Evaluation of mini-mental status examination score after gamma knife radiosurgery as the first radiation treatment for brain metastases

Prediction Models for Radiation-Induced Neurocognitive Decline in Adult Patients With Primary or Secondary Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review

Purpose

Although an increasing body of literature suggests a relationship between brain irradiation and deterioration of neurocognitive function, it remains as the standard therapeutic and prophylactic modality in patients with brain tumors. This review was aimed to abstract and evaluate the prediction models for radiation-induced neurocognitive decline in patients with primary or secondary brain tumors.

Methods

MEDLINE was searched on October 31, 2021 for publications containing relevant truncation and MeSH terms related to “radiotherapy,” “brain,” “prediction model,” and “neurocognitive impairments.” Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool.

Results

Of 3,580 studies reviewed, 23 prediction models were identified. Age, tumor location, education level, baseline neurocognitive score, and radiation dose to the hippocampus were the most common predictors in the models. The Hopkins verbal learning (n = 7) and the trail making tests (n = 4) were the most frequent outcome assessment tools. All studies used regression (n = 14 linear, n = 8 logistic, and n = 4 Cox) as machine learning method. All models were judged to have a high risk of bias mainly due to issues in the analysis.

Conclusion

Existing models have limited quality and are at high risk of bias. Following recommendations are outlined in this review to improve future models: developing cognitive assessment instruments taking into account the peculiar traits of the different brain tumors and radiation modalities; adherence to model development and validation guidelines; careful choice of candidate predictors according to the literature and domain expert consensus; and considering radiation dose to brain substructures as they can provide important information on specific neurocognitive impairments.

Cerebral metastases

Brain metastases are common and deadly. Over the last 25 years GKNS has been established as an invaluable treatment. It may be used as a primary treatment or after either surgery or WBRT. Patients are assessed using one of a number of available scales. GKNS may be repeated for new metastases and for unresponsive tumors. Prescription doses are usually between 18 and 20Gy. The use of advanced MR techniques to highlight sensitive structures like the hippocampi have extended the efficacy of the treatment. More recently GKNS has been used with different target therapies with improved results. More recently frameless treatments have become more popular in this group of very sick patients. GKNS controls tumors in between 80% and over 95% of cases and may even be used for brainstem tumors.

Cognitive effects of stereotactic radiosurgery in adult patients with brain metastases: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS) is increasingly applied in patients with brain metastases (BM) and is expected to have fewer adverse effects on cognitive functioning than whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Patients with BM are often confronted with a relatively short life expectancy, and the prevention or delay of cognitive decline to maintain quality of life is a clinically and highly relevant treatment goal. This review systematically and specifically evaluates the current literature on the cognitive effects of SRS in patients with BM.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Published trials on SRS alone or in combination with WBRT, including objective assessment of cognitive functioning, were identified through a systematic search of the PubMed database up to March 2018.

RESULTS

Of the 241 records screened, 14 studies matched the selection criteria: 2 pilot studies, 7 single-group/observational trials (1 study update), and 5 randomized trials (1 secondary analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the results show little to no objective cognitive decline up to 4 months after SRS compared with WBRT. However, most trials suffered from methodologic limitations that hindered reliable conclusions. Most importantly, few studies investigated the specific cognitive effects of SRS alone or versus WBRT. Furthermore, disentangling the cognitive effects of SRS from the effects of the disease itself and from the effects of other treatments remains very difficult. By presenting this comprehensive review, we aim to encourage researchers to probe deeper into this area and to do so in a standardized and methodologically optimal manner. The ultimate objective of this line of research is to inform both doctors and patients more precisely about the cognitive effects they can expect from treatment. This study is expected to improve the quality of decision-making and maximize clinical outcomes for each individual patient.

The treatment of patients with 1-3 brain metastases: is there a place for whole brain radiotherapy alone, yet? A retrospective analysis

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without other treatments in patients (pts) with 1-3 brain metastases (BM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Toxicities and survival of 134 pts treated between 2009 and 2013 with WBRT alone (58 pts), WBRT plus surgery (SUR-WBRT: 42 pts) or WBRT followed by stereotactic or integrated boost radiotherapy (SRT-WBRT: 34 pts) were analyzed. Differences in toxicity (acute and late) incidence and in overall (OS), disease-free (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated (χ(2)-test, uni- and multivariate analysis).

