1
|
de Bernardi A, Bachelot T, Larrouquère L. Long-term response to sequential anti-HER2 therapies including trastuzumab-deruxtecan in a patient with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with leptomeningeal metastases: a case report and review of the literature. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1210873. [PMID: 38269026 PMCID: PMC10806069 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1210873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) is increasing among breast cancer patients, but their prognosis remains dismal. Many therapeutic options are now available to treat HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) involving the central nervous system (CNS). This case report illustrates a long-lasting response of more than 2 years in a patient with HER2+ MBC with LM after sequential administration of systemic and intrathecal (IT) anti-HER2 therapies and highlights that an appropriate treatment of HER2+ LM can result in durable survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel de Bernardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Cancer Reseach Center of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Louis Larrouquère
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Cancer Reseach Center of Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bartsch R, Jerzak KJ, Larrouquere L, Müller V, Le Rhun E. Pharmacotherapy for leptomeningeal disease in breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 122:102653. [PMID: 38118373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
Clinical data supporting the best therapeutic approach in leptomeningeal disease (LMD; also known as leptomeningeal metastases or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) are lacking. Despite the development of new agents and increasing incidence of central nervous system metastases, patients with LMD are often excluded from clinical trials in breast cancer, with very few conducted specifically in LMD. Consequently, current evidence may not provide an accurate reflection of real-world clinical practice. This review aims to provide further insight into the treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer and LMD. We explore differences between clinical and real-world studies, considering inclusion criteria, levels of evidence for LMD diagnosis, and time between diagnosis of LMD and LMD-specific treatment initiation. Patient prognosis is poor; median overall survival is limited to several months, with approximately 10% of patients alive at 12 months. Efficacy results have been reported for various systemic and intrathecal agents in LMD to date. Systemic therapies under investigation for LMD in breast cancer include tucatinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and paclitaxel trevatide; trastuzumab is the main intrathecal agent currently under investigation. Recent trials investigating systemic or intrathecal therapies are typically small, single-arm studies, and most are restricted to patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. Moreover, the variability among inclusion criteria and response assessment tools makes the interpretation of results difficult. Large retrospective cohorts with various inclusion criteria and treatment regimens provide some real-world data. However, there remains an urgent need for randomised clinical trials which include patients with LMD across all breast cancer subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupert Bartsch
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katarzyna J Jerzak
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bardhan M, Dey D, Suresh V, Javed B, Venur VA, Joe N, Kalidindi R, Ozair A, Khan M, Mahtani R, Lo S, Odia Y, Ahluwalia MS. An overview of the therapeutic strategies for neoplastic meningitis due to breast cancer: when and why? Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:77-103. [PMID: 38145503 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2293223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is characterized by the infiltration of tumor cells into the meninges, and poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Breast cancer is a common cause of NM among solid tumors, further highlighting the urgent need to explore effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of NM therapy in breast cancer by collating existing research, evaluating current treatments, and identifying potential emerging therapeutic options. AREAS COVERED This review explores the clinical features, therapeutic strategies, recent advances, and challenges of managing NM in patients with breast cancer. Its management includes multimodal strategies, including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. This review also emphasizes targeted drug options and optimal drug concentrations, and discusses emerging therapies. Additionally, it highlights the variability in treatment outcomes and the potential of combination regimens to effectively manage NM in breast cancer. EXPERT OPINION Challenges in treating NM include debates over clinical trial end points and the management of adverse effects. Drug resistance and low response rates are significant hurdles, particularly inHER2-negative breast cancer. The development of more precise and cost-effective medications with improved selectivity is crucial. Additionally, global efforts are needed for infrastructure development and cancer control considering the diverse nature of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mainak Bardhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Vinay Suresh
- King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Binish Javed
- Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Vyshak Alva Venur
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Neha Joe
- St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | | | - Ahmad Ozair
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Reshma Mahtani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Simon Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yazmin Odia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fitzpatrick A, Iravani M, Mills A, Vicente D, Alaguthurai T, Roxanis I, Turner NC, Haider S, Tutt ANJ, Isacke CM. Genomic profiling and pre-clinical modelling of breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis reveals acquisition of a lobular-like phenotype. Nat Commun 2023; 14:7408. [PMID: 37973922 PMCID: PMC10654396 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43242-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis (BCLM), where tumour cells grow along the lining of the brain and spinal cord, is a devastating development for patients. Investigating this metastatic site is hampered by difficulty in accessing tumour material. Here, we utilise cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and CSF disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) to explore the clonal evolution of BCLM and heterogeneity between leptomeningeal and extracranial metastatic sites. Somatic alterations with potential therapeutic actionability were detected in 81% (17/21) of BCLM cases, with 19% detectable in CSF cfDNA only. BCLM was enriched in genomic aberrations in adherens junction and cytoskeletal genes, revealing a lobular-like breast cancer phenotype. CSF DTCs were cultured in 3D to establish BCLM patient-derived organoids, and used for the successful generation of BCLM in vivo models. These data reveal that BCLM possess a unique genomic aberration profile and highlight potential cellular dependencies in this hard-to-treat form of metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Fitzpatrick
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Marjan Iravani
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Adam Mills
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - David Vicente
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Ioannis Roxanis
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Syed Haider
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Andrew N J Tutt
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
- Oncology and Haematology Directorate, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare M Isacke
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Le Rhun E, Weller M, van den Bent M, Brandsma D, Furtner J, Rudà R, Schadendorf D, Seoane J, Tonn JC, Wesseling P, Wick W, Minniti G, Peters S, Curigliano G, Preusser M. Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours: EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101624. [PMID: 37863528 PMCID: PMC10619142 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
•This Clinical Practice Guideline provides recommendations for managing leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumours. •The guideline covers clinical, imaging and cytological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •A treatment and management algorithm is provided. •The author panel encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M van den Bent
- Department of The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
| | - D Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Furtner
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MIAAI), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
| | - R Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - D Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen; University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - J Seoane
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J-C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc and Brain Tumour Center, Amsterdam; Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Steininger J, Gellrich FF, Engellandt K, Meinhardt M, Westphal D, Beissert S, Meier F, Glitza Oliva IC. Leptomeningeal Metastases in Melanoma Patients: An Update on and Future Perspectives for Diagnosis and Treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11443. [PMID: 37511202 PMCID: PMC10380419 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of cancer with a particularly poor prognosis. Among solid tumours, malignant melanoma (MM) has one of the highest rates of metastasis to the leptomeninges, with approximately 10-15% of patients with advanced disease developing LMD. Tumour cells that metastasise to the brain have unique properties that allow them to cross the blood-brain barrier, evade the immune system, and survive in the brain microenvironment. Metastatic colonisation is achieved through dynamic communication between metastatic cells and the tumour microenvironment, resulting in a tumour-permissive milieu. Despite advances in treatment options, the incidence of LMD appears to be increasing and current treatment modalities have a limited impact on survival. This review provides an overview of the biology of LMD, diagnosis and current treatment approaches for MM patients with LMD, and an overview of ongoing clinical trials. Despite the still limited efficacy of current therapies, there is hope that emerging treatments will improve the outcomes for patients with LMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Steininger
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank Friedrich Gellrich
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Kay Engellandt
- Department of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Matthias Meinhardt
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Dana Westphal
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Beissert
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lazaratos AM, Maritan SM, Quaiattini A, Darlix A, Ratosa I, Ferraro E, Griguolo G, Guarneri V, Pellerino A, Hofer S, Jacot W, Stemmler HJ, van den Broek MPH, Dobnikar N, Panet F, Lahijanian Z, Morikawa A, Seidman AD, Soffietti R, Panasci L, Petrecca K, Rose AAN, Bouganim N, Dankner M. Intrathecal trastuzumab versus alternate routes of delivery for HER2-targeted therapies in patients with HER2+ breast cancer leptomeningeal metastases. Breast 2023; 69:451-468. [PMID: 37156650 PMCID: PMC10300571 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with HER2+ breast cancer (BC) frequently develop leptomeningeal metastases (LM). While HER2-targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings, including for parenchymal brain metastases, their efficacy for patients with LM has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial. However, several single-armed prospective studies, case series and case reports have studied oral, intravenous, or intrathecally administered HER2-targeted therapy regimens for patients with HER2+ BC LM. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in HER2+ BC LM in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Targeted therapies evaluated were trastuzumab (intrathecal or intravenous), pertuzumab, lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with CNS-specific progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS 7780 abstracts were screened, identifying 45 publications with 208 patients, corresponding to 275 lines of HER2-targeted therapy for BC LM which met inclusion criteria. In univariable and multivariable analyses, we observed no significant difference in OS and CNS-specific PFS between intrathecal trastuzumab compared to oral or intravenous administration of HER2-targeted therapy. Anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody-based regimens did not demonstrate superiority over HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In a cohort of 15 patients, treatment with trastuzumab-deruxtecan was associated with prolonged OS compared to other HER2-targeted therapies and compared to trastuzumab-emtansine. CONCLUSIONS The results of this meta-analysis, comprising the limited data available, suggest that intrathecal administration of HER2-targeted therapy for patients with HER2+ BC LM confers no additional benefit over oral and/or IV treatment regimens. Although the number of patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan in this cohort is small, this novel agent offers promise for this patient population and requires further investigation in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Maria Lazaratos
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sarah M Maritan
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrea Quaiattini
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Amelie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, INSERM, CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Emanuela Ferraro
- Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA
| | - Gaia Griguolo
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessia Pellerino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Hofer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Nika Dobnikar
- Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Francois Panet
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Zubin Lahijanian
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Aki Morikawa
- Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA
| | - Andrew D Seidman
- Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Lawrence Panasci
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kevin Petrecca
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - April A N Rose
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nathaniel Bouganim
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Matthew Dankner
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Glitza Oliva IC, Ferguson SD, Bassett R, Foster AP, John I, Hennegan TD, Rohlfs M, Richard J, Iqbal M, Dett T, Lacey C, Jackson N, Rodgers T, Phillips S, Duncan S, Haydu L, Lin R, Amaria RN, Wong MK, Diab A, Yee C, Patel SP, McQuade JL, Fischer GM, McCutcheon IE, O'Brien BJ, Tummala S, Debnam M, Guha-Thakurta N, Wargo JA, Carapeto FCL, Hudgens CW, Huse JT, Tetzlaff MT, Burton EM, Tawbi HA, Davies MA. Concurrent intrathecal and intravenous nivolumab in leptomeningeal disease: phase 1 trial interim results. Nat Med 2023; 29:898-905. [PMID: 36997799 PMCID: PMC10115650 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02170-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
There is a critical need for effective treatments for leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Here, we report the interim analysis results of an ongoing single-arm, first-in-human phase 1/1b study of concurrent intrathecal (IT) and intravenous (IV) nivolumab in patients with melanoma and LMD. The primary endpoints are determination of safety and the recommended IT nivolumab dose. The secondary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Patients are treated with IT nivolumab alone in cycle 1 and IV nivolumab is included in subsequent cycles. We treated 25 patients with metastatic melanoma using 5, 10, 20 and 50 mg of IT nivolumab. There were no dose-limiting toxicities at any dose level. The recommended IT dose of nivolumab is 50 mg (with IV nivolumab 240 mg) every 2 weeks. Median OS was 4.9 months, with 44% and 26% OS rates at 26 and 52 weeks, respectively. These initial results suggest that concurrent IT and IV nivolumab is safe and feasible with potential efficacy in patients with melanoma LMD, including in patients who had previously received anti-PD1 therapy. Accrual to the study continues, including in patients with lung cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03025256 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roland Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexandra P Foster
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ida John
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tarin D Hennegan
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michelle Rohlfs
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jessie Richard
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Masood Iqbal
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tina Dett
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carol Lacey
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Natalie Jackson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Theresa Rodgers
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Suzanne Phillips
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sheila Duncan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ruitao Lin
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cassian Yee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grant M Fischer
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barbara J O'Brien
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sudhakar Tummala
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew Debnam
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nandita Guha-Thakurta
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fernando C L Carapeto
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Courtney W Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Khaled ML, Tarhini AA, Forsyth PA, Smalley I, Piña Y. Leptomeningeal Disease (LMD) in Patients with Melanoma Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061884. [PMID: 36980770 PMCID: PMC10047692 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication caused by seeding malignant cells to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the leptomeningeal membrane. LMD is diagnosed in 5-15% of patients with systemic malignancy. Management of LMD is challenging due to the biological and metabolic tumor microenvironment of LMD being largely unknown. Patients with LMD can present with a wide variety of signs and/or symptoms that could be multifocal and include headache, nausea, vomiting, diplopia, and weakness, among others. The median survival time for patients with LMD is measured in weeks and up to 3-6 months with aggressive management, and death usually occurs due to progressive neurologic dysfunction. In melanoma, LMD is associated with a suppressive immune microenvironment characterized by a high number of apoptotic and exhausted CD4+ T-cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and a low number of CD8+ T-cells. Proteomics analysis revealed enrichment of complement cascade, which may disrupt the blood-CSF barrier. Clinical management of melanoma LMD consists primarily of radiation therapy, BRAF/MEK inhibitors as targeted therapy, and immunotherapy with anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4, and anti-LAG-3 immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review summarizes the biology and anatomic features of melanoma LMD, as well as the current therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Lotfy Khaled
- Metabolism and Physiology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 12613, Egypt
| | - Ahmad A Tarhini
- Departments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Neuro-Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Inna Smalley
- Metabolism and Physiology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Yolanda Piña
- Neuro-Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Neoplastic Meningitis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010119. [PMID: 36612116 PMCID: PMC9817816 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from systemic cancers can involve the brain parenchyma, leptomeninges, or the dura. Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known by different terms, including leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and carcinomatous meningitis, occurs due to solid tumors and hematologic malignancies and is associated with a poor prognosis. The current management paradigm entails a multimodal approach focused on palliation with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, which may be administered systemically or directly into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This review focuses on novel therapeutic approaches, including targeted and immunotherapeutic agents under investigation, that have shown promise in NM arising from solid tumors.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gao T, Chen F, Li M. Development of Two Diagnostic Prediction Models for Leptomeningeal Metastasis in Patients With Solid Tumors. Front Neurol 2022; 13:899153. [PMID: 35677335 PMCID: PMC9168081 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.899153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesFor accurate diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) and to avoid unnecessary examinations or lumber puncture (LP), we develop two diagnostic prediction models for patients with solid tumors.Study Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis is a retrospective cohort study launched at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University. In total, 206 patients who had been admitted between January 2005 and December 2021 with a solid tumor and clinical suspicion of LM were enrolled to develop model A. In total, 152 patients of them who underwent LPs for cytology and biochemistry were enrolled to develop model B.Model DevelopmentDiagnostic factors included skull metastasis, active brain metastasis, progressed extracranial disease, number of extracranial organs involved, number of symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein, and CSF glucose. The outcome predictor was defined as the clinical diagnosis of LM. Logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to identify relevant variables and fit the prediction model. A calibration curve and the concordance index (c-index) were used to evaluate calibration and discrimination ability. The n-fold cross-validation method was used to internally validate the models. The decision curve analysis (DCA) and the interventions avoided analysis (IAA) were used to evaluate the clinical application.ResultsThe area under the curve (AUC) values of models A and B were 0.812 (95% CI: 0.751–0.874) and 0.901 (95% CI: 0.852–0.949). Respectively, compared to the first magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and first LP, models A and B showed a higher AUC (model A vs. first MRI: 0.812 vs. 0.743, p = 0.087; model B vs. first LP: 0.901 vs. 0.800, p = 0.010). The validated c-indexes were 0.810 (95% CI: 0.670–0.952) and 0.899 (95% CI: 0.823–0.977). The calibration curves show a good calibrated ability. The evaluation of clinical application revealed a net clinical benefit and a reduction of unnecessary interventions using the models.ConclusionsThe models can help improve diagnostic accuracy when used alone or in combination with conventional work-up. They also exhibit a net clinical benefit in medical decisions and in avoiding unnecessary interventions for patients with LM. Studies focused on external validation of our models are necessary in the future.
Collapse
|
12
|
Chi Y, Shang M, Xu L, Gong H, Tao R, Song L, Zhang B, Yin S, Cong B, Li H. Durable Effect of Pyrotinib and Metronomic Vinorelbine in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Leptomeningeal Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:811919. [PMID: 35251981 PMCID: PMC8888838 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.811919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are rare and catastrophic for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) with LM is extremely poor. There is no high-quality evidence of treatment regimens in HER2-positive BC with LM yet. Here, we present a case of LM in a 50-year-old woman with HER2-positive BC. Immunohistochemistry revealed invasive ductal carcinoma, estrogen receptor negative, progesterone receptor negative, HER2 3+, P53 positive 80%, and Ki-67 positive 35%. Reported for the first time, the patient was given pyrotinib-targeted therapy (400 mg, oral, every day), metronomic vinorelbine (40 mg, oral, three times a week), and intrathecal methotrexate (10 mg, infrequent and irregular use due to poor compliance) synchronously. The patient received and benefited from the treatment regimen for 16 months. And the quality of life, as self-reported, improved significantly. We also comprehensively summarized all the case reports, observational studies, and clinical trials related to HER2-positive BC with LM in the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov. Intrathecal chemotherapy (methotrexate, cytarabine, thiotepa), intrathecal trastuzumab, whole-brain radiotherapy, and systemic therapy are commonly used treatment options according to a review of the literature and research. Pembrolizumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) as novel drugs are promising in LM. Furthermore, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as tucatinib and neratinib have exhibited good efficacy in HER2-positive BC with central nervous system (CNS) metastases and deserve further exploration. In our report, combining pyrotinib-targeted therapy with metronomic chemotherapy is a potential regimen, which has presented satisfactory therapeutic efficacy and also warrants additional investigation in HER2-positive BC with LM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajing Chi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Mao Shang
- Department of Oncology, Jinan Central Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Liang Xu
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Heyi Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Rongjie Tao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Lihua Song
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Baoxuan Zhang
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Sha Yin
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Binbin Cong
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Huihui Li
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mathis NJ, Wijetunga NA, Imber BS, Pike LRG, Yang JT. Recent Advances and Applications of Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:335-342. [PMID: 35133614 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01209-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Radiation therapy (RT) is a mainstay of treatment for brain metastases from solid tumors. Treatment of these patients is complex and should focus on minimizing symptoms, preserving functional status, and prolonging survival. RECENT FINDINGS Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) can lead to toxicity, and while it does reduce recurrence in the CNS, this has not been shown to provide a survival benefit. Recent advances focus on reducing the toxicity of WBRT or using more targeted radiation therapy. New paradigms including the use of proton RT for leptomeningeal metastases (LM) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) before craniotomy hold promise in improving treatment efficacy and reducing toxicity. Omission or replacement of WBRT is often safe and the use of SRS is expanding to include patients with more lesions and preoperative RT. Proton RT holds promise for LM. Progress is being made in improving patient-centered outcomes and reducing toxicity for patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah J Mathis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - N Ari Wijetunga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Brandon S Imber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Luke R G Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fitzpatrick A, Iravani M, Mills A, Childs L, Alaguthurai T, Clifford A, Garcia-Murillas I, Van Laere S, Dirix L, Harries M, Okines A, Turner NC, Haider S, Tutt ANJ, Isacke CM. Assessing CSF ctDNA to improve diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic monitoring in breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 28:1180-1191. [PMID: 34921020 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology is the gold standard diagnostic test for breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis (BCLM), but has impaired sensitivity, often necessitating repeated lumbar puncture to confirm or refute diagnosis. Further, there is no quantitative response tool to assess response or progression during BCLM treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Facing the challenge of working with small volume samples and the lack of common recurrent mutations in breast cancers, cell-free DNA was extracted from CSF and plasma of patients undergoing investigation for BCLM (n=30). ctDNA fraction was assessed by ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing (ulpWGS), which does not require prior tumor sequencing. RESULTS In this proof-of-concept study ctDNA was detected (fraction {greater than or equal to}0.10) in CSF of all 24 BCLM+ patients (median ctDNA fraction 0.57), regardless of negative cytology or borderline MRI imaging, whereas CSF ctDNA was not detected in the 6 BCLM- patients (median ctDNA fraction 0.03, P<0.0001). Plasma ctDNA was only detected in patients with extracranial disease progression or who had previously received whole brain radiotherapy. ctDNA fraction was highly concordant with mutant allele fraction measured by tumor mutation-specific ddPCR assays (r=0.852, P<0.0001). During intrathecal treatment, serial monitoring (n=12 patients) showed that suppression of CSF ctDNA fraction was associated with longer BCLM survival (P=0.034) and rising ctDNA fraction was detectable up to 12 weeks before clinical progression. CONCLUSION Measuring ctDNA fraction by ulpWGS is a quantitative marker demonstrating potential for timely and accurate BCLM diagnosis and therapy response monitoring, with the ultimate aim to improve management of this poor prognosis patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Fitzpatrick
