Prospective trial evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (18F-DOPA) PET and MRI in patients with recurrent gliomas

PET-based response assessment criteria for diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0): methodological application in [18F]-FDOPA PET imaging

BACKGROUND

The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) group recently reported PET-based response assessment criteria for diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0). The objective of this study was to evaluate the methodological application of these criteria for the amino acid [18F]-FDOPA radiotracer. Patients with confirmed glioma who underwent at least one baseline [18F]-FDOPA PET scan were retrospectively included. The PET RANO 1.0 criteria were evaluated regarding their methodological application. Patients with at least one follow-up PET scan were evaluated with the PET RANO 1.0 criteria as compared to the routine interpretation of two experts not using the PET RANO 1.0 criteria, defined as the reference. The different PET parameters included in the PET RANO 1.0 criteria were evaluated separately regarding their contribution.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (52.0 ± 15.3 years old, 56% women) were included in this study regards to the methodology of application of the PET RANO 1.0 criteria, with 86% of patients presenting measurable diseases. Among these patients, 65 patients were evaluated for the comparison between the PET RANO 1.0 criteria and the expert interpretation: a concordance of 80%, equivalent for newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas, as well as IDH-mutant vs. IDH-wildtype gliomas was found. The metabolic tumor volume represented the most contributive parameter (71% of cases) to the definition of response according to the PET RANO 1.0 criteria. Striatum infiltration, post-treatment related effects, measurable diseases criteria and thresholds for PET RANO 1.0 criteria were related to the cases discordances.

CONCLUSION

The PET RANO 1.0 criteria can be applied with [18F]-FDOPA imaging, with a reasonable concordance with results of an expert interpretation. Description of discordant cases should help to improve future PET RANO 1.0 criteria updating.

Joint EANM/EANO/RANO/SNMMI practice guideline/procedure standard for PET imaging of brain metastases: version 1.0

This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). Brain metastases are the most common malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors. PET imaging with radiolabeled amino acids and to lesser extent [18F]FDG has gained considerable importance in the assessment of brain metastases, especially for the differential diagnosis between recurrent metastases and treatment-related changes which remains a limitation using conventional MRI. The aim of this guideline is to assist nuclear medicine physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of brain PET imaging in patients with brain metastases. This practice guideline will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with brain metastases in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers.

A Practical, Short, [18F]F-DOPA PET/CT Acquisition Method for Distinguishing Recurrent Brain Metastases from Radionecrosis Following Radiotherapy

Background/Objectives: Determining whether 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]fluoro-L-phenylalanine positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]F-DOPA PET/CT) data indicate brain metastasis progression (MP) or brain radionecrosis (RN) is challenging. The aim of this study was to present a method usable in the clinical setting without dedicated software that relies on less than five minutes of SiPM PET/CT data collected immediately after [18F]F-DOPA injection. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 15 patients with 19 lesions. Each acquisition was conducted in list mode (LM) for 25 min using a four-ring SiPM PET/CT system. We reconstructed three volumes from the LM file: acquisition duration of 120 s (V120), 270 s (V270), and 10 min for the standard clinical volume (Vclin). We measured each lesion's maximum voxel activity (LSmax) and the corresponding mean activity with its standard deviation (CLmean, CLsd). We then calculated the LSmax/CLmean ratio and the coefficient of variation (COV), defined as 100 × (CLsd/CLmean). Results: Lesions were classified as RN (n = 7) and MP (n = 12). For all volumes, LSmax/CLmean differed significantly. The COV parameter exhibited significant differences in all comparisons except for V120 vs. V270. The best diagnostic performances were observed for V120 and V270, with an accuracy of 94.7%. The AUC values were 97.6% in both cases. Conclusions: A simple, static [18F]F-DOPA PET/CT acquisition, starting 1.5 min after injection and lasting less than five minutes, permitted reaching excellent diagnostic performance (100% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, and 97.6% AUC) in discriminating between RN and MP.

