Genetic Counselors' Experience with and Opinions on the Management of Newborn Screening Incidental Carrier Findings

Utility, benefits, and risks of newborn genetic screening carrier reports for families

Background

Newborn genetic screening (NBGS) based on next-generation sequencing offers enhanced disease detection and better detection rates than traditional newborn screening. However, challenges remain, especially around reporting the NBGS carrier results. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the NBGS carrier parents' views on NBGS and NBGS reports in China.

Methods

We distributed a survey querying demographic information, knowledge and perceptions of NBGS, the impact of NBGS on a total of 2930 parents, and their decision-making to parents of newborns reported as carriers in NBGS in Nanjing, China in 2022.

Results

The average age of the survey respondents was 30.7 years (standard deviation = 3.6). Most (68.38%) felt informed about NBGS, especially women, the highly educated, and high earners. Nearly all (98.74%) saw NBGS as crucial for early disease detection, with 73.18% believing it positively impacts their future. However, 19.16% felt it might cause anxiety, especially among the less educated. Concerns included potential discrimination due to exposed genetic data and strained family ties. Many suggested NBGS coverage by medical insurance to ease financial burdens.

Conclusions

Through our study, we gained insights into parents' perspectives and concerns regarding the NBGS carrier result reporting, thus providing relevant information for further refinement and clinical promotion of the NBGS project.

Psychological and Ethical Challenges of Introducing Whole Genome Sequencing into Routine Newborn Screening: Lessons Learned from Existing Newborn Screening

As a psychologist and an ethicist, we have explored empirically newborn screening consent and communication processes. In this paper we consider the impact on families if newborn screening uses whole genome sequencing. We frame this within the World Health Organization's definition of health and contend that proposals to use whole genome sequencing in newborn screening take into account the ethical, practical and psychological impact of such screening. We argue that the important psychological processes occurring in the neonatal phase necessitate a clear justification that providing risk information at this stage provides a health benefit. We illustrate how research on current newborn screening can inform whole genome sequencing debates, whilst highlighting important gaps. Obtaining explicit, voluntary, and sufficiently informed consent for newborn screening is challenging, however we stress that such consent is ethically and legally appropriate and psychologically and practically important. We conclude by outling how this might be done.

Parents' Experiences and Needs Regarding Infant Sickle Cell Trait Results

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Sickle cell trait (SCT) has reproductive implications and can rarely cause health problems. SCT counseling improves parent knowledge but is infrequently received by children with SCT compared with children with cystic fibrosis carrier status. There are no national guidelines on SCT disclosure timing, frequency, or counseling content. Parents' experiences with SCT disclosure and counseling are poorly understood but could inform the development of guidelines. We explored parents' experiences with and desires for SCT disclosure and counseling for their infants with SCT identified via newborn screening.

METHODS

Parents of infants 2 to 12 months old with SCT were recruited through a state newborn screening program for semistructured interviews to explore their experiences with and desires for SCT disclosure and counseling. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Sixteen interviews were completed from January to August 2020. Most parents reported that SCT disclosure occurred soon after birth, in person, and by the child's physician. Five themes were identified: parent knowledge before child's SCT disclosure, family planning, the dynamics of SCT disclosure and counseling, emotions and actions after SCT disclosure, and parent desires for the SCT disclosure and counseling process. Two primary parent desires were revealed. Parents want more information about SCT, particularly rare symptomatology, and they want SCT counseling repeated once the child approaches adolescence.

CONCLUSION

Parents report receiving their child's SCT diagnosis in the early newborn period from their child's doctor but indicate they receive incomplete information. Opportunities exist in primary care pediatrics to better align SCT disclosure timing and counseling content with parent desires.

Identifying and overcoming barriers to harmonize newborn screening programs through consensus strategies

The benefits of newborn screening (NBS) programs have been widely demonstrated after more than 50 years since first established. NBS enables the detection of the disease before the child shows clinical symptoms, allowing clinicians to act early and facilitating appropriate interventions to prevent or improve adverse outcomes. Delay or lack of medical intervention in these infants may lead to developmental delay, severe disability, or premature death. NBS programs have grown exponentially both in the number of diseases screened and in complexity, creating controversy. New technological advances, as well as the emergence of new therapies that require early disease detection, have allowed for the inclusion of new diseases in NBS screening programs. However, different countries and even different regions have in turn adopted very diverse strategies and diagnostic algorithms when it comes to NBS. There are many factors responsible for these differences, such as the health care system, available funds, local politics, professional groups, and others that depend on the position taken by policymakers. These differences in NBS have led to discrepancies in detection opportunities between countries or regions, which has led to many varied attempts to harmonize NBS programs but not all have been equally satisfactory. Some countries have achieved good results, but always within their borders. Therefore, there are still many differences between NBS programs at the international level that must be overcome. These advances have also brought considerable uncertainty regarding ethical aspects and balance between benefits and harms. For this reason, and so that the situation of disparity in the global NBS programs can be minimized, health authorities must work to develop uniform criteria for decision-making and to take a further step toward harmonization. To do so, it is necessary to identify the crucial factors that lead to the adoption of different NBS programs worldwide, in order to analyze their influence and find ways to overcome them.