Effect of pulmonary vein isolation on atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in patients with high dispersion of atrial refractoriness

The immediate trends in atrial electrical remodeling for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation across different modes of catheter ablation

Background

Catheter ablation has emerged as a major strategy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Atrial electrical remodeling (AER) plays a critical role in the recurrence of PAF after ablation.

Hypothesis

To characterize the immediate trends of AER during ablations in patients with PAF, and assess the relationship between immediate trends and recurrence.

Methods

We performed this prospective observational study of 135 patients to investigate AER following three ablation modes: radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA) and 3D mapping‐guided cryoablation (3D‐CA). The atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and atrial conduction time (ACT) were measured via electrophysiology before and immediately after ablation, and P‐wave indices were measured via electrocardiography before and within 24 h after ablation. Follow‐up visits were conducted for at least 1 year or until relapse.

Results

Different approaches of ablation caused a fairly significant increase in the shortest P‐wave duration and AERP in both the proximal coronary sinus (PCS) and distal coronary sinus (DCS) but caused a shortened P‐wave dispersion. No different effect was found at the AERP among the three modes. Compared to patients who received CA, among patients who received RFA, a significant reduction in total ACT and right ACT was seen. Statistically, there was a weakly positive association between changes in total ACT and early recurrence.

Conclusions

Injury during ablation for PAF was associated with an increase in the AERP but not in the ACT. Total ACT and right ACT were shorter after RFA than after CA. The increase in total ACT were slightly predictive of early recurrence.

Exploring Refractoriness as an Adjunctive Electrical Biomarker for Staging of Atrial Fibrillation

Patients diagnosed with the same subtype of atrial fibrillation according to our current classification system may differ in symptom severity, severity of the arrhythmogenic substrate, and response to antiarrhythmic therapy. Hence, there is a need for an electrical biomarker as an indicator of the arrhythmogenic substrate underlying atrial fibrillation enabling patient‐tailored therapy. The aim of this review is to investigate whether atrial refractoriness, a well‐known electrophysiological parameter that is affected by electrical remodeling, can be used as an electrical biomarker of the arrhythmogenic substrate underlying atrial fibrillation. We discuss methodologies of atrial effective refractory period assessment, identify which changes in refractoriness‐related parameters reflect different degrees of electrical remodeling, and explore whether these parameters can be used to predict clinical outcomes.

Effect of pulmonary vein isolation on atrial fibrillation recurrence after accessory pathway ablation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Background

Although successful ablation of the accessory pathway (AP) eliminates atrial fibrillation (AF) in some of patients with Wolff‐Parkinson‐White (WPW) syndrome and paroxysmal AF, in other patients it can recur.

Hypothesis

Whether adding pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) after successful AP ablation effectively prevents AF recurrence in patients with WPW syndrome is unknown.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 160 patients (102 men, 58 women; mean age, 46 ± 14 years) with WPW syndrome and paroxysmal AF who underwent AP ablation, namely 103 (64.4%) undergoing only AP ablation (AP group) and 57 (35.6%) undergoing AP ablation plus PVI (AP + PVI group). Advanced interatrial block (IAB) was defined as a P‐wave duration of >120 ms and biphasic (±) morphology in the inferior leads, using 12‐lead electrocardiography (ECG).

Results

During the mean follow‐up period of 30.9 ± 9.2 months (range, 3‐36 months), 22 patients (13.8%) developed AF recurrence. The recurrence rate did not differ in patients in the AP + PVI group and AP group (15.5% vs 10.5%, respectively; P = .373). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that PVI was not associated with the risk of AF recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.26‐1.68; P = .380). In WPW patients with advanced IAB, the recurrence rate was lower in patients in the AP + PVI group vs the AP group (90% vs 33.3%, respectively; P = .032).

Conclusions

PVI after successful AP ablation significantly reduced the AF recurrence rate in WPW patients with advanced IAB. Screening of a resting 12‐lead ECG immediately after AP ablation helps identify patients in whom PVI is beneficial.

Early repolarization in the inferior leads after accessory pathway ablation is highly correlated with atrial fibrillation in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

BACKGROUND

Both atrial fibrillation (AF) and early repolarization (ER) are highly prevalent in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 123 WPW patients with manifest accessory pathway (mAP) and 105 patients with concealed accessory pathways (cAP) who underwent successful ablation of the APs. AF history prior to the ablation was investigated. The presence of ER was evaluated from the 12-lead electrocardiograms performed both before and immediately after the ablation. Patients were further followed up for AF occurrence after the AP ablation.

RESULTS

Compared with cAP patients, WPW patients presented with higher incidence of previous AF, as well as ER after the AP ablation. Compared with those without AF history, WPW patients with comorbid AF were more prone to presenting ER, especially in the inferior leads, after the mAP ablation. Regression analysis suggested that the post-ablation ER in the inferior leads was strongly associated with AF in WPW patients [OR = 5.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.29-14.96], even after adjusting for age and left atrial diameter (OR = 5.14; 95% CI: 1.80-14.74). Moreover, post-ablation inferior-lead ER was predictive of AF recurrence after mAP ablation during the follow-up of 22.6 ± 11.1 months. In comparison, ER was correlated with neither AF history nor AF recurrence in patients undergoing cAP ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

ER in the inferior leads after the mAP ablation is highly correlated with AF history and recurrence in WPW patients.