Bioequivalence for highly variable drugs: regulatory agreements, disagreements, and harmonization

Bioequivalence of generic and branded ibrutinib capsules in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions: a randomized, four-period, fully replicated, crossover study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of the test and reference products of ibrutinib capsule (140 mg).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a fully replicated crossover study that included 100 healthy Chinese volunteers (50 in the fasting BE study and 50 in the fed BE study). Subjects were assigned to receive a single dose of test or reference product in each treatment period. The bioequivalence of main PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞) was evaluated using either the average bioequivalence (ABE) approach or the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach, depending on the within-subject standard deviation of the reference product (SWR) estimated in the study.

RESULTS

RSABE approach was applied to Cmax as the corresponding SWR value exceeded the cutoff value of 0.294, while ABE approach was applied to AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ as the corresponding SWR values were less than 0.294. All three PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞) met the bioequivalence acceptance criteria in both fasting and fed studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The test and reference products of ibrutinib capsule are bioequivalent under both fasting and fed conditions. This study also confirmed high intra-subject variability for the Cmax of ibrutinib.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html identifier is CTR20202168.

A randomized, open-label two-period crossover pilot study to evaluate the relative bioavailability in the fed state of atovaquone-proguanil (Atoguanil™) versus atovaquone-proguanil hydrochloride (Malarone®) in healthy adult participants

Atoguanil™ is a novel complex of atovaquone (ATV) and proguanil (PG) with enhanced ATV bioavailability compared to Malarone®. This pilot study assessed whether the relative bioavailability (Frel) of ATV, PG, and the primary PG metabolite cycloguanil (CG) following a single oral dose in the fed state of Atoguanil was similar to Malarone despite a 50% lower ATV dose. This open-label, single-dose, randomized 2-period, 2-treatment, balanced crossover study was conducted between 17th November 2021 and 18th March 2022. Eligible participants (aged 18-55 years) were randomized (1:1) in period 1 to Atoguanil (ATV/PG 500/348 mg) or Malarone (ATV/PG hydrochloride 1000/400 mg) administered following a high-fat, high caloric meal. After a 24-day washout period, participants crossed treatment arms. For the doses tested, Frel was assumed similar if 90%CIs were between 80 and 125% for the geometric mean ratio of the least square mean differences for each exposure parameter. In 15 evaluable participants, Frel was similar for ATV Cmax (93.6% [90%CI 83.6, 104.9]) but not AUC0-inf (77.8% [67.4, 89.8]), for PG AUC0-inf (95.6% [92.1, 99.2]) but not Cmax (82.4% [75.8, 89.5]), and for both CG Cmax (100.8% [95.0, 107.0]) and AUC0-inf (102.9% [98.4, 107.7]). Nine adverse events occurred; all were of mild severity and not considered treatment related. At the doses tested, ATV Frel was lower following Atoguanil versus Malarone based on AUC0-inf, though when adjusted for dose Frel increased by 156%. Both drugs were well tolerated with no safety concerns. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04866602 (April 26th, 2021).

Bioequivalence Study of Velpatasvir/Sofosbuvir Oral Coated Tablets in Healthy Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions

This study was conducted as a single-site, open-label, randomized, replicated crossover trial with 4 treatment periods. The aim was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a generic test drug containing velpatasvir and sofosbuvir compared to an established brand-name medication in healthy White subjects under fasting conditions. Blood samples were collected at specified intervals up to 72 hours after dosing to measure the concentrations of velpatasvir and sofosbuvir using a certified high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method. The bioequivalence of the 2 formulations was confirmed when statistical analysis showed that confidence intervals for the log-transformed peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable sample were within an acceptable range from 80% to 125%. Criteria for bioequivalence were met for both area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 until the last quantifiable sample and peak concentration parameters. No adverse effects were reported during this trial in both groups.

