Assessment of changes in blood glucose concentration with intravascular microdialysis

Emerging Combination of Hydrogel and Electrochemical Biosensors

Electrochemical sensors are among the most promising technologies for biomarker research, with outstanding sensitivity, selectivity, and rapid response capabilities that make them important in medical diagnostics and prognosis. Recently, hydrogels have gained attention in the domain of electrochemical biosensors because of their superior biocompatibility, excellent adhesion, and ability to form conformal contact with diverse surfaces. These features provide distinct advantages, particularly in the advancement of wearable biosensors. This review examines the contemporary utilization of hydrogels in electrochemical sensing, explores strategies for optimization and prospective development trajectories, and highlights their distinctive advantages. The objective is to provide an exhaustive overview of the foundational principles of electrochemical sensing systems, analyze the compatibility of hydrogel properties with electrochemical methodologies, and propose potential healthcare applications to further illustrate their applicability. Despite significant advances in the development of hydrogel-based electrochemical biosensors, challenges persist, such as improving material fatigue resistance, interfacial adhesion, and maintaining balanced water content across various environments. Overall, hydrogels have immense potential in flexible biosensors and provide exciting opportunities. However, resolving the current obstacles will necessitate additional research and development efforts.

Comparison of Intravenous Microdialysis and Standard Plasma Sampling for Monitoring of Vancomycin and Meropenem Plasma Concentrations-An Experimental Porcine Study

Microdialysis is a catheter-based method suitable for dynamic sampling of unbound antibiotic concentrations. Intravenous antibiotic concentration sampling by microdialysis has several advantages and may be a superior alternative to standard plasma sampling. We aimed to compare concentrations obtained by continuous intravenous microdialysis sampling and by standard plasma sampling of both vancomycin and meropenem in a porcine model. Eight female pigs received 1 g of both vancomycin and meropenem, simultaneously over 100 and 10 min, respectively. Prior to drug infusion, an intravenous microdialysis catheter was placed in the subclavian vein. Microdialysates were collected for 8 h. From a central venous catheter, plasma samples were collected in the middle of every dialysate sampling interval. A higher area under the concentration/time curve and peak drug concentration were found in standard plasma samples compared to intravenous microdialysis samples, for both vancomycin and meropenem. Both vancomycin and meropenem concentrations obtained with intravenous microdialysis were generally lower than from standard plasma sampling. The differences in key pharmacokinetic parameters between the two sampling techniques underline the importance of further investigations to find the most suitable and reliable method for continuous intravenous antibiotic concentration sampling.

Accuracy and stability of an arterial sensor for glucose monitoring in a porcine model using glucose clamp technique

Intravascular glucose sensors have the potential to improve and facilitate glycemic control in critically ill patients and might overcome measurement delay and accuracy issues. This study investigated the accuracy and stability of a biosensor for arterial glucose monitoring tested in a hypo- and hyperglycemic clamp experiment in pigs. 12 sensors were tested over 5 consecutive days in 6 different pigs. Samples of sensor and reference measurement pairs were obtained every 15 minutes. 1337 pairs of glucose values (range 37–458 mg/dl) were available for analysis. The systems met ISO 15197:2013 criteria in 99.2% in total, 100% for glucose <100 mg/dl (n = 414) and 98.8% for glucose ≥100 mg/dl (n = 923). The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) during the entire glycemic range of all sensors was 4.3%. The MARDs within the hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dl), euglycemic (≥70–180 mg/dl) and hyperglycemic glucose ranges (≥180 mg/dl) were 6.1%, 3.6% and 4.7%, respectively. Sensors indicated comparable performance on all days investigated (day 1, 3 and 5). None of the systems showed premature failures. In a porcine model, the performance of the biosensor revealed a promising performance. The transfer of these results into a human setting is the logical next step.