1
|
Zhang X, Chen Y, Yu Y, Li J. Diagnosis and Management of Aggressive/Refractory Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors. Int J Endocrinol 2024; 2024:5085905. [PMID: 39224564 PMCID: PMC11368557 DOI: 10.1155/2024/5085905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The majority of acromegaly and gigantism are caused by growth hormone-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). Most cases can be cured or controlled by surgery, medical therapy, and/or radiotherapy. However, a few of these tumors are resistant to traditional therapy and always have a poor prognosis. The title aggressive/refractory is used to differentiate them from pituitary carcinomas. To date, there is no definitive conclusion on how to diagnose aggressive/refractory growth hormone-secreting PitNETs, which may have slowed the process of exploring new therapeutical strategies. We summarized the literature described diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Potential disease markers and prospective therapies were also included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojuan Zhang
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismWest China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismWest China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yerong Yu
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismWest China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jianwei Li
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismWest China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giustina A, Biermasz N, Casanueva FF, Fleseriu M, Mortini P, Strasburger C, van der Lely AJ, Wass J, Melmed S. Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission. Pituitary 2024; 27:7-22. [PMID: 37923946 PMCID: PMC10837217 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-023-01360-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The 14th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was convened to consider biochemical criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. METHODS Fifty-six acromegaly experts from 16 countries reviewed and discussed current evidence focused on biochemical assays; criteria for diagnosis and the role of imaging, pathology, and clinical assessments; consequences of diagnostic delay; criteria for remission and recommendations for follow up; and the value of assessment and monitoring in defining disease progression, selecting appropriate treatments, and maximizing patient outcomes. RESULTS In a patient with typical acromegaly features, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I > 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for age confirms the diagnosis. Random growth hormone (GH) measured after overnight fasting may be useful for informing prognosis, but is not required for diagnosis. For patients with equivocal results, IGF-I measurements using the same validated assay can be repeated, and oral glucose tolerance testing might also be useful. Although biochemical remission is the primary assessment of treatment outcome, biochemical findings should be interpreted within the clinical context of acromegaly. Follow up assessments should consider biochemical evaluation of treatment effectiveness, imaging studies evaluating residual/recurrent adenoma mass, and clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly, its complications, and comorbidities. Referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center should be considered for patients with equivocal biochemical, pathology, or imaging findings at diagnosis, and for patients insufficiently responsive to standard treatment approaches. CONCLUSION Consensus recommendations highlight new understandings of disordered GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly and the importance of expert management for this rare disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Giustina
- San Raffaele Vita-Salute University and IRCCS Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Pietro Mortini
- San Raffaele Vita-Salute University and IRCCS Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Shlomo Melmed
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, NT 2015, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Voltan G, Mazzeo P, Regazzo D, Scaroni C, Ceccato F. Role of Estrogen and Estrogen Receptor in GH-Secreting Adenomas. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:9920. [PMID: 37373068 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24129920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Acromegaly is a rare disease with several systemic complications that may lead to increased overall morbidity and mortality. Despite several available treatments, ranging from transsphenoidal resection of GH-producing adenomas to different medical therapies, complete hormonal control is not achieved in some cases. Some decades ago, estrogens were first used to treat acromegaly, resulting in a significant decrease in IGF1 levels. However, due to the consequent side effects of the high dose utilized, this treatment was later abandoned. The evidence that estrogens are able to blunt GH activity also derives from the evidence that women with GH deficiency taking oral estro-progestins pills need higher doses of GH replacement therapy. In recent years, the role of estrogens and Selective Estrogens Receptor Modulators (SERMs) in acromegaly treatment has been re-evaluated, especially considering poor control of the disease under first- and second-line medical treatment. In this review, we analyze the state of the art concerning the impact of estrogen and SERMs on the GH/IGF1 axis, focusing on molecular pathways and the possible implications for acromegaly treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Voltan
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Endocrinology Unit, Padova University Hospital, Via Ospedale Civile 105, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Mazzeo
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Endocrinology Unit, Padova University Hospital, Via Ospedale Civile 105, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Daniela Regazzo
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Carla Scaroni
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Endocrinology Unit, Padova University Hospital, Via Ospedale Civile 105, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Filippo Ceccato
