Impact of atrial fibrillation recurrences during the blanking period following catheter ablation on long-term arrhythmia-free survival: a prospective study with continuous monitoring

Early atrial fibrillation recurrence post catheter ablation: Analysis from insertable cardiac monitor in the era of optimized radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) is associated with ablation-induced proarrhythmogenic inflammation; however, existing studies used intermittent monitoring or nonoptimized radiofrequency (RF) applications (noncontiguous or without ablation index target value).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between ERAT and late recurrence based on insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) data.

METHODS

We compiled data from Close-To-Cure and Close Maze studies, which enrolled patients who underwent RF ablation for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). All patients were implanted with an ICM 2-3 months before ablation.

RESULTS

We studied 165 patients (104 with paroxysmal AF, 61 with persistent AF). Over the 1-year follow-up period, 41 of the patients experienced late recurrence. The risk of late recurrence was higher in patients experiencing ERAT (hazard ratio [HR] 6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-13.0), with negative and positive predictive values of 90.5% and 45.7%, respectively. Median burden of AF during the blanking period was significantly higher in patients with late recurrence (7.9% [0.0%-99.6%]) compared to those without recurrence (0.0% [0.0%-6.0]; P <.001). For each 1% increase in AF burden during the blanking period, late recurrence increased by 4.6% (HR 1.046; 95% CI 1.035-1.059). The best tradeoff for predicting AF from ERAT occurrence was AF burden of 0.6% and last ERAT at 64 days.

CONCLUSION

In patients ablated for paroxysmal and persistent AF with a durable RF lesion set and implanted with a continuous monitoring device, postablation early AF recurrence and burden significantly predict late recurrence. The post-AF ablation blanking period should be reduced to 2 months.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Improved 1-year outcomes after active cooling during left atrial radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

Active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly being utilized to reduce esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula formation. Randomized controlled data also show trends towards increased freedom from AF when using active cooling. This study aimed to compare 1-year arrhythmia recurrence rates between patients treated with luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring versus active esophageal cooling during left atrial ablation.

METHOD

Data from two healthcare systems (including 3 hospitals and 4 electrophysiologists) were reviewed for patient rhythm status at 1-year follow-up after receiving PVI for the treatment of AF. Results were compared between patients receiving active esophageal cooling (ensoETM, Attune Medical, Chicago, IL) and those treated with traditional LET monitoring using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 513 patients were reviewed; 253 received LET monitoring using either single or multi-sensor temperature probes; and 260 received active cooling. The mean age was 66.8 (SD ± 10) years, and 36.8% were female. Arrhythmias were 60.1% paroxysmal AF, 34.3% persistent AF, and 5.6% long-standing persistent AF, with no significant difference between groups. At 1-year follow-up, KM estimates for freedom from AF were 58.2% for LET-monitored patients and 72.2% for actively cooled patients, for an absolute increase in freedom from AF of 14% with active esophageal cooling (p = .03). Adjustment for the confounders of patient age, gender, type of AF, and operator with an inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 0.6 for the effect of cooling on AF recurrence (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study to date of the association between esophageal protection strategy and long-term efficacy of left atrial RF ablation, a clinically and statistically significant improvement in freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 1 year was found in patients treated with active esophageal cooling when compared to patients who received LET monitoring. More rigorous prospective studies or randomized studies are required to validate the findings of the current study.