A study method using early dynamic acquisition of [18F]fluorodopa positron emission tomography for the differential diagnosis between progression and radionecrosis of brain metastases after radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to distinguish between the brain metastasis progression (BMP) and brain radionecrosis (BRN) on the basis of 18F-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography/computed-tomography (18F-FDOPA PET/CT) data. The advent of silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) PET technology makes it possible to study dynamic volumes and potentially improve diagnostic accuracy. We developed a method for processing 18F-FDOPA PET/CT in the differential diagnosis between BMP and BRN. The method involves a short (3-second) sampling time during a 4-minute acquisition on a SiPM-PET/CT machine. We prospectively included 15 patients and 19 metastases. All acquisitions were performed in list mode acquisition for 25 min on a four-ring SiPM PET/CT system. We calculated the ratios between the maximum activity in the lesion's voxel and the mean activity in the contralateral region (VOImax/CLmean) or the mean activity in the white matter (VOImax/WMmean).

RESULTS

Seven lesions were classified as BMP and twelve were classified as BRN. Statistically significant intergroup differences in the VOImax/CLmean and VOImax/WMmean activity ratios were observed for both the clinical volume and the early acquisition. The best performing quantitative variable was the VOImax/CLmean ratio on early acquisition, with a diagnostic accuracy of 94.7%, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 91.7%.

CONCLUSION

The 18F-FDOPA PET/CT data acquired a few minutes after the bolus injection confirms its value in differentiating between BMP and BRN, compared to the much longer classic clinical protocol.

Contribution of [18F]FET PET in the Management of Gliomas, from Diagnosis to Follow-Up: A Review

Gliomas, the most common type of primary malignant brain tumors in adults, pose significant challenges in diagnosis and management due to their heterogeneity and potential aggressiveness. This review evaluates the utility of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) positron emission tomography (PET), a promising imaging modality, to enhance the clinical management of gliomas. We reviewed 82 studies involving 4657 patients, focusing on the application of [18F]FET in several key areas: diagnosis, grading, identification of IDH status and presence of oligodendroglial component, guided resection or biopsy, detection of residual tumor, guided radiotherapy, detection of malignant transformation in low-grade glioma, differentiation of recurrence versus treatment-related changes and prognostic factors, and treatment response evaluation. Our findings confirm that [18F]FET helps delineate tumor tissue, improves diagnostic accuracy, and aids in therapeutic decision-making by providing crucial insights into tumor metabolism. This review underscores the need for standardized parameters and further multicentric studies to solidify the role of [18F]FET PET in routine clinical practice. By offering a comprehensive overview of current research and practical implications, this paper highlights the added value of [18F]FET PET in improving management of glioma patients from diagnosis to follow-up.

Post-treatment imaging of gliomas: challenging the existing dogmas

Gliomas are the commonest malignant central nervous system tumours in adults and imaging is the cornerstone of diagnosis, treatment, and post-treatment follow-up of these patients. With the ever-evolving treatment strategies post-treatment imaging and interpretation in glioma remains challenging, more so with the advent of anti-angiogenic drugs and immunotherapy, which can significantly alter the appearance in this setting, thus making interpretation of routine imaging findings such as contrast enhancement, oedema, and mass effect difficult to interpret. This review details the various methods of management of glioma including the upcoming novel therapies and their impact on imaging findings, with a comprehensive description of the imaging findings in conventional and advanced imaging techniques. A systematic appraisal for the existing and emerging techniques of imaging in these settings and their clinical application including various response assessment guidelines and artificial intelligence based response assessment will also be discussed.

PET-based response assessment criteria for diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0): a report of the RANO group

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) response criteria have been established and were updated in 2023 for MRI-based response evaluation of diffuse gliomas in clinical trials. In addition, PET-based imaging with amino acid tracers is increasingly considered for disease monitoring in both clinical practice and clinical trials. So far, a standardised framework defining timepoints for baseline and follow-up investigations and response evaluation criteria for PET imaging of diffuse gliomas has not been established. Therefore, in this Policy Review, we propose a set of criteria for response assessment based on amino acid PET imaging in clinical trials enrolling participants with diffuse gliomas as defined in the 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. These proposed PET RANO criteria provide a conceptual framework that facilitates the structured implementation of PET imaging into clinical research and, ultimately, clinical routine. To this end, the PET RANO 1.0 criteria are intended to encourage specific investigations of amino acid PET imaging of gliomas.

