1
|
Hajikarimloo B, Tos SM, Mohammadzadeh I, Habibi MA, Hasanzade A, Hezaveh EB, Ghorbanpouryami F, Ebrahimi A. Efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery for petroclival meningiomas: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Neurol Belg 2025:10.1007/s13760-025-02805-z. [PMID: 40388062 DOI: 10.1007/s13760-025-02805-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2025] [Accepted: 05/03/2025] [Indexed: 05/20/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Managing petroclival meningiomas (PCMs) is challenging due to their deep-seated location and proximity to critical anatomical structures. Resection aimed at achieving gross total resection (GTR) has been the primary therapeutic approach for PCMs; however, GTR is associated with considerable complications. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an effective and safe minimally invasive option for managing petroclival meningiomas. This study evaluated the role of primary or adjuvant SRS in the treatment of petroclival meningiomas. METHODS Following a comprehensive literature search, studies evaluating the role of primary or adjuvant SRS in petroclival meningiomas were included. The meta-analysis calculated the pooled estimates for local tumor control (LTC), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse radiation effect (ARE). RESULTS A total of 10 studies involving 605 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled LTC rate of 94% (95% CI: 88-98%), a 5-year PFS rate of 94% (95% CI: 81-100%), and a 10-year PFS rate of 87% (95% CI: 69-98%). The meta-analysis for the SRS indication demonstrated that both primary and adjuvant SRS were associated with substantial LTC rates, and the difference was not significant (Primary: 95% [95% CI: 83-100%] vs. Adjuvant: 92% [95% CI: 69-100%], P = 0.65). The meta-analysis for the ARE indicated a pooled rate of 5% (95% CI: 0-12%). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that primary and adjuvant SRS are associated with significant LTC and PFS rates, along with minimal complications. Primary SRS may be considered for individuals with small or asymptomatic lesions, while adjuvant SRS is advised for larger or recurrent lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bardia Hajikarimloo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| | - Salem M Tos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh
- Skull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Habibi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arman Hasanzade
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ehsan Bahrami Hezaveh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Ghorbanpouryami
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azin Ebrahimi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goldman MJ, Teh BS, Lo SS, Butler EB, Baskin DS. Radiosurgery for Intracranial Meningiomas: A Review of Anatomical Challenges and an Update on the Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 17:45. [PMID: 39796674 PMCID: PMC11718812 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2024] [Revised: 12/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Radiation has been used to treat meningiomas since the mid-1970s. Traditionally, radiation was reserved for patients unfit for major surgery or those with surgically inaccessible tumors. With an increased quantity and quality of imaging, and an aging population, there has been a rise in incidentally diagnosed meningiomas with smaller tumors at diagnosis time. Deciding if, how, and when to intervene must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Anatomical location and adjacent vital structures are crucial for decision-making. Prior review articles have detailed outcomes of radiosurgery in broad anatomical regions such as the skull base, but a recent deluge of research on increasingly specific anatomical subregions deserves attention. This narrative review synthesizes information regarding specific anatomical subregions, including anatomical challenges, radiosurgical outcomes, and unique considerations. Via MEDLINE and ascendancy search, we utilized evidence available for each anatomical region and herein discuss details of published research and explore future directions. Meningioma management remains individualized based on patient comorbidities, tumor location/characteristics, symptomatic burden, and patient age. In addition to stereotactic radiosurgery's established role for surgically inaccessible, recurrent, and high-grade meningiomas, its use as upfront management for small asymptomatic meningiomas is increasingly investigated. For all subregions reported, radiosurgical intervention resulted in high tumor control rates and acceptably low adverse radiation events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Goldman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Bin S. Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (B.S.T.); (E.B.B.)
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - E. Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (B.S.T.); (E.B.B.)
| | - David S. Baskin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Kenneth R. Peak Brain and Pituitary Tumor Treatment Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10022, USA
- Department of Medicine, Texas A & M Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bin Sumaida A, Shanbhag NM, Balaraj K. Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of CyberKnife for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e56848. [PMID: 38528994 PMCID: PMC10961244 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
This systematic review aims to evaluate CyberKnife (Accuray, Madison, WI, USA) radiosurgery's efficacy, safety, and outcomes in treating meningiomas, focusing on tumour control rates, symptom relief, survival rates, quality of life, and adverse events. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), covering studies published in the last 20 years and available in English. The inclusion criteria targeted studies involving patients with meningioma treated with CyberKnife radiosurgery, reporting on specific outcomes of interest. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies, and a narrative synthesis approach was adopted for data analysis. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing various design types and patient demographics. The review highlights CyberKnife's effectiveness in managing benign and atypical meningiomas and specific challenging cases like perioptic lesions and large cranial base tumours. Key findings include high tumour control rates, preservation or improvement of visual functions in perioptic lesions, and promising results in benign spinal tumours and supratentorial meningiomas. Comparative analyses suggest better radiographic tumour control and a lower incidence of post-treatment complications with stereotactic radiotherapy over stereotactic radiosurgery. Long-term outcomes and safety profiles underline the viability of CyberKnife as a treatment option, with minimal permanent side effects reported. CyberKnife radiosurgery is a highly effective and safe treatment modality for meningiomas. It offers significant benefits in tumour control, symptom relief, and maintaining the quality of life with minimal adverse effects. The precision and adaptability of CyberKnife technology make it a valuable addition to the treatment arsenal for meningiomas. It necessitates further research and adoption in clinical practice, especially in regions like the United Arab Emirates, where its use is emerging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nandan M Shanbhag
- Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, ARE
- Oncology/Radiation Oncology/Palliative Care, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, ARE
| | - Khalid Balaraj
- Oncology/Radiation Oncology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, ARE
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Piperno G, Ferrari A, Volpe S, Cattani F, Zaffaroni M, Comi S, Pansini F, Bergamaschi L, Mazzola GC, Ceci F, Colandrea M, Petralia G, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Alterio D. Hypofractionated proton therapy for benign tumors of the central nervous system: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 191:104114. [PMID: 37683814 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Aim of the present analysis was to report results of a systematic review of the literature in the setting of patients treated with hypoF PT for benign lesions of the central nervous system (CNS). METHODS The methodology complied with the PRISMA recommendations. PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases were interrogated in September 2022. RESULTS Twelve papers have been selected including patients treated for base of the skull meningiomas (6 papers), vestibular schwannoma (3 papers) and pituitary adenomas (3 papers). Clinical outcomes were evaluated with both radiologic images and clinical parameters. Long-term toxicity was reported in all but one series with an incidence ranging from 2 % to 7 % in patients treated for base of skull meningioma and 1-9 % for schwannoma. CONCLUSIONS HypoF PT is a safe and effective treatment in selected benign tumors of the CNS. Further dosimetric and clinical comparisons are required to better refine the patients' selection criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaia Piperno
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Annamaria Ferrari
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Comi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Floriana Pansini
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marzia Colandrea
- Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|