1
|
Japelj N, Horvat N, Knez L, Kos M. Deprescribing: An umbrella review. ACTA PHARMACEUTICA (ZAGREB, CROATIA) 2024; 74:249-267. [PMID: 38815201 DOI: 10.2478/acph-2024-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
This umbrella review examined systematic reviews of deprescribing studies by characteristics of intervention, population, medicine, and setting. Clinical and humanistic outcomes, barriers and facilitators, and tools for deprescribing are presented. The Medline database was used. The search was limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English up to April 2022. Reviews reporting deprescribing were included, while those where depre-scribing was not planned and supervised by a healthcare professional were excluded. A total of 94 systematic reviews (23 meta--analyses) were included. Most explored clinical or humanistic outcomes (70/94, 74 %); less explored attitudes, facilitators, or barriers to deprescribing (17/94, 18 %); few focused on tools (8/94, 8.5 %). Reviews assessing clinical or humanistic outcomes were divided into two groups: reviews with deprescribing intervention trials (39/70, 56 %; 16 reviewing specific deprescribing interventions and 23 broad medication optimisation interventions), and reviews with medication cessation trials (31/70, 44 %). Deprescribing was feasible and resulted in a reduction of inappropriate medications in reviews with deprescribing intervention trials. Complex broad medication optimisation interventions were shown to reduce hospitalisation, falls, and mortality rates. In reviews of medication cessation trials, a higher frequency of adverse drug withdrawal events underscores the importance of prioritizing patient safety and exercising caution when stopping medicines, particularly in patients with clear and appropriate indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuša Japelj
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nejc Horvat
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Lea Knez
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- 2University Clinic Golnik 4204 Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Mitja Kos
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prabahar K, Alhawiti MS, Yosef AM, Alqarni RS, Sayd FY, Alsharif MO, Subramani V, Alshareef H, Hamdan AME, Alqifari S, Alqarni GS, Yousuf SM. Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Hospitalized Older Patients in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia Using 2023 Beers Criteria: A Retrospective Multi-Centric Study. J Multidiscip Healthc 2024; 17:1971-1979. [PMID: 38706504 PMCID: PMC11070160 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s461180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Older persons are frequently prescribed several medications; therefore, inappropriate medication prescriptions are common. Prescribing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) poses a serious risk and hence, we aimed to assess the PIMs in older patients in Tabuk, using the 2023 Beers criteria. Patients and Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out, including older persons ≥65 years of age admitted in two government hospitals from June 2022 to May 2023, and prescribed with five or more medications. PIMs were assessed using the 2023 Beers criteria. Descriptive analysis was performed for the categorical and continuous variables. Logistic regression was used to assess the influence of age, gender, number of medications and comorbidities on PIMs using SPSS version 27. Results The study included 420 patients. The mean age of the participants was 75.52 ± 8.70 years (range, 65-105 years). There was a slightly higher proportion of females (52%). The prevalence of PIMs was 81.43%, where 35.41% were prescribed one PIM, 26.48% were prescribed two PIMs, and 17.32% were prescribed three PIMs. The proportion of medications considered potentially inappropriate among older patients was 70.11%, and proton pump inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed medication (52.99%). The proportion of medications to be used with caution was 19.55%, with diuretics being the most frequently administered medication (91.43%). Gender and comorbidity did not influence PIMs, but age and number of medications significantly influenced the likelihood of PIMs. Conclusion PIMs are prevalent among older people and are significantly associated with age and multiple medications. Caution should be exercised while prescribing medications to older persons. Frequent audits should be performed to assess PIMs, and clinicians should be informed of the same to avoid serious outcomes associated with PIMs. Interventions designed to reduce PIM need to be initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kousalya Prabahar
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | | | - Fai Yahya Sayd
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Vikashini Subramani
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Nilgiris, TN, India
| | - Hanan Alshareef
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed M E Hamdan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Alqifari
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Colón-Emeric CS, McDermott CL, Lee DS, Berry SD. Risk Assessment and Prevention of Falls in Older Community-Dwelling Adults: A Review. JAMA 2024; 331:1397-1406. [PMID: 38536167 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.1416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/24/2024]
Abstract