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research
| | - Marjan Iravani
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research
| | - Adam Mills
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research
| | - Lucy Childs
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Angela Clifford
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital, King's College London
| | - Isaac Garcia-Murillas
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital
| | - Steven Van Laere
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Oncology Center, General Hospital Sint-Augustinus
| | - Luc Dirix
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Oncology Center, AZ Sint-Augustinus
| | - Mark Harries
- Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Nicholas C Turner
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, and Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research
| | - Syed Haider
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research
| | - Andrew N J Tutt
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, Institute of Cancer Research London
| | - Clare M Isacke
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Leptomeningeal Disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2021; 36:189-215. [PMID: 34756800 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
16
|
Mollica L, Leli C, Puglisi S, Sardi S, Sottotetti F. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and breast cancer: a systematic review of current evidence on diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Drugs Context 2021; 10:dic-2021-6-6. [PMID: 34745272 PMCID: PMC8552906 DOI: 10.7573/dic.2021-6-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a rare but challenging manifestation of advanced breast cancer with a severe impact on morbidity and mortality. We performed a systematic review of the evidence published over the last two decades, focusing on recent advances in the diagnostic and therapeutic options of LC. Lobular histology and a triple-negative intrinsic subtype are well-known risk factors for LC. Clinical manifestations are diverse and often aspecific. There is no gold standard for LC diagnosis: MRI and cerebrospinal fluid cytology are the most frequently used modalities despite the low accuracy. Current standard of care involves a multimodal strategy including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy in combination with brain radiotherapy. Intrathecal chemotherapy has been widely used through the years despite the lack of data from randomized controlled trials and conflicting evidence on patient outcomes. No specific chemotherapeutic agent has shown superiority over others for both intrathecal and systemic treatment. Although endocrine therapy was heuristically considered unable to exert significant control on central nervous system metastatic disease, retrospective data suggest a favourable toxicity profile and even a possible positive impact on survival. In recent years, encouraging data on the use of targeted agents has emerged but further research in this field is required. Palliative treatment in the form of whole brain or stereotactic radiotherapy is associated with improvement in clinical manifestations and quality of life, with no proven impact on survival. The most investigated prognostic factors include performance status, non-triple-negative disease and multimodal treatment. Validation of prognostic scores is necessary to aid clinicians in the identification of patient subgroups that are most likely to benefit from an intensive therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudia Leli
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Puglisi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Silvia Sardi
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Federico Sottotetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Comlek S, Saglam S. A new approach for leptomeningeal metastases: chemotherapy administered through lumbar intrathecal port. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2021; 79:816-823. [PMID: 34669821 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2020-0554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrathecal chemotherapy is a local therapeutic modality used for treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. However, the techniques currently used, i.e. repeated lumbar puncture and Ommaya reservoir, have certain disadvantages. Lumbar intrathecal port (LIP) placement is a relatively novel technique, which has been used for pain management in cancer patients. OBJECTIVE To investigate the use of LIP for intrathecal administration of chemotherapeutic agents in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. METHODS Retrospective study of 13 patients treated with intrathecal chemotherapy for secondary leptomeningeal involvement of a primary solid tumor were included in this retrospective study. The patients received intrathecal chemotherapy through a LIP. RESULTS The patients received a total of 123 intrathecal chemotherapy doses. No grade 3-4 toxicity, technical problem or severe complication developed. During a median of 136 days of follow-up (range, 67-376 days), 12 patients died (92.3%). The treatment resulted in symptom improvement in all patients and self-rated overall health and quality of life improved, compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS The LIP system, which has been used for intrathecal pain management for decades, appears to offer a safe alternative for intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Further studies are warranted to clarify its potential use in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savas Comlek
- Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hastanesi, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sezer Saglam
- Demiroglu Bilim Üniversitesi, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bhambhvani HP, Rodrigues AJ, Umeh-Garcia MC, Hayden Gephart M. Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: Molecular Landscape, Current Management, and Emerging Therapies. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2021; 31:613-625. [PMID: 32921356 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is a devastating consequence of late-stage cancer, and despite multimodal treatment, remains rapidly fatal. Definitive diagnosis requires identification of malignant cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or frank disease on MRI. Therapy is generally palliative and consists primarily of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, which is administered intrathecally or systemically. Immunotherapies and novel experimental therapies have emerged as promising options for decreasing patient morbidity and mortality. In this review, the authors discuss a refined view of the molecular pathophysiology of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, current approaches to disease management, and emerging therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hriday P Bhambhvani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94305 USA
| | - Adrian J Rodrigues
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94305 USA
| | - Maxine C Umeh-Garcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94305 USA
| | - Melanie Hayden Gephart
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94305 USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Le Rhun E, Devos P, Weller J, Seystahl K, Mo F, Compter A, Berghoff AS, Jongen JLM, Wolpert F, Rudà R, Brandsma D, van den Bent M, Preusser M, Herrlinger U, Weller M. Prognostic validation and clinical implications of the EANO ESMO classification of leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1100-1112. [PMID: 33367859 PMCID: PMC8301235 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EANO ESMO guidelines have proposed a classification of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid cancers based on clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology presentation. MRI patterns are classified as linear, nodular, both, or neither. Type I LM is defined by positive CSF cytology (confirmed LM) whereas type II LM is defined by typical clinical and MRI signs (probable or possible LM). Here we explored the clinical utility of these LM subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively assembled data from 254 patients with newly diagnosed LM from solid tumors. Survival curves were derived using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log-rank test. RESULTS Median age at LM diagnosis was 56 years. Typical clinical LM features were noted in 225 patients (89%); 13 patients (5%) were clinically asymptomatic. Tumor cells in the CSF were observed in 186 patients (73%) whereas the CSF was equivocal in 24 patients (9.5%) and negative in 44 patients (17.5%). Patients with confirmed LM had inferior outcome compared with patients with probable or possible LM (P = 0.006). Type I patients had inferior outcome than type II patients (P = 0.002). Nodular disease on MRI was a negative prognostic factor in type II LM (P = 0.014), but not in type I LM. Administration of either intrathecal pharmacotherapy (P = 0.020) or systemic pharmacotherapy (P = 0.0004) was associated with improved outcome in type I LM, but not in type II LM. CONCLUSION The EANO ESMO LM subtypes are highly prognostic and should be considered for stratification and overall design of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Le Rhun
- University of Lille, Inserm, Lille, France
- Neuro-oncology, General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service, University Hospital of Lille, Rue Emile Laine, Lille, France
- Breast Cancer Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Devos
- University of Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 – METRICS: Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Lille, France
| | - Johannes Weller
- Department of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Seystahl
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Francesca Mo
- Department of Neuro-oncology, City of Health and Science and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Annette Compter
- Department of Neuro-oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anna S Berghoff
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joost L M Jongen
- Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fabian Wolpert
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-oncology, City of Health and Science and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Dieta Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Department of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Breast cancer patients treated with intrathecal therapy for leptomeningeal metastases in a large real-life database. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100150. [PMID: 33984675 PMCID: PMC8134714 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a rare complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with high morbidity/mortality rates. Our study aimed to describe the largest-to-date real-life population of MBC patients treated with intrathecal (IT) therapy and to evaluate prognostic models. Methods The Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC database (NCT03275311) includes all consecutive patients who have initiated treatment for MBC since 2008. Overall survival (OS) of patients treated with IT therapy was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic models were constructed using Cox proportional hazards models. Performance was evaluated using C-index and calibration plots. Results Of the 22 266 patients included in the database between 2008 and 2016, 312 received IT therapy and were selected for our analysis. Compared with non-IT-treated patients, IT-treated patients were younger at MBC relapse (median age: 52 years versus 61 years) and more often had lobular histology (23.4% versus 12.7%) or triple-negative subtype (24.7% versus 13.3%) (all P < 0.001). Median OS was 4.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-5.6] and 1-year survival rate was 25.6%. Significant prognostic factors associated with poorer outcome on multivariable analysis were triple-negative subtype (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% CI 1.32-2.47), treatment line ≥3 (hazard ratio 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.73), ≥3 other metastatic sites (hazard ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.74) and IT cytarabine or thiotepa versus methotrexate (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.28-2.22), while concomitant systemic therapy was associated with better OS (hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.62) (all P < 0.001). We validated two previously published prognostic scores, the Curie score and the Breast-graded prognostic assessment, both with C-index of 0.57. Conclusions MBC patients with LM treated with IT therapy have a poor prognosis. We could identify a subgroup of patients with better prognosis, when concomitant systemic therapy and IT methotrexate were used. The outcome of BC patients with IT-treated LM is poor, with a median OS of 4.5 months. Concomitant systemic therapy may improve the outcome in IT-treated patients. Patients treated with IT methotrexate had better outcome than those treated with IT cytarabine/thiotepa. The Curie and Breast-graded prognostic assessment scores were prognostic for IT-treated patients.