Disease Assessments in Patients with Glioblastoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The neuro-oncology team faces a unique challenge when assessing treatment response in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the standard imaging modality for measuring therapeutic response in both clinical practice and clinical trials. However, even for the neuroradiologist, MRI interpretations are not straightforward because of tumor heterogeneity, as evidenced by varying degrees of enhancement, infiltrating tumor patterns, cellular densities, and vasogenic edema. The situation is even more perplexing following therapy since treatment-related changes can mimic viable tumor. Additionally, antiangiogenic therapies can dramatically decrease contrast enhancement giving the false impression of decreasing tumor burden. Over the past few decades, several approaches have emerged to augment and improve visual interpretation of glioblastoma response to therapeutics. Herein, we summarize the state of the art for evaluating the response of glioblastoma to standard therapies and investigational agents as well as challenges and future directions for assessing treatment response in neuro-oncology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Monitoring glioblastoma responses to standard therapy and novel agents has been fraught with many challenges and limitations over the past decade. Excitingly, new promising methods are emerging to help address these challenges. Recently, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group proposed an updated response criteria (RANO 2.0) for the evaluation of all grades of glial tumors regardless of IDH status or therapies being evaluated. In addition, advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as histogram analysis, parametric response maps, morphometric segmentation, radio pharmacodynamics approaches, and the integrating of amino acid radiotracers in the tumor evaluation algorithm may help resolve equivocal lesion interpretations without operative intervention. Moreover, the introduction of other techniques, such as liquid biopsy and artificial intelligence could complement conventional visual assessment of glioblastoma response to therapies. Neuro-oncology has evolved over the past decade and has achieved significant milestones, including the establishment of new standards of care, emerging therapeutic options, and novel clinical, translational, and basic research. More recently, the integration of histopathology with molecular features for tumor classification has marked an important paradigm shift in brain tumor diagnosis. In a similar manner, treatment response monitoring in neuro-oncology has made considerable progress. While most techniques are still in their inception, there is an emerging body of evidence for clinical application. Further research will be critically important for the development of impactful breakthroughs in this area of the field.

Added value of [18F]FDOPA PET to the management of high-grade glioma patients after their initial treatment: a prospective multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic value of 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]fluoro-L-phenylalanine ([18F]FDOPA) PET in patients with suspected recurrent gliomas is recognised. We conducted a multicentre prospective study to assess its added value in the practical management of patients suspected of recurrence of high grade gliomas (HGG).

METHODS

Patients with a proven HGG (WHO grade III and IV) were referred to the multidisciplinary neuro-oncology board (MNOB) during their follow-up after initial standard of care treatment and when MRI findings were not fully conclusive. Each case was discussed in 2 steps. For step 1, a diagnosis and a management proposal were made only based on the clinical and the MRI data. For step 2, the same process was repeated taking the [18F]FDOPA PET results into consideration. A level of confidence for the decisions was assigned to each step. Changes in diagnosis and management induced by [18F]FDOPA PET information were measured. When unchanged, the difference in the confidence of the decisions were assessed. The diagnostic performances of each step were measured.

RESULTS

107 patients underwent a total of 138 MNOB assessments. The proposed diagnosis changed between step 1 and step 2 in 37 cases (26.8%) and the proposed management changed in 31 cases (22.5%). When the management did not change, the confidence in the MNOB final decision was increased in 87 cases (81.3%). Step 1 had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 83%, 58% and 66% and step 2, 86%, 64% and 71% respectively.

CONCLUSION

[18F]FDOPA PET adds significant information for the follow-up of HGG patients in clinical practice. When MRI findings are not straightforward, it can change the management for more than 20% of the patients and increases the confidence level of the multidisciplinary board decisions.

Differentiating high-grade glioma progression from treatment-related changes with dynamic [18F]FDOPA PET: a multicentric study

OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic accuracy of amino-acid PET for distinguishing progression from treatment-related changes (TRC) is currently based on single-center non-homogeneous glioma populations. Our study assesses the diagnostic value of static and dynamic [¹⁸F]FDOPA PET acquisitions to differentiate between high-grade glioma (HGG) recurrence and TRC in a large cohort sourced from two independent nuclear medicine centers.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 106 patients with suspected glioma recurrences (WHO GIII, n = 38; GIV, n = 68; IDH-mutant, n = 35, IDH-wildtype, n = 71). Patients underwent dynamic [¹⁸F]FDOPA PET/CT (n = 83) or PET/MRI (n = 23), and static tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs), metabolic tumor volumes and dynamic parameters (time to peak and slope) were determined. The final diagnosis was either defined by histopathology or a clinical-radiological follow-up at 6 months. Optimal [¹⁸F]FDOPA PET parameter cut-offs were obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Predictive factors and clinical parameters were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses.

