potential barriers to treatment, leading to inequity of access. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are the mainstay of medical treatment for infertility and include procedures such as in vitro fertilisation. This scoping review aims to explore the barriers to accessing assisted reproductive technologies to highlight a potential role for the pharmacist in addressing these barriers. Five databases, including CINAHL, Emcare, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched using keywords that resulted in 19 studies that explored barriers to initially accessing or continuing ART. Studies identified more than one barrier to accessing ART, with the most mentioned barrier being the geographic location of the patient, with others themed as psychological, financial, minority groups, educational level, and the age of the patient. Recommendations were made to address barriers to accessing ART, which included changes to government regulations to increase health education and promotion of infertility. Pharmacists' accessibility, even in geographically remote locations, places them in an ideal position to address many of the challenges experienced by people accessing infertility treatment to improve outcomes for these people.

Racial disparities in access to reproductive health and fertility care in the United States

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the status of racial and ethnic inequalities in fertility care in the United States (U.S.) at inception of 2022. This review highlights addressable underpinnings for the prevalent differentials in access to and utilization of infertility treatments and underscores gaps in preventive care as key contributors to racial and ethnic disparities in risk burden for subfertility and infertility.

RECENT FINDINGS

Significant gaps in access to and utilization of fertility care are consistently reported among racial and ethnic minorities, particularly Black and Hispanic women. Access to and utilization of contraceptives, human papilloma virus vaccination rates, preexposure prophylaxis use, and differentials in treatment of common gynecologic disorders are relevant to the prevalent racial and ethnic disparities in reproductive health. The spectrum of differential in reproductive wellness and the magnitude of reproductive health burden afflicting racial minorities in the U.S. raise concerns regarding systemic and structural racism as plausible contributors to the prevalent state of affairs.

SUMMARY

Despite efforts to reform unequal reproductive health practices and policies, racial and ethnic disparities in fertility care are pervasive and persistent. In addition to measures aimed at reducing barriers to care, societal efforts must prioritize health disparity research to systematically examine underpinnings, and addressing structural racism and interpersonal biases, to correct the prevalent racial inequities and mitigate disparities.

Provision of infertility care for the underserved in reproductive endocrinology and infertility practices associated with obstetrics and gynecology residency training programs in the United States

Objective

To survey practice patterns designed to increase access to infertility care and evaluate the exposure of obstetrics and gynecology residents to infertility care for the underserved.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

Reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) practices associated with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency training programs.

Patient(s)

None.

Intervention(s)

Questionnaire survey.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Presence of clinical programs designed to improve access to REI care, resident involvement in such programs, and perceived barriers to expanding access to care.

Result(s)

Clinical initiatives to expand access included discounted infertility services (38%, n = 30), utilization of a low-cost in vitro fertilization (IVF) program (28%, n = 22), and utilization of a resident- and/or fellow-staffed clinic to provide infertility care (39%, n = 31). The most commonly discounted infertility services were IVF (73%, n = 22), clinical consultation (70%, n = 21), and intrauterine insemination (53%, n = 16). The provision of discounted prices was correlated with the increasing practice size (odds ratio [OR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–4.24) and number of assisted reproductive technology cycles performed annually (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.48–9.02). Academic REI practices (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.98–13.25) were more likely to have a low-cost IVF program. Less than half of obstetrics and gynecology residency programs (39%, n = 31) had an associated REI clinic in which obstetrics and gynecology residents provide direct infertility care to the medically underserved. Frequency and services offered in trainee clinics varied. Multiple barriers to expanding access to care were reported.

Conclusion(s)

Reproductive endocrinology and infertility practices associated with obstetrics and gynecology residency programs utilize a diverse range of approaches to provide infertility care to the underserved in the backdrop of considerable challenges and barriers, but significant gaps persist.

See one, do one, teach one: Reimagining reproductive endocrinology and infertility training programs to expand access to care

Objective

To provide a review of the current literature surrounding barriers to reproductive medicine and present examples of how resident and fellow education can be used to overcome these barriers.

Design

A review of the relevant literature addressing barriers to reproductive medicine, resident and fellow education, and related materials was completed.

Setting

Academic medical institutions.

Patient(s)

None.

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Health disparities and barriers in access to care.

Result(s)

Of barriers in access to care, 3 were reviewed in detail: cost of health care, racial inequities, and marginalization of immigrant communities. The suggested strategies to mitigate these barriers include the following: reducing racial inequities through improved diversity within reproductive medicine and through antiracism training, developing opportunities for trainees to engage in advocacy, strengthening reproductive endocrinology and infertility clinical exposure and educational curricula in training programs, inclusion of residents and fellows in clinical care, and improving the accessibility of fertility care through implementing approaches to optimize the management of infertility in challenging, resource-constrained settings.

Conclusion(s)

Infertility is one of the most prevalent reproductive health diseases, yet profound disparities and inequities in access to care exist today in the United States. Lower-income, minority, and immigrant communities are among those most marginalized. Improved access to care begins with broadened obstetrics and gynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility trainee education, which acknowledges the barriers these communities face and provides strategies to help overcome these obstacles to care.