Importance Falls are reported by more than 14 million US adults aged 65 years or older annually and can result in substantial morbidity, mortality, and health care expenditures. Observations Falls result from age-related physiologic changes compounded by multiple intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors. Major modifiable risk factors among community-dwelling older adults include gait and balance disorders, orthostatic hypotension, sensory impairment, medications, and environmental hazards. Guidelines recommend that individuals who report a fall in the prior year, have concerns about falling, or have gait speed less than 0.8 to 1 m/s should receive fall prevention interventions. In a meta-analysis of 59 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in average-risk to high-risk populations, exercise interventions to reduce falls were associated with 655 falls per 1000 patient-years in intervention groups vs 850 falls per 1000 patient-years in nonexercise control groups (rate ratio [RR] for falls, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83; risk ratio for number of people who fall, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81-0.89; risk difference, 7.2%; 95% CI, 5.2%-9.1%), with most trials assessing balance and functional exercises. In a meta-analysis of 43 RCTs of interventions that systematically assessed and addressed multiple risk factors among individuals at high risk, multifactorial interventions were associated with 1784 falls per 1000 patient-years in intervention groups vs 2317 falls per 1000 patient-years in control groups (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.87) without a significant difference in the number of individuals who fell. Other interventions associated with decreased falls in meta-analysis of RCTs and quasi-randomized trials include surgery to remove cataracts (8 studies with 1834 patients; risk ratio [RR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.96), multicomponent podiatry interventions (3 studies with 1358 patients; RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99), and environmental modifications for individuals at high risk (12 studies with 5293 patients; RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.91). Meta-analysis of RCTs of programs to stop medications associated with falls have not found a significant reduction, although deprescribing is a component of many successful multifactorial interventions. Conclusions and Relevance More than 25% of older adults fall each year, and falls are the leading cause of injury-related death in persons aged 65 years or older. Functional exercises to improve leg strength and balance are recommended for fall prevention in average-risk to high-risk populations. Multifactorial risk reduction based on a systematic clinical assessment for modifiable risk factors may reduce fall rates among those at high risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathleen S Colón-Emeric
- Division of Geriatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Deborah S Lee
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Sarah D Berry
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Marcus Institute for Aging Research & Department of Medicine, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang J, Shen JY, Conwell Y, Podsiadly EJ, Caprio TV, Nathan K, Yu F, Ramsdale EE, Fick DM, Mixon AS, Simmons SF. Implementation considerations of deprescribing interventions: A scoping review. J Intern Med 2024; 295:436-507. [PMID: 36524602 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Over half of older adults experience polypharmacy, including medications that may be inappropriate or unnecessary. Deprescribing, which is the process of discontinuing or reducing inappropriate and/or unnecessary medications, is an effective way to reduce polypharmacy. This review summarizes (1) the process of deprescribing and conceptual models and tools that have been developed to facilitate deprescribing, (2) barriers, enablers, and factors associated with deprescribing, and (3) characteristics of deprescribing interventions in completed trials, as well as (4) implementation considerations for deprescribing in routine practice. In conceptual models of deprescribing, multilevel factors of the patient, clinician, and health-care system are all related to the efficacy of deprescribing. Numerous tools have been developed for clinicians to facilitate deprescribing, yet most require substantial time and, thus, may be difficult to implement during routine health-care encounters. Multiple deprescribing interventions have been evaluated, which mostly include one or more of the following components: patient education, medication review, identification of deprescribing targets, and patient and/or provider communication about high-risk medications. Yet, there has been limited consideration of implementation factors in prior deprescribing interventions, especially with regard to the personnel and resources in existing health-care systems and the feasibility of incorporating components of deprescribing interventions into the routine care processes of clinicians. Future trials require a more balanced consideration of both effectiveness and implementation when designing deprescribing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinjiao Wang
- Elaine, Hubbard Center for Nursing Research on Aging, School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Jenny Y Shen
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Yeates Conwell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Eric J Podsiadly
- Harriet J. Kitzman Center for Research Support, School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Thomas V Caprio