RESULTS

Pts given intensified treatments (SUR- and SBRT-WBRT) had better 3-month local response compared to WBRT alone group (p < 0.045). Better 1-year local control was evident only in SRT-WBRT pts (p < 0.035). Univariate OS analysis confirmed, as favorable prognostic factors, RPA class I (p < 0.001), GPA class III and IV (p < 0.001), single metastasis (p = 0.045), stable primary disease (p = 0.03), intensified treatment (p = 0.000), systemic therapy after radiotherapy (p = 0.04) and response of metastatic lesions (p = 0.002). At multivariate analysis, OS was better in RPA class I pts (p = 0.002), who had more aggressive radiotherapy treatments (p = 0.001), chemotherapy after radiotherapy (p < 0.001) and response to RT (p = 0.003). Response to radiotherapy (p = 0.002) and BM number (p < 0.001) resulted independently prognostic for DFS. About 60 % of patients had mild acute toxicity (G1), especially headache (51 %) and fatigue (34 %); only 2 patients (2 %) had severe (G3) headache and 5 patients (4 %) severe fatigue (G3) reversible with oral steroids. No differences were evident between the different treatment groups. Among 80 pts followed up with MRI, 12 (15 %) had leukoencephalopathy (equally distributed across subgroups) and 5 (6 %) radionecroses, 4/5 asymptomatic, 5/5 in pts given intensified treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis confirms the known prognostic factors for BM, emphasizing the importance of intensified treatments in a population with favorable features.

Survival after surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple intracranial metastases: results of a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Patients with systemic cancer and a single brain metastasis who undergo treatment with resection plus radiotherapy live longer and have a better quality of life than those treated with radiotherapy alone. Historically, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the mainstay of radiation therapy; however, it is associated with significant delayed neurocognitive sequelae. In this study, the authors looked at survival in patients with single and multiple intracranial metastases who had undergone surgery and adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the tumor bed and synchronous lesions.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records from an 8-year period at a single institution for consecutive patients with brain metastases treated via complete resection of dominant lesions and adjuvant radiosurgery. The cohort was analyzed for time to local progression, synchronous lesion progression, new intracranial lesion development, systemic progression, and overall survival. The Kaplan-Meier method (stratified by age, sex, tumor histology, and number of intracranial lesions prior to surgery) was used to calculate both progression-free and overall survival. A Cox proportional-hazards regression model was also fitted with the number of intracranial lesions as the predictor and survival as the outcome controlling for disease severity, age, sex, and primary histology.

RESULTS

The median overall follow-up among the 150-person cohort eligible for analysis was 17 months. Patients had an average age of 46.2 years (range 16-82 years), and 62.7% were female. The mean (± standard deviation) number of intracranial lesions per patient was 2.5 ± 2.3. The mean time between surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was 3.2 ± 4.1 weeks. Primary cancers included lung cancer (43.3%), breast cancer (21.3%), melanoma (10.0%), renal cell carcinoma (6.7%), and colon cancer (6.7%). The average number of isocenters per treated lesion was 7.6 ± 6.6, and the average treatment dose was 17.8 ± 2.8 Gy. One-year survival for patients in this cohort was 52%, and the 1-year local control rate was 77%. The median (±standard error) overall survival was 13.2 ± 1.9 months. There was no difference in survival between patients with a single lesion and those with multiple lesions (p = 0.319) after controlling for age, sex, and histology of primary tumor. Patients with primary breast histology had the greatest overall median survival (22.9 ± 6.2 months); patients with colorectal cancer had the shortest overall median survival (5.3 ± 1.8 months). The most common cause of death in this series was systemic progression (79%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that 1-year survival for patients with multiple intracranial metastases treated with resection followed by SRS to both the tumor bed and synchronous lesions is similar to established outcomes for patients with a single intracranial metastasis.