Euploidy rates are not affected when embryos are cultured in a continuous (CCM) or sequential culture medium (SCM): a sibling oocyte study

Impact of culture media pre-equilibration methods on embryo development

This study investigates the influence of four culture media pre-equilibration methods on embryo development and clinical pregnancy outcomes. The methods are as follows: Method A involved covering media with fresh mineral oil in humid-type incubators for 24 h. Method B replicated Method A in dry-type incubators. Method C utilized pre-equilibrated (humidified) mineral oil to cover the media, also in humid-type incubators for 24 h. Method D followed the same process as Method C but in dry-type incubators. Subsequently, media from all groups were transferred to dry-type incubators for 72 h. Osmolality was measured at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. For G1 PLUS, no significant differences were observed among groups at 24, 48, and 72 h. However, at 96 h, Groups B and D exhibited significantly higher osmolality than Groups A and C (A vs B, p = 0.043; A vs D: p = 0.046; B vs C, p = 0.043; C vs D, p = 0.046). No significant variations were found between Groups A and C or B and D. Similar results were obtained for G2 PLUS. A retrospective analysis of embryo development and clinical outcomes using Methods A revealed significant improvements in good blastocysts and available embryos compared with Method B for all (p = 0.005 and 0.004) and IVF cycles (p = 0.025 and 0.017). Method A also enhanced blastocyst formation in ICSI cycles (p = 0.017). However, clinical pregnancy outcomes did not significantly differ between Methods A and B. Pre-equilibrating culture media overnight in humid-type incubators, even when covered with fresh mineral oil, significantly mitigates osmolality rise and improves embryo development potential during embryo culture in dry-type incubators.

Influence of delayed blastulation and expansion grade on clinical outcomes of high-quality blastocyst transfer: an analysis of 1751 frozen-thawed cycles

The aim of the study was to compare retrospectively the extent of blastulation timing (Day 5 or later) and expansion grade to predict the ability of blastocysts to give rise to a pregnancy. Blastocysts frozen on day 5 with a lower expansion grade (group D5) or day 6 with a higher expansion grade (group D6) were included. A single embryo was thawed and transferred on day 5 after ovulation or progesterone supplementation. Differences in patient baseline characteristics, endometrial preparation and pregnancy outcomes between groups were stratified by patient age and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels. Logistic regression was used to analyse the results. A total of 617 blastocysts in group D5 and 1134 blastocysts in group D6 were assessed. Stratified analyses showed higher biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates for patients aged less than 30 years old, and higher ongoing pregnancy rate for patients with AMH ≥ 1.1 ng/ml. For patients aged less than 30 years old, the biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in group D5 were higher than those in group D6.

Reproductive outcomes with delayed blastocyst development: the clinical value of day 7 euploid blastocysts in frozen embryo transfer cycles

Embryos of optimal development reach blastocyst stage 116 ± 2 h after insemination. Usable D7 blastocysts represent nearly 5% of embryos in IVF with acceptable pregnancy and live birth rates, however data are still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) of D7 blastocysts in single euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. An observational study was performed including 1527 FET cycles with blastocysts biopsied on D5 (N = 855), D6 (N = 636) and D7 (N = 36). Blastocysts were classified as good (AA/AB/BA), fair (BB) or poor (AC/BC/CC/CA/CB) (Gardner scoring). FETs were performed in natural cycles (NC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles. Patient's age differed significantly between D5, D6 and D7 blastocysts FET cycles (33.2 ± 5.6, 34.4 ± 5.3 and 35.9 ± 5.2, P < 0.001). OPRs were higher when D5 euploid blastocysts were transferred compared with D6 and D7 (56.0% vs. 45.3% and 11.1%, P < 0.001). Poor quality blastocysts were predominant in D7 blastocyst FET cycles (good quality: 35.4%, 27.2%, 5.6%; fair quality: 52.1%, 38.5%, 11.1%; poor quality: 12.5%, 34.3%, 83.3%, P < 0.001 for D5, D6 and D7 blastocysts; respectively). OPR was significantly reduced by D7 blastocyst FETs (OR = 0.23 [0.08;0.62], P = 0.004), patient's BMI (OR = 0.96 [0.94;0.98], P < 0.001), HRT cycles (OR = 0.70 [0.56;0.88], P = 0.002) and poor quality blastocysts (OR = 0.33 [0.24;0.45], P < 0.001). OPR is significantly reduced with D7 compared with D5/D6 euploid blastocysts in FET cycles. The older the patient, the more likely they are to have an FET cycle with blastocysts biopsied on D7, therefore culturing embryos until D7 can be a strategy to increase OPR outcomes in patients ≥38 years.