Statistical Testing for Protein Equivalence Identifies Core Functional Modules Conserved across 360 Cancer Cell Lines and Presents a General Approach to Investigating Biological Systems

Quantitative proteomics has enhanced our capability to study protein dynamics and their involvement in disease using various techniques, including statistical testing, to discern the significant differences between conditions. While most focus is on what is different between conditions, exploring similarities can provide valuable insights. However, exploring similarities directly from the analyte level, such as proteins, genes, or metabolites, is not a standard practice and is not widely adopted. In this study, we propose a statistical framework called QuEStVar (Quantitative Exploration of Stability and Variability through statistical hypothesis testing), enabling the exploration of quantitative stability and variability of features with a combined statistical framework. QuEStVar utilizes differential and equivalence testing to expand statistical classifications of analytes when comparing conditions. We applied our method to an extensive data set of cancer cell lines and revealed a quantitatively stable core proteome across diverse tissues and cancer subtypes. The functional analysis of this set of proteins highlighted the molecular mechanism of cancer cells to maintain constant conditions of the tumorigenic environment via biological processes, including transcription, translation, and nucleocytoplasmic transport.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Azithromycin Tablets: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Three-Period, Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Azithromycin is the first azalide antibiotic that is related to the macrolide family of antibiotics. Bioequivalence studies in China are initiated by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), which supports a generic consistency evaluation program for ensuring that generic products manufactured in China meet the required standards and provide equivalent therapeutic effects to their reference products. This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two azithromycin tablets under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers.

METHODS

This was a single-center, open-label, single-dose, randomized, three-way crossover trial with two independent groups (fasting group and fed group). A total of 72 healthy Chinese subjects (36 subjects in the fasting state and 36 subjects in the fed state) were enrolled and randomized to treatment. Blood samples were collected from 0 to 120 h after a single oral dose of a 250-mg generic azithromycin tablet (test, T) or branded azithromycin tablet (reference, R). The plasma concentrations of azithromycin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC‒MS/MS). A non-compartmental analysis method was used to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters. Adverse events were documented.

RESULTS

In a fasting state, the bioequivalence of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was evaluated using the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach (within-subject standard deviation, SWR > 0.294), and the bioequivalence of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last measurable plasma concentration (AUC0-t) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) were evaluated by the average bioequivalence (ABE) method (SWR <  0.294). The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of T/R for Cmax was 106.49%, while the 95% upper confidence bound was <  0. The GMRs of AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 103.34% and 101.28%, and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the test/reference were 95.90-111.35%/94.85-108.15%, respectively. In the fed state, the RSABE approach was applied to estimate the bioequivalence of Cmax (SWR >0.294), and the ABE approach was applied to estimate the bioequivalence of AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ (SWR <  0.294). The GMR for Cmax was 99.80%, while the 95% upper confidence bound value was <  0. The GMRs of AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 97.07% and 98.15%, and the 90% CIs of the T/R were 90.02-104.68% and 90.66-106.25%, respectively. All adverse events were mild and transient.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial indicated that the test and the reference azithromycin tablets were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials, ChiCTR2300071630 (retrospectively registered in 19/05/2023).

Finite sample corrections for average equivalence testing

Average (bio)equivalence tests are used to assess if a parameter, like the mean difference in treatment response between two conditions for example, lies within a given equivalence interval, hence allowing to conclude that the conditions have "equivalent" means. The two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure, consisting in testing whether the target parameter is respectively significantly greater and lower than some pre-defined lower and upper equivalence limits, is typically used in this context, usually by checking whether the confidence interval for the target parameter lies within these limits. This intuitive and visual procedure is however known to be conservative, especially in the case of highly variable drugs, where it shows a rapid power loss, often reaching zero, hence making it impossible to conclude for equivalence when it is actually true. Here, we propose a finite sample correction of the TOST procedure, theα $$ \alpha $$ -TOST, which consists in a correction of the significance level of the TOST allowing to guarantee a test size (or type-I error rate) ofα $$ \alpha $$ . This new procedure essentially corresponds to a finite sample and variability correction of the TOST procedure. We show that this procedure is uniformly more powerful than the TOST, easy to compute, and that its operating characteristics outperform the ones of its competitors. A case study about econazole nitrate deposition in porcine skin is used to illustrate the benefits of the proposed method and its advantages compared to other available procedures.