RESULTS

Surgery or the clinical-radiological 6-month follow-up identified 71 progressions and 35 treatment-related changes. TBR_mean, with a threshold of 1.8, best-differentiated glioma recurrence/progression from post-treatment changes in the whole population (sensitivity 82%, specificity 71%, p < 0.0001) whereas curve slope was only significantly different in IDH-mutant HGGs (n = 25). In survival analyses, MTV was a clinical independent predictor of progression-free and overall survival on the multivariate analysis (p ≤ 0.01). A curve slope > -0.12/h was an independent predictor for longer PFS in IDH-mutant HGGs CONCLUSION: Our multicentric study confirms the high accuracy of [¹⁸F]FDOPA PET to differentiate recurrent malignant gliomas from TRC and emphasizes the diagnostic and prognostic value of dynamic acquisitions for IDH-mutant HGGs.

KEY POINTS

• The diagnostic accuracy of dynamic amino-acid PET, for distinguishing progression from treatment-related changes, is currently based on single-center non-homogeneous glioma populations. • This multicentric study confirms the high accuracy of static [¹⁸F]FDOPA PET images for differentiating progression from treatment-related changes in a homogeneous population of high-grade gliomas and highlights the diagnostic and prognostic value of dynamic acquisitions for IDH-mutant high-grade gliomas. • Dynamic acquisitions should be performed in IDH-mutant glioma patients to provide valuable information for the differential diagnosis of recurrence and treatment-related changes.

Diagnostic value of PET with different radiotracers and MRI for recurrent glioma: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 6 different imaging modalities for differentiating glioma recurrence from postradiotherapy changes by performing a network meta-analysis (NMA) using direct comparison studies with 2 or more imaging techniques.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, the Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to August 2021. The Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies with the criterion for study inclusion being direct comparison using 2 or more imaging modalities.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The consistency was evaluated by examining the agreement between direct and indirect effects. NMA was performed and the surface under the the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values was obtained to calculate the probability of each imaging modality being the most effective diagnostic method. The CINeMA tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Direct comparison, inconsistency test, NMA and SUCRA values.

RESULTS

A total of 8853 potentially relevant articles were retrieved and 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. 18F-FET showed the highest SUCRA values for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy, followed by 18F-FDOPA. The quality of the included evidence is classified as moderate.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This review indicates that 18F-FET and 18F-FDOPA may have greater diagnostic value for glioma recurrence relative to other imaging modalities (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations B).

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021293075.

A Comparison of PET Tracers in Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review

Humans with high-grade gliomas have a poor prognosis, with a mean survival time of just 12-18 months for patients who undergo standard-of-care tumor resection and adjuvant therapy. Currently, surgery and chemoradiotherapy serve as standard treatments for this condition, yet these can be complicated by the tumor location, growth rate and recurrence. Currently, gadolinium-based, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) serves as the predominant imaging modality for recurrent high-grade gliomas, but it faces several drawbacks, including its inability to distinguish tumor recurrence from treatment-related changes and its failure to reveal the entirety of tumor burden (de novo or recurrent) due to limitations inherent to gadolinium contrast. As such, alternative imaging modalities that can address these limitations, including positron emission tomography (PET), are worth pursuing. To this end, the identification of PET-based markers for use in imaging of recurrent high-grade gliomas is paramount. This review will highlight several PET radiotracers that have been implemented in clinical practice and provide a comparison between them to assess the efficacy of these tracers.

