1
|
Vohra M, Kour A, Kalia NP, Kumar M, Sharma S, Jaglan S, Kamath N, Sharma S. A comprehensive review of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomic insights into the differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the planktonic to biofilm state: A multi-omics approach. Int J Biol Macromol 2024; 257:128563. [PMID: 38070800 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is primarily responsible for chronic wound and lung infections in humans. These infections are persistent owing to the biofilm's high tolerance to antimicrobials and constantly changing environmental factors. Understanding the mechanism governing biofilm formation can help to develop therapeutics explicitly directed against the molecular markers responsible for this process. After numerous years of research, many genes responsible for both in vitro and in vivo biofilm development remain unidentified. However, there is no "all in one" complete in vivo or in vitro biofilm model. Recent findings imply that the shift from planktonic bacteria to biofilms is a complicated and interrelated differentiation process. Research on the applications of omics technologies in P. aeruginosa biofilm development is ongoing, and these approaches hold great promise for expanding our knowledge of the mechanisms of biofilm formation. This review discusses the different factors that affect biofilm formation and compares P. aeruginosa biofilm formation using the omics approaches targeting essential biological macromolecules, such as DNA, RNA, Protein, and metabolome. Furthermore, we have outlined the application of currently available omics tools, such as genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics, and integrated multi-omics methodologies, to understand the differential gene expression (biofilm vs. planktonic bacteria) of P. aeruginosa biofilms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Vohra
- Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India; Department of Microbiology, Shri Vinoba Bhave Civil Hospital, Silvassa 396230, India
| | - Avleen Kour
- Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India
| | - Nitin Pal Kalia
- Department of Biological Sciences (Pharmacology & Toxicology), National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Balanagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500037, India
| | - Manoj Kumar
- Maternal and Child Health Program, Research Department, Sidra Medicine, Doha 122104, Qatar
| | - Sarika Sharma
- Department of Sponsored Research, Division of Research & Development, Lovely Professional University, India
| | - Sundeep Jaglan
- Fermentation & Microbial Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine, Jammu 180016, J&K, India
| | - Narayan Kamath
- Department of Microbiology, Shri Vinoba Bhave Civil Hospital, Silvassa 396230, India; Department of Microbiology, NAMO Medical Education and Research Institute, Silvassa 396230, India
| | - Sandeep Sharma
- Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 144411, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aqel H, Sannan N, Foudah R, Al-Hunaiti A. Enzyme Production and Inhibitory Potential of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Contrasting Clinical and Environmental Isolates. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1354. [PMID: 37760651 PMCID: PMC10525495 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12091354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: This study summarizes the findings of two studies investigating the inhibitory effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from clinical and environmental sources against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and fungi. The studies also analyzed the correlation between enzyme production and inhibitory effects to gain insights into the antimicrobial capabilities of P. aeruginosa strains; (2) Methods: Both studies employed similar methodologies, including the use of disk diffusion and well diffusion methods to assess the inhibitory effects of P. aeruginosa strains against target pathogens. Enzyme production was analyzed through various biochemical assays to determine the diversity and frequencies of enzyme secretion among the strains; (3) Results: A comparative analysis of enzyme production in P. aeruginosa strains from clinical sources revealed significant variations in enzyme production, with hemolysin and protease being the most commonly produced enzymes. Gelatinase production showed lower rates, whereas chondroitinase and hyaluronidase were absent or occurred less frequently. In contrast, a comparative analysis of enzyme production in environmental isolates showed different patterns, indicating adaptation to environmental conditions. Pyocyanin production was absent in all environmental isolates. The inhibitory effects against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria varied among different P. aeruginosa strains, with strain-specific variations observed. Limited inhibitory effects were observed against fungi, primarily toward gram-positive bacteria; (4) Conclusions: The findings highlight the strain-specific nature of inhibitory effects and enzyme production in P. aeruginosa strains. The correlation between enzyme production and inhibitory effects against gram-positive bacteria suggest a potential role of specific enzymes, such as hemolysin and protease, in the antimicrobial activity. The complexity of the relationship between enzyme production and the inhibition of different pathogens requires further investigation. The results emphasize the potential of P. aeruginosa strains as sources for antimicrobial strategies, particularly against gram-positive bacteria. Future research should focus on understanding the mechanisms underlying these inhibitory effects and exploring their therapeutic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazem Aqel
- Basic Medical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, Al-Balqa' Applied University, Salt 19117, Jordan
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah 22384, Saudi Arabia
| | - Naif Sannan
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah 22384, Saudi Arabia
- Clinical Laboratory Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ramy Foudah
- Clinical Laboratory Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 14611, Saudi Arabia
| | - Afnan Al-Hunaiti
- Chemistry Department, College of Science, Jordan University, Amman 11942, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kothari A, Kumar SK, Singh V, Kumar P, Kaushal K, Pandey A, Jain N, Omar BJ. Association of multidrug resistance behavior of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa to pigment coloration. Eur J Med Res 2022; 27:120. [PMID: 35842687 PMCID: PMC9288039 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00752-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an adaptable bacterial pathogen that infects a variety of organs, including the respiratory tract, vascular system, urinary tract, and central nervous system, causing significant morbidity and mortality. As the primary goal of this study, we wanted to determine how pigment color production differed between clinical strains of P. aeruginosa, and whether or not that variation was associated with multidrug resistance or the ability to form biofilms. We screened in total 30.1% of yellow, 39.8% green and 30.1% of no pigment-producing P. aeruginosa strains from a total of 143 various clinical isolates. Yellow pigment-producing strains presented significant resistance to antibiotics groups, including β-lactam (91.5%), aminoglycosides (70.5%), and carbapenems (51.9%) compared to green and non-pigmented strains. Notably, 16.3% of yellow pigment-producing strains were resistant to colistin which is used as a last-resort treatment for multidrug-resistant bacteria, whereas only 2.3% of non-pigmented and 1.8% of green pigmented strains were resistant to colistin. Aside from that, yellow pigment-producing strains were frequent producers of enzymes belonging to the lactamase family, including ESBL (55.6%), MBL (55.6%), and AmpC (50%). Compared to the green groups (7.14%) and non-pigmented groups (28.5%), they had a higher frequency of efflux positive groups (64.2%). Notably, when compared to non-pigmented groups, green pigment-producing strains also displayed antibiotic susceptibility behavior similar to yellow pigment-producing strains. The majority of yellow pigment-producing strains outperformed the green and non-pigmented strains in terms of MIC levels when compared to the other two groups of strains. Despite the fact that previous studies have demonstrated a direct correlation between multidrug resistance behaviors and biofilm production, no such statistically significant association between pigment and biofilm formation was found in our investigation. Our research has demonstrated that the correlation of bacterial pigments on their susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Yellow pigment-producing P. aeruginosa strains posed a significant problem due to the lack of alternative agents against such transformed strains, which may be associated with the development of multidrug resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Kothari
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India
| | - Shyam Kishor Kumar
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, 814152, India
| | - Vanya Singh
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India
| | - Prashant Kumar
- Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India
| | - Karanvir Kaushal
- Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India
| | - Atul Pandey
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Neeraj Jain
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India. .,Division of Cancer Biology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, 226031, India.
| | - Balram Ji Omar
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India.
| |
Collapse
|