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics & Aging, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- UR Medicine Home Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Finger Lakes Geriatric Education Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Kobi Nathan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics & Aging, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- St. John Fisher College, Wegmans School of Pharmacy, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Fang Yu
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Erika E Ramsdale
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Donna M Fick
- Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amanda S Mixon
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Medicine, Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sandra F Simmons
- Department of Medicine, Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anderssen-Nordahl E, Sánchez-Arcilla Rosanas M, Bosch Ferrer M, Sabaté Gallego M, Fernández-Liz E, San-José A, Barceló-Colomer ME. Pharmacological treatments and medication-related problems in nursing homes in Catalonia: a multidisciplinary approach. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1320490. [PMID: 38529187 PMCID: PMC10961593 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1320490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Aging correlates with increased frailty, multi-morbidity, and chronic diseases. Furthermore, treating the aged often entails polypharmacy to achieve optimal disease management, augmenting medication-related problems (MRPs). Few guidelines and tools address the problem of polypharmacy and MRPs, mainly within the institutionalized elderly population. Routine pharmacological review is needed among institutionalized patients. This pharmacological review may improve with a multidisciplinary approach of a collaboration of multiple health professionals. This study aimed to describe institutionalized patients, systematically review their medication plans, and then give recommendations and identify MRPs. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using data obtained from patients living in five nursing homes in the northern area of Barcelona, Spain. The inclusion criteria comprised institutionalized patients with public health coverage provided by the Health Department of Catalonia. A detailed description of the clinical characteristics, chronic diseases, pharmacological treatments, recommendations, incomplete data, and MRPs, such as potential drug-drug interactions, therapeutic duplications, contraindications, and drugs deemed inappropriate or of doubtful efficacy, was made. The clinical pharmacologist was the medical doctor specialist who acted as the coordinator of the multidisciplinary team and actively reviewed all the prescribed medications to make recommendations and detect MRPs. Results: A total of 483 patients were included. Patients had a mean age of 86.3 (SD 8.8) years, and 72.0% were female individuals. All patients had at least three health-related problems, with a mean of 17.4 (SD 5.6). All patients, except one, had a minimum of one prescription, with a mean of 8.22 drugs prescribed (SD 3.5) per patient. Recommendations were made for 82.4% of the patients. Of these recommendations, verification of adequate use was made for 69.3% and withdrawal of a drug for 49.5%. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a high prevalence of health-related problems and several prescribed drugs in nursing homes in Catalonia. Many recommendations were made, confirming the increased proportion of polypharmacy, MRPs, and the need for standardized interventions. A multidisciplinary team approach, including general practitioners, geriatric assessments, a clinical pharmacist, and a clinical pharmacologist, should address this problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Anderssen-Nordahl
- Clinical Pharmacology Service, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Group, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarita Sánchez-Arcilla Rosanas
- Geriatric Unit, Internal Medicine Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Bosch Ferrer
- Clinical Pharmacology Service, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Group, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mònica Sabaté Gallego
- Clinical Pharmacology Service, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Group, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eladio Fernández-Liz
- Primary Healthcare Barcelona, Management of Primary Care and the Community of Barcelona City, Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona, Spain
- Foundation University Institute for Research in Primary Healthcare Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio San-José
- Geriatric Unit, Internal Medicine Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Estrella Barceló-Colomer
- Primary Healthcare Barcelona, Management of Primary Care and the Community of Barcelona City, Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona, Spain
