Lesion durability after antral pulmonary vein isolation using a radiofrequency hot balloon catheter

HotBalloon Pulmonary Vein Isolation Registry Study - Real-World Efficacy and Safety of HotBalloon Ablation

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency hotballoon (RHB) is an ablation device used for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. The efficacy and safety of RHB-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in real-world practice are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A multicenter, prospective registry study (UMIN000029567) enrolled AF patients who underwent RHB-PVI. The primary endpoint was the AF recurrence-free survival rate at 12 months after PVI. Of the 679 patients enrolled, 613 (90.3%; paroxysmal AF, n=370; persistent AF, n=136; long-standing AF, n=107) underwent initial RHB-PVI. Acute isolation using only the RHB was successful for 55.6% of patients and 83.5% of pulmonary veins (PVs). The acute isolation rate was higher for patients with paroxysmal AF and more experienced centers. Antiarrhythmic drugs were prescribed after 3 months for 47.5% of patients. The AF recurrence-free survival rate at 12 months was 83.7%. Procedure-related complications including atrio-esophageal fistula (n=1) and phrenic nerve injury (persistent; n=4, permanent; n=2) were observed in 19 (3.1%) patients. Five (1.7%) of the 302 patients who underwent pre-procedural and post-procedural multidetector computed tomography had severe PV stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The size-adjustable RHB has been used for the treatment of various AF types. The arrhythmia recurrence-free rate at 12 months, with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs in approximately half of the patients, was acceptable, but the acute isolation rate using the RHB requires further improvement.

Effects of Hot Balloon vs. Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

Background: Balloon-based catheter ablations, including hot balloon ablation (HBA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA), have rapidly emerged as alternative modalities to conventional catheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation owing to their impressive procedural advantages and better clinical outcomes and safety. However, the differences in characteristics, effectiveness, safety, and efficacy between HBA and CBA remain undetermined. This study compares the characteristic and prognosis differences between HBA and CBA.

Methods: Electronic search was conducted in six databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrial.gov, and medRxiv) with specific search strategies. Eligible studies were selected based on specific criteria; all records were identified up to June 1, 2021. The mean difference, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed using predefined criteria.

Results: Seven studies were included in the final meta-analysis. Compared with CBA, more patients in the HBA group had residual conduction and required a higher incidence of touch-up ablation (TUA) [OR (95% CI) = 2.76 (2.02–3.77), P = 0.000]. The most frequent sites of TUA were the left superior pulmonary veins (PVs) in the HBA group vs. the right inferior PVs in the CBA group. During HBA surgery, the left and right superior PVs were more likely to have a higher fluid injection volume. Furthermore, the procedure time was longer in the HBA group than in the CBA group [weighted mean difference (95% CI) = 14.24 (4.39–24.09), P = 0.005]. Patients in the CBA group could have an increased risk of AF occurrence, and accepted more antiarrhythmic drug therapy; however, the result was insignificant.

Conclusions: HBA and CBA are practical ablation approaches for AF treatment. Patients who received HBA had a higher incidence of TUA and longer procedure time. Clinical outcomes during the mid-term follow-up between HBA and CBA were comparable.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=259487, identifier: CRD42021259487.

Utility of hot-balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation under balloon surface temperature monitoring: First clinical experience

INTRODUCTION

A new hot balloon system that registers balloon surface temperature (BST) during energy delivery is now available for clinical use in Japan. This study sought to investigate the utility of BST measurement for achievement of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by a single-shot energy delivery strategy during hot balloon ablation (HBA).

METHODS

We applied and tested the system in 30 consecutive patients undergoing HBA for paroxysmal or early-persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We also performed real-time PV potential monitoring using a circular catheter.

RESULTS

Acute PVI was achieved with single hot balloon shots in 88% (106/120) of the PVs. Real-time BSTs and PV potentials were recorded in all cases. Mean BST at documentation of PVI was 49.4°C, and acute reconnections were observed in most cases (86%, 12/14) in which the single-shot technique was ineffective. Time-to-isolation (TTI) (23.1 ± 8.7 s vs. 36.3 ± 9.3 s, p < .01) and median BST (59.9 ± 2.6°C vs. 55.7 ± 1.9°C, p < .01) differed significantly between cases in which PVI was achieved (vs. those in which PVI was not achieved). Multivariable analysis revealed strong association between both TTI and median BST and acute PVI. The best median BST cutoff value for achieving PVI with a single shot was >58.7°C (sensitivity 67.0%, specificity 100%).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that real-time BST monitoring during energy applications is useful for predicting achievement of acute PVI by a single shot during HBA.