Collapse
|
21
|
Le Rhun E, Wallet J, Mailliez A, Le Deley MC, Rodrigues I, Boulanger T, Lorgis V, Barrière J, Robin YM, Weller M, Bonneterre J. Intrathecal liposomal cytarabine plus systemic therapy versus systemic chemotherapy alone for newly diagnosed leptomeningeal metastasis from breast cancer. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:524-538. [PMID: 31637444 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND DEPOSEIN (NCT01645839) was a randomized open-label phase III study to explore the role of intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), a common manifestation of breast cancer. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed LM defined by tumor cells in the cerebrospinal fluid or combination of clinical and neuroimaging signs of LM were randomized to receive systemic therapy alone (control group) or systemic therapy plus intrathecal liposomal cytarabine (experimental group). Progression-free survival related to LM (LM-PFS) was the primary endpoint. RESULTS Thirty-seven and 36 patients were assigned to the control and the experimental groups. Median number of liposomal cytarabine injections in the experimental group was 5 (range 1-20). Focal radiotherapy was performed in 6 (16%) and 3 (8%) patients in the control and experimental groups. In the intent-to-treat population, median LM-PFS was 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.3-3.1) in the control versus 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.3-6.8) in the experimental group (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% CI: 0.38-0.98) (P = 0.04). Seventy-one patients have died. Median overall survival was 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.2-6.3) in the control versus 7.3 months (95% CI: 3.9-9.6) in the experimental group (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI: 0.53-1.36) (P = 0.51). Serious adverse events were reported in 22 and 30 patients, respectively. Quality of life until progression did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION The addition of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine to systemic treatment improves LM-related PFS. Confirmatory trials with optimized patient selection criteria and more active drugs may be required to demonstrate a survival benefit from intrathecal pharmacotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Le Rhun
- University of Lille, INSERM, Lille, France.,Neuro-oncology, General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery service, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France.,Breast Cancer Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France.,Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Audrey Mailliez
- Neuro-oncology, General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery service, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Marie Cecile Le Deley
- Biostatistics Unit, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France.,Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP, INSERM), Paris-Sud, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Isabelle Rodrigues
- Neuro-oncology, General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery service, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Veronique Lorgis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - Jerome Barrière
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Center, Nice, France
| | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Apostolidis L, Schrader J, Jann H, Rinke A, Krug S. Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: A Clinical Dilemma in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:biology10040277. [PMID: 33800581 PMCID: PMC8066280 DOI: 10.3390/biology10040277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) involvement by paraneoplastic syndromes, brain metastases, or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) has only been described in individual case reports. We evaluated patients with LC in four neuroendocrine tumor (NET) centers (Halle/Saale, Hamburg, Heidelberg, and Marburg) and characterized them clinically. In the study, 17 patients with a LC were defined with respect to diagnosis, clinic, and therapy. The prognosis of a LC is very poor, with 10 months in median overall survival (mOS). This is reflected by an even worse course in neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) G3 Ki-67 >55%, with a mOS of 2 months. Motor and sensory deficits together with vigilance abnormalities were common symptoms. In most cases, targeted radiation or temozolomide therapy was used against the LC. LC appears to be similarly devastating to brain metastases in NEN patients. Therefore, the indication for CNS imaging should be discussed in certain cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonidas Apostolidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Jörg Schrader
- I. Medical Department—Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Henning Jann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Charité—University Medical Center Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Anja Rinke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Marburg, Baldinger Strasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
- Correspondence: (A.R.); (S.K.); Tel.: +49-0345-557-2661 (S.K.); Fax: +49-0345-557-2253 (S.K.)
| | - Sebastian Krug
- Clinic for Internal Medicine I, Martin-Luther University Halle/Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120 Halle, Germany
- Correspondence: (A.R.); (S.K.); Tel.: +49-0345-557-2661 (S.K.); Fax: +49-0345-557-2253 (S.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dankner M, Lam S, Degenhard T, Garzia L, Guiot MC, Petrecca K, Siegel PM. The Underlying Biology and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities of Leptomeningeal Metastases in Adult Solid Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040732. [PMID: 33578853 PMCID: PMC7916586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastasis to the central nervous system occurs in approximately 20% of patients with advanced solid cancers such as lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. While central nervous system metastases most commonly form in the brain parenchyma, metastatic cancer cells may also reside in the subarachnoid space surrounding the brain and spinal cord to form tumors called leptomeningeal metastases. Leptomeningeal metastasis involves cancer cells that reach the subarachnoid space and proliferate in the cerebrospinal fluid compartment within the leptomeninges, a sequela associated with a myriad of symptoms and poor prognosis. Cancer cells exposed to cerebrospinal fluid in the leptomeninges must contend with a unique microenvironment from those that establish within the brain or other organs. Leptomeningeal lesions provide a formidable clinical challenge due to their often-diffuse infiltration within the subarachnoid space. The molecular mechanisms that promote the establishment of leptomeningeal metastases have begun to be elucidated, demonstrating that it is a biological entity distinct from parenchymal brain metastases and is associated with specific molecular drivers. In this review, we outline the current state of knowledge pertaining to the diagnosis, treatment, and molecular underpinnings of leptomeningeal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Dankner
- Goodman Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada; (M.D.); (M.-C.G.)
| | - Stephanie Lam
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada;
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada;
| | - Theresa Degenhard
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; (T.D.); (K.P.)
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Livia Garzia
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada;
| | - Marie-Christine Guiot
- Goodman Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada; (M.D.); (M.-C.G.)
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; (T.D.); (K.P.)
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
- Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada
| | - Kevin Petrecca
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; (T.D.); (K.P.)
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Peter M. Siegel
- Goodman Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada; (M.D.); (M.-C.G.)
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada;
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; (T.D.); (K.P.)
- Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada
- Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-514-398-4259; Fax: +1-514-398-6769
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yang TJ, Wijetunga NA, Yamada J, Wolden S, Mehallow M, Goldman DA, Zhang Z, Young RJ, Kris MG, Yu HA, Seidman AD, Gavrilovic IT, Lin A, Santomasso B, Grommes C, Piotrowski AF, Schaff L, Stone JB, DeAngelis LM, Boire A, Pentsova E. Clinical trial of proton craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal metastases. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:134-143. [PMID: 32592583 PMCID: PMC7850116 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are associated with limited survival and treatment options. While involved-field radiotherapy is effective for local palliation, it lacks durability. We evaluated the toxicities of proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI), a treatment encompassing the entire central nervous system (CNS) compartment, for patients with LM from solid tumors. METHODS We enrolled patients with LM to receive hypofractionated proton CSI in this phase I prospective trial. The primary endpoint was to describe treatment-related toxicity, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as any radiation-related grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity or grade 4 hematologic toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events that occurred during or within 4 weeks of completion of proton CSI. Secondary endpoints included CNS progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We enrolled 24 patients between June 2018 and April 2019. Their median follow-up was 11 months. Twenty patients were evaluable for protocol treatment-related toxicities and 21 for CNS PFS and OS. Two patients in the dose expansion cohort experienced DLTs consisted of grade 4 lymphopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and/or grade 3 fatigue. All DLTs resolved without medical intervention. The median CNS PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 5-13) and the median OS was 8 months (95% CI: 6 to not reached). Four patients (19%) were progression-free in the CNS for more than 12 months. CONCLUSION Hypofractionated proton CSI using proton therapy is a safe treatment for patients with LM from solid tumors. We saw durable disease control in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Jonathan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- PROMISE (Precision Radiation for OligoMetastatIc and MetaStatic DiseasE) Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Neil A Wijetunga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Josh Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- PROMISE (Precision Radiation for OligoMetastatIc and MetaStatic DiseasE) Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Suzanne Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michelle Mehallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Debra A Goldman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mark G Kris
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Helena A Yu
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew D Seidman
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Igor T Gavrilovic
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Lin
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bianca Santomasso
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christian Grommes
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anna F Piotrowski
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lauren Schaff
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jacqueline B Stone
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lisa M DeAngelis
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elena Pentsova
