Association of advanced age with procedural complications and in-hospital outcomes from left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the National Inpatient Sample of 36,065 procedures

Left atrial appendage occlusion in vulnerable oldest-old patients - Effectiveness and safety in a large single-center registry

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Complex periprocedural approaches contrast with the need of oldest-old patients to keep medical procedures simple and short. This study investigates the effectiveness and safety of a simplified non-complex LAAO procedure.

METHODS

All patients who received an LAAO procedure at our center since 2014 with available follow-up data were retrospectively assessed concerning effectiveness in preventing all-cause death, stroke, or systemic embolism (i.e., effectiveness outcome). Safety was primarily evaluated by major bleeding (i.e., ≥ BARC type 3). Oldest-old patients (i.e., ≥ 80 years of age) were compared with younger patients.

RESULTS

43.0 % of 230 patients were oldest-olds. High technical success rate was achieved in both groups (oldest-olds 96.0 vs. younger patients 98.5 %; p = 0.41). Major complications occurred in 8.1 vs. 3.8 % of patients (p = 0.17). Effectiveness outcome was achieved in 70.7 vs. 82.4 % of patients (p = 0.035; mean follow-up 428 (100; 1007) and 382 (179; 1192) days). Oldest-old patients trended to an excess mortality (22.2 vs. 13.0 %; p = 0.064) and more ischemic strokes (10.1 vs. 3.8 %; p = 0.056). This was not associated with peri-device leaks ≥ 5 mm or device-related thromboses (2.0 vs. 1.5 %; p = 1.00). Major bleeding occurred in 9.1 vs. 7.6 % of patients over total follow-up (p = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-complex LAAO procedure achieved a state-of-the-art technical success rate and a low complication rate in vulnerable oldest-old patients. Care should be taken to identify patients with sufficient life expectancy to benefit from LAAO. The trend towards more ischemic strokes during follow-up is an important signal focusing on cardioembolic stroke etiologies besides LAA thrombi in these patients.

Current Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Prevention and Management: Taming the Commonest Cardiac Arrhythmia

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the commonest cardiac arrhythmia, constituting a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with an age-dependent incidence and prevalence ranging from 1-2% in the general population to ~10% in persons aged >60 years. The global prevalence of AF is rapidly increasing, mostly due to the aging population. If not properly and timely managed, this arrhythmia adversely affects left ventricular function, increases the risk of stroke five-fold, impairs quality of life, and shortens longevity. There is a genetic, hence non-modifiable, predisposition to the arrhythmia, while several life-style and cardiometabolic inciting factors, such as hypertension, heart failure, coronary disease, metabolic syndrome, alcohol use, and thyroid disorders, can be addressed, attesting to the importance of a holistic approach to its management. Thromboembolism is a serious consequence of AF, which could lead to a disabling stroke or have a lethal outcome. The risk of a thromboembolic complication can be estimated as based on a scoring system that takes into consideration the patient's age, previous thromboembolic events, and clinical comorbidities. In addition, rapid AF could affect cardiac performance, leading to an elusive type of arrhythmia- induced cardiomyopathy and heart failure with grave consequences if undetected and untreated. Furthermore, AF may cause silent brain infarcts and/or its hemodynamic perturbations can account for a type of dementia that needs to be taken into account, emphasizing the need for AF screening and prevention strategies. All these issues are herein detailed, the causes of the arrhythmia are tabulated, and an algorithm illustrates our current approach to its management.

Frailty and associated outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: findings from the NCDR LAAO registry

BACKGROUND

Frailty is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and may have clinical implications in an advanced age population with atrial fibrillation undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). We sought to develop a novel frailty scale to predict worse outcomes in patients undergoing LAAO.

METHODS

Patients in the NCDR LAAO Registry between 2016 and 2021 receiving percutaneous LAAO devices were categorized as non-frail (0 points), pre-frail (1-3 points), or frail (4-5 points) based on a 5-point scale representing multiple domains of frailty: hemoglobin <13.0 g/dL in male, <12.0 g/dL in female; creatinine ≥1.2 mg/dL; albumin <3.5 g/dL; body mass index <20 kg/m2; and increased risk of falls.