- Foundation University Institute for Research in Primary Healthcare Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Veronese N, Gallo U, Boccardi V, Demurtas J, Michielon A, Taci X, Zanchetta G, Campbell Davis SE, Chiumente M, Venturini F, Pilotto A. Efficacy of deprescribing on health outcomes: An umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ageing Res Rev 2024; 95:102237. [PMID: 38367812 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing is an important intervention across different settings in medicine, but the literature supporting such a practice is still conflicting. Therefore, we aimed to capture the breadth of outcomes reported and assess the strength of evidence of the use of deprescribing for health outcomes. METHODS Umbrella review of systematic reviews of the use of deprescribing searching in Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science until 01 November 2023. The grading of evidence was carried out using the GRADE for intervention studies, whilst data regarding systematic reviews were reported as narrative findings. RESULTS Among 456 papers, 12 systematic reviews (six with meta-analysis) for a total of 231 RCTs and 44,193 patients were included. In any setting, deprescribing was able to significantly reduce the number of total and of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older patients (low certainty of evidence) and to reduce the proportion of participants potentially having several or PIMs (moderate certainty of evidence). In community, supported by a high certainty of evidence, deprescribing was not more effective than standard care in decreasing injurious falls, any falls or number of fallers. In nursing home, deprescribing was associated with a significantly lower PIMs than standard care (very low certainty of evidence). In end-of-life situations, deprescribing significantly reduced mortality rate of approximately 41% (high certainty of evidence). CONCLUSIONS Deprescribing is a promising intervention across different settings and situations, but a notable gap in the literature concerning its effects on substantial outcomes still exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Veronese
- Geriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Umberto Gallo
- Pharmaceutical Department, Local Health Unit n. 6 Euganea, Padua, Italy
| | - Virginia Boccardi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Jacopo Demurtas
- Family Medicine Department, USL Sud Est Toscana, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Alberto Michielon
- School of Specialization in Hospital Pharmacy, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Xhoajda Taci
- School of Specialization in Hospital Pharmacy, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Giulia Zanchetta
- School of Specialization in Hospital Pharmacy, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Marco Chiumente
- Scientific Direction, SIFaCT - Società Italiana di Farmacia Clinica e Terapia, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Pilotto
- Geriatrics Unit, Department Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy; Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cole JA, Gonçalves-Bradley DC, Alqahtani M, Barry HE, Cadogan C, Rankin A, Patterson SM, Kerse N, Cardwell CR, Ryan C, Hughes C. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 10:CD008165. [PMID: 37818791 PMCID: PMC10565901 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008165.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate polypharmacy is a particular concern in older people and is associated with negative health outcomes. Choosing the best interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy is a priority, so that many medicines may be used to achieve better clinical outcomes for patients. This is the third update of this Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions, alone or in combination, in improving the appropriate use of polypharmacy and reducing medication-related problems in older people. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and two trials registers up until 13 January 2021, together with handsearching of reference lists to identify additional studies. We ran updated searches in February 2023 and have added potentially eligible studies to 'Characteristics of studies awaiting classification'. SELECTION CRITERIA For this update, we included randomised trials only. Eligible studies described interventions affecting prescribing aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy (four or more medicines) in people aged 65 years and older, which used a validated tool to assess prescribing appropriateness. These tools can be classified as either implicit tools (judgement-based/based on expert professional judgement) or explicit tools (criterion-based, comprising lists of drugs to be avoided in older people). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Four review authors independently reviewed abstracts of eligible studies, and two authors extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. We pooled study-specific estimates, and used a random-effects model to yield summary estimates of effect and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We identified 38 studies, which includes an additional 10 in this update. The included studies consisted of 24 randomised trials and 14 cluster-randomised trials. Thirty-six studies examined complex, multi-faceted interventions of pharmaceutical care (i.e. the responsible provision of medicines to improve patients' outcomes), in a variety of settings. Interventions were delivered by healthcare professionals such as general physicians, pharmacists, nurses and geriatricians, and most were conducted in high-income countries. Assessments using the Cochrane risk of bias tool found that there was a high and/or unclear risk of bias across a number of domains. Based on the GRADE approach, the overall certainty of evidence for each pooled outcome ranged from low to very low. It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care improves medication appropriateness (as measured by an implicit tool) (mean difference (MD) -5.