Radiologic follow-up of non-functioning pituitary adenomas: rationale and cost effectiveness

Surveillance Imaging Strategies for Pituitary Adenomas: When, How Frequent, and When to Stop

OBJECTIVE

To describe a practical approach of when and how often to perform imaging, and when to stop imaging pituitary adenomas (PAs).

METHODS

A literature review was carried out and recommendations provided are derived largely from personal experience.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging is the mainstay imaging modality of choice in the assessment, treatment planning, and follow-up of PAs. These adenomas are discovered incidentally during imaging for a variety of unrelated conditions, because of clinical symptoms related to mass effects on the adjacent structures, or during workup for functional alterations of the adenoma. Imaging is also used in the preoperative and postoperative phases of assessment of PAs, for surgical and radiotherapy planning, for postoperative surveillance to assess for adenoma stability and detection of adenoma recurrence, and for surveillance to monitor for adenoma growth in unoperated PAs. Currently, because there are no evidence-based consensus recommendations, the optimal strategy for surveillance imaging of PAs is not clearly established. Younger age, initial adenoma size, extrasellar extension, mass effect, cavernous sinus invasion, functional status, histopathologic characteristics, cost considerations, imaging accessibility, patient preference, and patient contraindications (eg, implanted metallic devices and patient claustrophobia) are all important factors that influence the strategy for surveillance imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a practical approach of performing surveillance imaging strategies for PAs that should be individualized based on clinical presentation, history, adenoma morphology on imaging, and histopathologic characteristics.

Natural history of post-operative non-functioning pituitary adenomas - a single centre cohort analysis

PURPOSE

To study behaviour of endonasally operated non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) and propose a cost-effective stratified follow-up regimen.

METHODS

A single centre retrospective cohort analysis from June 2009 till December 2019. All endonasally operated pituitary adenomas were identified with sub-analysis of the NFPA's. Patients of all age groups with radiological follow-up more than 30 months were included. Patients with any kind of cranial intervention performed < within 30 months of surgery were excluded. The post-operative MRI for this cohort was evaluated until either any intervention was performed or until the last follow-up. The maximal tumour diameter in any plane (mm) was measured from the MRI scans. The annual growth rate and the statistical relationship between age, sex, IHC, Ki-67, resection %, residual tumour was calculated.

RESULTS

Out of 610 pituitary adenomas identified in the dataset, 116 patients met the inclusion criteria. Follow-up period ranged from 30 to 142 months (mean 78.5 months). A strong relationship existed between predicting tumour progression with first post-operative residue size (p = .001). A statistically significant relationship was found to be present between tumour growth and a residue of less than 10 mm diameter and 11-20 mm in diameter (Log rank p value .0216). On average, each patient with a residue < 5mm had MRI scans costing 976 £.

CONCLUSION

Based on statistical analysis and internal validation of the growth rate of the residue, we have proposed MRI follow-up scans. These recommendations have the potential to save more than 300 £per patient towards MRI costs and can lay down a marker for defining time interval of serial scans for post-operative NFPA's.

The natural history of non-functioning pituitary adenomas: A meta-analysis of conservatively managed tumors

BACKGROUND

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) are often discovered incidentally. The natural history of NFPA is not well understood, obfuscating evidence-based management decisions. Meta-data of radiographically followed NFPA may help guide conservative versus operative treatment of these tumors.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Ovid for studies with NFPA managed nonoperatively with radiographic follow-up. Studies on postoperative outcomes after NFPA resection and studies that did not delineate NFPA data from functional pituitary lesions were excluded. NFPA were divided into micro- and macroadenomas based on size at presentation. We performed a meta-analysis of aggregate data for length of follow-up, change in tumor size, rate of apoplexy, and need for resection during follow-up.

RESULTS

Our database search yielded 1787 articles, of which 19 were included for final analysis. The studies included 1057 patients with NFPA followed radiographically. Macroadenomas were significantly more likely to undergo growth (34% vs. 12%; p < 0.01) or apoplexy (5% vs. < 1%; p = 0.01) compared to microadenomas. Resection was performed in 11% of all NFPA patients during follow-up regardless of size at presentation. Meta-regression showed that surgery during follow-up was associated with macroadenomas and negatively associated with microadenomas that decreased in size.

CONCLUSION

Low-quality evidence suggests that NFPA classified as macroadenomas have an increased rate of growth and apoplexy during follow-up compared to microadenomas. A significant minority of all NFPA patients ultimately underwent surgery. In select patients, nonoperative management may be the appropriate strategy for NFPA. Macroadenomas may require closer follow-up.

Guidelines in the management of CNS tumors

INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines in the management of central nervous system tumors (CNS) continue to be developed and updated through the work of the Joint Section on Tumors of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS).

METHODS

The guidelines are created using the most current and clinically relevant evidence using systematic methodologies, which classify available data and provide recommendations for clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

This update summarizes the Tumor Section Guidelines developed over the last five years for non-functioning pituitary adenomas, low grade gliomas, vestibular schwannomas, and metastatic brain tumors.