RESULTS

Of 57,728 patients, 44,360 (76.8%) were pre-frail and 7693 (13.3%) were frail. Compared to non-frail, pre-frail and frail patients were older, had a higher burden of co-morbidities, and more disability based on the Modified Rankin Scale. Compared to non-frail patients after adjustment, frail patients were at higher risk of in-hospital major complication (OR 1.29, 95% 1.02-1.62, p = 0.01), any complication (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.09-1.52, p = 0.0005), and death (OR 5.79, 95% CI 1.75-19.17, p = 0.001), while no difference was observed in pre-frail patients. At 45-day follow-up, there was no difference in the risk of complications in frail patients as compared to non-frail, although mortality was significantly higher (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.97-4.85, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A simple and practical frailty scale accurately predicts adverse events in patients undergoing LAAO. The 13% of patients considered frail were at significantly higher risk of in-hospital adverse events and 45-day mortality.

In-hospital safety outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion in octogenarians and nonagenarians

AIMS

Data on safety outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in elderly patients are limited. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of LAAO between octogenarians (age 80-89) and nonagenarians (age ≥90) vs. younger patients (age ≤79).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients hospitalized for LAAO from 2016 to 2020 and to compare in-hospital safety outcomes in octogenarians and nonagenarians vs. younger patients. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital all-cause mortality or stroke. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications, length of stay (LOS), and total costs. Outcomes were determined using logistic regression models. Among 84 140 patients hospitalized for LAAO, 32.9% were octogenarians, 2.8% were nonagenarians, and 64.3% were ≤79 years of age. Over the study period, the volume of LAAO increased in all age groups (all Ptrend < 0.01). After adjustment for clinical and demographic factors, octogenarians and nonagenarians had similar odds of in-hospital all-cause mortality or stroke [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-2.13 for octogenarians; aOR 1.69, 95% CI 0.67-3.92 for nonagenarians], cardiac tamponade, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, and blood transfusion, in addition to similar LOS and total costs compared with younger patients (all P > 0.05). However, octogenarians and nonagenarians had higher odds of vascular complications compared with younger patients (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.08-1.99 for octogenarians; aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.18-2.97 for nonagenarians).

CONCLUSION

Octogenarians and nonagenarians undergoing LAAO have a similar safety profile compared with clinically similar younger patients except for higher odds of vascular complications.

Left atrial appendage closure in very elderly patients in the French National Registry

OBJECTIVE

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is recommended to decrease the stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications to anticoagulation. However, age-stratified data are scarce. The aim of this study was to provide information on the safety and efficacy of LAAC, with emphasis on the oldest patients.

METHODS

A nationwide, prospective, multicentre, observational registry was established by 53 French cardiology centres in 2018-2021. The composite primary endpoint included ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, and unexplained or cardiovascular death. Separate analyses were done in the groups <80 years and ≥80 years.

RESULTS

Among the 1053 patients included, median age was 79.7 (73.6-84.3) years; 512 patients (48.6%) were aged ≥80 years. Procedure-related serious adverse events were non-significantly more common in octogenarians (7.0% vs 4.4% in patients aged <80 years, respectively; p=0.07). Despite a higher mean CHA2DS2-VASc score in octogenarians, the rate of thromboembolic events during the study was similar in both groups (3.0 vs 3.1/100 patient-years; p=0.85). By contrast, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in octogenarians (15.3 vs 10.1/100 patient-years, p<0.015), due to a higher rate of non-cardiovascular deaths (8.2 vs 4.9/100 patient-years, p=0.034). The rate of the primary endpoint was 8.1/100 patient-years overall with no statistically significant difference between age groups (9.4 and 7.0/100 patient-years; p=0.19).

CONCLUSION

Despite a higher mean CHA2DS2-VASc score in octogenarians, the rate of thromboembolic events after LAAC in this age group was similar to that in patients aged <80 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03434015).