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) -9.26 to -2.06; I2 = 97%; 8 studies, 947 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care reduces the number of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.19, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.05; I2 = 67%; 9 studies, 2404 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care reduces the proportion of patients with one or more PIM (risk ratio (RR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98; I2 = 84%; 13 studies, 4534 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Pharmaceutical care may slightly reduce the number of potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) (SMD -0.48, 95% CI -1.05 to 0.09; I2 = 92%; 3 studies, 691 participants; low-certainty evidence), however it must be noted that this effect estimate is based on only three studies, which had serious limitations in terms of risk of bias. Likewise, it is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care reduces the proportion of patients with one or more PPO (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.91; I2 = 95%; 7 studies, 2765 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Pharmaceutical care may make little or no difference to hospital admissions (data not pooled; 14 studies, 4797 participants; low-certainty evidence). Pharmaceutical care may make little or no difference to quality of life (data not pooled; 16 studies, 7458 participants; low-certainty evidence). Medication-related problems were reported in 10 studies (6740 participants) using different terms (e.g. adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions). No consistent intervention effect on medication-related problems was noted across studies. This also applied to studies examining adherence to medication (nine studies, 3848 participants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS It is unclear whether interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy resulted in clinically significant improvement. Since the last update of this review in 2018, there appears to have been an increase in the number of studies seeking to address potential prescribing omissions and more interventions being delivered by multidisciplinary teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith A Cole
- Clinical Trial Service Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | - Cathal Cadogan
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Audrey Rankin
- School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Ngaire Kerse
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Chris R Cardwell
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Cristin Ryan
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Carmel Hughes
- School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang J, Shen JY, Yu F, Nathan K, Caprio TV, Conwell Y, Moskow MS, Brasch JD, Simmons SF, Mixon AS, Norton SA. How to Deprescribe Potentially Inappropriate Medications During the Hospital-to-Home Transition: Stakeholder Perspectives on Essential Tasks. Clin Ther 2023; 45:947-956. [PMID: 37640614 PMCID: PMC10841554 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nearly all older patients receiving postacute home health care (HHC) use potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) that carry a risk of harm. Deprescribing can reduce and optimize the use of PIMs, yet it is often not conducted among HHC patients. The objective of this study was to gather perspectives from patient, practitioner, and HHC clinician stakeholders on tasks that are essential to postacute deprescribing in HHC. METHODS A total of 44 stakeholders, including 14 HHC patients, 15 practitioners (including 9 primary care physicians, 4 pharmacists, 1 hospitalist, and 1 nurse practitioner), and 15 HHC nurses, participated. The stakeholders were from 12 US states, including New York (n = 29), Colorado (n = 2), Connecticut (n = 1), Illinois (n = 2), Kansas (n = 2), Massachusetts (n = 1), Minnesota (n = 1), Mississippi (n = 1), Nebraska (n = 1), Ohio (n = 1), Tennessee (n = 1), and Texas (n = 2). First, individual interviews were conducted by experienced research staff via video conference or telephone. Second, the study team reviewed all interview transcripts and selected interview statements regarding stakeholders' suggestions for important tasks needed for postacute deprescribing in HHC. Third, concept mapping was conducted in which stakeholders sorted and rated selected interview statements regarding importance and feasibility. A content analysis was conducted of data collected in the individual interviews, and a mixed-method analysis was conducted of data collected in the concept mapping. FINDINGS Four essential tasks were identified for postacute deprescribing in HHC: (1) ongoing review and assessment of medication use, (2) patent-centered and individualized plan of deprescribing, (3) timely and efficient communication among members of the care team, and (4) continuous and tailored medication education to meet patient needs. Among these tasks, developing patient-centered deprescribing considerations was considered the most important and feasible, followed by medication education, review and assessment of medication use, and communication. IMPLICATIONS Deprescribing during the transition of care from hospital to home requires the following: continuous medication education for patients, families, and caregivers; ongoing review and assessment of medication use; patient-centered deprescribing considerations; and effective communication and collaboration among the primary care physician, HHC nurse, and pharmacist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinjiao Wang
- Elaine Hubbard Center for Nursing Research on Aging, University of Rochester, School of Nursing, Rochester, New York.
