1
|
Lee HI, Kim J, Kim IA, Lee JH, Cho J, Rahman R, Fell G, Wee CW, Yoon HI. Choosing Wisely between Radiotherapy Dose-Fractionation Schedules: The Molecular Graded Prognostic Assessment for Elderly Glioblastoma Patients. Cancer Res Treat 2025; 57:378-386. [PMID: 39265619 PMCID: PMC12016846 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2024.680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to develop a graded prognostic assessment (GPA) model integrating genomic characteristics for elderly patients with glioblastoma (eGBM), and to compare the efficacy of different radiotherapy schedules. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multi-institutional retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with or without temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed eGBM. Based on the significant factors identified in the multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS), the molecular GPA for eGBM (eGBM-molGPA) was established. RESULTS A total of 334 and 239 patients who underwent conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) were included, respectively, with 86% of patients receiving TMZ-based chemoradiation. With a median follow-up of 17.4 months (range, 3.3 to 149.9 months), the median OS was 18.7 months for CFRT+TMZ group, 15.1 months for HFRT+TMZ group, and 10.4 months for radiotherapy alone group (CFRT+TMZ vs. HFRT+TMZ: hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; p < 0.001 and CFRT+TMZ vs. radiotherapy alone: HR, 2.52; p < 0.001). In a combined analysis with the NOA-08 and Nordic trials, CFRT+TMZ group exhibited the highest survival rates among all treatment groups. The eGBM-molGPA, which integrated four clinical and three molecular parameters, stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. CFRT+TMZ significantly improved OS compared to HFRT+TMZ or radiotherapy alone in the low-risk (p=0.023) and intermediate-risk groups (p < 0.001). However, in the high-risk group, there was no significant difference in OS between treatment options (p=0.770). CONCLUSION CFRT+TMZ may be more effective than HFRT+TMZ or radiotherapy alone for selected eGBM patients. The novel eGBM-molGPA model can guide treatment selection for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye In Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jina Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Ah Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Joo Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaeho Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Geoffrey Fell
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chan Woo Wee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong In Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beckham TH, Rooney MK, McAleer MF, Ghia AJ, Tom MC, Perni S, McGovern S, Grosshans D, Chung C, Wang C, De B, Swanson T, Paulino A, Jiang W, Ferguson S, Patel CB, Li J, Yeboa DN. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for glioblastoma: A large institutional retrospective assessment of 2 approaches. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:266-274. [PMID: 38737610 PMCID: PMC11085842 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) poses therapeutic challenges due to its aggressive nature, particularly for patients with poor functional status and/or advanced disease. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) regimens have demonstrated comparable disease outcomes for this population while allowing treatment to be completed more quickly. Here, we report our institutional outcomes of patients treated with 2 hypofractionated RT regimens: 40 Gy/15fx (3w-RT) and 50 Gy/20fx (4w-RT). METHODS A single-institution retrospective analysis was conducted of 127 GBM patients who underwent 3w-RT or 4w-RT. Patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The impact of chemotherapy and RT schedule was explored through subgroup analyses. RESULTS Median OS for the entire cohort was 7.7 months. There were no significant differences in PFS or OS between 3w-RT and 4w-RT groups overall. Receipt and timing of temozolomide (TMZ) emerged as the variable most strongly associated with survival, with patients receiving adjuvant-only or concurrent and adjuvant TMZ having significantly improved PFS and OS (P < .001). In a subgroup analysis of patients that did not receive TMZ, patients in the 4w-RT group demonstrated a trend toward improved OS as compared to the 3w-RT group (P = .12). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates comparable survival outcomes between 3w-RT and 4w-RT regimens in GBM patients. Receipt and timing of TMZ were strongly associated with survival outcomes. The potential benefit of dose-escalated hypofractionation for patients not receiving chemotherapy warrants further investigation and emphasizes the importance of personalized treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H Beckham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael K Rooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary F McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Subha Perni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chenyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Brain De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Todd Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Arnold Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wen Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sherise Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chirag B Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tseng CL, Zeng KL, Mellon EA, Soltys SG, Ruschin M, Lau AZ, Lutsik NS, Chan RW, Detsky J, Stewart J, Maralani PJ, Sahgal A. Evolving concepts in margin strategies and adaptive radiotherapy for glioblastoma: A new future is on the horizon. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S3-S16. [PMID: 38437669 PMCID: PMC10911794 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment after maximal safe resection for glioblastoma (GBM). Despite advances in molecular profiling, surgical techniques, and neuro-imaging, there have been no major breakthroughs in radiotherapy (RT) volumes in decades. Although the majority of recurrences occur within the original gross tumor volume (GTV), treatment of a clinical target volume (CTV) ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 cm beyond the GTV remains the standard of care. Over the past 15 years, the incorporation of standard and functional MRI sequences into the treatment workflow has become a routine practice with increasing adoption of MR simulators, and new integrated MR-Linac technologies allowing for daily pre-, intra- and post-treatment MR imaging. There is now unprecedented ability to understand the tumor dynamics and biology of GBM during RT, and safe CTV margin reduction is being investigated with the goal of improving the therapeutic ratio. The purpose of this review is to discuss margin strategies and the potential for adaptive RT for GBM, with a focus on the challenges and opportunities associated with both online and offline adaptive workflows. Lastly, opportunities to biologically guide adaptive RT using non-invasive imaging biomarkers and the potential to define appropriate volumes for dose modification will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - K Liang Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simcoe Muskoka Regional Cancer Program, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angus Z Lau
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natalia S Lutsik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Rachel W Chan
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman J Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arakawa Y, Mineharu Y, Uto M, Mizowaki T. Optimal managements of elderly patients with glioblastoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:833-842. [PMID: 35552425 PMCID: PMC9841411 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Optimizing the management of elderly patients with glioblastoma is an ongoing task in neuro-oncology. The number of patients with this tumor type is gradually increasing with the aging of the population. Although available data and practice recommendations remain limited, the current strategy is maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy in combination with temozolomide. However, survival is significantly worse than that in the younger population. Surgical resection provides survival benefit in patients with good performance status. Hypofractionated radiotherapy decreases toxicities while maintaining therapeutic efficacy, thus improving treatment adherence and subsequently leading to better quality of life. The intensity of these treatments should be balanced with patient-specific factors and consideration of quality of life. This review discusses the current optimal management in terms of efficacy and safety, as well as future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiki Arakawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yohei Mineharu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Megumi Uto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matsui JK, Perlow HK, Ritter AR, Upadhyay R, Raval RR, Thomas EM, Beyer SJ, Pillainayagam C, Goranovich J, Ong S, Giglio P, Palmer JD. Small Molecules and Immunotherapy Agents for Enhancing Radiotherapy in Glioblastoma. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10071763. [PMID: 35885067 PMCID: PMC9313399 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor that is associated with a poor prognosis and quality of life. The standard of care has changed minimally over the past two decades and currently consists of surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT), concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, and tumor treating fields (TTF). Factors such as tumor hypoxia and the presence of glioma stem cells contribute to the radioresistant nature of GBM. In this review, we discuss the current treatment modalities, mechanisms of radioresistance, and studies that have evaluated promising radiosensitizers. Specifically, we highlight small molecules and immunotherapy agents that have been studied in conjunction with RT in clinical trials. Recent preclinical studies involving GBM radiosensitizers are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K. Matsui
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Haley K. Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (H.K.P.); (A.R.R.); (R.U.); (R.R.R.); (E.M.T.); (S.J.B.)
| | - Alex R. Ritter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (H.K.P.); (A.R.R.); (R.U.); (R.R.R.); (E.M.T.); (S.J.B.)
| | - Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (H.K.P.); (A.R.R.); (R.U.); (R.R.R.); (E.M.T.); (S.J.B.)
| | - Raju R. Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (H.K.P.); (A.R.R.); (R.U.); (R.R.R.); (E.M.T.); (S.J.B.)
| | - Evan M. Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (H.K.P.); (A.R.R.); (R.U.); (R.R.R.); (E.M.T.); (S.J.B.)
| | - Sasha J. Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (H.K.P.); (A.R.R.); (R.U.); (R.R.R.); (E.M.T.); (S.J.B.)
| | - Clement Pillainayagam
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (C.P.); (J.G.); (S.O.); (P.G.)
| | - Justin Goranovich
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (C.P.); (J.G.); (S.O.); (P.G.)
| | - Shirley Ong
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (C.P.); (J.G.); (S.O.); (P.G.)
| | - Pierre Giglio
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (C.P.); (J.G.); (S.O.); (P.G.)