Conventional and Advanced Imaging Techniques in Post-treatment Glioma Imaging

Despite decades of advancement in the diagnosis and therapy of gliomas, the most malignant primary brain tumors, the overall survival rate is still dismal, and their post-treatment imaging appearance remains very challenging to interpret. Since the limitations of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the distinction between recurrence and treatment effect have been recognized, a variety of advanced MR and functional imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS), as well as a variety of radiotracers for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been investigated for this indication along with voxel-based and more quantitative analytical methods in recent years. Machine learning and radiomics approaches in recent years have shown promise in distinguishing between recurrence and treatment effect as well as improving prognostication in a malignancy with a very short life expectancy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the conventional and advanced imaging techniques with the potential to differentiate recurrence from treatment effect and includes updates in the state-of-the-art in advanced imaging with a brief overview of emerging experimental techniques. A series of representative cases are provided to illustrate the synthesis of conventional and advanced imaging with the clinical context which informs the radiologic evaluation of gliomas in the post-treatment setting.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of imaging in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adults with glioblastoma who have been previously treated with first-line radiation or chemoradiotherapy and who are suspected of experiencing tumor progression.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, is standard contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging including diffusion weighted imaging useful for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes?

LEVEL II

Magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement including diffusion weighted imaging is recommended as the imaging surveillance method to detect the progression of previously diagnosed glioblastoma.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does magnetic resonance spectroscopy add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement?

LEVEL II

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy is recommended as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does magnetic resonance perfusion add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement?

LEVEL III

Magnetic resonance perfusion is suggested as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does the addition of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provide additional useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement?

LEVEL III

Single-photon emission computed tomography imaging is suggested as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement?

LEVEL III

The routine use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to identify progression of glioblastoma is not recommended.

QUESTION

In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does positron emission tomography with amino acid agents add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement?

LEVEL III

It is suggested that amino acid positron emission tomography be considered to assist in the differentiation of progressive glioblastoma from treatment related changes.

The Utility of Conventional Amino Acid PET Radiotracers in the Evaluation of Glioma Recurrence also in Comparison with MRI

AIM

In this comprehensive review we present an update on the most relevant studies evaluating the utility of amino acid PET radiotracers for the evaluation of glioma recurrence as compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A literature search extended until June 2020 on the PubMed/MEDLINE literature database was conducted using the terms "high-grade glioma", "glioblastoma", "brain tumors", "positron emission tomography", "PET", "amino acid PET", "[11C]methyl-l-methionine", "[18F]fluoroethyl-tyrosine", "[18F]fluoro-l-dihydroxy-phenylalanine", "MET", "FET", "DOPA", "magnetic resonance imaging", "MRI", "advanced MRI", "magnetic resonance spectroscopy", "perfusion-weighted imaging", "diffusion-weighted imaging", "MRS", "PWI", "DWI", "hybrid PET/MR", "glioma recurrence", "pseudoprogression", "PSP", "treatment-related change", and "radiation necrosis" alone and in combination. Only original articles edited in English and about humans with at least 10 patients were included.

RESULTS

Forty-four articles were finally selected. Conventional amino acid PET tracers were demonstrated to be reliable diagnostic techniques in differentiating tumor recurrence thanks to their high uptake from tumor tissue and low background in normal grey matter, giving additional and early information to standard modalities. Among them, MET-PET seems to present the highest diagnostic value but its use is limited to on-site cyclotron facilities. [18F]labelled amino acids, such as FDOPA and FET, were developed to provide a more suitable PET tracer for routine clinical applications, and demonstrated similar diagnostic performance. When compared to the gold standard MRI, amino acid PET provides complementary and comparable information to standard modalities and seems to represent an essential tool in the differentiation between tumor recurrence and other entities such as pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, and pseudoresponse.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the introduction of new advanced imaging techniques, the diagnosis of glioma recurrence remains challenging. In this scenario, the growing knowledge about imaging techniques and analysis, such as the combined PET/MRI and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), could represent promising tools to face this difficult and debated clinical issue.