Bioequivalence of 2 Pediatric Formulations of Fexofenadine Hydrochloride Oral Suspension

Fexofenadine hydrochloride (HCl) is a second-generation, nonsedating, histamine H1-receptor antagonist used to manage seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. A new oral pediatric suspension of fexofenadine HCl has been developed, with the preservative potassium sorbate replacing parabens. The objective of this phase 1 single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-treatment, full-replicated, 4-period, 2-sequence crossover study in healthy adult volunteers was to assess the bioequivalence of 30 mg of the new oral suspension of fexofenadine HCl (test) versus 30 mg of the marketed pediatric oral suspension of fexofenadine HCl (reference). The replicate design was based on the high intra-individual variability of fexofenadine (>30% on Cmax ). The study comprised 68 randomized and treated volunteers. Plasma concentrations of fexofenadine were similar following the administration of a single dose of each formulation. Cmax , AUClast , AUC, median tmax , and mean t1/2z were similar between administrations of the same fexofenadine formulation and between formulations. A high intra-individual variability was confirmed with both formulations. Bioequivalence of the test and reference fexofenadine HCl formulations was demonstrated as the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric least squares mean ratio for Cmax , AUClast , and AUC of fexofenadine were all within the bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) or study discontinuations due to treatment-emergent AEs with either fexofenadine HCl formulation. The new paraben-free fexofenadine HCl 30-mg oral suspension and marketed fexofenadine HCl 30-mg pediatric oral suspension are bioequivalent under fasting conditions, with no safety concerns and a safety profile consistent with the known profile of fexofenadine.

Bioequivalence evaluation and blood concentration estimation of generic and branded tacrolimus in healthy subjects under fasting: A randomized, four-periods, two-sequences, complete repeated, crossover study

OBJECTIVE

The demand for generic tacrolimus is enormous. Our randomized trial was an open-label single-dose testing with four-periods and two-sequences; we aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between a generic and branded tacrolimus by establishing their area under concentration-time curve (AUC) predictive equations. For better comparison, each tacrolimus served either as test vs. reference in sequence 1 or vice versa as reference vs. test in sequence 2.

METHODS

Forty healthy subjects were randomized into two groups, namely a sequence 1 group (N = 20 in test-reference-test-reference) or sequence 2 (N = 20, reference-test-reference-test) received a test tacrolimus (Ruibeirong®; Chengdu Shengdi Medicine Co., Ltd.) and a reference tacrolimus (Astagraf XL®, Astellas Ireland Co., Ltd.) under the fasting condition with a wash-out period of ≥14 days between every two phases. Blood samples were collected sequentially until 120 h after oral administration of tacrolimus.

RESULTS

A 95% upper confidence bound was -0.05% for the peak concentration (Cmax), -0.02% for the AUC from 0 to the last time point (AUC0-t), and - 0.02% for the AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞). The geometric least square means ratio (test/reference) with 90% of confidence interval (CI)) was 96.10% (90.58%-101.95%) for Cmax, 93.80% (88.52%-99.39%) for AUC0-t, and 94.34% (89.20%-99.77%) for AUC0-∞. Meanwhile, the ratio of within-subject standard deviation of test/reference (σWT/WR) with 90% CI was 0.66 (0.50-0.86) for Cmax, 0.73 (0.55-0.96) for AUC0-t, and 0.75 (0.57-0.98) for AUC0-∞. These results fulfilled the bioequivalence criteria by the Food and Drug Administration. Both products showed acceptable safety. Moreover, the AUC predictive equations (by linear regression plus limited sampling strategy) with 2-5 sampling time point showed the high performance (all R > 0.970, predictive error (PE) >0.5%, absolute PE <5.1%, which were interchangeable between test and reference products.

CONCLUSION

Generic tacrolimus (Ruibeirong®) is bioequivalent to branded tacrolimus (Astagraf XL®) with tolerable safety, which AUC predictive equations work well and are interchangeable between the two products.

