Are Social Status and Migration Background Associated with Utilization of Non-medical Antenatal Care? Analyses from Two German Studies

Group antenatal care compared with standard antenatal care for Somali-Swedish women: a historically controlled evaluation of the Hooyo Project

OBJECTIVES

Comparing language-supported group antenatal care (gANC) and standard antenatal care (sANC) for Somali-born women in Sweden, measuring overall ratings of care and emotional well-being, and testing the feasibility of the outcome measures.

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental trial with one intervention and one historical control group, nested in an intervention development and feasibility study.

SETTING

Midwifery-led antenatal care clinic in a mid-sized Swedish town.

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant Somali-born women (<25 gestational weeks); 64 women in gANC and 81 in sANC.

INTERVENTION

Language-supported gANC (2017-2019). Participants were offered seven 60-minute group sessions with other Somali-born women led by one to two midwives, in addition to 15-30 min individual appointments with their designated midwife.

OUTCOMES

Primary outcomes were women's overall ratings of antenatal care and emotional well-being (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)) in gestational week ≥35 and 2 months post partum. Secondary outcomes were specific care experiences, information received, social support, knowledge of pregnancy danger signs and obstetric outcomes.

RESULTS

Recruitment and retention of participants were challenging. Of eligible women, 39.3% (n=106) declined to participate. No relevant differences regarding overall ratings of antenatal care between the groups were detected (late pregnancy OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.50 to 4.16 and 6-8 weeks post partum OR 2.71, 95% CI 0.88 to 9.41). The reduction in mean EPDS score was greater in the intervention group when adjusting for differences at baseline (mean difference -1.89; 95% CI -3.73 to -0.07). Women in gANC were happier with received pregnancy and birth information, for example, caesarean section where 94.9% (n=37) believed the information was sufficient compared with 17.5% (n=7) in standard care (p<0.001) in late pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

This evaluation suggests potential for language-supported gANC to improve knowledge acquisition among pregnant Somali-born women with residence in Sweden ˂10 years. An adequately powered randomised trial is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03879200).

Group antenatal care (gANC) for Somali-speaking women in Sweden - a process evaluation

Background

Language supported group antenatal care (gANC) for Somali-born women was implemented in a Swedish public ANC clinic. The women were offered seven 60-min sessions, facilitated by midwives and starting with a presentation of a selected topic, with an additional 15-min individual appointment before or after. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility for participants and midwives of implementing The Hooyo (“mother” in Somali) gANC intervention, including implementation, mechanisms of impact and contextual factors.

Methods

A process evaluation was performed, using The Medical Research Council (MRC) guidelines for evaluating complex interventions as a framework. A range of qualitative and quantitative data sources were used including observations (n = 9), complementary, in-depth and key-informant interviews (women n = 6, midwives n = 4, interpreters and research assistants n = 3) and questionnaire data (women n = 44; midwives n = 8).

Results

Language-supported gANC offered more comprehensive ANC that seemed to correspond to existing needs of the participants and could address knowledge gaps related to pregnancy, birth and the Swedish health care system. The majority of women thought listening to other pregnant women was valuable (91%), felt comfortable in the group (98%) and supported by the other women (79%), and they said that gANC suited them (79%). The intervention seemed to enhance knowledge and cultural understanding among midwives, thus contributing to more women-centred care. The intervention was not successful at involving partners in ANC.

Conclusions

The Hooyo gANC intervention was acceptable to the Somali women and to midwives, but did not lead to greater participation by fathers-to-be. The main mechanisms of impact were more comprehensive ANC and enhanced mutual cultural understanding. The position of women was strengthened in the groups, and the way in which the midwives expanded their understanding of the participants and their narratives was promising. To be feasible at a large scale, gANC might require further adaptations and the “othering” of women in risk groups should be avoided.

Trial registration

The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03879200).

Prenatal care adequacy of migrants born in conflict-affected countries and country-born parturients in Finland

•

Migrants from conflict-affected areas had a 3.5-fold risk for delayed prenatal care.

•

Less prenatal visits prior to term birth compared with country-born parturients.

•

No differences in prepartum hospitalization between migrants and country-born parturients.

Background

The 2015 refugee crisis led into a forced migration of millions of people globally. As a consequence, many countries experienced a quick change in the proportion of conflict-area born migrants. This group being stated as an especially vulnerable group for suboptimal maternal health, a timely inspection of preventive maternity care was required. This study investigated prenatal care in terms of gestation trimester at the first prenatal visit, number of check-ups prior to birth, and prepartum hospitalization in conflict-country born migrants and Finnish parturients in Finland.

Material and methods

Cross-sectional study included all pregnancies of migrants born in conflict-affected countries (n = 3 155) and country-born parturients (n = 93 600) in Finland in 2015–16. The data were obtained through Medical Birth Registry and Population Information System. Statistical analysis employed T-test, Chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were adjusted for sociodemographic and health-related background variables.

Results

Migrant parturients had a higher probability for delayed enter in prenatal care compared with Finnish-born parturients (adjusted odds ratio aOR = 3.46; 95% Confidence Interval CI 3.06, 3.91). Recommended minimum number of check-ups was participated by 95.3% of the migrant, and 96.4% of the Finnish-born group (P <0.000). Migrants’ probability for more than ten visits prior to term birth was significantly lower (aOR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.51, 0.66). No significant differences in prepartum hospitalization yielded between the groups.

Conclusions

Migrant parturients had significantly smaller number of check-ups and later entry in care compared with the country-born parturients. These findings add to earlier reported challenges in the organizing of conflict-affected country born migrants’ prenatal care in a high-income setting, in which the proportion of conflict-area born migrants has risen rapidly and unexpectedly.

Information on, knowledge and utilisation of support services during pregnancy and after childbirth: cross-sectional analyses of predictors using data from the KUNO-Kids health study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate mothers' knowledge and utilisation of antenatal and perinatal support services as well as predictors of knowledge and service utilisation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Prospective birth cohort in Regensburg, Eastern Bavaria, Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

2455 mothers after delivery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants' knowledge of distinct antenatal and perinatal support services (poor vs good, defined by median split). Participants' use of antenatal services provided by midwife (yes, no) and of any other antenatal support services (yes, no).

RESULTS

The vast majority of mothers knew at least some support services. Two-thirds of women (68.4%) reported to have used the services provided by midwives. 23.6% of women reported to have used at least one of the other antenatal services. Good knowledge of services was associated with higher education (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.67), no migration background (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.76 to 2.90), better health literacy (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06), while being primiparous (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.86) and being unmarried/living with a partner (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89) reduced the chance. Predictors of service utilisation differed with regard to the services considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, mothers had a good level of knowledge of antenatal and perinatal support services. However, we found that some groups of women were less well informed. This inequality in social predictors of knowledge of services was also partly reflected in differences in service utilisation during pregnancy.