Comparison of the effects of various airway devices on hemodynamic response and QTc interval in rabbits under general anesthesia

Feasibility of forced oscillatory assessment of respiratory mechanics across a laryngeal mask airway in rabbits

OBJECTIVES

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) is the method of choice for assessment of respiratory tissue mechanics. A laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is increasingly used to secure the airways in subjects under sedation or general anesthesia. While FOT is routinely performed using an endotracheal tube (ETT), the accuracy of information about airway and tissue mechanics obtained with FOT using a LMA has not been characterized. Therefore, we compared the mechanical parameters obtained with FOT using LMA and ETT in rabbits.

APPROACH

FOT was performed through a LMA at normal and reduced oscillatory amplitudes in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated rabbits (n  =  9) at positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) of 3 and 6 cmH₂O. These measurements were repeated at normal amplitude for the same animal using an ETT. Airway resistance, inertance, respiratory tissue damping (G) and elastance (H) were measured under each condition by FOT. The potential bias of the distensible upper airways when FOT was applied using LMA was assessed with a simulation study.

MAIN RESULTS

Values of parameters reflecting airway mechanics were significantly higher when measured using LMA at both PEEPs and oscillatory amplitudes than with ETT. Conversely, regardless of the condition, there was a correlation (r  =  0.89 both at normal and reduced amplitudes; p   <  0.0001) with good agreement (mean bias of 8.8 cmH₂O/l and 11.3 cmH₂O/l) in H, whereas G was systematically lower when obtained with LMA than with ETT at PEEP 3 (21.1%  ±  7.2% and 9.6%  ±  6.9% at normal and reduced oscillatory amplitudes, respectively) and 6 cmH₂O (15.1%  ±  8.2%, 1.6%  ±  9.4%, p   <  0.05 for all).

SIGNIFICANCE

Mechanical properties of the airways and the respiratory tissues, particularly for respiratory tissue stiffness, can be reliably assessed using LMA. However, the involvement of a longer laryngo-tracheo-bronchial pathway when using LMA should be considered for airway resistance and inertance, whereas upper airway shunting may affect the assessment of respiratory tissue damping.

Comparison of a Supraglottic Airway Device (v-gel®) with Blind Orotracheal Intubation in Rabbits

INTRODUCTION

Achieving a secure airway in rabbits is generally considered more difficult than in cats or dogs. Their relatively large tongue, small oropharyngeal cavity and glottis limit direct visualization. A rabbit-specific supraglottic airway device (SGAD) may offer benefits over blind orotracheal intubation.

ANIMALS AND METHODS

Fifteen adult New Zealand white rabbits were randomized to SGAD or orotracheal intubation (ETT). All animals were sedated with dexmedetomidine (0.1 mg kg^-1 IM) and midazolam (0.5 mg kg^-1 IM), followed by induction with alfaxalone (0.3 mg kg^-1 IV). Two CT scans of the head and neck were performed, following sedation and SGAD/ETT placement. The following were recorded: time to successful device insertion, smallest cross-sectional airway area, airway sealing pressure, and histological score of tracheal tissue. Data were analyzed with a Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Two rabbits were excluded following failed ETT. Body masses were similar [ETT; n = 6, 2.6 (2.3-4.5) kg, SGAD; n = 7, 2.7 (2.4-5.0) kg]. SGAD placement was significantly faster [33 (14-38) s] than ETT [59 (29-171) s]. Cross-sectional area (CSA) was significantly reduced from baseline [12.2 (6.9-3.4) mm²] but similar between groups [SGAD; 2.7 (2.0-12.3) mm², ETT; 3.8 (2.3-6.6) mm²]. In the SGAD group, the device tip migrated into the laryngeal vestibule in 6/7 rabbits, reducing the CSA. ETT airway seals were higher [15 (10-20) cmH₂O], but not significant [SGAD; 5 (5-20) cmH₂O, p = 0.06]. ETT resulted in significantly more mucosal damage [histological score 3.3 (1.0-5.0)], SGAD; 0.67 (0.33-3.67).

CONCLUSION

The SGAD studied was faster to place and caused less damage than orotracheal intubation, but resulted in a similar CSA.