1
|
Nakatani Y, Nuñez-Garcia M, Cheniti G, Sridi-Cheniti S, Bustin A, Jia S, Goujeau C, André C, Nakashima T, Krisai P, Takagi T, Kamakura T, Derval N, Duchateau J, Pambrun T, Chauvel R, Sacher F, Hocini M, Haïssaguerre M, Sermesant M, Jais P, Cochet H. Preoperative Personalization of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Strategy to Prevent Esophageal Injury: Impact of Changes in Esophageal Position. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:908-916. [PMID: 35274776 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Due to changes in esophageal position, preoperative assessment of the esophageal location may not mitigate the risk of esophageal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess esophageal motion and its impact on AF ablation strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS Ninety-seven AF patients underwent 2 computed tomography (CT) scans. The area at risk of esophageal injury (AAR) was defined as the left atrial surface ≤3 mm from the esophagus. On CT1, ablation lines were drawn blinded to the esophageal location to create 3 ablation sets: individual pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA), and WACA with linear ablation (WACA+L). Thereafter, ablation lines for WACA and WACA+L were personalized to avoid the AAR. Rigid registration was performed to align CT1 onto CT2, and the relationship between ablation lines and the AAR on CT2 was analyzed. The esophagus moved by 3.6 [2.7 to 5.5] mm. The AAR on CT2 was 8.6 ± 3.3 cm2 , with 77% overlapping that on CT1. High body mass index was associated with the AAR mismatch (standardized β 0.382, P <0.001). Without personalization, AARs on ablation lines for individual PVI, WACA, and WACA+L were 0 [0-0.4], 0.8 [0.5-1.2], 1.7 [1.2-2.0] cm2 . Despite the esophageal position change, the personalization of ablation lines for WACA and WACA+L reduced the AAR on lines to 0 [0-0.5] and 0.7 [0.3-1.0] cm2 (P <0.001 for both). CONCLUSION The personalization of ablation lines based on a preoperative CT reduced ablation to the AAR despite changes in esophageal position. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Nakatani
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Marta Nuñez-Garcia
- IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Ghassen Cheniti
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Soumaya Sridi-Cheniti
- Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Aurélien Bustin
- IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Shuman Jia
- INRIA Epione research team, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Cyril Goujeau
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Clementine André
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Takashi Nakashima
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Philipp Krisai
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Takamitsu Takagi
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Tsukasa Kamakura
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Nicolas Derval
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.,IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Josselin Duchateau
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.,IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Thomas Pambrun
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.,IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Remi Chauvel
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.,IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Frederic Sacher
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.,IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mélèze Hocini
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.,IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Michel Haïssaguerre
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.,IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Maxime Sermesant
- IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,INRIA Epione research team, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Pierre Jais
- Department of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.,IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Hubert Cochet
- IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blanck O, Ipsen S, Chan MK, Bauer R, Kerl M, Hunold P, Jacobi V, Bruder R, Schweikard A, Rades D, Vogl TJ, Kleine P, Bode F, Dunst J. Treatment Planning Considerations for Robotic Guided Cardiac Radiosurgery for Atrial Fibrillation. Cureus 2016; 8:e705. [PMID: 27588226 PMCID: PMC4999353 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Robotic guided stereotactic radiosurgery has recently been investigated for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Before moving into human treatments, multiple implications for treatment planning given a potential target tracking approach have to be considered. Materials & Methods Theoretical AF radiosurgery treatment plans for twenty-four patients were generated for baseline comparison. Eighteen patients were investigated under ideal tracking conditions, twelve patients under regional dose rate (RDR = applied dose over a certain time window) optimized conditions (beam delivery sequence sorting according to regional beam targeting), four patients under ultrasound tracking conditions (beam block of the ultrasound probe) and four patients with temporary single fiducial tracking conditions (differential surrogate-to-target respiratory and cardiac motion). Results With currently known guidelines on dose limitations of critical structures, treatment planning for AF radiosurgery with 25 Gy under ideal tracking conditions with a 3 mm safety margin may only be feasible in less than 40% of the patients due to the unfavorable esophagus and bronchial tree location relative to the left atrial antrum (target area). Beam delivery sequence sorting showed a large increase in RDR coverage (% of voxels having a larger dose rate for a given time window) of 10.8-92.4% (median, 