Alterations in neuronal transport but not blood-brain barrier transport are observed during gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) sedative/hypnotic tolerance

A strange New Year's Eve: triggers in Kleine-Levin syndrome

NONE

Kleine-Levin syndrome is a rare neurological disease of unknown cause beginning typically during adolescence, characterized by remittent-relapsing episodes of severe hypersomnia associated with cognitive and behavioral disturbances. Triggering factors at Kleine-Levin syndrome onset include infection, sleep deprivation, as well as alcohol, drug, and substance intake. A young woman had 6 episodes over 2 years, including hypersomnia, confusion, derealization, cognitive impairment, anxiety, feeling of being scrutinized, anorexia (and sweet craving once) but no hypersexuality. The first episode started after a party where she experienced a complete, 4-hour-long blackout despite moderate alcohol intake. The patient suspected having been poisoned. Twenty-five months after the party, when Kleine-Levin syndrome was eventually diagnosed, her long hair was analyzed and exogenous γ-hydroxybutyrate was found in the tips (corresponding to the party time). This case illustrates the interest of looking for γ-hydroxybutyrate in the hair when Kleine-Levin syndrome starts after a party.

Effect of chronic γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) administration on GHB toxicokinetics and GHB-induced respiratory depression

BACKGROUND

γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) has a high potential for illicit use; overdose of this compound results in sedation, respiratory depression and death. Tolerance to the hypnotic/sedative and electroencephalogram effects of GHB occurs with chronic GHB administration; however, tolerance to respiratory depression has not been evaluated. GHB toxicodynamic effects are mediated predominantly by GABA_B receptors. Chronic treatment may affect monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) and alter the absorption, renal clearance and brain uptake of GHB.

OBJECTIVES

To determine effects of chronic GHB dosing on GHB toxicokinetics, GHB-induced respiratory depression, and MCT expression.

METHODS

Rats were administered GHB 600 mg/kg intravenously daily for 5 days. Plasma, urine and tissue samples and respiratory measurements were obtained on days 1 and 5. Plasma and urine were analyzed for GHB by LC/MS/MS and tissue samples for expression of MCT1, 2 and 4 and their accessory proteins by QRT-PCR.

RESULTS

No differences in GHB pharmacokinetics or respiratory depression were observed between days 1 and 5. Opposing changes in MCT1 and MCT4 mRNA expression were observed in kidney samples on day 5 compared to GHB-naïve animals, and MCT4 expression was increased in the intestine.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of tolerance observed with GHB-induced respiratory depression, in contrast to the tolerance reported for the sedative/hypnotic and electroencephalogram effects, suggests that different GABA_B receptor subtypes may be involved in different GABA_B-mediated toxicodynamic effects of GHB. Chronic or binge users of GHB may be at no less risk for fatality from respiratory arrest with a GHB overdose than with a single dose of GHB.

Behavioral analyses of GHB: receptor mechanisms

GHB is used therapeutically and recreationally, although the precise mechanism of action responsible for its different behavioral effects is not entirely clear. The purpose of this review is to summarize how behavioral procedures, especially drug discrimination procedures, have been used to study the mechanism of action of GHB. More specifically, we will review several different drug discrimination procedures and discuss how they have been used to qualitatively and quantitatively study different components of the complex mechanism of action of GHB. A growing number of studies have provided evidence that the behavioral effects of GHB are mediated predominantly by GABAB receptors. However, there is also evidence that the mechanisms mediating the effects of GHB and the prototypical GABAB receptor agonist baclofen are not identical, and that other mechanisms such as GHB receptors and subtypes of GABAA and GABAB receptors might contribute to the effects of GHB. These findings are consistent with the different behavioral profile, abuse liability, and therapeutic indications of GHB and baclofen. A better understanding of the similarities and differences between GHB and baclofen, as well as the pharmacological mechanisms of action underlying the recreational and therapeutic effects of GHB, could lead to more effective medications with fewer adverse effects.

Neuropharmacological profile of tetrahydrofuran in mice

Since the regulation of illicit gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) as a Federal Schedule I drug, the use of substitute chemical precursors such as gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) and 1,4-butanediol have emerged. Most recently there have been concerns about another potential analog of GHB, namely tetrahydrofuran (THF). While there is some suggestion that THF can be converted to GHB or GBL, little is known about the pharmacology of THF. Various doses of THF and GBL were studied in neurobehavioral tests to better characterize the pharmacology of THF. The TD(50)'s (with 95% confidence intervals) of THF for loss of the righting reflex and failure of performance on the rotarod test were 15.18 (11.88-19.39) and 7.00 (5.22-9.40) mmol/kg, respectively. These values were significantly greater (p<0.05) than those determined for GBL: 4.60 (3.25-6.51), and 0.85 (0.52-1.38) mmol/kg, respectively. The effects of THF on the impairment of motor function in the rotarod test were antagonized by pretreatment with the GABA(B) receptor antagonist CGP-35348 (200 mg/kg, i.p.). While both THF and GBL had depressant effects on open-field locomotor activity, the pattern of activity at the lower doses of THF and GBL were dissimilar. Chronic treatment with low dose THF (5 or 10 mmol/kg, i.p.) followed by acute challenge with THF (15 mmol/kg, i.p.) demonstrated tolerance to the observed sedative effects. While some of the mechanisms of the THF actions on the central nervous system appear likely to involve direct or indirect interactions with the GABA(B) receptor, some differences in its qualitative and quantitative pharmacology suggests other mechanisms are also likely involved in the observed neurobehavioral effects of these selected doses of THF in mice.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid during tolerance in rats: effects on extracellular dopamine

gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is a potent sedative/hypnotic and drug of abuse. Tolerance develops to GHB's sedative/hypnotic effects. It is hypothesized that GHB tolerance may be mediated by alterations in central nervous system pharmacokinetics or neurotransmitter response. Rats were dosed daily with GHB (548 mg/kg s.c. q.d. for 5 days), and sleep time was measured as an index of behavioral tolerance. Plasma and brain GHB pharmacokinetics on days 1 and 5 were monitored using blood and microdialysis sampling. Extracellular (ECF) striatal dopamine levels were measured by microdialysis as a pharmacodynamic endpoint of tolerance. Pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling was performed to describe the plasma and brain disposition using an indirect response model with inhibition of dopamine synthesis rate to describe the pharmacodynamic response. GHB plasma and brain ECF concentration versus time profiles following acute or chronic exposure were not significantly different. GHB sedative/hypnotic tolerance was observed by day 5. Acute GHB administration resulted in a decrease in striatal ECF dopamine (DA) levels compared with baseline levels. GHB tolerance was reflected by a 60% decrease in dopamine area under the curve (effect and baseline): acute, 10.1 +/- 15.3% basal DA/min/10(-3) versus chronic, 4.73 +/- 1.49% basal DA/min/10(-3) (p < 0.05, n = 5; unpaired Student's t test). The PK/PD model revealed an increase in the IC50 following chronic exposure indicating decreased dopaminergic sensitivity toward the inhibitory effects of GHB. Our findings indicate that GHB pharmacokinetics do not contribute to behavioral tolerance; however, changes in neurotransmitter responsiveness may suggest specific neurochemical pathways involved in the development and expression of tolerance.