Post-operative imaging assessment of non-functioning pituitary adenomas

BACKGROUND

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFAs) are the most common pituitary tumors. There is significant variability in clinical practice in terms of post-operative imaging evaluation. The objective of this manuscript is to provide an exhaustive review of published articles pertaining to the post-operative imaging evaluation of NFAs.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was queried for studies investigating imaging for the post-operative evaluation of pituitary adenomas. From an initial search of 5589 articles, 37 articles were evaluated in detail and included in this review.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for post-operative monitoring of NFAs, although functional imaging modalities may improve identification of residual tumor in conjunction with MRI. The residual tumor can be distinguished from post-operative changes by experienced practitioners using high-resolution MRI in the immediate post-operative setting (within 1 week of surgery). However, continued imaging evolution in the appearance of residual tumor or resection cavity is expected up to 3 months post-operatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative imaging appearance of the pituitary gland, optic apparatus, and pneumocephalus patterns, correlated with the clinical outcomes. Long-term, lifetime follow-up is warranted for NFA patients who underwent surgical resection.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on Posttreatment Follow-up Evaluation of Patients With Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas

BACKGROUND

Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are the most frequent pituitary tumors. Due to the lack of hormonal hypersecretion, posttreatment follow-up evaluation of NFPAs is challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To create evidence-based guidelines in an attempt to formulate guidance for posttreatment follow-up in a consistent, rigorous, and cost-effective way.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed. Only clinical articles describing postoperative follow-up of adult patients with NFPAs were included. To ascertain the class of evidence for the posttreatment follow-ups, the authors used the Clinical Assessment evidence-based classification.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria with respect to answering the questions on the posttreatment radiologic, endocrinologic, and ophthalmologic follow-up. Through this search, the authors formulated evidence-based guidelines for radiologic, endocrinologic, and ophthalmologic follow-up after surgical and/or radiation treatment.

CONCLUSION

Long-term radiologic, endocrinologic, and ophthalmologic surveillance monitoring after surgical and/or radiation therapy treatment of NFPAs to evaluate for tumor recurrence or regrowth, as well as pituitary and visual status, is recommended. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation on the duration of time of surveillance and its frequency. It is recommended that the first radiologic study to evaluate the extent of resection of the NFPA be performed ≥3 months after surgical intervention. The full guidelines document for this chapter can be located at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-management-patients-non-functioning-pituitary-adenomas/Chapter_8.

ABBREVIATION

NFPA, nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma.

Natural history of postoperative nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies attempting to define the natural history of postoperative nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (pNFPAs) were somewhat limited by selection bias and/or small numbers and/or lack of consistency among the study findings. The aim of this study was to scrutinize the literature in order to analyze the natural history of pNFPAs.

METHODS

Electronic database including MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. The literature relating to the patients with pNFPAs without postoperative radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy was collected. Eligible studies reported on the rate of tumor recurrence, the tumor growth-free survival rate (TGFSR) at 5 and 10 years, and/or the residual tumor volume doubling time (TVDT).

RESULTS

19 studies met the criteria. The pNFPAs were divided into two groups: the pooled recurrence rate of group I without detectable residual tumor (371 patients) was 12% (95% CI 6-19%), the TGFSR at 5 and 10 years were 96% (95% CI 89-99%) and 82% (95% CI 65-94%), respectively. The pooled recurrence rate of group II with residual tumor (600 patients) was 46% (95% CI 36-56%), the TGFSR at 5 and 10 years were 56% (95% CI 41-71%) and 40% (95% CI 27-53%), respectively. The mean TVDT was 3.4 years (95% CI 2.4-4.5 years).

CONCLUSIONS

pNFPAs, with or without detectable residual tumor, need stratification of treatment and radiological/endocrinological follow-up strategy. According to the TVDT, residual tumor regrowth is very slow, which permits an extensive and safe follow-up program for most patients.

Incidentally discovered pituitary masses: pituitary incidentalomas

With the widespread use of computed tomography and MRI, the incidental discovery of pituitary incidentalomas is increasing in frequency. The most common cause of a pituitary mass is a pituitary adenoma (90% of all pituitary masses); however, the differential diagnosis remains extensive. The challenge is to distinguish those that can or will cause morbidity/mortality from those that will not. Opinions on approaching management of these lesions vary. This article will review current data regarding the prevalence, natural history and potential morbidity associated with this entity and describe an epidemiological approach based on four questions: does an incidental mass put the patient at increased risk for an adverse outcome? Can individuals with treatable syndromes be accurately diagnosed? Is the treatment of these syndromes more effective in presymptomatic patients? And do the beneficial effects of presymptomatic detection and treatment of these patients justify the costs incurred? We recommend the following approach: recognizing that one size does not fit all and that the approach should be tailored to the needs of the particular case. If the mass was discovered on a computed tomography, an enhanced MRI is recommended. Detailed history and physical examination should be carried out to look for signs of functional or 'subclinically' functional tumor. Size and structure should be assessed, especially proximity to the optic chiasm. Laboratory evaluation with a serum prolactin for small tumors is cost effective, other lab testing is indicated if metabolic problems are present. Care should be taken to assess for hypopituitarism, clinically and biochemically, if the mass is large, that is, more than 1 cm, visual field testing is also recommended. Note that the vast majority of patients with pituitary incidentalomas that are microadenomas die with them, not from them.