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Angus L, Deger T, Jager A, Martens JWM, de Weerd V, van Heuvel I, van den Bent MJ, Sillevis Smitt PAE, Kros JM, Bindels EMJ, Heitzer E, Sleijfer S, Jongen JLM, Wilting SM. Detection of Aneuploidy in Cerebrospinal Fluid from Patients with Breast Cancer Can Improve Diagnosis of Leptomeningeal Metastases. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:2798-2806. [PMID: 33514525 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Detection of leptomeningeal metastasis is hampered by limited sensitivities of currently used techniques: MRI and cytology of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Detection of cell-free tumor DNA in CSF has been proposed as a tumor-specific candidate to detect leptomeningeal metastasis at an earlier stage. The aim of this study was to investigate mutation and aneuploidy status in CSF-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of patients with breast cancer with a clinical suspicion of leptomeningeal metastasis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN cfDNA was isolated from stored remnant CSF and analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS; n = 30) and the modified fast aneuploidy screening test-sequencing system (mFAST-SeqS; n = 121). The latter method employs selective amplification of long interspaced nuclear elements sequences that are present throughout the genome and allow for fast and cheap detection of aneuploidy. We compared these results with the gold standard to diagnose leptomeningeal metastasis: cytology. RESULTS Leptomeningeal metastasis was cytology proven in 13 of 121 patients. Low DNA yields resulted in insufficient molecular coverage of NGS for the majority of samples (success rate, 8/30). The mFAST-SeqS method, successful in 112 of 121 (93%) samples, detected genome-wide aneuploidy in 24 patients. Ten of these patients had cytology-proven leptomeningeal metastasis; 8 additional patients were either concurrently diagnosed with central nervous system metastases by radiological means or developed these soon after the lumbar puncture. The remaining six cases were suspected of leptomeningeal metastasis, but could not be confirmed by cytology or imaging. Aneuploidy was associated with development of leptomeningeal metastasis and significantly worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Aneuploidy in CSF-derived cfDNA may provide a promising biomarker to improve timely detection of leptomeningeal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Angus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Teoman Deger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vanja de Weerd
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Irene van Heuvel
- Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter A E Sillevis Smitt
- Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johan M Kros
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eric M J Bindels
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Heitzer
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Liquid Biopsies for Early Detection of Cancer, Institute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stefan Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost L M Jongen
- Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia M Wilting
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fernandes L, de Matos LV, Cardoso D, Saraiva M, Medeiros-Mirra R, Coelho A, Miranda H, Martins A. Endocrine therapy for the treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in luminal breast cancer: a comprehensive review. CNS Oncol 2020; 9:CNS65. [PMID: 33078616 PMCID: PMC7737195 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2020-0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) represents a devastating complication of advanced breast cancer (ABC), with survival of <5 months with multimodal treatment. The role of endocrine therapy (ET), due to its favorable toxicity profile and first-line indication in luminal ABC, appears promising in the setting of LMD, where symptom stabilization and quality-of-life preservation are the main goals; however, evidenced-based data are lacking. We conducted a thorough review of published evidence, aiming to investigate the role of ET in LMD treatment in luminal ABC. Twenty-one of 342 articles, evaluating 1302 patients, met inclusion criteria. ET use was rarely reported. New targeted agents show CNS activity. Research is lacking on the role of ET and targeted agents in BC-LMD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonor Fernandes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Leonor Vasconcelos de Matos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Débora Cardoso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Marlene Saraiva
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1349-019 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Renata Medeiros-Mirra
- Cardiff School of Dentistry, College of Biomedical & Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales, UK
| | - Andreia Coelho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Helena Miranda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ana Martins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jaeckle KA, Dixon JG, Anderson SK, Moreno-Aspitia A, Colon-Otero G, Hebenstreit K, Patel TA, Reddy SL, Perez EA. Intra-CSF topotecan in treatment of breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Cancer Med 2020; 9:7935-7942. [PMID: 32885617 PMCID: PMC7643683 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are few treatment options for patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM). Methods We report a case series of patients with breast cancer and LM treated with intra‐CSF topotecan (TOPO). Outcome was assessed by clinical exam and MRI at baseline, at end of induction (4‐5 weeks), then every 3 months; CSF cytology was determined at baseline and with each treatment. Results Thirty‐one women [median age, 58 (37‐81); median KPS 60 (40‐100)] received treatment. At baseline, 68% had positive CSF cytology, and 90%, leptomeningeal enhancement on MRI. 84% of patients also received focal RT (not during TOPO) and 77% received concomitant systemic hormonal or chemotherapy. Median number of TOPO treatments was 14.5 (range, 3‐71); median duration of treatment, 11 weeks (1‐176); and median OS, 6.9 months (range, 0.9‐48.8). Patients remaining progression‐free during 4‐6 weeks of induction (81%) had a median OS of 11.5 months (range, 1.8‐48.8). Overall neurologic PFS at 6, 12, and 24 months was 39%, 26%, and 6%, respectively. Clearing of CSF malignant cells for >3 consecutive samples occurred in 10/21 (48%) patients with positive CSF cytology at baseline, remaining clear for a median duration of 15.9 months (range, 1.4‐34.5). Grade 3 adverse events included headache or vomiting (3pts), T2 hyperintensity surrounding the ventricular catheter (2 pts), and meningitis (2 pts). Conclusions Intra‐CSF TOPO, with focal RT as needed for symptomatic areas of enhancement produced durable clearing of CSF malignant cells in 48% of patients positive at baseline, with promising median PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tejal A Patel
- Houston Methodist Hospital Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samarth L Reddy
- Hematology Oncology Associates of Boca Raton, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Angus L, Martens JWM, van den Bent MJ, Sillevis Smitt PAE, Sleijfer S, Jager A. Novel methods to diagnose leptomeningeal metastases in breast cancer. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:428-439. [PMID: 30418595 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) in breast cancer patients are rare but often accompanied by devastating neurological symptoms and carry a very poor prognosis, even if treated. To date, two diagnostic methods are clinically used to diagnose LM: gadolinium MRI of the brain and/or spinal cord and cytological examination of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Both techniques are, however, hampered by limited sensitivities, often leading to a long diagnostic process requiring repeated lumbar punctures and MRI examinations. To improve the detection rate of LM, numerous studies have assessed new techniques. In this review, we present the current workup to diagnose LM, set out an overview of novel techniques to diagnose LM, and give recommendations for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Angus
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John W M Martens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter A E Sillevis Smitt
- The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Sleijfer
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Exman P, Mallery RM, Lin NU, Parsons HA. Response to Olaparib in a Patient with Germline BRCA2 Mutation and Breast Cancer Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis. NPJ Breast Cancer 2019; 5:46. [PMID: 31815182 PMCID: PMC6884546 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-019-0139-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a devastating complication of metastatic cancer that disproportionately affects patients with advanced breast cancer. Moreover, those with BRCA1/2-mutated disease more often experience leptomeningeal metastasis. Treatment options for LC are limited and often include significant toxicities. PARP inhibitors offer an important potential treatment for patients with BRCA1/2-mutated breast and ovarian cancers, but clinical studies excluded patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, including LC. Efficacy data in this area are therefore limited, although a phase I study of olaparib in glioblastoma did show CNS penetration. Here we report a case of a patient with BRCA2-mutated breast cancer and solitary recurrence in the leptomeninges with ongoing complete response to treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib. PARP inhibitors may be an important treatment option for patients with BRCA-mutated disease and LC, and warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Exman
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Robert M. Mallery
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Nancy U. Lin
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Buszek SM, Chung C. Radiotherapy in Leptomeningeal Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Non-randomized Trials. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1224. [PMID: 31803614 PMCID: PMC6872542 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD), also known as neoplastic meningitis, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, or carcinomatous meningitis, is a rare cancer complication occurring in ~5% of cases and ultimately leads to significant morbidity and mortality. In the modern era, incidence of this condition continues to rise with longer survival of patients with advanced and even metastatic disease due to continued improvements in systemic therapies that are providing prolonged control of distant disease, but with limited effect in the central nervous system (CNS). Typical treatment strategies include optimal systemic therapy for the primary disease, as well as neuroaxis directed therapies, which may include intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC) or radiotherapy (RT). Methods: A systematic review of radiotherapy for LMD was performed. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1946 to 2018 for clinical trials, retrospective/prospective reviews, and case series with ≥2 human subjects that used radiation therapy techniques in the treatment of LMD. The outcome measures of interest included: characteristics of trial participants, inclusion/exclusion criteria, study type, number of participants, primary cancer histology, type of intervention for LMD, survival results if reported, length of follow up, and study conclusion. Results: Of 547 unique citations, 62 studies met the pre-specified eligibility criteria. These studies included 36 retrospective cohorts, 11 prospective series, 12 case series, and a single citation of guidelines, NCDB analysis, and a randomized control trial. Owing to study heterogeneity, meta-analyses of the endpoint data could not be performed. Conclusions: LMD is a devastating complication of cancer with reported survivals ranging from 2 to 4 months. Based on this systematic review, the recommendation for the treatment of LMD is for multimodality discussion of cases and treatment, including the use of radiotherapy, for LMD. However, with continued advances in systemic therapy as well as imaging advances, the landscape of LMD is evolving rapidly and the role of RT will likely also continue to evolve and advance. There is limited high-quality evidence to guide the optimal use of RT for the treatment of LMD, and there is a great need for prospective, histology specific investigation of the role of radiotherapy for LMD in the era of modern systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Buszek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Brizzi K, Zupanc SN, Udelsman BV, Tulsky JA, Wright AA, Poort H, Lindvall C. Natural Language Processing to Assess Palliative Care and End-of-Life Process Measures in Patients With Breast Cancer With Leptomeningeal Disease. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2019; 37:371-376. [DOI: 10.1177/1049909119885585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Palliative care consultation during serious life-limiting illness can reduce symptom burden and improve quality of care. However, quantifying the impact of palliative care is hindered by the limitations of manual chart review and administrative coding. Objectives: Using novel natural language process (NLP) techniques, we examined associations between palliative care consultations and performance on nationally endorsed metrics for high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care in patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD) secondary to metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Patients with breast cancer with LMD were identified using administrative billing codes and NLP review of magnetic resonance imaging reports at 2 tertiary care centers between 2010 and 2016. Next, NLP was used to review clinical notes to (1) determine the presence of palliative care consultations and (2) determine the performance of process measures associated with high-quality EOL care, including discussions of goals of care, code status limitations, and hospice. Associations between palliative care consultation and documentation of EOL process measures were assessed using logistic regression. Results: We identified 183 cases of LMD. Median age was 56 (interquartile range [IQR]: 46-64) years and median survival was 150 days (IQR: 67-350). Within 6 months of diagnosis, 88.5% of patients had documentation of ≥1 process measure, including discussions of goals of care (63.4%), code status limitations (62.8%), or hospice (72.1%). Palliative care consultation was a predictor of subsequent documentation of goals of care (odds ratio [OR], 3.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-6.27) and hospice discussions (OR, 4.61; 95% CI, 2.12-10.03). Conclusion: Palliative care involvement is associated with increased performance of EOL process measures in patients with breast cancer with LMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Brizzi
