A Neighborhood Analysis of Time Trends in COVID-19 Infection in NYC

State variation in neighborhood COVID-19 burden across the United States

BACKGROUND

A lack of fine, spatially-resolute case data for the U.S. has prevented the examination of how COVID-19 infection burden has been distributed across neighborhoods, a key determinant of both risk and resilience. Without more spatially resolute data, efforts to identify and mitigate the long-term fallout from COVID-19 in vulnerable communities will remain difficult to quantify and intervene on.

METHODS

We leveraged spatially-referenced data from 21 states collated through the COVID Neighborhood Project to examine the distribution of COVID-19 cases across neighborhoods and states in the U.S. We also linked the COVID-19 case data with data on the neighborhood social environment from the National Neighborhood Data Archive. We then estimated correlations between neighborhood COVID-19 burden and features of the neighborhood social environment.

RESULTS

We find that the distribution of COVID-19 at the neighborhood-level varies within and between states. The median case count per neighborhood (coefficient of variation (CV)) in Wisconsin is 3078.52 (0.17) per 10,000 population, indicating a more homogenous distribution of COVID-19 burden, whereas in Vermont the median case count per neighborhood (CV) is 810.98 (0.84) per 10,000 population. We also find that correlations between features of the neighborhood social environment and burden vary in magnitude and direction by state.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the importance that local contexts may play when addressing the long-term social and economic fallout communities will face from COVID-19.

Maintaining point of care testing capacity and pandemic preparedness in the post-COVID-19 era

INTRODUCTION

Testing at the point of care (we also refer to the 'point of need'), with rapid, actionable results reported to the patient and provider within hours can impact the individual as well as public health. Faster testing is good for patients and public health outcomes during 'peace time' (outside of the pandemic setting).

AREAS COVERED

Testing at the point of need was important during the COVID-19 pandemic to meet testing capacity demands, providing actionable results, and for providing testing within communities to increase access for all populations. Resources were acquired and built up dramatically during the pandemic as part of the response. With the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency and transition back to 'peace time' some testing sites have successfully shifted to using this capacity for testing for other critical needs, like sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing, and response to other seasonal diseases and for outbreak response.

EXPERT OPINION

The increased testing capacity added to handle unprecedented testing volume during the COVID-19 pandemic can be repurposed for other critical infectious diseases during 'peace time' (post-COVID-19 pandemic). This maintains testing capacity for the next pandemic.

State Variation in Neighborhood COVID-19 Burden: Findings from the COVID Neighborhood Project

A lack of fine, spatially-resolute case data for the U.S. has prevented the examination of how COVID-19 burden has been distributed across neighborhoods, a known geographic unit of both risk and resilience, and is hampering efforts to identify and mitigate the long-term fallout from COVID-19 in vulnerable communities. Using spatially-referenced data from 21 states at the ZIP code or census tract level, we documented how the distribution of COVID-19 at the neighborhood-level varies significantly within and between states. The median case count per neighborhood (IQR) in Oregon was 3,608 (2,487) per 100,000 population, indicating a more homogenous distribution of COVID-19 burden, whereas in Vermont the median case count per neighborhood (IQR) was 8,142 (11,031) per 100,000. We also found that the association between features of the neighborhood social environment and burden varied in magnitude and direction by state. Our findings underscore the importance of local contexts when addressing the long-term social and economic fallout communities will face from COVID-19.

Epidemiology and Regional Predictors of COVID-19 Clusters: A Bayesian Spatial Analysis Through a Nationwide Contact Tracing Data

Purpose: Revealing the clustering risks of COVID-19 and prediction is essential for effective quarantine policies, since clusters can lead to rapid transmission and high mortality in a short period. This study aimed to present which regional and social characteristics make COVID-19 cluster with high risk. Methods: By analyzing the data of all confirmed cases (14,423) in Korea between January 10 and August 3, 2020, provided by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, we manually linked each case and discovered clusters. After classifying the cases into clusters as nine types, we compared the duration and size of clusters by types to reveal high-risk cluster types. Also, we estimated odds for the risk factors for COVID-19 clustering by a spatial autoregressive model using the Bayesian approach. Results: Regarding the classified clusters (n = 539), the mean size was 19.21, and the mean duration was 9.24 days. The number of clusters was high in medical facilities, workplaces, and nursing homes. However, multilevel marketing, religious facilities, and restaurants/business-related clusters tended to be larger and longer when an outbreak occurred. According to the spatial analysis in COVID-19 clusters of more than 20 cases, the global Moran's I statistics value was 0.14 (p < 0.01). After adjusting for population size, the risks of COVID-19 clusters were related to male gender (OR = 1.29) and low influenza vaccination rate (OR = 0.87). After the spatial modeling, the predicted probability of forming clusters was visualized and compared with the actual incidence and local Moran's I statistics 2 months after the study period. Conclusions: COVID-19 makes different sizes of clusters in various contact settings; thus, precise epidemic control measures are needed. Also, when detecting and screening for COVID-19 clusters, regional risks such as vaccination rate should be considered for predicting risk to control the pandemic cost-effectively.