Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) results in low prevalence of neuro-endocrine dysfunction and NOT deficiency

Prevalence of pituitary dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pituitary dysfunction (PD) is a common complication after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The prevalence of PD varies widely at a global level and no recent meta-analysis is available. Therefore, the aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the updated estimates of worldwide prevalence of PD after aSAH.

METHODS

Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed databases were used to comprehensively search the appropriate literature and a random-effects meta-analysis on the results of the available studies was performed. The heterogeneity in the prevalence estimates was evaluated by subgroup analysis in terms of types of PD, and acute and chronic phases of aSAH. The onset of PD within 6 months after aSAH was considered as acute, while that after 6 months was considered as chronic.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies with 1848 patients were included in this analysis. The pooled prevalence of PD in the acute phase was 49.6% (95% CI, 32.4-66.8%), and 30.4% (95% CI, 21.4-39.4%) in the chronic phase. Among the hormonal deficiencies, growth hormone dysfunction was the most prevalent in the acute phase, being 36.0% (95% CI, 21.0-51.0%), while hypoadrenalism was the most prevalent in the chronic phase, being 21.0% (95% CI, 12.0-29.0%). Among the six World Health Organization regions, the South-East Asia Region has the highest prevalence of PD in the acute phase (81.0%, 95%CI, 77.0-86.0%, P < 0.001), while the European Region had the highest prevalence of PD in the chronic phase (33.0%, 95%CI, 24.0-43.0%, P < 0.001). Moreover, single pituitary hormonal dysfunction occurred more frequently than the multiple one, regardless of acute or chronic phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost half (49.6%) of the included patients with aSAH developed PD complication in the acute phase, while 30.4% of the patients developed them in the chronic phase. Although prevalence varies globally, the high healthcare burden, morbidity and mortality require greater awareness among clinicians.

Endocrine dysregulation in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is one of the most common causes of neurocritical care admission. Consistent evidence has been suggestive of endocrine dysregulation in aSAH. This review aims to provide an up-to-date presentation of the available evidence regarding endocrine dysregulation in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed database. All available evidence related to endocrine dysregulation in hypothalamic-pituitary hormones, adrenal hormones and natriuretic peptides after aSAH, published since 2010, were reviewed.

RESULTS

There have been reports of varying prevalence of dysregulation in hypothalamic-pituitary and adrenal hormones in aSAH. The cause of this dysregulation and its pattern remain unclear. Hypothalamic-pituitary and adrenal dysregulation have been associated with higher incidence of poor neurological outcome and increased mortality. Whilst there is evidence that long-term dysregulation of these axes may also develop, it appears to be less frequent than the acute-phase dysregulation and transient in pattern. Increased levels of catecholamines have been reported in the hyper-acute phase of aSAH with reported inconsistent correlation with the outcomes and the complications of the disease. There is growing evidence that of a causal link between the endocrine dysregulation and the development of hyponatraemia and delayed cerebral ischaemia, in the acute phase of aSAH. However, the pathophysiological mechanism and pattern of endocrine dysregulation which could be causally associated with these complications still remain debatable.

CONCLUSION

The evidence, mainly from small observational and heterogeneous in methodology studies, is suggestive of adverse effects of the endocrine dysregulation on the outcome and the incidence of complications of the disease. However, the cause of this dysregulation and a pathophysiological mechanism that could link its presence with the development of acute complications and the outcome of the aSAH remain unclear. Further research is warranted to elucidate the clinical significance of endocrine dysregulation in subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Pituitary dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoidal hemorrhage

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) results from the rupture of an intracranial aneurysm and represents a highly debilitating and devastating disorder. The prevalence rate of neuroendocrine impairment in the acute phase is extremely variable, ranging from 3.8% to 92.3%, depending on the time point considered, the method/test utilized, the clinical severity at admission, and probably also ethnicity. Further studies are needed to clarify such a wide range in neuroendocrine dysfunction in patients with aSAH. The overall neuroendocrine impairment rate in chronic aSAH is in the range 47%-83.3% with specific neuroendocrine impairment varying from 2.5% to 83.3%. The overall pituitary deficiency rate tends to decrease over time after SAH, with recovery of most endocrine and some de novo dysfunctions being reported. Only one study has reported an increase of overall endocrine impairment in the chronic follow-up. Neuroendocrine dysfunction seems to have a high prevalence in aSAH patients, even though its exact impact is not precisely known and is based on contrasting findings. More high-quality studies and trials are necessary before informing guidelines and protocols recommending preventive endocrine screening and related treatment (hormone replacement therapy) on a routine basis. The usage of standardized testing and reporting procedures could significantly move the field forward.