| | - Jenny Y Shen
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Fang Yu
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Kobi Nathan
- Division of Geriatrics and Aging, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Wegmans School of Pharmacy, St. John Fisher College, Rochester, New York
| | - Thomas V Caprio
- Division of Geriatrics and Aging, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; University of Rochester Home Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Finger Lakes Geriatric Education Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Yeates Conwell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Marian S Moskow
- Harriet Kitzman Center for Research Support, University of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, New York
| | - Judith D Brasch
- Harriet Kitzman Center for Research Support, University of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, New York
| | - Sandra F Simmons
- Department of Medicine, Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee; Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Amanda S Mixon
- Department of Medicine, Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee; Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Sally A Norton
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jungo KT, Ansorg AK, Floriani C, Rozsnyai Z, Schwab N, Meier R, Valeri F, Stalder O, Limacher A, Schneider C, Bagattini M, Trelle S, Spruit M, Schwenkglenks M, Rodondi N, Streit S. Optimising prescribing in older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in primary care (OPTICA): cluster randomised clinical trial. BMJ 2023; 381:e074054. [PMID: 37225248 PMCID: PMC10206530 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the effects of a primary care medication review intervention centred around an electronic clinical decision support system (eCDSS) on appropriateness of medication and the number of prescribing omissions in older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy compared with a discussion about medication in line with usual care. DESIGN Cluster randomised clinical trial. SETTING Swiss primary care, between December 2018 and February 2021. PARTICIPANTS Eligible patients were ≥65 years of age with three or more chronic conditions and five or more long term medications. INTERVENTION The intervention to optimise pharmacotherapy centred around an eCDSS was conducted by general practitioners, followed by shared decision making between general practitioners and patients, and was compared with a discussion about medication in line with usual care between patients and general practitioners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were improvement in the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) and the Assessment of Underutilisation (AOU) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included number of medications, falls, fractures, and quality of life. RESULTS In 43 general practitioner clusters, 323 patients were recruited (median age 77 (interquartile range 73-83) years; 45% (n=146) women). Twenty one general practitioners with 160 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 22 general practitioners with 163 patients to the control group. On average, one recommendation to stop or start a medication was reported to be implemented per patient. At 12 months, the results of the intention-to-treat analysis of the improvement in appropriateness of medication (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.87) and the number of prescribing omissions (0.90, 0.41 to 1.96) were inconclusive. The same was the case for the per protocol analysis. No clear evidence was found for a difference in safety outcomes at the 12 month follow-up, but fewer safety events were reported in the intervention group than in the control group at six and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS In this randomised trial of general practitioners and older adults, the results were inconclusive as to whether the medication review intervention centred around the use of an eCDSS led to an improvement in appropriateness of medication or a reduction in prescribing omissions at 12 months compared with a discussion about medication in line with usual care. Nevertheless, the intervention could be safely delivered without causing any harm to patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03724539Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03724539.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carmen Floriani
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Zsofia Rozsnyai
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nathalie Schwab
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rahel Meier
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Valeri
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Claudio Schneider
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Sven Trelle
- CTU Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Spruit
- Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Public Health and Primary Care (PHEG), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS), Faculty of Science, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Matthias Schwenkglenks
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sven Streit
