MHP-133, a drug with multiple CNS targets: potential for neuroprotection and enhanced cognition

Neurobiology of nAChRs and cognition: a mini review of Dr. Jerry J. Buccafusco's contributions over a 25 year career

This review highlights some of the many contributions of the late Dr. Jerry J. Buccafusco to the neurobiology of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and cognition over a 25 year period. The article is written by two of Dr. Buccafusco's professional colleagues, one from academia and one from the pharmaceutical industry. While Dr. Buccafusco's expertise in the cholinergic field was extensive, his insights into the practical relevance of his work (with a long-term goal of formulating new drug development strategies) were unique, and a great asset to both the basic science community and pharmaceutical companies. In 1988, Dr. Buccafusco's laboratory was the first to report the cognitive enhancing action of low doses of nicotine in non-human primates. Since that time he studied a large number of novel pro-cognitive agents from several pharmacological classes in rodents as well as monkeys. Based on years of observing paradoxical effects of nicotinic ligands in vitro and in vivo, Dr. Buccafusco made the provocative argument that it might be possible to develop new chemical entities (with pro-cognitive actions) that have the ability to desensitize nAChRs without producing an antecedent agonist action. Some of his more recent work focused on development of single molecular entities that act on multiple CNS targets (including nAChRs) to enhance cognition, provide neuroprotection, and/or provide additional therapeutic actions (e.g., antipsychotic effects). Dr. Buccafusco's influence will live on in the work of the numerous graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and junior faculty that he mentored over the years who now serve in prestigious positions throughout the world.

Multifunctional receptor-directed drugs for disorders of the central nervous system

The marked decline in FDA-approved new drug candidates in recent years suggests the possibility that the "low-hanging fruit" has been almost entirely harvested. This might be particularly applicable to drugs acting on the central nervous system. Fortunately, there are several examples extant for the utility of multifunctional drugs, compounds, or drug mixtures that act on multiple additive or synergistic targets. However, to exploit this approach may require the willingness to consider the possibility that drug targets might be addressed by molecules of rather low specificity and moderate potency. The expectation is that single target molecules with high specificity might not have access to complex interacting neural pathways, and that moderate potency could engender fewer off-target side effects. Though novel compounds might be developed by combining the active functional groups of two or more drug molecules, the approach still lends itself to high throughput screening of large chemical libraries. Multifunctional compounds might be designed with the ability to: 1) offer both palliative and disease modifying actions, 2) act on targets that produce additive or synergistic therapeutic responses, 3) simultaneously evoke a therapeutic response at the desired target and prevent an undesired response mediated by an alternate target, 4) allow one component to promote the drugable characteristics (e.g., brain penetration) of the therapeutic component, and 5) prolong the duration of effectiveness of one compound by contributing the pharmacodynamic actions of another. The author takes the liberty to include examples of the situations just mentioned from studies in his laboratory in the following discussion.

Desensitization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as a strategy for drug development

The specific pharmacological response evoked by a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist is governed by the anatomical distribution and expression of each receptor subtype and by the stoichiometry of subunits comprising each subtype. Contributing to this complexity is the ability of agonists that bind to the orthosteric site of the receptor to alter the affinity state of the receptor and induce desensitization and the observation that, at low doses, some nAChR antagonists evoke agonist-like nicotinic responses. Brain concentrations of nicotine rarely increase to the low-mid micromolar concentrations that have been reported to evoke direct agonist-like responses, such as calcium influx or neurotransmitter release. Low microgram per kilogram doses of nicotine administered to humans or to nonhuman primates to improve cognition and working memory probably result only in low nanomolar brain concentrations--more in line with the ability of nicotine to induce receptor desensitization. Here we review data illustrating that nicotine, its major metabolite cotinine, and two novel analogs of choline, JWB1-84-1 [2-(4-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)piperazin-1-yl)ethanol] and JAY2-22-33, JWB1-84-1 [2-(methyl(pyridine-3-ylmethyl)amino)-ethanol], improve working memory in macaques. The effectiveness of these four compounds in the task was linearly related to their effectiveness in producing desensitization of the pressor response to ganglionic stimulation evoked by a nAChR agonist in rats. Only nicotine evoked an agonist-like action (increased resting blood pressure). Therefore, it is possible to develop new chemical entities that have the ability to desensitize nAChRs without an antecedent agonist action. Because these "silent desensitizers" are probably acting allosterically, an additional degree of subtype specificity could be attained.

Profile of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists ABT-594 and A-582941, with differential subtype selectivity, on delayed matching accuracy by young monkeys

ABT-594 and A-582941 are high affinity neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists with differential selectivity for the alpha4beta2 and the alpha7 subtypes, respectively. This study was designed to determine whether either compound, like nicotine also possesses cognitive-enhancing ability. The compounds were administered by intramuscular injection to young adult Rhesus monkeys trained to perform two versions of a computer-assisted delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) task. ABT-594 (0.115-3.7 microg/kg) significantly improved DMTS accuracies, shifting the retention curve (accuracy-delay relationship) to the right in a parallel fashion. DMTS accuracy also was maintained during the sessions initiated 24h after compound administration. Because task accuracy was improved during short delay trials, a separate study was performed in which non-predictable distractors were inserted within the DMTS format to impair accuracy. The 0.115 microg/kg dose of ABT-594 almost completely reversed distractor-impaired performance associated with short delay trials. The alpha7 nAChR agonist, A-582941 (1.14-38 microg/kg) also significantly improved DMTS accuracies. The compound produced a significant improvement during long delay trials. The effect was twice as robust for long delay as compared with short delay trials and A-582941 was not as effective as ABT-594 in improving short delay trial accuracy. A-582941 also failed to sustain task improvement during sessions run 24h after dosing. These data are consistent with the ability of subtype-preferring nicotinic receptor agonists to enhance specific components of working memory and cognitive function, and they suggest that differential subtype selectivity could result in varied pharmacological response profiles.