Embryo Culture Medium Has No Impact on Mosaicism Rates: a Sibling Oocyte Study

Human embryos cultured in vitro can contain two or more cytogenetically distinct cell lineages known as "chromosomal mosaicism". Since mosaicism is produced by mitotic errors after fertilization occurs, culture conditions might contribute to mosaicism origins. Many studies demonstrated that euploidy rates are not affected by culture media; however, whether oocytes cultured under continuous culture media (CCM) or sequential culture media (SCM) has a higher risk of mosaicism occurring remains unsolved. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether mosaicism rates differ when sibling oocytes are cultured in CCM or SCM. A single center observational study was performed including 6072 sibling oocytes. Mature oocytes (MII) were inseminated and cultured in CCM (n = 3,194) or SCM (n = 2,359) until blastocyst stage for trophectoderm (TE) biopsy on day (D) 5, D6, or D7 for preimplantation genetic testing analysis with a semi-automated next-generation sequencing. Mosaicism was classified as low (30-50%) or high (50-80%) based on the percentage of abnormal cells constitution detected in TE samples. As a result, 426 women with a mean age of 34.7 ± 6.4 years were included in the study. Fertilization rates were comparable between CCM and SCM (74.0% vs 72.0%, p = 0.091). Although total blastulation rate and usable blastocyst rate (biopsied blastocysts) were significantly higher in CCM than SCM (75.3 % vs. 70.3%, p < 0.001 and 58.0% vs. 54.5%, p = 0.026), euploidy rates did not differ significantly (45.2% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.810, respectively). Mosaicism rate was not significantly different for blastocysts cultured in CCM or SCM (4.7% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.650), neither the proportion of low or high mosaic rates (3.7% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.353 and 1.0% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.355, respectively). Hence, it was concluded that CCM or SCM does not have an impact on mosaicism rate of embryos cultured until the blastocyst stage.

Can Culture Media Impact Preimplantation Embryo Aneuploidy?

With continued improvements in blastocyst culture, cell sampling approaches, and genetic analysis platforms, the resulting improvements in embryo development and the resolution and accuracy of chromosome analysis have provided valuable insights into the preimplantation embryo. This includes the impact of in vitro culture conditions on chromosomal dynamics. Specifically, through analysis of embryo aneuploidy and mosaicism, a growing number of reports indicate that rates of chromosomal abnormalities can vary between IVF centers. Because differences in mosaicism reflect mitotic errors, this endpoint analysis suggests that IVF laboratory-controlled variables during embryo development may be influencing chromosome separation and segregation. A growing body of literature suggests that culture media may be one variable influencing preimplantation embryo aneuploidy and mosaicism. However, these data are far from definitive in demonstrating cause-and-effect. Whether reported differences may be due to media formulation, use of sequential media or single-step media, or uninterrupted culture approaches is unknown. Importantly, variables directly impacting media performance and embryo development, including pH, temperature, osmolality, and oxygen concentration, must also be considered and make it difficult to isolate the impact of culture media as the sole factor responsible. These IVF laboratory variables will be reviewed and literature suggesting a possible link to mitotic aneuploidy/mosaicism will be discussed.