38.0%) for a 40-50 min time window, which may be significant for non-malignant targets. For ultrasound tracking, blocking beams through the ultrasound probe was found to have no visible impact on plan quality given previous optimal ultrasound window estimation for the planning CT. For fiducial tracking in the right atrial septum, the differential motion may reduce target coverage by up to -24.9% which could be reduced to a median of -0.8% (maximum, -12.0%) by using 4D dose optimization. The cardiac motion was also found to have an impact on the dose distribution, at the anterior left atrial wall; however, the results need to be verified. Conclusion Robotic AF radiosurgery with 25 Gy may be feasible in a subgroup of patients under ideal tracking conditions. Ultrasound tracking was found to have the lowest impact on treatment planning and given its real-time imaging capability should be considered for AF robotic radiosurgery. Nevertheless, advanced treatment planning using RDR or 4D respiratory and cardiac dose optimization may be still advised despite using ideal tracking methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Blanck
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany ; Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt and Güstrow, Germany
| | - Svenja Ipsen
- Robotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Lübeck
| | - Mark K Chan
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany ; Department for Radiation Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ralf Bauer
- Institute for Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Germany ; Department for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Kerl
- Institute for Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Germany ; Radiology, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Peter Hunold
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Volkmar Jacobi
- Institute for Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ralf Bruder
- Institute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Lubeck
| | - Achim Schweikard
- Institute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Luebeck, Institute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Lubeck
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Thomas J Vogl
- Institute for Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Peter Kleine
- Department for Thoracic, Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University Clinic Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Frank Bode
- Cardiology Department, Sana Clinic Oldenburg in Holstein
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany ; Department for Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wielandts JY, De Buck S, Michielsen K, Louw R, Garweg C, Nuyts J, Ector J, Maes F, Heidbuchel H. Multi-phase rotational angiography of the left ventricle to assist ablations: feasibility and accuracy of novel imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 17:162-8. [PMID: 26003152 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Interventional left ventricular (LV) procedures integrating static 3D anatomy visualization are subject to mismatch with dynamic catheter movements due to prominent LV motion. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a recently developed acquisition and post-processing protocol for low radiation dose LV multi-phase rotational angiography (4DRA) in patients. METHODS AND RESULTS 4DRA image acquisition of the LV was performed as investigational acquisition in patients undergoing left-sided ablation (11 men; BMI = 24.7 ± 2.5 kg/m²). Iodine contrast was injected in the LA, while pacing from the RA at a cycle length of 700 ms. 4DRA acquisition and reconstruction were possible in all 11 studies. Reconstructed images were post-processed using streak artefact reduction algorithms and an interphase registration-based filtering method, increasing contrast-to-noise ratio by a factor 8.2 ± 2.1. This enabled semi-automatic segmentation, yielding LV models of five equidistant phases per cardiac cycle. For evaluation, off-line 4DRA fluoroscopy registration was performed, and the 4DRA LV contours of the different phases were compared with the contours of five corresponding phases of biplane LV angiography, acquired in identical circumstances. Of the distances between these contours, 95% were <4 mm in both incidences. Effective radiation dose for 4DRA, calculated by patient-specific Monte-Carlo simulation, was 5.1 ± 1.1 mSv. CONCLUSION Creation of 4DRA LV models in man is feasible at near-physiological heart rate and with clinically acceptable radiation dose. They showed high accuracy with respect to LV angiography in RAO and LAO. The presented technology not only opens perspectives for full cardiac cycle dynamic anatomical guidance during interventional procedures, but also for 3DRA without need for very rapid pacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Yves Wielandts
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Medical Imaging Research Centre, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stijn De Buck
- Medical Imaging Research Centre, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, Medical Image Computing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Michielsen
- Medical Imaging Research Centre, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ruan Louw
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Johan Nuyts
- Medical Imaging Research Centre, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Ector
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frederik Maes
- Medical Imaging Research Centre, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, Medical Image Computing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium iMinds-Future Health Department, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hein Heidbuchel
- Hasselt University and Heart Center Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|