Does Older Age Lead to Higher Risk for Neutropenia in Patients Treated with Paclitaxel?

Model-based approach to identify predictors of paclitaxel-induced myelosuppression in "real-world" administration

Taxanes are currently the most frequently used chemotherapeutic agents in cancer care, where real-world use has focused on minimizing adverse events and standardizing the delivery. Myelosuppression is a well-characterized, adverse pharmacodynamic effect of taxanes. Electronic health records (EHRs) comprise data collected during routine clinical care that include patients with heterogeneous demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics. Application of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling to EHR data promises new insights on the real-world use of taxanes and strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes especially for populations who are typically excluded from clinical trials, including the elderly. This investigation: (i) leveraged previously published PK/PD models developed with clinical trial data and addressed challenges to fit EHR data, and (ii) evaluated predictors of paclitaxel-induced myelosuppression. Relevant EHR data were collected from patients treated with paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy at Inova Schar Cancer Institute between 2015 and 2019 (n = 405). Published PK models were used to simulate mean individual exposures of paclitaxel and carboplatin, which were linearly linked to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) using a published semiphysiologic myelosuppression model. Elderly patients (≥70 years) constituted 21.2% of the dataset and 2274 ANC measurements were included in the analysis. The PD parameters were estimated and matched previously reported values. The baseline ANC and chemotherapy regimen were significant predictors of paclitaxel-induced myelosuppression. The nadir ANC and use of supportive treatments, such as growth factors and antimicrobials, were consistent across age quantiles suggesting age had no effect on paclitaxel-induced myelosuppression. In conclusion, EHR data could complement clinical trial data in answering key therapeutic questions.

Ninety-degree angled collimator: a dosimetric study related to dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to ensure that the dose constraints of the organs at risk (OARs) were not exceeded while increasing the prescription dose to the planning target volume (PTV) from 45 to 50.4 Gray (Gy) with the dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique. While trying for this purpose, a new dynamic IMRT technique named 90° angled collimated dynamic IMRT (A-IMRT) planning was developed by us.

METHODS

This study was based on the computed tomography data sets of 20 patients with postoperatively diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage 2 endometrial carcinoma. For each patient, conventional dynamic IMRT (C-IMRT, collimator angle of 0° at all gantry angles), A-IMRT (collimator angle of 90° at gantry angles of 110°, 180°, 215°, and 285°), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were planned. Planning techniques were compared with parameters used to evaluate PTV and OARs via dose-volume-histogram analysis using the paired two-tailed Wilcoxon's signed-rank test; p < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance.

RESULTS

All plans achieved adequate dose coverage for PTV. Although the technique with the lowest mean conformality index was A-IMRT (0.76 ± 0.05) compared to both C-IMRT (0.79 ± 0.04, p = 0.000) and VMAT (0.83 ± 0.03, p = 0.000), it protected the OARs especially the bladder (V45 = 32.84 ± 2.03 vs. 44.21 ± 6.67, p = 0.000), rectum (V30 = 56.18 ± 2.05 vs. 73.80 ± 4.75, p = 0.000) and both femoral heads (V30 for right = 12.19 ± 1.34 vs. 21.42 ± 4.03, p = 0.000 and V30 for left = 12.58 ± 1.48 vs. 21.35 ± 4.16, p = 0.000) better than C-IMRT. While the dose constraints of the bladder, rectum and bilateral femoral heads were not exceeded in any patient with A-IMRT or VMAT, they were exceeded in 19 (95%), 20 (100%) and 20 (100%) patients with C-IMRT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

OARs are better protected when external beam radiotherapy is applied to the pelvis at a dose of 50.4 Gy by turning the collimator angle to 90° at some gantry angles with the dynamic IMRT technique in the absence of VMAT.

P-glycoprotein antibody-conjugated paclitaxel liposomes targeted for multidrug-resistant lung cancer

Aims: To overcome the resistance of lung cancer to paclitaxel. Methods: P-glycoprotein antibody-conjugated paclitaxel PEG-coated immunoliposomes (Pab-PTX-L) were prepared, and a series of quality evaluations, in vitro cell evaluation and assessment of their in vivo antitumor effect in mice were conducted. Results: The results showed that Pab-PTX-L was nano-sized with high encapsulation efficiency of paclitaxel. For the paclitaxel-resistant lung cancer A549/T cells, the cellular uptake and cell viability inhibition and apoptosis of Pab-PTX-L-treated cells were higher than those of the control groups. More importantly, Pab-PTX-L showed a good targeting and antitumor effect on tumor tissue in mouse experiments. Conclusion: This study will provide a new insight on enhanced paclitaxel delivery into paclitaxel-resistant cancer cells.

Comparison of Anticancer Drug Toxicities: Paradigm Shift in Adverse Effect Profile

The inception of cancer treatment with chemotherapeutics began in the 1940s with nitrogen mustards that were initially employed as weapons in World War II. Since then, treatment options for different malignancies have evolved over the period of last seventy years. Until the late 1990s, all the chemotherapeutic agents were small molecule chemicals with a highly nonspecific and severe toxicity spectrum. With the landmark approval of rituximab in 1997, a new horizon has opened up for numerous therapeutic antibodies in solid and hematological cancers. Although this transition to large molecules improved the survival and quality of life of cancer patients, this has also coincided with the change in adverse effect patterns. Typically, the anticancer agents are fraught with multifarious adverse effects that negatively impact different organs of cancer patients, which ultimately aggravate their sufferings. In contrast to the small molecules, anticancer antibodies are more targeted toward cancer signaling pathways and exhibit fewer side effects than traditional small molecule chemotherapy treatments. Nevertheless, the interference with the immune system triggers serious inflammation- and infection-related adverse effects. The differences in drug disposition and interaction with human basal pathways contribute to this paradigm shift in adverse effect profile. It is critical that healthcare team members gain a thorough insight of the adverse effect differences between the agents discovered during the last twenty-five years and before. In this review, we summarized the general mechanisms and adverse effects of small and large molecule anticancer drugs that would further our understanding on the toxicity patterns of chemotherapeutic regimens.