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sophia N. Zupanc
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - James A. Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexi A. Wright
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hanneke Poort
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mayinger M, Reibelt A, Borm KJ, Ettl J, Wilkens JJ, Combs SE, Oechsner M, Duma MN. MRI based neuroanatomical segmentation in breast cancer patients: leptomeningeal carcinomatosis vs. oligometastatic brain disease vs. multimetastastic brain disease. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:170. [PMID: 31533742 PMCID: PMC6749713 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1380-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Pathogenesis of brain metastases/meningeal cancer and the emotional and neurological outcomes are not yet well understood. The hypothesis of our study is that patients with leptomeningeal cancer show volumetric differences in brain substructures compared to patients with cerebral metastases. Methods Three groups consisting of female breast cancer patients prior to brain radiotherapy were compared. Leptomeningeal cancer patients (LMC Group), oligometastatic patients (1–3 brain metastases) prior to radiosurgery (OMRS Group) and patients prior to whole brain radiation (WB Group) were included. All patients had MRI imaging before treatment. T1 MRI sequences were segmented using automatic segmentation. For each patient, 14 bilateral and 11 central/median subcortical structures were tested. Overall 1127 structures were analyzed and compared between groups using age matched two-sided t-tests. Results The average age of patients in the OMRS group was 60.8 years (± 14.7), 65.3 (± 10.3) in the LMC group and 62.6 (± 10.2) in the WB group. LMC patients showed a significantly larger fourth ventricle compared to OMRS (p = 0.001) and WB (p = 0.003). The central corpus callosum appeared smaller in the LMC group (LMC vs OMRS p = 0.01; LMC vs WB p = 0.026). The right amygdala in the WB group appeared larger compared with the OMRS (p = 0.035). Conclusions Differences in the size of brain substructures of the three groups were found. The results appear promising and should be taken into account for further prospective studies also involving healthy controls. The volumetrically determined size of the fourth ventricle might be a helpful diagnostic marker in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Antonia Reibelt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Joachim Borm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie Elisabeth Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK)-Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy, Helmholtzzentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Oechsner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marciana Nona Duma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of the Friedrich-Schiller-University, Bachstr. 18, 07745, Jena, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article discusses the diagnosis and management of neoplasms that affect the spinal cord as well as spinal cord disorders that can occur due to cancer treatments. RECENT FINDINGS Neoplastic myelopathies are uncommon neurologic disorders but cause significant morbidity when they occur. Primary spinal cord tumors can be classified into intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, or extradural tumors. Diffuse gliomas and ependymal tumors are the most common intramedullary tumors. Diffuse gliomas include the World Health Organization (WHO) grade II and grade III astrocytomas, the grade II and grade III oligodendrogliomas, the grade IV glioblastomas, and newly recognized pediatric diffuse midline gliomas with H3 K27M mutation. The majority of diffuse and anaplastic astrocytomas are IDH-mutant tumors, whereas only 10% of glioblastomas are IDH-mutant. Oligodendrogliomas are typically IDH-mutant and are characterized by the molecular signature of 1p/19q codeletion. Nine distinct molecular subgroups of ependymomas have been identified based on their genetic features and location. NF2 mutations are frequently found in spinal cord ependymomas. Metastatic tumors are the most common tumors of the spine and can be extradural, leptomeningeal, or, rarely, intramedullary. Extradural metastatic spinal cord compression is a neurologic emergency and should be promptly diagnosed as pretreatment neurologic status dictates the posttreatment outcome. SUMMARY Neoplastic myelopathies encompass many diagnoses ranging from benign and malignant spinal tumors to paraneoplastic syndromes heralding cancers. The knowledge of the clinical features and management of neoplastic myelopathies is essential to practicing neurologists as early diagnosis and treatment can prevent devastating neurologic sequelae.
Collapse
|
34
|
Figura NB, Rizk VT, Mohammadi H, Evernden B, Mokhtari S, Yu HM, Robinson TJ, Etame AB, Tran ND, Liu J, Washington I, Diaz R, Czerniecki BJ, Soliman H, Han HS, Sahebjam S, Forsyth PA, Ahmed KA. Clinical outcomes of breast leptomeningeal disease treated with intrathecal trastuzumab, intrathecal chemotherapy, or whole brain radiation therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175:781-788. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05170-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
35
|
Franzoi MA, Hortobagyi GN. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 135:85-94. [PMID: 30819451 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 01/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is defined as infiltration of the leptomeninges by metastatic carcinoma, a relatively uncommon but devastating complication of many malignancies. Although only 5% of patients with breast cancer develop leptomeningeal involvement, it remains the most common etiology of LC. It can occur as a late-stage complication of systemic progression or present as the first sign of metastatic disease, with or without parenchymal brain metastases. Lobular carcinomas have a higher propensity to metastasize into the meninges when compared to ductal carcinoma, especially the triple-negative subtype, which usually is associated with a shorter interval between metastatic breast cancer diagnosis and the development of LC. Prognosis remains poor, with median survival of 4 months for patients receiving state-of-the-art treatment. The main factors associated with survival are performance status at diagnosis, CSF protein level and triple-negative subtype. Headache is commonly the first clinical presentation of LC, and the diagnostic workup usually requires CSF-cytological analysis and or/MRI. The current management of LC consists of a combination of intra-CSF chemotherapy, systemic therapy, radiotherapy and/or best-supportive care. The standard intra-CSF chemotherapy regimen is methotrexate. Radiotherapy is used for relieving obstruction points on CSF-outflow channels due to ependymal nodules, tumor deposits or bulky disease. Objective responses have been reported with intrathecal administration of trastuzumab for HER2-positive disease, yet this strategy is still under investigation. Further prospective trials are needed to better address the impact of these treatment modalities on overall survival and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel N Hortobagyi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
El Shafie RA, Böhm K, Weber D, Lang K, Schlaich F, Adeberg S, Paul A, Haefner MF, Katayama S, Sterzing F, Hörner-Rieber J, Löw S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Rieken S, Bernhardt D. Outcome and prognostic factors following palliative craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:789-801. [PMID: 30697071 PMCID: PMC6340499 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s182154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a severe complication of metastatic tumor spread to the central nervous system. Prognosis is dismal with a median overall survival (OS) of ~10–15 weeks. Treatment options include radiotherapy (RT) to involved sites, systemic chemo- or targeted therapy, intrathecal chemotherapy and best supportive care with dexamethasone. Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is a more aggressive radiotherapeutic approach, for which very limited data exists. Here, we report on our 10-year experience with palliative CSI of selected patients with LC. Patients and methods Twenty-five patients received CSI for the treatment of LC at our institution between 2008 and 2018. Patients were selected individually for CSI based on clinical performance, presenting symptoms and estimated benefit. Median patient age was 53 years (IQR: 45–59), and breast cancer was the most common primary. Additional brain metastases were found in 18 patients (72.0%). RT was delivered at a TomoTherapy machine, using helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The most commonly prescribed dose was 36 Gy in 20 fractions, corresponding to a median biologically equivalent dose of 40.8 Gy (IQR: 39.0–2.5). Clinical performance and neurologic function were assessed before and in response to therapy, and deficits were retrospectively quantified on the 5-point neurologic function scale (NFS). A Cox proportional hazards model with univariate and multivariate analyses was fitted for survival. Results Twenty-one patients died and four were alive at the time of analysis. Median OS from LC diagnosis was 19.3 weeks (IQR: 9.3–34.0, 95% CI: 11.0–32.0). In univariate analysis, a Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) ≥70% (P=0.001), age ≤55 years at LC diagnosis (P=0.022), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein <100 mg/dL (P=0.018) and no more than mild or moderate neurologic deficits (NFS ≤2; P=0.007) were predictive of longer OS. So were the neurologic response to treatment (P=0.018) and the application of systemic therapy after RT completion (P=0.029). The presence of CSF flow obstruction was predictive of shorter OS (P=0.026). In multivariate analysis, age at LC diagnosis (P=0.018), KPI (P<0.001) and neurologic response (P=0.037) remained as independent prognostic factors for longer OS. Treatment-associated toxicity was manageable and mostly grades I and II according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Eight patients (32%) developed grade III myelosuppression. Neurologic symptom stabilization could be achieved in 40.0% and a sizeable improvement in 28.0% of all patients. Conclusion CSI for the treatment of LC is feasible and may have therapeutic value in carefully selected patients, alleviating symptoms or delaying neurologic deterioration. OS after CSI was comparable to the rates described in current literature for patients with LC. The use of modern irradiation techniques such as helical IMRT is warranted to limit toxicity. Patient selection should take into account prognostic factors such as age, clinical performance, neurologic function and the availability of systemic treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Karina Böhm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Dorothea Weber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Fabian Schlaich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Angela Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Matthias F Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Florian Sterzing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Kempten, Kempten 87439, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Sarah Löw
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
