Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats

Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring With Multi-train Electrical Stimulation During Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: A Case Report

Intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are measured for assessing motor function during surgery. MEP monitoring is often performed in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) surgery, but false positives are common and amplification methods are needed to obtain waveforms under severe conditions to assess proper spinal cord function. One method of amplitude amplification in transcranial-stimulated MEP monitoring is multitrain stimulation. There are few reports on multitrain-stimulated MEP monitoring for this surgery. A 57-year-old woman underwent open repair of the thoracoabdominal aorta due to a dissecting aortic aneurysm. After opening the chest, the aneurysm was incised proximally, and anastomosis with an artificial vessel was initiated. The lumbar artery leading to the Adam-Kiewicz artery was reconstructed at a body temperature of 25 °C. However, the single-train stimulation did not produce MEPs. When the measurement was switched to multitrain stimulation, MEPs were elicited in the lower extremity muscle groups and the waveforms were maintained until the end of the measurement. This case illustrates that MEP monitoring using multitrain stimulation during descending thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery can effectively elicit MEPs under challenging conditions, in which conventional single-train stimulation may be insufficient.

Correlation between Single-pulse and Pulse-train stimulation during Neuromonitoring of Thoracic Pedicle Screws in Scoliosis Surgery

BACKGROUND

The use of thoracic pedicle screws (TPS) during scoliosis surgery entails an inherent risk of neurological deficit. Triggered electromyography (t-EMG) is an accurate neuromonitoring test for the detection of malpositioned TPS. However, single-pulse t-EMG (SP t-EMG) stimulation has shown variable capability for detecting medial pedicle breaches while pulse-train t-EMG (PT t-EMG) could be more accurate. The aim is to analyze the correlation between SP t-EMG and PT t-EMG.

METHODS

Retrospective study including 20 patients of scoliosis correction with 294 TPS placed. A total of 588 tests with both SP t-EMG and PT t-EMG were performed, analyzed, and compared. The results of both t-EMG techniques were stratified into three different groups according to threshold obtained: Group 1 (≤6 mA), Group 2 (6.1 - 11.9 mA) and Group 3 (=12 mA). Generalized Linear Model was performed to analyze the correlation between the methods.

RESULTS

SP t-EMG elicited response in 5 screws (1.7%) at ≤ 6 mA; 28 screws (9.5%) at 6.1 - 11.9 mA; and 261 screws (88.8%) at =12 mA. PT t-EMG elicited response in 16 screws (5.4%) at ≤6 mA; 30 screws (10.2%) at 6.1 - 11.9mA; and 248 screws (84.4%) at =12 mA. There is a strong positive and significant association between SP t-EMG and PT t-EMG with a decrease ratio of 2% (95% CI: 1% to 3%).

CONCLUSIONS

SP t-EMG and PT t-EMG stimulation techniques had similar results when the stimuli were applied the TPS, but PT t-EMG may have better efficacy in low-threshold group.