1
|
Johnstone B, Kaiser A, Injeyan MC, Sappleton K, Chitayat D, Stephens D, Shuman C. The Relationship Between Burnout and Occupational Stress in Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:731-41. [PMID: 27228983 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9968-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2015] [Accepted: 05/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Burnout represents a critical disruption in an individual's relationship with work, resulting in a state of exhaustion in which one's occupational value and capacity to perform are questioned. Burnout can negatively affect an individual's personal life, as well as employers in terms of decreased work quality, patient/client satisfaction, and employee retention. Occupational stress is a known contributor to burnout and occurs as a result of employment requirements and factors intrinsic to the work environment. Empirical research examining genetic counselor-specific burnout is limited; however, existing data suggests that genetic counselors are at increased risk for burnout. To investigate the relationship between occupational stress and burnout in genetic counselors, we administered an online survey to members of three genetic counselor professional organizations. Validated measures included the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (an instrument measuring burnout on three subscales: exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy) and the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised (an instrument measuring occupational stress on 14 subscales). Of the 353 respondents, more than 40 % had either considered leaving or left their job role due to burnout. Multiple regression analysis yielded significant predictors for burnout risk. The identified sets of predictors account for approximately 59 % of the variance in exhaustion, 58 % of the variance in cynicism, and 43 % of the variance in professional efficacy. Our data confirm that a significant number of genetic counselors experience burnout and that burnout is correlated with specific aspects of occupational stress. Based on these findings, practice and research recommendations are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittney Johnstone
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
| | - Amy Kaiser
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marie C Injeyan
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prenatal Diagnosis and Medical Genetics Program, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Sappleton
- Centre for Innovation and Excellence in Child and Family Centred Care, Hospital of Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Chitayat
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prenatal Diagnosis and Medical Genetics Program, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Derek Stephens
- Biostatistical Design and Analysis, Clinical Research Services, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cheryl Shuman
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noss R, Mills R, Callanan N. The incorporation of predictive genomic testing into genetic counseling programs. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:671-8. [PMID: 24584888 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9699-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2013] [Accepted: 02/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
This study explored whether genetic counseling programs are incorporating instruction about the applications and techniques of predictive genomic testing (PGT) based on student recollection, and whether this is perceived as adequate by those students. For the purpose of this study, PGT was defined as the use of genome-based testing to assess a person's risk, or susceptibility, of developing a disorder with either a known or suspected genetic component. Surveys from 114 graduates were analyzed. The majority of respondents indicated that PGT was covered in their curriculum including methodology, information generated, benefits, risks, limitations, and impact on the field of genetic counseling. A statistically significant increase in incorporating information about PGT as a whole from 2008 to 2011 was also reported. The majority of respondents reported that coverage of PGT prepared them for the American Board of Genetic Counseling (ABGC) board exam (80.6 %), to interpret PGT test results (60.2 %) and to identify clinical situations warranting testing (53.1 %). Although the majority of respondents indicated learning about a wide variety of aspects surrounding PGT, many recent graduates indicated their training was less likely to cover aspects essential for the clinical application of PGT. Therefore, genetic counseling programs should place a greater emphasis on these skills, and the development of continuing education opportunities aimed at increasing genetic counselors abilities to interpret and discuss PGT tests and identify clinical situations warranting such testing may be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Noss
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave NE50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mills R, Haga SB. Genomic counseling: next generation counseling. J Genet Couns 2013; 23:689-92. [PMID: 24026254 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9641-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2012] [Accepted: 08/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Personalized medicine continues to expand with the development and increasing use of genome-based testing. While these advances present new opportunities for diagnosis and risk assessment, they also present challenges to clinical delivery. Genetic counselors will play an important role in ushering in this new era of testing; however, it will warrant a shift from traditional genetic counseling to "genomic counseling." This shift will be marked by a move from reactive genetic testing for diagnosis of primarily single-gene diseases to proactive genome-based testing for multiple complex diseases for the purpose of disease prevention. It will also require discussion of risk information for a number of diseases, some of which may have low relative risks or weak associations, and thus, may not substantially impact clinical care. Additionally, genomic counselors will expand their roles, particularly in the area of health promotion to reduce disease risk. This additional role will require a style of counseling that is more directive than traditional counseling and require greater knowledge about risk reducing behaviors and disease screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Mills
- Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, 304 Research Drive, North Building, Room #227, Box 90141, Durham, NC, 27708, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|