A Study to Compare Bioequivalence Approach Between FDA and EMA in a Highly Variable Drug: Pinaverium Bromide Film Tablets

The aim of this study is to investigate pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference film tablet formulations of a highly variable drug, pinaverium bromide, under fasting conditions and to assess their bioequivalence in accordance with the FDA and EMA criteria. A randomised open-label, single oral dose, three-sequence, three-period, semi-replicated, cross-over trial was conducted with 36 healthy subjects. The intrasubject variability of reference products for C_max and AUC_0-tlast was found to be more than 50%. While bioequivalence was proven according to the FDA reference scaled average bioequivalence approach with only 36 subjects, more than 200 subjects are required to demonstrate bioequivalence in accordance with the EMA bioequivalence guideline. It is believed that the EMA bioequivalence criteria are too stringent for highly variable drugs whose intrasubject variability are more than 30% for both C_max and AUC_0-tlast and that in consequence the EMA ought to revise their bioequivalence guidelines for such drugs in the future.

Interchangeability between Generic and Reference Products: Limits of Average Bioequivalence Methodology

Marketing authorisation of generic drugs is based on a demonstration of the "average" bioequivalence (ABE), with acceptance limits of 0.8-1.25 for the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio (generic versus reference) of geometric means of exposure (whole blood, serum or plasma drug concentration). However, when interchangeability of reference by one generic is considered during treatment of a given patient, such methodology cannot guarantee the lack of therapeutic impact especially for drugs with narrow therapeutic index. This review article describes the basis and limits of ABE methodology, and the adaptations that have been proposed by regulatory agencies. For highly variable drugs, given their large therapeutic margin, regulatory agencies even allow widening of the bioequivalence acceptance limits. For drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, the average bioequivalence methodology has been amended differently by regulatory agencies. The European Medicine Agency only requires the narrowing of the ABE acceptance limits to the 0.9-1.10 range. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed to narrow the ABE acceptance limits according to the reference within-subject variance. The FDA requires a fully replicate cross-over study (with four periods) which allows one to compare the within-subject variance between generic and reference drug, and to detect any subject-by-formulation interaction. Indeed, any within-subject variance difference or subject by formulation interaction is an obstacle to interchangeability at the individual level. These amendments for the ABE do not fundamentally change the fact that individual ratios of exposure (generic/reference) will vary to a larger extent than the ratio of their means. For these reasons, since true individual bioequivalence studies cannot be performed for practical reasons and statistical issues, one can suggest that, in addition to the usual average bioequivalence criteria, the limits of the 95% confidence interval of the individual generic/reference exposure ratios could be used to allow interchangeability during treatment (at least for narrow therapeutic index drugs). Limit values of such CI for interchangeability acceptance should be scaled to the therapeutic margin of the reference drug. Regulatory agencies could conduct calculations based on real datasets of bioequivalence studies to determine if such criteria could be acceptable to allow interchangeability.

A Reference-Scaled Average Bioequivalence Study of Azithromycin Tablets Manufactured in China and the United States: An Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Dose, 3-Way Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasted and Fed Conditions

Azithromycin (Zithromax) is an azalide antibiotic that binds to the 50S ribosomal subunit of the susceptible organism and thereby interferes with its protein synthesis. An open-label, randomized, single-dose, 3-way crossover bioequivalence study was conducted to compare the rate and extent of absorption of the azithromycin 250-mg tablet manufactured at Pfizer Dalian (China) and that at Pfizer Barceloneta (United States) under fasted and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects. This study aimed to support a generic consistency evaluation program, initiated by the National Medical Products Administration, for evaluating the quality and efficacy of the products manufactured in China. In the study, the within-subject standard deviation for area under the serum concentration-time profile from time 0 to 72 hours after dosing in the fasted condition was <0.294, and the 90%CI for the ratio was within 80% to 125%; the within-subject SDs for serum peak concentration in the fasted condition, area under the serum concentration-time profile from time 0 to 72 hours after dosing in the fed condition, and serum peak concentration in the fed condition, were all >0.294, with the upper confidence bounds being <0.00, and the point estimates of the ratios being within 80% to 125%. The results support the bioequivalence between azithromycin tablets manufactured in China and the United States in fasted and fed conditions, with both tablets showing an acceptable safety/tolerability profile in the studied population.