Pituitary Dysfunction After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of pituitary dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains incompletely elucidated. Furthermore, it is not clear whether these abnormalities impact patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of pituitary dysfunction after aSAH and its effect on outcomes.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective, cohort study including adult patients (18 y of age or older) with a diagnosis of aSAH who were admitted to the intensive care unit in 3 centers between January 2017 and January 2019. Exclusion criteria were previous hypopituitarism, hormonal replacement therapies for pituitary dysfunction or any corticosteroid treatment. Endocrine function was tested within the first 48 hours after aSAH onset (acute phase), after 1 to 3 weeks (subacute phase), and after 6 to 12 months (chronic phase). Clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 to 12 months using the modified Rankin Scale.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included in the study; all were studied in the acute phase, 34 were studied in the subacute phase, and 49 in the chronic phase. Pituitary dysfunction was identified in 92.3% (95% confidence interval; [CI]: 86.6%-98.0%) of cases in the acute phase, in 83.3% (95% CI: 70.8%-95.8%) in the subacute phase, and in 83.3% (95% CI: 72.7%-93.9%) of cases in the chronic phase. The most commonly identified abnormality was dysfunction of the pituitary-gonadal axis. There was no correlation between pituitary dysfunction and clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Pituitary dysfunction is common after aSAH, but does not affect 6 to 12-month clinical outcomes.

Neuroendocrine changes after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of pituitary dysfunction is high following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and when occurs it may contribute to residual symptoms of aSAH such as decreased cognition and quality of life. Hypopituitarism following aSAH may have non-specific, subtle symptoms and potentially serious consequences if remained undiagnosed.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature on epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic methods and management of neuroendocrine changes after aSAH as well as on the impact of pituitary dysfunction on outcome of the patient.

RESULTS

The prevalence rates of pituitary dysfunction after aSAH varies greatly across studies due to different diagnostic methods, though growth hormone deficiency is generally the most frequently reported followed by adrenocorticotropic hormone, gonadotropin and thyroid stimulating hormone deficiencies. Pituitary deficiency tends to improve over time after aSAH but new onset deficiencies in chronic phase may also occur. There are no clinical parameters to predict the presence of hypopituitarism after aSAH. Age of the patient and surgical procedures are risk factors associated with development of hypopituitarism but the effect of pituitary dysfunction on outcome of the patient is not clear. Replacement of hypocortisolemia and hypothyroidism is essential but treatment of other hormonal insufficiencies should be individualized.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypopituitarism following aSAH necessitates screening despite lack of gold standard evaluation tests and cut-off values in the follow up, because missed diagnosis may lead to untoward consequences.

Hypopituitarism 3 and 12 months after traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid haemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

High prevalence of hypopituitarism (HP) has been reported after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the prevalence and progression of HP in patients after TBI and SAH in Icelandic population.

DESIGN

A 12 month prospective single-centre study.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

A total of 27 patients were included, 15 patients with TBI and 12 patients with SAH. Pituitary function was evaluated with baseline hormone measurements and diagnostic tests. An insulin tolerance test was used unless contraindicated, then the GHRH-arginine test and Synachten test were used.

RESULTS

At three months, 16.7% (2/12) of the patients had HP after TBI and 33.3% (4/12) after SAH. At 12 months, 21.4% (3/14) of patients had HP after TBI and 9.1% (1/11) after SAH. Gonadotropin deficiency was the most common deficiency at 3 months and GH and gonadotropin deficiency at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a considerable risk of HP after TBI and reason to study pituitary function further in patients with SAH. We believe that neuroendocrine evaluation is important in these patients. Since recovery commonly occurs 12 months after the event, evaluation should be performed after that time if not clinically indicated earlier.

The prevalence of growth hormone deficiency in survivors of subarachnoid haemorrhage: results from a large single centre study

OBJECTIVE

The variation in reported prevalence of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) post subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is mainly due to methodological heterogeneity. We report on the prevalence of GHD in a large cohort of patients following SAH, when dynamic and confirmatory pituitary hormone testing methods are systematically employed.

DESIGN

In this cross-sectional study, pituitary function was assessed in 100 patients following SAH. Baseline pituitary hormonal profile measurement and glucagon stimulation testing (GST) was carried out in all patients. Isolated GHD was confirmed with an Arginine stimulation test and ACTH deficiency was confirmed with a short synacthen test.