Diagnostic Accuracy of PET for Differentiating True Glioma Progression From Post Treatment-Related Changes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PET with different radiotracers and parameters in differentiating between true glioma progression (TPR) and post treatment-related change (PTRC). Methods: Studies on using PET to differentiate between TPR and PTRC were screened from the PubMed and Embase databases. By following the PRISMA checklist, the quality assessment of included studies was performed, the true positive and negative values (TP and TN), false positive and negative values (FP and FN), and general characteristics of all the included studies were extracted. Results of PET consistent with reference standard were defined as TP or TN. The pooled sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves (HSROC) were generated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. Results: The 33 included studies had 1,734 patients with 1,811 lesions suspected of glioma recurrence. Fifteen studies tested the accuracy of 18F-FET PET, 12 tested 18F-FDG PET, seven tested 11C-MET PET, and three tested 18F-DOPA PET. 18F-FET PET showed a pooled Sen and Spe of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.93) and 0.78 (0.69, 0.85), respectively. In the subgroup analysis of FET-PET, diagnostic accuracy of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) was higher than that of mixed-grade gliomas (P interaction = 0.04). 18F-FDG PET showed a pooled Sen and Spe of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.83) and 0.87 (0.80, 0.92), the Spe of the HGGs group was lower than that of the low-grade gliomas group (0.82 vs. 0.90, P = 0.02). 11C-MET PET had a pooled Sen and Spe of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.96) and 0.78 (0.69, 0.86). 18F-DOPA PET had a pooled Sen and Spe of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.89) and 0.70 (0.60, 0.79). FET-PET combined with MRI had a pooled Sen and Spe of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.94) and 0.76 (0.57, 0.88). Multi-parameters analysis of FET-PET had pooled Sen and Spe values of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.92) and 0.79 (0.63, 0.89). Conclusion: PET has a moderate diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between TPR and PTRC. The high Sen of amino acid PET and high Spe of FDG-PET suggest that the combination of commonly used FET-PET and FDG-PET may be more accurate and promising, especially for low-grade glioma.

Usefulness of 18F-FDOPA PET for the management of primary brain tumors: a systematic review of the literature

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is currently the standard of care in the management of primary brain tumors, although certain limitations remain. Metabolic imaging has proven useful for an increasing number of indications in oncology over the past few years, most particularly 18F-FDG PET/CT. In neuro-oncology, 18F-FDG was insufficient to clearly evaluate brain tumors. Amino-acid radiotracers such as 18F-FDOPA were then evaluated in the management of brain diseases, notably tumoral diseases. Even though European guidelines on the use of amino-acid PET in gliomas have been published, it is crucial that future studies standardize acquisition and interpretation parameters. The aim of this article was to systematically review the potential effect of this metabolic imaging technique in numerous steps of the disease: primary and recurrence diagnosis, grading, local and systemic treatment assessment, and prognosis. A total of 41 articles were included and analyzed in this review. It appears that 18F-FDOPA PET holds promise as an effective additional tool in the management of gliomas. More consistent prospective studies are still needed.

Metabolic Imaging of Brain Tumor Recurrence

OBJECTIVE. Diagnosing brain tumor recurrence, especially with changes that occur after treatment, is a challenge. MRI has an exceptional structural resolution, which is important from the perspective of treatment planning. However, its reliability in diagnosing recurrence is relatively lower, when compared to metabolic imaging. The latter is more sensitive to the early changes associated with recurrence and relatively immune to confounding by treatment related changes. CONCLUSION. There is no one-stop shop for the diagnosis of recurrence in brain tumors. The sensitivity of metabolic imaging is not a substitute for the resolution of the MRI, making a multi-modal approach the only way forward.

Prediction of MGMT Status for Glioblastoma Patients Using Radiomics Feature Extraction From 18F-DOPA-PET Imaging

PURPOSE

Methylation of the O⁶-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter is associated with improved treatment response and survival in patients with glioblastoma (GB), but the necessary pathologic specimen can be nondiagnostic. In this study, we assessed whether radiomics features from pretreatment ¹⁸F-DOPA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging could be used to predict pathologic MGMT status.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study included 86 patients with newly diagnosed GB, split into 3 groups (training, validating, and predicting). We performed a radiomics analysis on ¹⁸F-DOPA PET images by extracting features from 2 tumor-based contours: a "Gold" contour of all abnormal uptake per expert nuclear medicine physician and a high-grade glioma (HGG) contour based on a tumor-to-normal hemispheric ratio >2.0, representing the most aggressive components. Feature selection was performed by comparing the weighted feature importance and filtering with bivariate analysis. Optimization of model parameters was explored using grid search with selected features. The stability of the model with increasing input features was also investigated for model robustness. The model predictions were then applied by comparing the overall survival probability of the patients with GB and unknown MGMT status versus those with known MGMT status.

