1
|
Dumot C, Mantziaris G, Dayawansa S, Brantley C, Lee CC, Yang HC, Peker S, Samanci Y, Mathieu D, Tourigny JN, Martinez Moreno N, Martinez Alvarez R, Chytka T, Liscak R, Speckter H, Lazo E, Brito A, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Alzate J, Mashiach E, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Tripathi M, Bowden GN, Warnick RE, Sheehan D, Sheehan K, Fuentes A, Jane JA, Vance ML, Sheehan JP. Risk of new tumor, carotid stenosis, and stroke after stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary tumor: A multicenter study of 2254 patients with imaging follow-up. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:2328-2338. [PMID: 39028740 PMCID: PMC11630564 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A higher risk of secondary brain tumor, carotid stenosis, and stroke has been reported after conventional sella irradiation for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), which is a more focused approach, is now increasingly used instead. The aim was to assess the risk of secondary brain tumor, carotid stenosis/occlusion, and stroke after SRS. METHODS In this multicentric retrospective study, 2254 patients with PitNET were studied, 1377 in the exposed group, and 877 in the control group. RESULTS There were 9840.1 patient-years at risk for the SRS and 5266.5 for the control group. The 15-year cumulative probability of secondary intracranial tumor was 2.3% (95% CI: 0.5%, 4.1%) for SRS and 3.7% (95% CI: 0%, 8.7%) for the control group (P = .6), with an incidence rate of 1.32 per 1000 and 0.95 per 1000, respectively. SRS was not associated with an increased risk of tumorigenesis when stratified by age (HR: 1.59 [95% CI: 0.57, 4.47], Pp = .38). The 15-year probability of new carotid stenosis/occlusion was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.2, 1.6) in the SRS and 2% (95% CI: 0, 4.4) in the control group (P = .8). The 15-year probability of stroke was 2.6% (95% CI: 0.6%, 4.6%) in the SRS and 11.1% (95% CI: 6%, 15.9%) in the control group (P < .001). In Cox multivariate analysis stratified by age, SRS (HR 1.85 [95% CI:0.64, 5.35], P = .26) was not associated with risk of new stroke. CONCLUSIONS No increased risk of long-term secondary brain tumor, new stenosis or occlusion, and stroke was demonstrated in the SRS group compared to the control in this study with imaging surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Dumot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Sam Dayawansa
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Carson Brantley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, KOC University Hospital School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, KOC University Hospital School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Nicolas Tourigny
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Thomas Chytka
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Erwin Lazo
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Anderson Brito
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Juan Alzate
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Elad Mashiach
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York City, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Manjul Tripathi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Greg N Bowden
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Angelica Fuentes
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - John A Jane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carilion Clinic, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Mary Lee Vance
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Nigris Vasconcellos F, Vilela MAD, Garcia Torrico F, Scalise MA, Vargas VPS, Mendieta CD, Pichardo-Rojas P, Rosi MEA, Fleury LT, de Brito Rebelo ND, Benjamin C, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent/residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2024; 166:392. [PMID: 39356336 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06296-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/28/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are a significant subtype of pituitary tumors, accounting for 30% of all pituitary tumors and 10-20% of intracranial tumors. The primary treatment for NFPAs is resection, but complete resection is often challenging due to the tumor's proximity to critical structures, leading to frequent recurrences. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a viable treatment option for recurrent or residual NFPAs, but its long-term efficacy and safety profile require further investigation. METHODS This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and included studies published up to February 2024. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating SRS for recurrent/residual NFPAs. Inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting outcomes and complications of SRS, while exclusion criteria omitted case reports, case series, and non-English studies. Data extracted included demographic details, dosimetry parameters, and follow-up durations. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and statistical analyses were performed using single-arm meta-analyses. RESULTS A total of 24 studies involving 3,781 patients were included. The mean follow-up duration was 60 months. Tumor control was achieved in approximately 92.3% of patients. The risk of developing hypopituitarism post-SRS was 13.62%, while the risk for panhypopituitarism was 2.55%. New visual field deficits occurred in 3.94% of patients. Cranial nerve deficits were rare, with event rates below 1% for CN III, CN V, and CN VI. CONCLUSION SRS is effective in managing recurrent or residual NFPAs, achieving high tumor control rates. However, the risk of hypopituitarism remains a significant concern, necessitating regular endocrinological monitoring. While generally safe, the potential for new visual field deficits and other cranial nerve deficits must be considered. SRS remains a valuable treatment option, but clinicians should be aware of its potential complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Cristian D Mendieta
- Universidad Mayor Real y Pontificia de San Francisco Xavier de Chuquisaca, Sucre, Bolivia
| | | | | | - Laura Tajara Fleury
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS), Campinas, Brazil
| | | | | | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mantziaris G, Pikis S, Chytka T, Liščák R, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Peker S, Samanci Y, Bindal SK, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD, Kaur R, Madan R, Tripathi M, Pangal DJ, Strickland BA, Zada G, Langlois AM, Mathieu D, Warnick RE, Patel S, Minier Z, Speckter H, Xu Z, Kormath Anand R, Sheehan JP. Adjuvant versus on-progression Gamma Knife radiosurgery for residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a matched-cohort analysis. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:1662-1668. [PMID: 36401547 DOI: 10.3171/2022.10.jns221873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radiological progression occurs in 50%-60% of residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a safe and effective management option for residual NFPAs, but there is no consensus on its optimal timing. This study aims to define the optimal timing of SRS for residual NFPAs. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter study involved 375 patients with residual NFPAs managed with SRS. The patients were divided into adjuvant (ADJ; treated for stable residual NFPA within 6 months of resection) and progression (PRG) cohorts (treated for residual NFPA progression). Factors associated with tumor progression and clinical deterioration were analyzed. RESULTS Following propensity-score matching, each cohort consisted of 130 patients. At last follow-up, tumor control was achieved in 93.1% of patients in the ADJ cohort and in 96.2% of patients in the PRG cohort (HR 1.6, 95% CI 0.55-4.9, p = 0.37). Hypopituitarism was associated with a maximum point dose of > 8 Gy to the pituitary stalk (HR 4.5, 95% CI 1.6-12.6, p = 0.004). No statistically significant difference was noted in crude new-onset hypopituitarism rates (risk difference [RD] = -0.8%, p > 0.99) or visual deficits (RD = -2.3%, p = 0.21) between the two cohorts at the last follow-up. The median time from resection to new hypopituitarism was longer in the PRG cohort (58.9 vs 29.7 months, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS SRS at residual NFPA progression does not appear to alter the probability of tumor control or hormonal/visual deficits compared with adjuvant SRS. Deferral of radiosurgical management to the time of radiological progression could significantly prolong the time to radiosurgically induced pituitary dysfunction. A lower maximum point dose (< 8 Gy) to the pituitary stalk portended a more favorable chance of preserving pituitary function after SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Mantziaris
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Tomas Chytka
- 2Department of Radiation and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liščák
- 2Department of Radiation and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Selcuk Peker
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Shray K Bindal
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rupinder Kaur
- 5Department of Neurosurgery and Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Renu Madan
- 5Department of Neurosurgery and Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- 5Department of Neurosurgery and Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Dhiraj J Pangal
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ben A Strickland
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gabriel Zada
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anne-Marie Langlois
- 7Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherché du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- 7Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherché du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- 8Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Samir Patel
- 9Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and
| | - Zayda Minier
- 10Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Herwin Speckter
- 10Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Rithika Kormath Anand
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Umekawa M, Shinya Y, Hasegawa H, Shin M, Kawashima M, Katano A, Saito N. Long-term outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for skull base tumors involving the cavernous sinus. J Neurooncol 2022; 156:377-386. [PMID: 35028788 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03921-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective and less invasive therapeutic option for cavernous sinus (CS) tumors. However, its long-term effectiveness and neurological outcomes have yet to be fully elucidated. We aimed to examine the long-term outcomes of SRS for CS tumors. METHODS Overall, a cohort of 113 patients with benign CS tumors, including 91 with meningioma, 14 with trigeminal schwannoma (TS), and eight with cavernous hemangioma, treated with SRS at our institution from 1990 to 2018, was included. Tumor control and functional preservation/recovery were evaluated in detail. RESULTS The median post-SRS follow-up period was 77 months (interquartile range, 39-177). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 97% at 5 years, 89% at 10 years, and 87% at 15 years for the entire cohort; 96% at 5 years and 87% at 10 years for meningiomas; and 100% at 10 years for the other tumors. No significant difference was observed between meningiomas and non-meningiomas (log-rank test, p = 0.107). Improvement in cranial nerve (CN) function was observed in 35 (27%) patients. TSs tended to show CN improvements more often than meningiomas did (total improvements, 62% vs. 23%; p = 0.004; eye movement function, 100% vs. 20%; p = 0.002). CN deterioration or development of new CN deficits was observed in 11 (10%) patients. CONCLUSION SRS provides good tumor control and acceptable long-term outcome with sufficient preservation of CN function in patients with benign CS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motoyuki Umekawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yuki Shinya
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Hirotaka Hasegawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Masahiro Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Mariko Kawashima
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Atsuto Katano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Nobuhito Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|