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Endocrinology Unit, Padova University Hospital, Via Ospedale Civile 105, 35128 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Growth hormone (GH) regulates metabolic and physical health in the adult human. Because the GH system is regulated by estrogens, therapeutic estrogen compounds are likely to affect metabolic health. Estrogens are available for oral and parenteral use in natural, prodrug, and synthetic formulations including selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). This review covers the pharmacology of estrogen and the effects on GH action to inform judicious use in the pituitary patient. The effects on the GH system are route dependent due to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Oral but not parenteral estrogen compounds inhibit GH action, reducing hepatic insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) production, protein anabolism, and fat utilization. In patients with GH deficiency, oral estrogen therapy exacerbates the degree of hyposomatotrophism and attenuates the beneficial effects of GH replacement therapy, effects that are greater with contraceptive than replacement doses. Surveys report that less than one-fifth of hypopituitary women are appropriately replaced by a transdermal route and up to half on oral therapy are inappropriately treated with contraceptive steroids. In acromegaly, however, estrogens, especially synthetic formulations of greater potency, reduce IGF-1, improving disease control, an effect also observed in men treated with SERMs. The route-dependent effects and potency of estrogen formulations are important considerations for optimizing the management of hypogonadal patients with pituitary disease, in particular GH deficiency and acromegaly. For hypopituitary women, estrogens should be replaced by a nonoral route. For acromegaly, oral estrogen formulations can be considered as simple adjuvant therapy for disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Shoung
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Saint Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Saint Vincent's Clinical School UNSW, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Ken K Y Ho
- Correspondence: Ken K. Y. Ho, MD, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dumot C, Schlesinger D, Mantziaris G, Dayawansa S, Xu Z, Sheehan JP. Role of biological effective dose for prediction of endocrine remission in acromegaly patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Pituitary 2023; 26:124-131. [PMID: 36471108 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-022-01293-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be used in acromegaly patients to achieve endocrine remission. In this study we evaluate the biological effective dose (BED) as a predictor of SRS outcomes for acromegaly. METHOD This retrospective, single-center study included patients treated with single-fraction SRS with growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas and available endocrine follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to study endocrine remission, new pituitary deficit, and tumor control. Cox analyses were performed using two models [margin dose (model 2) versus BED (model 1)]. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients (53.7% male) with a median age of 46.8 years (IQR 21.2) were treated using a median dose of 25 Gy (IQR 5), and a median BED of 171.9Gy2.47 (IQR 66.0). Five (7.5%) were treated without stopping antisecretory medication. The cumulative probability of maintained endocrine remission off suppressive medications was 62.5% [47.9-73.0] at 3 years and 76.5% [61.0-85.9] at 5 years. IGF1i > 1.5 was a predictor of treatment failure [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.40 (0.21-0.79) in model 1, p = 0.00783]. Margin dose > 22 Gy [HR 2.33 (1.06-5.13), p = 0.03593] or a BED > 170Gy2.47 [HR 2.02 (1.06-3.86), p = 0.03370] were associated with endocrine remission. The cumulative probability of new hypopituitarism after SRS was 36.8% (CI 95% 22.4-45.9) at 3 years and 53.2% (CI 95% 35.6-66) at 5 years. BED or margin dose were not associated with new hypopituitarism. CONCLUSION BED is a strong predictor of endocrine remission in patients treated with SRS. Dose planning and optimization of the BED to > 170Gy2.47 give a greater probability of endocrine remission in acromegalic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Dumot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VG, USA
- Department of neurological surgery, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - David Schlesinger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VG, USA
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VG, USA
| | - Sam Dayawansa
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VG, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VG, USA
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VG, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fleseriu M, Langlois F, Lim DST, Varlamov EV, Melmed S. Acromegaly: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2022; 10:804-826. [PMID: 36209758 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00244-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas that cause acromegaly arise as monoclonal expansions of differentiated somatotroph cells and are usually sporadic. They are almost invariably benign, yet they can be locally invasive and show progressive growth despite treatment. Persistent excess of both growth hormone and its target hormone insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) results in a wide array of cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, musculoskeletal, neurological, and neoplastic comorbidities that might not be reversible with disease control. Normalisation of IGF-1 and growth hormone are the primary therapeutic aims; additional treatment goals include tumour shrinkage, relieving symptoms, managing complications, reducing excess morbidity, and improving quality of life. A multimodal approach with surgery, medical therapy, and (more rarely) radiation therapy is required to achieve these goals. In this Review, we examine the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, complications, and treatment of acromegaly, with an emphasis on the importance of tailoring management strategies to each patient to optimise outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Fleseriu
- Department of Medicine (Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition) and Department of Neurological Surgery, and Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Fabienne Langlois
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | - Elena V Varlamov
- Department of Medicine (Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition) and Department of Neurological Surgery, and Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Shlomo Melmed
- Department of Medicine and Pituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|