RESULTS

A radiomics signature was constructed to predict MGMT methylation status. Using features extracted from HGG contour alone with a random forest model, we achieved 80% ± 10% accuracy for 95% confidence level in predicting MGMT status. The prediction accuracy was not improved with the addition of the Gold contour or with more input features. The model was applied to the patients with unknown MGMT methylation status. The prediction results are consistent with what is expected using overall survival as a surrogate.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that 3 features from radiomics modeling of ¹⁸F-DOPA PET imaging can predict MGMT methylation status with reasonable accuracy. These results could provide valuable therapeutic guidance for patients in whom MGMT testing is inconclusive or nondiagnostic.

Use of static and dynamic [18F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression

BACKGROUND

Static [¹⁸F]-F-DOPA PET images are currently used for identifying patients with glioma recurrence/progression after treatment, although the additional diagnostic value of dynamic parameters remains unknown in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of static and dynamic [¹⁸F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence/progression as well as assess further relationships with patient outcome.

METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive patients who underwent an [¹⁸F]-F-DOPA PET for a suspected glioma recurrence/progression at post-resection MRI, were retrospectively included. Static parameters, including mean and maximum tumor-to-normal-brain (TBR) ratios, tumor-to-striatum (TSR) ratios, and metabolic tumor volume (MTV), as well as dynamic parameters with time-to-peak (TTP) values and curve slope, were tested for predicting the following: (1) glioma recurrence/progression at 6 months after the PET exam and (2) survival on longer follow-up.

RESULTS

All static parameters were significant predictors of glioma recurrence/progression (accuracy ≥ 94%) with all parameters also associated with mean progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall population (all p < 0.001, 29.7 vs. 0.4 months for TBR_max, TSR_max, and MTV). The curve slope was the sole dynamic PET predictor of glioma recurrence/progression (accuracy = 76.5%) and was also associated with mean PFS (p < 0.001, 18.0 vs. 0.4 months). However, no additional information was provided relative to static parameters in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Although patients with glioma recurrence/progression can be detected by both static and dynamic [¹⁸F]-F-DOPA PET parameters, most of this diagnostic information can be achieved by conventional static parameters.

Diagnostic and grading accuracy of 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging with 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[¹⁸F] fluoro-L-phenylalanine (¹⁸F-FDOPA) has been used in the evaluation of gliomas. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain the diagnostic and grading accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 May 2019. We included studies reporting the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET or PET/CT in glioma patients. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated from eligible studies on a per-lesion basis.

Results

Eventually, 19 studies were included. Across 13 studies (370 patients) for glioma diagnosis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT were 0.90 (95%CI: 0.86–0.93) and 0.75 (95%CI: 0.65–0.83). Across 7 studies (219 patients) for glioma grading, ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95%CI: 0.81–0.93) and a pooled specificity of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.64–0.81).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT demonstrated good performance for diagnosing gliomas and differentiating high-grade gliomas (HGGs) from low-grade gliomas (LGGs). Further studies implementing standardized PET protocols and investigating the grading parameters are needed.

The Role of Standard and Advanced Imaging for the Management of Brain Malignancies From a Radiation Oncology Standpoint

Radiation therapy (RT) plays a critical role in the overall management of many central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Advances in RT treatment planning, with techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery, now allow the delivery of highly conformal dose with great precision. These techniques rely on high-resolution 3-dimensional anatomical imaging modalities such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to accurately and reliably define CNS targets and normal tissue avoidance structures. The integration of cross-sectional imaging into radiation oncology has directly translated into improvements in the therapeutic window of RT, and the union between radiation oncology and imaging is only expected to grow stronger. In addition, advanced imaging modalities including diffusion, perfusion, and spectroscopic MRIs as well as positron emission tomography (PET) scans with novel tracers are being utilized to provide additional insight into tumor biology and behavior beyond anatomy. Together, these standard and advanced imaging modalities hold significant potential to improve future RT delivery and response assessment. In this review, we will discuss the current utilization of standard/advanced imaging for CNS tumors from a radiation oncology perspective as well as the implications of novel MRI and PET modalities currently under investigation.