Age-Based Trends in the Outcomes of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Insights from a Real-World Database

The age-based trends in-hospital outcomes in patients with percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are unknown. Using the National Readmission Database from 2016 to 2019, patients who underwent LAAO were divided into 2 age groups: 60 to 79 and ≥80 years. The primary objective was to evaluate the age-based trends in the outcomes related to LAAO. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the mean cost and total cumulative cost of readmissions in both age groups in 2019. We identified 58,818 patients who underwent LAAO, of whom 36,964 (63%) were aged 60 to 79 years, and 21,854 (37%) were ≥80 years. The hospital mortality, pericardial complications, acute kidney injury, and in-hospital cardiac arrest did not change over time. The risk-adjusted postoperative stroke and bleeding requiring blood transfusion decreased in patients aged ≥80 years (p trend 0.03 for both outcomes). The length of stay decreased, and early discharge rates increased over time in both the unadjusted and risk-adjusted models in both age groups. The risk-adjusted 90-day readmission rates also decreased in patients aged ≥80 years. The inflation-adjusted cost did not change over time on the unadjusted and adjusted analyses. The total cumulative all-cause 90-readmission cost for both groups in 2019 was $31.7 million. Most outcomes after LAAO either improved or did not change from 2016 to 2019. Hospital mortality has remained <0.5% consistently since 2016. The risk-adjusted postoperative stroke, bleeding, and 90-day readmission rates improved in elderly vulnerable patients aged ≥80 years. The inflation-adjusted cost did not improve despite the decreasing length of stay and improving early discharge rates.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Therapy: Evolution and Growing Evidence

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and if untreated, significantly increases both the risk of intracardiac thrombus formation and ischemic stroke. In patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF), the left atrial appendage (LAA) has been estimated to be the source of thrombus development in 91% to 99% of cases. Consequently, oral anticoagulation (OAC) to provide stroke prevention has become the standard of care for most AF patients; however, OACs are associated with a risk of bleeding and their efficacy depends on optimal patient compliance. In terms of alternative approaches to preventing embolic events, surgical LAA excision was attempted as early as in the late 1940s in patients with valvular AF; LAA excision remains a recommendation in surgical guidelines for NVAF patients who need open-heart coronary bypass or valvular replacement/repair surgeries. However, due to its invasive nature surgical LAA intervention has limited clinical application in present cardiology practice. Percutaneous LAA occlusion (LAAO) is increasingly being performed as an alternative to OAC for stroke prevention; this is particularly the case in patients at increased bleeding risk. Substantial progress has been made in percutaneous LAAO therapy since its inception some twenty years ago. Herein we systematically review both the critical literature that led to the development of LAAO, and the increasing clinical evidence supporting the application of this treatment strategy in NVAF. To this end we focus on recently published critical evaluations of United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and Conformité Européenne (Commercial Sale of Licensed Product in the EU) (CE-Mark) approved LAAO devices, summarize the current status of LAAO therapy, and discuss the future perspectives regarding the knowledge and technology gaps in this area by recognizing the potential contributions of many ongoing but likely transformative clinical trials.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly >75 Years Old: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Background: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an established therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, there is a limited understanding of LAAC in elderly patients (≥75 years old). We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the procedural complications and long-term outcomes after LAAC in the elderly versus the non-elderly. Methods: We screened PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Procedural endpoints of interest included successful implantation LAAC rates, in-hospital mortality, major bleeding events, pericardial effusion/tamponade, stroke, and vascular access complications related to LAAC. Long-term outcomes included all-cause mortality, major bleeding events, and stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) during follow-up. Results: Finally, 12 studies were included in the analysis; these included a total of 25,094 people in the elderly group and 36,035 people in the non-elderly group. The successful implantation LAAC rates did not differ between the groups, while the elderly patients experienced more periprocedural mortality (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.79−3.83, p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), pericardial effusion/tamponade (OR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.06−1.82, p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), major bleeding events (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.17−1.48, p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), and vascular access complications (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.16−1.55, p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) than the non-elderly patients. The long-term stroke/TIA rates did not differ between the elderly and the non-elderly at least one year after follow-up. Conclusions: Even though successful implantation LAAC rates are similar, elderly patients have a significantly higher incidence of periprocedural mortality, major bleeding events, vascular access complications, and pericardial effusion/tamponade after LAAC than non-elderly patients. The stroke/TIA rates did not differ between both groups after at least one-year follow-up.