Predictors of hemodynamic compromise with propofol during defibrillator implantation: a single center experience

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting intraoperative hypotension in cardiac valve replacement

Background: Cardiac valve replacement risks include intraoperative hypotension, endangering organ perfusion. Our nomogram predicted hypotension risk in valve surgery, guiding early intervention. Methods: Analyzing 561 patients from July to November 2022, we developed a nomogram to predict hypotension in valve replacement patients, validated using data from December 2022 to January 2023 on 241 patients, with robust statistical confirmation. Results: Our study identified age, hypertension, left ventricular ejection fraction and serum creatinine as hypotension predictors. The resulting nomogram, validated with high concordance index and area under the curve scores, provided a clinically useful tool for managing intraoperative risk. Conclusion: For valve replacement patients, factors like age, hypertension, low left ventricular ejection fraction and high serum creatinine predicted hypotension risk. Our nomogram enabled clinicians to quantify this risk and proactively manage it.

Periprocedural hypotension after conscious sedation versus local anesthesia during defibrillator implantation for left ventricular dysfunction: analysis of a national inpatient database in Japan

The association between periprocedural hypotension and conscious sedation (CS) during defibrillator implantation remains to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to compare the occurrence of periprocedural hypotension after CS or local anesthesia (LA) during defibrillator implantation in a retrospective cohort study using a national inpatient database. Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we retrospectively collected data for adult inpatients who underwent implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy device from July 2010 to March 2016. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the occurrence of periprocedural hypotension between the CS and LA groups with adjustment for patient background characteristics and hospital factors. Additional analysis was performed after dividing the CS group into each specific anesthetic use. We identified 4842 patients, comprising 1533 patients with CS and 3309 with LA. The CS group had a significantly higher proportion of periprocedural hypotension than the LA group (13.4% versus 9.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.04; p = 0.001). Body mass index < 18.5 kg/m², New York Heart Association Class IV, and use of cardiac resynchronization therapy device were independently associated with occurrence of periprocedural hypotension. Additionally, ketamine and dexmedetomidine were significantly associated with higher incidence of hypotension than the LA group (adjusted odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-5.26; p = 0.006; adjusted odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.12; p = 0.019, respectively). Periprocedural hypotension was significantly more likely to occur in the CS group than the LA group, and was associated with CS.

Significant and safe reduction of propofol sedation dose for geriatric population undergoing pacemaker implantation: randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

A previous multidisciplinary pilot study based on computer simulations for the geriatric population showed that a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/h of propofol could sedate patients older than 65 for pacemaker implantation. The present study validates that the pacemaker implantation can be done in the elderly using 0.5-1 mg/kg/h of propofol with hemodynamic stability.

METHODS

66 patients from 65 to 88 years old scheduled for pacemaker implantation were randomly assigned one of three doses of propofol. The first group received 2 mg/kg/h of propofol (P2) that is within normal range of the sedation dose. The second group received 1 mg/kg/h (P1) dose and the third group received the dose of 0.5 mg/kg/h (P0.5) according to the simulation-predicted dose for geriatric populations.

RESULTS

All patients kept MAP between 76 and 85 mmHg, with no hypotension episodes in any of the groups; therefore, they were all hemodynamically stable during the procedure. BIS was between 80 and 65 during the pacemaker implantation for the three groups, BIS of group P2 was significantly lower than the other groups. BIS in groups P1 and P0.5 was within the appropriated range for moderate sedation. Brice was positive for auditory recalls only when there was arousing noise in the operating room.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate sedation, adequate for pacemaker implantation, can be achieved infusing 0.5-1 mg/kg/h of propofol in elderly patients when the patient has proper analgesia management at the device implantation site. The second important condition is to avoid unnecessary and alerting auditory and mechanical stimuli in the operating room, so that the patient will remain calm.

Feasibility and safety of using local anaesthesia with conscious sedation during complex cardiac implantable electronic device procedures

We assessed the feasibility and safety of using local anaesthesia with conscious sedation as an alternative to general anaesthesia during complex and noncomplex cardiac implantable device procedures. We enrolled 279 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac device implantation/replacement at our tertiary/quaternary cardiac specialist hospital during a 17-month study period. Continuous combined intravenous conscious sedation with propofol and midazolam plus fentanyl and local anaesthesia were used for all procedures. Among the patients, 113, 59, 43, and 64 patients underwent pacemaker implantation, implantable cardiac defibrillator implantation, cardiac resynchronisation therapy device implantation, and generator exchange, respectively. The procedural success rate was 100%, with no apnoea or hypoxia episodes requiring therapeutic intervention. None of the patients required conversion to general anaesthesia. The mean surgical duration was longer for complex vs. noncomplex procedures (p = 0.003). The minimum mean arterial pressure during complex procedures was slightly lower than that during noncomplex procedures (p = 0.03). The perioperative (<24 h) mortality rate was 0%, and neither complexity group required tracheal intubation. Only two patients (0.7%) required unplanned intensive care unit admission for further surveillance. Our findings suggest that local anaesthesia with conscious sedation is a safe and feasible option for cardiac device implantation procedures, including complex procedures.

Anaesthesiological support in a cardiac electrophysiology laboratory: a single-centre prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Implantation of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has greatly increased during the last decade and anaesthetic management of these patients remains an open question.

OBJECTIVE

This study describes anaesthetic management and risk factors associated with complications occurring during these procedures.

DESIGN

A single-centre prospective observational study.

SETTING

Grenoble University Hospital, France, from May 2010 to October 2010.

PATIENTS

All patients admitted to the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory were included.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical data, anaesthetic and medical characteristics as well as complications (respiratory or cardiovascular) and treatment were recorded by the anaesthetic nurse at the end of each procedure.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were included, 229 (85%) with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status of 3 or 4, 103 (38%) with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class of 3 or 4 and 136 (51%) with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%. Two hundred and forty-seven (92%) of the patients underwent deep sedation and 12 (8%) general anaesthesia. Seventy-eight (29%) patients had at least one complication, among whom 21 (27%) had at least one considered as severe. Fifty (19%) of the patients had a respiratory complication and 46 (17%) a cardiovascular complication; the latter was more frequently severe (41 vs. 12%; P=0.001). Lead extraction [odds ratio (OR) 13.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5 to 53.3; P<0.001], NYHA status of 4 (OR 11.8, 95% CI 1.8 to 74.8; P<0.001), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) testing by T-wave shock (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.53 to 10.2; P=0.005) and length of procedure (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.004 to 1.031; P=0.013) were identified as independent risk factors for cardiovascular complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients requiring cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation were fragile with a high complication rate and a high rate of severe complications even with anaesthesiological support. These complications, as well as the need for deep sedation or general anaesthesia, clearly justify the involvement of a qualified anaesthesiologist.