Just a 'romantic idea'? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners

Community pharmacists' views towards implementing a patient self-administered screening tool designed to identify risk of medication-related problems

Objective

There is limited information regarding community pharmacists' perspectives on implementing a self-administered screening tool for identifying patients at risk of medication-related problems. This study assessed Australian pharmacists' views on introducing such a tool within the community pharmacy setting.

Methods

An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among Australian community pharmacists from March to May 2023. The survey collected relevant demographic data and responses on perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing the screening tool. Reliability statistics were computed for the responses on barriers and facilitators, and chi-square or Fisher's Exact tests were performed to assess their association with demographic variables.

Results

Two hundred thirty-one community pharmacists across Australia were surveyed. Most (78%) reported that medication-related problems are common and expressed support for a patient self-administered screening tool to identify patients at high risk of medication-related problems (88%). Over two-thirds (69%) were willing to allocate time for reviewing patient medications if flagged for medication-related problems. The most frequently anticipated barriers to implementing screening tools were time constraints for pharmacists (63%), staff shortage and limited patient interest (each accounting for 57%). In contrast, effective communication with patients (69%) and patients' appreciation of pharmacists' expertise and efforts (67%) were predominantly stated facilitators.

Conclusion

Most community pharmacists were supportive of implementing a patient self-administered screening tool to identify patients at risk of medication-related problems. The study's findings provide valuable insights for developing medication-related problems screening tools tailored to the Australian community pharmacy setting.

Prevalence and solving strategies of drug-related problems in adult psychiatric inpatients - a systematic review

Introduction

Most psychiatric inpatients receive psychopharmacological treatment indicated for their mental diseases. The aim of this systematic review is to give clinical pharmacists and physicians a comprehensive summary of common drug-related problems (DRPs) in adult psychiatric inpatients and of potential interventions to solve them in clinical practice.

Methods

Six databases and registers were searched for English, German and French articles published between 1999 and 2023 with content regarding the prevalence and/or type or interventions to solve DRPs in adult psychiatric inpatients. Studies were categorized based on types of DRPs and clinical interventions. The prevalence rates of DRPs and subtypes were compared quantitatively and the tested interventions were summarized qualitatively.

Results

A total of 88 articles with an overall sample of over 95.425 adult psychiatric inpatients were included in this review. DRPs were reported with a prevalence range of 0.32 to 9.48 per patient. The most frequently reported DRPs were caused by prescribing errors (1.91 per patient), the most frequent subtype was drug interaction (0.77 per patient). Clinical pharmacists were involved in interventions in 7 of 13 included articles. Interventions consisted of clinical pharmacy services on the ward, educational classes, medication reviews, and the implementation of digital tools such as dispensing cabinets and prescribing tools.

Discussion

The included studies were heterogeneous. The most frequent DRPs in psychiatry are related to prescribing errors and drug interactions. Clinical pharmacists may support the drug therapy by identifying and effectively solving DRPs in psychiatric inpatients using interdisciplinary approaches.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022354958.

Implementation of medication reviews in community pharmacy: reaching consensus on stakeholders' recommendations for mechanisms of change using the nominal group technique

BACKGROUND

Since 2022, patients with five or more medicines are eligible for a medication review (MR) in a community pharmacy remunerated by the German health system. However, implementation has been slow, with few pharmacies providing MRs. Stakeholders' input is necessary to detail how implementation strategies can be executed effectively on a national level. Prior research identified "external facilitation" and "altering incentives" as crucial strategies to achieve implementation outcomes.

AIM

To gather stakeholders' recommendations for, and obtain consensus on, mechanisms of change that allow implementation strategies to work in practice.

METHOD

The consensus method used was the nominal group technique (NGT) with NGT-discussions held separately with pharmacy owners and pharmacy chambers employees. Votes were summed and the relative importance (rI) calculated, defined as (score achieved for a mechanism)/(maximum possible score) × 100. Content analysis provided context for the highest ranked mechanisms and allowed linking to implementation outcomes.

RESULTS

Four NGT-discussions were held in 2023 (n = 2 owners; n = 2 chamber employees) with a total of 17 participants. The overall highest ranked mechanisms were fit-for-purpose software (rI = 154.7) detailed process support (rI = 104.9) and an expert support line (rI = 77.7). These together with financial viability (rI = 40.0) were prioritised by both participant groups. Three mechanisms were favoured for both implementation strategies, namely software, process support and materials (rI = 34.3).

CONCLUSION

This study identified stakeholders' priorities for mechanisms of change to implement MRs in community pharmacies. Focusing efforts on the prioritised mechanisms is likely to significantly advance a national implementation plan for countries which are at an early implementation stage.

A survey on the implementation of clinical medication reviews in community pharmacies within a multidisciplinary setting

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy is common in chronic medication users, which increases the risk of drug related problems. A suitable intervention is the clinical medication review (CMR) that was introduced in the Netherlands in 2012, but the effectiveness might be hindered by limited implementation in community pharmacies. Therefore our aim was to describe the current implementation of CMRs in Dutch community pharmacies and to identify barriers to the implementation.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was developed based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and consisted of 58 questions with open ended, multiple choice or Likert-scale answering options. It was sent out to all Dutch community pharmacies (n = 1,953) in January 2021. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

A total of 289 (14.8%) community pharmacies filled out the questionnaire. Most of the pharmacists agreed that a CMR has a positive effect on the quality of pharmacotherapy (91.3%) and on medication adherence (64.3%). Pharmacists structured CMRs according to available selection criteria or guidelines (92%). Pharmacists (90%) believed that jointly conducting a CMR with a general practitioner (GP) improved their mutual relationship, whereas 21% believed it improved the relationship with a medical specialist. Lack of time was reported by 43% of pharmacists and 80% (fully) agreed conducting CMRs with a medical specialist was complicated. Most pharmacists indicated that pharmacy technicians can assist in performing CMRs, but they rarely do in practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of time and suboptimal collaboration with medical specialists are the most important barriers to the implementation of CMRs.