RESULTS

The prevalence of hypopituitarism in our cohort was 19% and the prevalence of GHD was 14%. There was no association between GHD and the clinical or radiological severity of SAH at presentation, treatment modality, age, or occurrence of vasospasm. There were statistically significant differences in terms of Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS; p = 0.03) between patients diagnosed with GHD and those without. Significant inverse correlations between GH peak on GST with body mass index (BMI) and waist hip ratio (WHR) was also noted (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Using the current testing protocol, the prevalence of GHD detected in our cohort was 14%. It is unclear if the BMI and WHR difference observed is truly due to GHD or confounded by the endocrine tests used in this protocol. There is possibly an association between the development of GHD and worse GOS score. Routine endocrine screening of all SAH survivors with dynamic tests is time consuming and may subject many patients to unnecessary side-effects. Furthermore the degree of clinical benefit derived from growth hormone replacement in this patient group, remains unclear. Increased understanding of the most appropriate testing methodology in this patient group and more importantly which SAH survivors would derive most benefit from GHD screening is required.

Pituitary Dysfunction After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has not been precisely determined, and conflicting results have been reported in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the prevalence of pituitary insufficiency after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and to focus on basal serum and dynamic test differences.

METHODS

The prevalence of pituitary dysfunction was quantified at 3 to 6 months and >6 months after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Proportions were transformed with the logit transformation. A subgroup analysis was performed focusing on the differences in outcome between basal serum and dynamic tests for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and secondary adrenal insufficiency.

RESULTS

Overall prevalence of hypopituitarism differed considerably between studies, ranging from 0.05 to 0.45 in studies performed between 3 and 6 months after the event and from 0 to 0.55 in long-term studies (>6 months), with pooled frequencies of 0.31 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.43) and 0.25 (95% CI: 0.16-0.36), respectively. Pooled frequency of GHD at 3 to 6 months was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08-0.24). At >6 months, GHD prevalence was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.13-0.26) overall, but ranged from 0.15 (95% CI: 0.06-0.33) with the insulin tolerance test to 0.25 (95% CI: 0.15-0.36) using the growth hormone releasing hormone + arginine test.

CONCLUSION

Hypopituitarism is a common complication in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, with GHD being the most prevalent diagnosis. We showed that variations in prevalence rates in the literature are partly due to methodological differences among pituitary function tests.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormoneaSAH, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhageGHD, growth hormone deficiencyGHRH, growth hormone-releasing hormoneGST, glucagon stimulation testIGF, insulin-like growth factor 1ITT, insulin tolerance testSAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Clinical prevalence and outcome impact of pituitary dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Pituitary dysfunction is reported to be a common complication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the literature on clinical prevalence, risk factors and outcome impact of pituitary dysfunction after aSAH, and to assess the possible need for pituitary screening in aSAH patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis based on a comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI/Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar).

RESULTS

A total of 20 papers met criteria for inclusion. The prevalence of pituitary dysfunction in the acute phase (within the first 6 months after aSAH) was 49.30 % (95 % CI 41.6-56.9), decreasing in the chronic phase (after 6 months from aSAH) to 25.6 % (95 % CI 18.0-35.1). Abnormalities in basal hormonal levels were more frequent when compared to induction tests, and the prevalence of a single pituitary hormone dysregulation was more frequent than multiple pituitary hormone dysregulation. Increasing age was associated with a lower prevalence of endocrine dysfunction in the acute phase, and surgical treatment of the aneurysm (clipping) was related to a higher prevalence of single hormone dysfunction. The prevalence of pituitary dysfunction did not correlate with the outcome of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuroendocrine dysfunction is common after aSAH, but these abnormalities have not been shown to consistently impact outcome in the data available. There is a need for well-designed prospective studies to more precisely assess the incidence, clinical course, and outcome impact of pituitary dysfunction after aSAH.

Pituitary dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Japanese patients

To elucidate the pituitary function of Japanese patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and implicative factors related to growth hormone deficiency (GHD) after aSAH. We evaluated basal pituitary hormone levels among 59 consecutive aSAH patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ⩽4 at 3months after aSAH onset. Patients with low insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) SD score (SDS) or who seemed to develop pituitary dysfunction underwent provocative endocrine testing during a period of 3-36months after SAH onset. The relationship between IGF-1 SDS and clinical factors of the patients such as severity of SAH, aneurysm location, and treatment modalities, were assessed. Six patients (10.2%) demonstrated their IGF-1 SDS less than -2. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that patients who underwent surgical clipping had a significantly lower IGF-1 SDS (<-1SD) than patients who underwent endovascular embolization with an odds ratio of 5.83 (p=0.032). Thirty-three patients took provocative tests and five (15.6%) patients were identified as having GHD. The mean IGF-1 SDS of these five GHD patients was 0.08 SD. The aneurysms in all GHD patients were located in internal carotid artery (ICA) or anterior cerebral artery (ACA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing the prevalence of GHD in Japanese patients after aSAH, and it was not as high as that of previous European studies. We recommend that screening pituitary dysfunction for aSAH survivors with their aneurysms located in ICA or ACA.