Temperature-dependent transitions of burst firing patterns in a model pyramidal neuron

Modulation of Astrocytes on Mode Selection of Neuron Firing Driven by Electromagnetic Induction

Both of astrocytes and electromagnetic induction are magnificent to modulate neuron firing by introducing feedback currents to membrane potential. An improved astro-neuron model considering both of the two factors is employed to investigate their different roles in modulation. The mixing mode, defined by combination of period bursting and depolarization blockage, characterizes the effect of astrocytes. Mixing mode and period bursting alternatively appear in parameter space with respect to the amplitude of feedback current on neuron from astrocyte modulation. However, magnetic flux obviously plays a role of neuron firing inhibition. It not only repels the mixing mode but also suppresses period bursting. The mixing mode becomes period bursting mode and even resting state when astrocytes are hyperexcitable. Abnormal activities of astrocytes are capable to induce depolarization blockage to compose the mixing mode together with bursting mode. But electromagnetic induction shows its strong ability of inhibition of neuron firing, which is also illustrated in the bifurcation diagram. Indeed, the combination of the two factors and appropriate choice of parameters show the great potential to control disorder of neuron firing like epilepsy.

Control of bursting behavior in neurons by autaptic modulation

Firing properties of biological neurons have long been recognized to be determined by extrinsic synaptic afferents that neurons receive and intrinsic ionic mechanisms that neurons possess, however, previous researches have also demonstrated that firing behavior of single neurons can be modulated by the neurons themselves, realized by the autapses. Thus in this investigation, we argued that how autaptic modulations shape the bursting behavior of biological neurons. We considered the issue from the following two aspects: autaptic-excitation and -inhibition. Our results suggested that for autaptic-excitation, under the condition of relatively weak stimulus, regular bursting was more incline to occur when the autaptic strength was weak, while regular spiking was more likely to appear when the autaptic strength was strong. However, larger stimulus would diminish the portion of bursting, but increase the portion of spiking. For autaptic-inhibition, under relatively weak stimulus, a wide range of regular bursting emerges when the autaptic strength was small, but when stronger stimulus were applied, the range of regular bursting shrinked into a small region. Meanwhile, we observed that synaptic delays have no obvious effects in the case of autaptic-excitation, while a subtle effect of synaptic delays was observed in the case of autaptic-inhibition. These results showed that bursting behavior of neurons could be controlled and modulated by the autaptic mechanisms that biological neurons intrinsically possess, and the final results may further promote the understanding in the generation of various neuronal firing patterns.