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Linkens AEMJH, Janssen MJM, van Nie N, Peeters L, Winkens B, Milosevic V, Spaetgens B, Hurkens KPGM, van der Kuy PHM. Additional value of a triggerlist as selection criterion in identifying patients at high risk of medication-related hospital admission: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Clin Pharm 2022; 44:1205-1210. [DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01447-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
11
|
Zhang H, Yin Y, Tao W, Liu L. Clinical Observation of MRI Scanning Combined with Clinical Nursing for Surgical Breast Cancer Patients. Int J Anal Chem 2022; 2022:6863281. [PMID: 35620047 PMCID: PMC9129973 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6863281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore the application effect of perioperative nursing care for patients with breast cancer. In this paper, 100 breast cancer patients with lymphatic spread treated by breast surgery in September 2019 to December were selected as the evaluation objects. They were divided into two groups according to preoperative imaging examination, 50 cases in each group. Group A was examined by B-ultrasound before axillary lymphadenectomy, group B was examined by MRI before axillary lymphadenectomy, and group C was examined by B-ultrasound and MRI before axillary lymphadenectomy. The facts in the three groups of disease findings were compared. Compared with the control group, the proportion of negative emotions (such as stress and depression) in the control group decreased (P<0.05). The decrease in blood cortisol was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). Improving the existing cancer surgery can improve the patient's heart rate and reduce blood cortisol so as to improve the patient's joint function and quality of life. The difficulty of nursing patients will also be reduced, which is medically necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Zhang
- Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital Department, Chongqing 400030, China
| | - Yanan Yin
- Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital Department, Chongqing 400030, China
| | - Wenjing Tao
- Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital Department, Chongqing 400030, China
| | - Ling Liu
- Department of Medicine, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital Department, Chongqing 400030, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Harrap N, Wells J, Howes K, Kayyali R. An Observational Cohort Study to Evaluate the Impact of a Tailored Medicines Optimisation Service on Medication Use, Accident and Emergency Department Visits, and Admissions Among Patients Identified with Medication Support Needs in Secondary Care. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:2947-2961. [PMID: 36329865 PMCID: PMC9624215 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s376686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Quantifying the impact of pharmacy interventions, such as tailored medicines optimisation, can be challenging owing to the sometimes-indirect nature of their effect on patient outcomes such A&E (Accident & Emergency) attendance, hospital admission and length of stay. This study aimed to assess the impact of the, Lewisham Integrated Medicines Optimisation Service (LIMOS) on medicines self-management, A&E attendances and hospital admissions. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study was conducted as a retrospective and prospective observational evaluation of patients referred to LIMOS at University Hospital Lewisham between April and September 2016. Only patients with an appropriate referral that received a LIMOS intervention within the study period were considered eligible. The main outcomes examined pre- and post-LIMOS included medicines self-management, A&E attendance, number of admissions, as well as length of stay. RESULTS Data were collected for a total of 193 patients. Over half (56.4%, n = 109) identified as female with a mean age of 78 years at the time of referral. The number of hospital admissions decreased significantly post-LIMOS (-0.36 ± 1.87, 95% CI -0.63-0.10). Furthermore, the mean reduction in length of stay was significant and decreased by over a week (19.58 vs 11.09 days post-LIMOS, -7.67 ± 48.57, 95% CI -14.57--0.78). There was a significant increase in A&E visits observed post-intervention (0.78 ± 1.93, 95% CI 0.50-1.06); however, the majority (63%, n =165/261) occurred over 90 days post-intervention. There was a significant reduction in the number of patients self-managing medication post-LIMOS, with the number of patients receiving additional support with their medication increasing (-0.38 ± 0.50, 95% CI -0.45--0.31). LIMOS, therefore, successfully identified patients who were unable to manage their medicines. CONCLUSION Specialist pharmacy interventions, which include support with medicines management, have a positive impact on admission avoidance and length of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Harrap
- Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Kingston, KT1 2EE, UK
| | - Joshua Wells
- Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Kingston, KT1 2EE, UK
| | - Katherine Howes
- Lewisham Integrated Medicines Optimisation Service, Pharmacy Department, Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust, London, SE13 6LH, UK
| | - Reem Kayyali
- Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Kingston, KT1 2EE, UK
- Correspondence: Reem Kayyali, Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston, KT1 2EE, UK, Tel/Fax +44 208 417 2561, Email
| |
Collapse
|