Early Cognitive and Adaptive Functioning of Clinically Referred Infants and Toddlers with Cancer

The association of environmental factors with neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)

PURPOSE

To investigate the association of environmental factors, rehabilitation services during therapy and socioeconomic status (SES - insurance type), with neurocognitive outcomes at the end of therapy for survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

METHODS

Survivors (n = 236) treated on the St. Jude Total Therapy Study 16 completed end of therapy testing with performance measures (IQ, attention, processing speed, fine motor skills, academics) and caregiver ratings (attention, executive function, adaptive skills). Environmental factors were abstracted from the medical record.

RESULTS

Distribution of sex (47.3% female, p = 0.399), treatment arm (45.5% low risk, 54.5% standard/high risk p = 0.929), insurance type (47.7% private, 52.3% public/none, p = 0.117), and mean age at diagnosis (7.7 vs. 6.8 years, p = 0.143) were similar for groups with (n = 110; 46.6%) and without (n = 126; 53.6%) rehabilitation services during therapy. Compared to those without rehabilitation, the rehabilitation group (n = 110; 46.4%) had more caregiver reported problems with attention (Z = -0.28 vs. 0.43, p = 0.022), executive function (Z = -0.50 vs. -0.08, p = 0.003), and adaptive skills (Z = -0.41 vs.-0.13, p = 0.031). Among the rehabilitation group, there was no difference in outcomes by insurance status. Among those without rehabilitation, those with public insurance had worse neurocognitive outcomes than those with private insurance in IQ (Z = -0.04 vs. -0.45, p = 0.0115), processing speed (Z = -0.10 vs. -0.75, p = 0.0030), reading (Z = 0.18 vs. -0.59, p < 0.0001), and math (Z = -0.04 vs. -0.50, p = 0.0021).

CONCLUSION

Participation in rehabilitation services during early intensive therapy is associated with end of therapy caregiver-reported neurocognitive outcomes in daily life.

Occupational Therapy: An Essential Component of Support for Young Children With Cancer

We established a multidisciplinary early childhood clinic to support infants and toddlers receiving cancer treatment. The access to occupational therapy (OT) in this population is unknown. To describe the access to OT for infants and toddlers with cancer. We retrospectively reviewed medical records to determine the frequency and characteristics of children with cancer who were referred to OT. Demographic data, medical information, and frequency of referrals were extracted from September 2015 to September 2018. Of the 134 patients, 112 (83.6%) received an OT evaluation: 88.4% were referred for hospital-based OT services; 42.0% were recommended for services upon returning home. Between-group comparisons revealed significant differences in referrals for home- or community-based OT services based on age and disease. OT is crucial to treatment plans that address the developmental needs of young pediatric oncology patients during hospitalization and thereafter. Recommendations for monitoring this vulnerable population are provided.

Effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy on psychological, physical and social outcomes of children with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to summarise the effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy on psychological, physical and social outcomes of children with cancer without limitations on publication date.

METHODS

Thirteen English and seven Chinese electronic databases were searched from April to June 2021. Randomised control trials, quasi-experimental studies, pre-test post-test studies with a control group, factorial or cross-over designs that included children ≤18 years old and during various stages of the cancer trajectory, who have received cognitive-behavioural therapy, and reported (anxiety, depression, stress, quality of life, self-efficacy, fatigue, pain, behavioural distress, anger, and/or academic performance) were included.

RESULTS

Eight studies with quality of evidence ranging from low to high risk of bias were included. The results show cognitive-behavioural therapy has favourable effects on anxiety, depression, pain and behavioural distress. The meta-analysis also show that it reduces anxiety (SMD = -0.89, 95% CI (-1.45, -0.32), p < 0.002), depression (SMD = -0.90, 95% CI (-1.40, -0.39), p < 0.0005), and pain (SMD = -0.56, 95% CI (-1.04, -0.08), p < 0.002). It also has a favourable effect on stress, anger and self-efficacy, though the results are drawn from a single study.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive-behavioural therapy has the potential to reduce anxiety, depression and pain for children with cancer. It also shows promise in reducing behavioural distress. Although effects on stress, anger, and self-efficacy have been found to be significant, there have been limited studies on these aspects of functioning and more research is needed. The findings are drawn from heterogeneous participants and interventions, thus emphasising the need to conduct well-designed intervention studies, including cancer survivors.