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (H.K.P.); (A.R.R.); (R.U.); (R.R.R.); (E.M.T.); (S.J.B.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Perlow HK, Prasad RN, Yang M, Klamer B, Matsui J, Marrazzo L, Detti B, Scorsetti M, Clerici E, Arnett A, Beyer S, Ammirati M, Chakravarti A, Raval RR, Brown PD, Navarria P, Scoccianti S, Grecula JC, Palmer JD. Accelerated hypofractionated radiation for elderly or frail patients with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A pooled analysis of patient-level data from 4 prospective trials. Cancer 2022; 128:2367-2374. [PMID: 35315512 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard of care for elderly or frail patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is 40 Gy in 15 fractions of radiotherapy. However, this regimen has a lower biological effective dose (BED) compared with the Stupp regimen of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. It is hypothesized that accelerated hypofractionated radiation of 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions (BED equivalent to Stupp) is safe and efficacious. METHODS Elderly or frail patients with GBM treated with 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions were pooled from 3 phase 1/2 studies and a prospective observational study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were defined time elapsing between surgery/biopsy and death from any cause or progression of disease. RESULTS Sixty-two newly diagnosed patients were eligible for this pooled analysis of individual patient data. The majority (66%) had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score <70. The median age was 73 years. The median OS and PFS were 10.3 and 6.9 months, respectively. Patients with KPS scores ≥70 and <70 had a median OS of 15.3 and 9.5 months, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for improved PFS and OS. Grade 3 neurologic toxicity was seen in 2 patients (3.2%). There was no grade 4/5 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS This is the only analysis of elderly/frail patients with GBM prospectively treated with a hypofractionated radiation regimen that is isoeffective to the Stupp regimen. Treatment was well tolerated and demonstrated excellent OS and PFS compared with historical studies. This regimen gives the elderly/frail population an alternative to regimens with a lower BED. Randomized trials are needed to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rahul N Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mike Yang
- Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Brett Klamer
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Livia Marrazzo
- Department of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Florence, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sasha Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mario Ammirati
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Raju R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Scoccianti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Florence, Italy
| | - John C Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chatterjee A, Bhadane M, Manjali JJ, Dasgupta A, Epari S, Sahay A, Patil V, Moiyadi A, Shetty P, Gupta T. Optimizing Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Single-Institution Audit of Clinical Outcomes from a Tertiary-Care Comprehensive Cancer Center in India. World Neurosurg 2022; 161:e587-e595. [PMID: 35192971 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is lack of consensus regarding optimal adjuvant therapy in elderly glioblastoma (GBM). We have been treating elderly (≥60 years) GBM patients with normofractionated or hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) plus temozolomide (TMZ) based on Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Herein we report clinical outcomes in this cohort treated at our institute using this approach. METHODS Medical records of elderly GBM patients (≥60 years) treated between 2013 and 2017 with either normofractionated RT (59.4-60 Gy/30-33 fractions/6-6.5 weeks) or hypofractionated RT (35 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks) plus TMZ were reviewed retrospectively. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ≥grade 3 myelotoxicity. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods, compared using log-rank test, and reported as point estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS The normofractionated cohort (n = 126) was characterized by a higher proportion of patients younger than age 65 years, KPS ≥70, methylated O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), and receiving adjuvant TMZ including extended adjuvant TMZ (>6 cycles) compared with the hypofractionated cohort (n = 20), confirming selection bias. At a median follow-up of 13 months, 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS and OS were 43% (95% CI: 36%-52%) and 56% (95% CI: 48%-64%), yielding median PFS and OS of 11.0 months and 13.1 months, respectively. Higher KPS, methylated MGMT, normofractionated RT, and extended adjuvant TMZ emerged as favorable prognostic factors. TMZ was well tolerated with a low risk of ≥grade 3 myelotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS Our single-institution clinical audit confirms poor survival in elderly GBM with suboptimal performance status but demonstrates acceptably fair outcomes in patients with preserved KPS comparable with the nonelderly cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Manish Bhadane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Jifmi Jose Manjali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Archya Dasgupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Sridhar Epari
- Department of Pathology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ayushi Sahay
- Department of Pathology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Vijay Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Aliasgar Moiyadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Prakash Shetty
- Department of Neurosurgery, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|