Influence of Gender, Body Mass Index, and Age on the Pharmacokinetics of Itraconazole in Healthy Subjects: Non-Compartmental Versus Compartmental Analysis

Itraconazole is a triazole antifungal agent with highly variable pharmacokinetics, with not yet fully identified factors as the source of this variability. Our study aimed to examine the influence of body mass index, gender, and age on the first dose pharmacokinetics of itraconazole in healthy subjects, using pharmacokinetic modeling, non-compartmental versus compartmental ones. A total of 114 itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole sets of plasma concentrations of healthy subjects of both genders, determined using a validated liquid chromatographic method with mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS), were obtained for pharmacokinetic analyses performed by the computer program Kinetica 5®. Genetic polymorphism in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP1A1, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 was analyzed using PCR-based methods. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that gender had a significant effect on AUC as the most important pharmacokinetics endpoint, whereas body mass index and age did not show such an influence. Therefore, further analysis considered gender and indicated that both geometric mean values of itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole plasma concentrations in men were prominently higher than those in women. A significant reduction of the geometric mean values of Cmax and AUC and increment of Vd in females compared with males were obtained. Analyzed genotypes and gender differences in drug pharmacokinetics could not be related. Non-compartmental and one-compartmental models complemented each other, whereas the application of the two-compartmental model showed a significant correlation with the analysis of one compartment. They indicated a significant influence of gender on itraconazole pharmacokinetics after administration of the single oral dose of the drug, given under fed conditions. Women were less exposed to itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole than men due to poorer absorption of itraconazole, its more intense pre-systemic metabolism, and higher distribution of both drug and its metabolite.

Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?

At the request of French Regulatory Authorities, a new formulation of Levothyrox^® was licensed in France in 2017, with the objective of avoiding the stability deficiencies of an existing licensed formulation. Before launching the new formulation, an average bioequivalence (ABE) trial was conducted, having enrolled 204 subjects and selected for interpretation a narrow a priori bioequivalence range of 0.90-1.11. Bioequivalence was concluded. In a previous publication, we questioned the ability of an ABE trial to guarantee the switchability within patients of the new and old levothyroxine formulations. It was suggested that the two formulations should be compared using the conceptual framework of individual bioequivalence. The present paper is a response to those claiming that, despite the fact that ABE analysis does not formally address the switchability of the two formulations, future patients will nevertheless be fully protected. The basis for this claim is that the ABE study was established in a large trial and analyzed using a stringent a priori acceptance interval of equivalence. These claims are questionable, because the use of a very large number of subjects nullifies the implicit precautionary intention of the European guideline when, for a Narrow Therapeutic Index drug, it recommends shortening the a priori acceptance interval from 0.80-1.25 to 0.90-1.11.

An In Vitro-In Vivo Simulation Approach for the Prediction of Bioequivalence

The aim of this study was to develop a new in vitro–in vivo simulation (IVIVS) approach in order to predict the outcome of a bioequivalence study. The predictability of the IVIVS procedure was evaluated through its application in the development process of a new generic product of amlodipine/irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide. The developed IVIVS methodology is composed of three parts: (a) mathematical description of in vitro dissolution profiles, (b) mathematical description of in vivo kinetics, and (c) development of joint in vitro–in vivo simulations. The entire programming was done in MATLAB^® and all created scripts were validated through other software. The IVIVS approach can be implemented for any number of subjects, clinical design, variability and can be repeated for thousands of times using Monte Carlo techniques. The probability of success of each scenario is recorded and finally, an overall assessment is made in order to select the most suitable batch. Alternatively, if the IVIVS shows reduced probability of BE success, the R&D department is advised to reformulate the product. In this study, the IVIVS approach predicted successfully the BE outcome of the three drugs. During the development of generics, the IVIVS approach can save time and expenses.