El Shafie RA, Böhm K, Weber D, Lang K, Schlaich F, Adeberg S, Paul A, Haefner MF, Katayama S, Hörner-Rieber J, Hoegen P, Löw S, Debus J, Rieken S, Bernhardt D. Palliative Radiotherapy for Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis-Analysis of Outcome, Prognostic Factors, and Symptom Response. Front Oncol 2019; 8:641. [PMID: 30671384 PMCID: PMC6331444 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this article is to report our institution's 10-year experience on palliative radiotherapy for the treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC), assessing survival, neurologic outcome, and prognostic factors. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 110 patients who received palliative radiotherapy for LC between 2008 and 2018. The most common histologies were breast cancer (n = 43, 39.1%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 31, 28.2%). Radiotherapy was administered as whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (n = 51, 46.4%), focal spinal RT (n = 11, 10.0%) or both (n = 47, 42.7%). Twenty-five patients (22.7%) were selected for craniospinal irradiation. Clinical performance and neurologic function were quantified on the neurologic function scale (NFS) before and in response to therapy. A Cox Proportional Hazards model with univariate and multivariate analysis was fitted for survival. Results: Ninety-eight patients (89.1%) died and 12 (10.9%) were alive at the time of analysis. Median OS from LC diagnosis and from the beginning of RT was 13.9 weeks (IQR: 7.1-34.0) and 9.9 weeks (IQR: 5.3-26.3), respectively. In univariate analysis, prognostic of longer OS were a Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) of ≥70% (HR 0.20, 95%-CI: [0.13; 0.32], p < 0.001), initially moderate neurological deficits (NFS ≤2) (HR 0.32, 95% CI: [0.19; 0.52], p < 0.001), symptom response to RT (HR 0.41, 95%-CI: [0.26; 0.67], p < 0.001) and the administration of systemic therapy (HR 0.51, 95%-CI: [0.33; 0.78], p = 0.002). Prognostic of inferior OS were high-grade myelosuppression (HR 1.78, 95% CI: [1.06; 3.00], p = 0.03) and serum LDH levels >500 U/l (HR 3.62, 95% CI: [1.76; 7.44], p < 0.001). Clinical performance, symptom response and serum LDH stayed independently prognostic for survival in multivariate analysis. RT was well-tolerated and except for grade III myelosuppression in 19 cases (17.3%), no high-grade acute toxicities were observed. Neurologic symptom stabilization was achieved in 83 cases (75.5%) and a sizeable improvement in 39 cases (35.5%). Conclusion: Radiotherapy is a well-tolerated and efficacious means of providing symptom palliation for patients with LC, delaying neurologic deterioration while probably not directly influencing survival. Prognostic factors such as clinical performance, neurologic response and serum LDH can be used for patient stratification to facilitate treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami A. El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karina Böhm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dorothea Weber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Schlaich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F. Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Löw
- Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schiopu SR, Habl G, Haefner M, Katayama S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Sterzing F. Helical tomotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 11:401-409. [PMID: 30643465 PMCID: PMC6317467 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s185414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is an increasingly common complication of late-stage systemic cancer, for which there is no standard treatment. We analyzed outcome and toxicity in patients with LM undergoing craniospinal irradiation via helical tomotherapy (HT-CSI) at our institution. Patients and methods The charts of 15 patients diagnosed with LM and undergoing HT-CSI between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively assessed. Main neoplasms included breast cancer, lung cancer, and lymphoma. All patients presented with cranial neuropathy due to LM. Follow-up was performed regularly. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan–Meier method, and prognostic factors were tested using the COX-regression model. Results Median survival by cancer type was 6 (breast cancer), 1 (lung cancer), and 2 months (lymphoma), respectively. Median overall survival and relapse-free survival were calculated to be between 2 and 3 months. Six- and 12-month survival was 30% (95% CI 0.08–0.5) and 20% (95% CI 0.05–0.4), respectively. Symptom palliation occurred in 53% of patients in general, but in 67% of breast cancer patients, in particular. Patients with lung cancer experienced no improvement. Most common acute treatment-related toxicity at different levels were hematological toxicity, multiple cranial neuropathy, fatigue, infections, nausea, and headache. Conclusion HT-CSI can help meet the challenge of treating patients with LM, especially because it can palliate symptoms and improve neurological functions. One-year survival remains as disappointing as before.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanziana Ri Schiopu
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany, .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany,
| | - Gregor Habl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany,
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany,
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, .,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, .,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Sterzing
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Radiation Oncology, Kempten Clinic, Kempten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ji G, Zhang C, Guan S, Yao X. Erlotinib for Progressive Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases From HER2-positive Breast Cancer After Treatment Failure With Trastuzumab and Lapatinib: Experience and Review of Literature. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 18:e759-e765. [PMID: 30177482 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Guanghui Ji
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Navy General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chenyang Zhang
- Geriatric Digestive System Department, Navy General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shan Guan
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Navy General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangying Yao
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Navy General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Griguolo G, Pouderoux S, Dieci MV, Jacot W, Bourgier C, Miglietta F, Firmin N, Conte P, Viala M, Guarneri V, Darlix A. Clinicopathological and Treatment-Associated Prognostic Factors in Patients with Breast Cancer Leptomeningeal Metastases in Relation to Tumor Biology. Oncologist 2018; 23:1289-1299. [PMID: 30120164 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) is one of the solid tumors most commonly associated with leptomeningeal disease (LMD). LMD carries a devastating prognosis; however, disease presentation and prognostic factors are uncertain. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS In order to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and factors associated with survival in a contemporary multicentric cohort, 153 consecutive BC patients diagnosed with LMD at two European institutions (2002-2017) were included. Time to LMD and overall survival (OS) after LMD diagnosis were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Median age at LMD diagnosis was 58 years (25-84). Tumor phenotype distribution was as follows: hormone receptor (HR) positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) negative 51.0%, triple-negative 15.0%, HR+/HER2 positive (HER2+) 13.1% and HR negative/HER2+ 7.2%. Most patients received active anticancer treatments (radiation therapy [RT] n = 42, systemic therapy n = 110, intrathecal treatment n = 103).Median OS was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-5.5). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) >2, high white blood cells count, low glucose, and high protein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were poor prognostic factors. Having received RT or systemic treatment was associated with better prognosis. In multivariate analysis, ECOG PS (hazard ratio 2.22, 95% CI 1.25-3.94), CSF glucose levels (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.05-2.88), and having received systemic treatment (hazard ratio 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.32) were confirmed as independent prognostic factors. In HER2+ BC patients, having received systemic HER2-targeted therapy was the only factor maintaining independent prognostication (hazard ratio 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.67) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Despite being limited by their retrospective nature, these results highlight the need for clinical trials in BC LMD, stratified on tumor biology. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of breast cancer (BC), and its optimal therapy is still not defined. Here, patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and prognostic factors from a contemporary cohort of 153 BC-related LMD patients are reported. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, cerebrospinal fluid glucose levels, and having received systemic treatment were confirmed as independent prognostic factors in the overall population, whereas in human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) positive BC patients, having received systemic HER2-targeted therapy was the only factor maintaining independent prognostication in multivariate analysis. These results highlight the need to consider stratification on tumor biology in the treatment of BC LMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaia Griguolo
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Stephane Pouderoux
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - William Jacot
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Céline Bourgier
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France
| | - Federica Miglietta
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Nelly Firmin
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Pierfranco Conte
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Marie Viala
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Amélie Darlix
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Burger MC, Wagner M, Franz K, Harter PN, Bähr O, Steinbach JP, Senft C. Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts Equipped with On-Off Valves for Intraventricular Therapies in Patients with Communicating Hydrocephalus due to Leptomeningeal Metastases. J Clin Med 2018; 7:jcm7080216. [PMID: 30110924 PMCID: PMC6111529 DOI: 10.3390/jcm7080216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Revised: 07/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with a reservoir and a valve to manually switch off the shunt function can be used for intraventricular injections of therapeutics in patients suffering from a communicating hydrocephalus caused by leptomeningeal metastases. These shunt devices avoid the risk of injecting therapeutics through the distal leg of the shunt system into the intraperitoneal space, which may cause toxicity. Furthermore, regular intraventricular injections of chemotherapeutics help to maintain sufficient concentrations in the ventricular space. Therefore, ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with an on-off valve are a useful tool to reliably inject chemotherapeutics into the ventricles. In order to systematically assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this procedure, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with leptomeningeal metastases who had received a shunt system at our institution. In total, six adult patients had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt equipped with an on-off valve implanted. Out of these six patients, two patients subsequently received intraventricular injections of chemotherapeutics. The configuration of the valve setting and the intraventricular injections were easily feasible in the setting of a neuro-oncology department. The complication of a shunt leakage occurred in one patient following the first intraventricular injection. No extra-central nervous system (CNS) toxicities were observed. In summary, ventriculoperitoneal shunts with on-off valves are useful tools for reliable intraventricular administration of therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Burger
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Marlies Wagner
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Kea Franz
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Patrick N Harter
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Institute of Neurology (Edinger Institute), Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Oliver Bähr
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Joachim P Steinbach
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Christian Senft
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) results from dissemination of cancer cells to both the leptomeninges (pia and arachnoid) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment. Breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma are the most common solid tumors that cause LM. Recent approval of more active anticancer therapies has resulted in improvement in survival that is partly responsible for an increased incidence of LM. Neurologic deficits, once manifest, are mostly irreversible, and often have a significant impact on patient quality of life. LM-directed therapy is based on symptom palliation, circumscribed use of neurosurgery, limited field radiotherapy, intra-CSF and systemic therapies. Novel methods of detecting LM include detection of CSF circulating tumor cells and tumor cell-free DNA. A recent international guideline for a standardization of response assessment in LM may improve cross-trial comparisons as well as within-trial evaluation of treatment. An increasing number of retrospective studies suggest that molecular-targeted therapy, such as EGFR and ALK inhibitors in lung cancer, trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer, and BRAF inhibitors in melanoma, may be effective as part of the multidisciplinary management of LM. Prospective randomized trials with standardized response assessment are needed to further validate these preliminary findings.
