Women's Understanding and Attitudes towards Down Syndrome and Other Genetic Conditions in the Context of Prenatal Screening

Attitudes of Chinese maternal and child health professionals toward termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a cross-sectional survey

Objectives

This study explores the attitudes of Chinese maternal and child health professionals toward the termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) based on four case scenarios and further identifies the factors that influence their attitudes.

Methods

This cross-sectional study, conducted from February 14-21, 2022, aimed to explore the attitudes of maternal and child health professionals toward TOPFA in Hunan Province. We targeted health service institutions across 14 prefecture-level cities and the autonomous prefecture. A questionnaire was made available online and shared via the instant communication platform, WeChat. Participants were recruited through the same platform and completed the survey online. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, and binary logistic regression was performed to determine factors affecting the health professionals' attitudes toward TOPFA, expressed as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

The study found that 63.5% of health professionals approved of the birth of a fetus with cleft lip and palate, while 36.5% opposed it. Similarly, 39.7% approved of the birth of a fetus with phenylketonuria, while 60.3% opposed it. The percentages of those in favor of and against the birth of a fetus with precocious heart disease were 45.5 and 54.5%, respectively, and those for and against the birth of a fetus with missing fingers were 50.8 and 49.2%, respectively. The top three factors considered by health professionals when agreeing on TOPFA were "the impact of fetal disease on fetal function and growth," "the severity of fetal disease," and "the assessment of indications for fetal disease by professionals and related professional advice." The majority of health professionals (75-78%) preferred joint decision-making by parents regarding the right to decide TOPFA.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that the attitudes of health professionals toward TOPFA can differ significantly depending on the specific birth defect under consideration. Notably, the majority of health professionals prioritized "the impact of fetal abnormalities on fetal function and development" when deciding their support for TOPFA, advocating for the decision to be a joint one between the parents. Additionally, factors such as religious beliefs, professional training, age, and job title appeared to influence these attitudes toward TOPFA. Our findings could serve as a reference point in the development of guidelines for the prevention and management of birth defects.

Women's responses to prenatal genetic diagnosis and attitudes to termination of pregnancy after non-invasive prenatal testing: An online survey of Western Australian women

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has expanded from detecting chromosome aneuploidy to testing for a variety of genetic conditions, including some select single gene disorders. As next generation sequencing/whole exome sequencing technology develops, it may be possible to expand NIPT of cfDNA to identify hundreds of single gene and chromosomal disorders in a fetus, thereby increasing the complexity of pretest counselling and parental decision-making.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the views of women on the phenotypes of genetic conditions potentially detectable with expanded NIPT that they would consider severe enough to warrant pregnancy termination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using multiple clinical scenarios, we asked women via an online survey about the early detection of several well-described genetic phenotypes in pregnancy that in theory could be detected by expanded NIPT.

RESULTS

Two hundred and nineteen women participated in this study. There was high support for early diagnosis and the option for termination of pregnancy in conditions perceived as severe (52-71%). Women expressed a preference for testing to be provided by general practitioners and assigned a high value to genetic counselling support (75-90%). In the case of a continuing pregnancy, women recognised the essential role of ongoing psychosocial counselling for family members and childhood early intervention programs.

CONCLUSION

Women expressed clear preferences for termination of pregnancy for severe conditions and as early in gestation as feasible. Information and support from genetic counsellors are a highly valued resource in decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis of a fetal genetic abnormality.

Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences

Background

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can be used to accurately detect fetal chromosomal anomalies early in pregnancy by assessing cell-free fetal DNA present in maternal blood. The rapid diffusion of NIPT, as well as the ease and simplicity of the test raises concerns around informed decision-making and the potential for routinization. Introducing NIPT in a way that facilitates informed and autonomous decisions is imperative to the ethical application of this technology. We approach this imperative by systematically reviewing and synthesizing primary qualitative research on women’s experiences with and preferences for informed decision-making around NIPT.

Methods

We searched multiple bibliographic databases including Ovid MEDLINE, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and ISI Web of Science Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Our review was guided by integrative qualitative meta-synthesis, and we used a staged coding process similar to that of grounded theory to conduct our analysis.

Results

Thirty empirical primary qualitative research studies were eligible for inclusion. Women preferred to learn about NIPT from their clinicians, but they expressed dissatisfaction with the quality and quantity of information provided during counselling and often sought information from a variety of other sources. Women generally had a good understanding of test characteristics, and the factors of accuracy, physical risk, and test timing were the critical information elements that they used to make informed decisions around NIPT. Women often described NIPT as easy or just another blood test, highlighting threats to informed decision-making such as routinization or a pressure to test.

Conclusions

Women’s unique circumstances modulate the information that they value and require most in the context of making an informed decision. Widened availability of trustworthy information about NIPT as well as careful attention to the facilitation of counselling may help facilitate informed decision-making.

Trial registration

PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018086261.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2168-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.