Collapse
|
43
|
Marrodan M, Bensi C, Alessandro L, Muggeri AD, Farez MF. Chronic and Subacute Meningitis: Differentiating Neoplastic From Non-Neoplastic Etiologies. Neurohospitalist 2018; 8:177-182. [PMID: 30245767 DOI: 10.1177/1941874418773924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Although incidence rates vary, infectious, autoimmune, and neoplastic diseases can all cause chronic and subacute meningitis (CSM). We report a Latin-American, single center, CSM case series, analyzing the main clinical characteristics as well as ancillary diagnostic methods differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic etiologies. Methods Retrospective review of CSM cases from a single center in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Results Seventy patients with CSM diagnosis were identified, 49 with neoplastic and 21 with non-neoplastic meningitis. A history of previous cancer was significantly higher in neoplastic cases, whereas prevalence of autoimmune disease and fever was more common in non-neoplastic meningitis. C-reactive protein values were higher in non-neoplastic CSM, as was pleocytosis in cerebrospinal fluid analysis. The most frequent etiologies were breast and lung cancer for neoplastic meningitis cases; and idiopathic, tuberculous, and fungal infection for non-neoplastic cases. Conclusions Chronic and subacute meningitis diagnosis is challenging in daily neurological practice. The results we report contribute information from Latin America regarding etiologies of CSM, which can be identified after a comprehensive evaluation in a majority of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariano Marrodan
- Department of Neurology, Epidemiology and Publich Health (CEBES), Institute for Neurological Research Dr. Raúl Carrea (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Catalina Bensi
- Department of Neurology, Epidemiology and Publich Health (CEBES), Institute for Neurological Research Dr. Raúl Carrea (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lucas Alessandro
- Department of Neurology, Epidemiology and Publich Health (CEBES), Institute for Neurological Research Dr. Raúl Carrea (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alejandro D Muggeri
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Epidemiology and Publich Health (CEBES), Neurological Research Dr. Raúl Carrea (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mauricio F Farez
- Center for Research on Neuroimmunological Diseases (CIEN), Epidemiology and Publich Health (CEBES), Neurological Research Dr. Raúl Carrea (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Center for Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Publich Health (CEBES), Neurological Research Dr. Raúl Carrea (FLENI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Le Rhun E, Taillibert S, Chamberlain MC. Neoplastic Meningitis Due to Lung, Breast, and Melanoma Metastases. Cancer Control 2018; 24:22-32. [DOI: 10.1177/107327481702400104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Le Rhun
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology and
Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle,
Washington
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, the Breast
Unit, Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of
Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sophie Taillibert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille
Cedex, France, the Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology and Neurological
Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Marc C. Chamberlain
- Departments of Neurology, and Radiation Oncology,
Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et
Marie Curie, Paris, France, and the Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research
Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, and Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of
Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle,
Washington
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Determinants of prolonged survival for breast cancer patient groups with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). J Neurooncol 2018; 138:191-198. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2790-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
46
|
Intrathecal trastuzumab in the management of HER2+ breast leptomeningeal disease: a single institution experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 169:391-396. [PMID: 29392582 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4684-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Leptomeningeal disease is a rare and devastating presentation of advanced stage metastatic breast cancer with historically poor overall survival. We assessed the safety and feasibility of intrathecal (IT) trastuzumab in HER2+ leptomeningeal disease. METHODS A total of 13 patients were treated at our institution with IT trastuzumab beginning November 2012 and followed until November 2017. Outcomes including craniospinal progression as well as overall survival (OS) following initiation of IT trastuzumab were assessed from review of the clinical chart and radiologic examinations. RESULTS The median age of patients was 48 (range 29-75). Median time from breast cancer diagnosis to development of brain metastases was 87.7 months with a median of 4.6 months from brain metastases diagnosis to the development of leptomeningeal disease. Previous whole brain radiotherapy was received by the majority of patients (92%) and prior surgery for brain metastases was performed in 23%. Median duration of IT trastuzumab treatment was 6.4 months. Median time from IT trastuzumab start to craniospinal progression was 5.7 months with 6- and 12-month Kaplan-Meier rates of 41 and 21%, respectively. Sustained responses > 6 months were achieved in 4 patients. Median survival from the start of IT trastuzumab was 10.6 months with 6- and 12-month OS rates of 68 and 47%, respectively. IT trastuzumab was well tolerated with one patient developing ventriculitis, which resolved with IV antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS IT trastuzumab was well tolerated with prolongation of OS over historical controls. IT trastuzumab should be considered for management of HER2+ leptomeningeal disease patients.
Collapse
|
47
|
Ricciardi GRR, Russo A, Franchina T, Schifano S, Mastroeni G, Santacaterina A, Adamo V. Efficacy of T-DM1 for leptomeningeal and brain metastases in a HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patient: new directions for systemic therapy - a case report and literature review. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:97. [PMID: 29370839 PMCID: PMC5784540 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-3994-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Herein, we report a complete response after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and concomitant T-DM1 in a patient with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and extensive brain and leptomeningeal involvement. Case presentation A 46 years old Caucasian woman with HER2-positive MBC and no baseline CNS involvement, started in August 2015 1st line therapy with Pertuzumab-Trastuzumab-Docetaxel, with partial response. However, in April 2016 the patient eventually progressed with emergence of brain and leptomeningeal metastases. Hence, she started in May 2016 2nd line therapy with T-DM1 and concomitant WBRT, with complete response (CR) after 3 courses of therapy, with complete resolution of neurological symptoms and no relevant toxicities. The CR is lasting over 13 months and the patient is out of corticosteroid use. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reporting interesting antitumor activity of T-DM1 and concomitant WBRT in both brain and leptomeningeal metastases, with a favorable safety profile and prolonged extracranial disease control. Further prospective studies should confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro Russo
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O. Papardo & Department of Human Pathology University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Tindara Franchina
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O. Papardo & Department of Human Pathology University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Silvia Schifano
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O. Papardo & Department of Human Pathology University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | - Vincenzo Adamo
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O. Papardo & Department of Human Pathology University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Le Rhun E, Bertrand N, Dumont A, Tresch E, Le Deley MC, Mailliez A, Preusser M, Weller M, Revillion F, Bonneterre J. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway as a risk factor of central nervous system metastasis in metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2017; 87:189-198. [PMID: 29103666 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway may be involved in the development of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from breast cancer. Accordingly, herein we explored whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of this pathway are associated with altered risk of CNS metastasis formation in metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS The GENEOM study (NCT00959556) included blood sample collection from breast cancer patients treated in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. We identified patients with CNS metastases for comparison with patients without CNS metastasis, defined as either absence of neurological symptoms or normal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before death or during 5-year follow-up. Eighty-eight SNPs of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway genes were selected for analysis: AKT1 (17 SNPs), AKT2 (4), FGFR1 (2), mTOR (7), PDK1 (4), PI3KR1 (11), PI3KCA (20), PTEN (17), RPS6KB1 (6). RESULTS Of 342 patients with metastases, 207 fulfilled the inclusion criteria: One-hundred-and-seven patients remained free of CNS metastases at last follow-up or date of death whereas 100 patients developed CNS metastases. Among clinical parameters, hormonal and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status as well as vascular tumour emboli was associated with risk of CNS metastasis. Only PI3KR1-rs706716 was associated with CNS metastasis in univariate analysis after Bonferroni correction (p < 0.00085). Multivariate analysis showed associations between AKT1-rs3803304, AKT2-rs3730050, PDK1-rs11686903 and PI3KR1-rs706716 and CNS metastasis . CONCLUSION PI3KR1-rs706716 may be associated with CNS metastasis in metastatic breast cancer patients and could be included in a predictive composite score to detect early CNS metastasis irrespective of breast cancer subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Le Rhun
- Univ. Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; Inserm, U-1192, F-59000 Lille, France; CHU Lille, General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery service, F-59000 Lille, France; Oscar Lambret Center, Medical Oncology Department, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | - Nicolas Bertrand
- Univ. Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; Oscar Lambret Center, Medical Oncology Department, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | - Aurélie Dumont
- Oscar Lambret Center, Human Molecular Oncology Unit, Lille, France; Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, CNS Unit Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna (CCC-CNS), Vienna, Austria.
| | - Emmanuelle Tresch
- Oscar Lambret Center, Biostatistic Unit, Lille, France; Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Marie-Cécile Le Deley
- Univ. Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; Oscar Lambret Center, Biostatistic Unit, Lille, France; Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Audrey Mailliez
- Oscar Lambret Center, Medical Oncology Department, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Oscar Lambret Center, Human Molecular Oncology Unit, Lille, France; Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, CNS Unit Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna (CCC-CNS), Vienna, Austria; Oscar Lambret Center, Biostatistic Unit, Lille, France; Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Françoise Revillion
- Oscar Lambret Center, Human Molecular Oncology Unit, Lille, France; Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, CNS Unit Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna (CCC-CNS), Vienna, Austria.
| | - Jacques Bonneterre
- Univ. Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; Oscar Lambret Center, Medical Oncology Department, F-59000 Lille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Durand B, Zairi F, Boulanger T, Bonneterre J, Mortier L, Le Rhun E. Chemical meningitis related to intra-CSF liposomal cytarabine. CNS Oncol 2017; 6:261-267. [PMID: 29057672 PMCID: PMC6004879 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2016-0046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic options of leptomeningeal metastases include intra-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) chemotherapy. Among intra-CSF agents, liposomal cytarabine has advantages but can induce specific toxicities. A BRAF-V600E-mutated melanoma leptomeningeal metastases patient, treated by dabrafenib and liposomal cytarabine, presented after the first injection of liposomal cytarabine with hyperthermia and headaches. Despite sterile CSF/blood analyses, extended intravenous antibiotics were given and the second injection was delayed. The diagnosis of chemical meningitis was finally made. Dose reduction and appropriate symptomatic treatment permitted the administration of 15 injections of liposomal cytarabine combined with dabrafenib. A confirmation of the diagnosis of chemical meningitis is essential in order (1) not to delay intra-CSF or systemic chemotherapy or (2) to limit the administration of unnecessary but potentially toxic antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bénédicte Durand
- Lille University, F-59000 Lille, France
- Oscar Lambret Center, Medical Oncology Department, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Fahed Zairi
- Lille University, F-59000 Lille, France
- Inserm, U-1192, F-59000 Lille, France
- CHU Lille, Neurosurgery Department, F-59000Lille, France
| | - Thomas Boulanger
- Oscar Lambret Center, Department of Radiology, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Jacques Bonneterre
- Lille University, F-59000 Lille, France
- Oscar Lambret Center, Medical Oncology Department, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Laurent Mortier
- Lille University, F-59000 Lille, France
- CHU Lille, Dermatology Department, F-59000Lille, France
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Lille University, F-59000 Lille, France
- Oscar Lambret Center, Medical Oncology Department, F-59000 Lille, France
- Inserm, U-1192, F-59000 Lille, France
- CHU Lille, Neurosurgery Department, F-59000Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
The necessity of intrathecal chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastasis: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Curr Probl Cancer 2017; 41:355-370. [DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2016] [Revised: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|