1
|
Durma AD, Saracyn M, Kołodziej M, Jóźwik-Plebanek K, Kamiński G. The Use of [ 11C]C-Methionine in Diagnostics of Endocrine Disorders with Focus on Pituitary and Parathyroid Glands. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2025; 18:229. [PMID: 40006042 PMCID: PMC11859209 DOI: 10.3390/ph18020229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2025] [Revised: 02/04/2025] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
The rapid development of nuclear medicine offers vast opportunities for diagnosing neoplasms, particularly in endocrinology. The use of the [11C]C-methionine radiotracer is currently limited due to its physical properties and the complex production process. However, studies conducted so far have demonstrated its utility in PET imaging, helping to detect lesions that often remain elusive with other modalities. This systematic review focuses on [11C]C-methionine in diagnosing hyperparathyroidism and pituitary tumors, highlighting its high effectiveness, which can be crucial in diagnosis. Despite some disadvantages, it should be considered when available, especially when other modalities or radiotracers fail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Daniel Durma
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, Szaserów 128, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Trigt VR, Bakker LEH, Lu H, Pelsma ICM, Verstegen MJT, van Furth WR, Pereira Arias-Bouda LM, Biermasz NR. Clinical use of [ 18F]fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine PET co-registered with MRI for localizing prolactinoma remnants. Pituitary 2024; 27:614-624. [PMID: 39042164 PMCID: PMC11513721 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-024-01430-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the utility of [18F]fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine PET co-registered with magnetic resonance imaging ([18F]FET-PET/MRICR) in patients with difficult-to-localize prolactinoma to inform clinical decision-making and (surgical) treatment planning. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 17 consecutive patients with prolactinoma undergoing [18F]FET-PET/MRICR between October 2020 and September 2022 for either (1) additional information in case of difficult-to-visualize remnants after prior transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), or pharmacological treatment, or (2) radiological diagnosis in absence of a (clear) adenoma on diagnostic/post-treatment conventional MRI. RESULTS [18F]FET-PET/MRICR identified a lesion in 14/17 patients, yet failed to identify active lesions in 2 patients with negative conventional MRI despite prolactin > 7.5 times upper limit of normal. [18F]FET-PET/MRICR results were inconclusive in 1 patient due to diffuse tracer uptake 10 weeks post-surgery. [18F]FET-PET/MRICR was completely concordant with a suspected lesion on conventional MRI in 10/17 patients, and partially concordant in 3/17 patients. New foci were identified in 4/17 patients. The [18F]FET-PET/MRICR conclusions influenced clinical shared decision-making in 15/17 patients, of whom 7 patients underwent TSS and 8 refrained from TSS. One patient underwent TSS despite negative [18F]FET-PET/MRICR, and one patient underwent additional imaging. Intraoperative findings corresponded with [18F]FET-PET/MRICR in 5/8 patients, and immunohistochemistry was positive in 5/8 patients. The treatment goal was achieved in 7/8 patients, and remission was achieved in 5/7 patients in whom total resection was considered feasible. CONCLUSION [18F]FET-PET/MRICR can be of added value in the preoperative decision-making process for selected patients with difficult-to-localize prolactinoma (remnants), or patients lacking a substrate on conventional MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria R van Trigt
- Dept. of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Leontine E H Bakker
- Dept. of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Huangling Lu
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Iris C M Pelsma
- Dept. of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J T Verstegen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter R van Furth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lenka M Pereira Arias-Bouda
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke R Biermasz
- Dept. of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bakker LEH, Verstegen MJT, Manole DC, Lu H, Decramer TJM, Pelsma ICM, Kruit MC, Verbist BM, van de Ven A, Gurnell M, Ghariq I, van Furth WR, Biermasz NR, Pereira Arias-Bouda LM. 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine PET co-registered with MRI in patients with persisting acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2024; 101:142-152. [PMID: 38818709 DOI: 10.1111/cen.15079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report our experience with 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) co-registered with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (FET-PET/MRICR) in the care trajectory for persistent acromegaly. DESIGN Prospective case series. PATIENTS Ten patients with insufficiently controlled acromegaly referred to our team to evaluate surgical options. MEASUREMENTS FET-PET/MRICR was used to support decision-making if MRI alone and multidisciplinary team evaluation did not provide sufficient clarity to proceed to surgery. RESULTS FET-PET/MRICR showed suspicious (para)sellar tracer uptake in all patients. In five patients FET-PET/MRICR was fully concordant with conventional MRI, and in one patient partially concordant. FET-PET/MRICR identified suggestive new foci in four other patients. Surgical re-exploration was performed in nine patients (aimed at total resection (6), debulking (2), diagnosis (1)), and one patient underwent radiation therapy. In 7 of 9 (78%) operated patients FET-PET/MRICR findings were confirmed intraoperatively, and in six (67%) also histologically. IGF-1 decreased significantly in eight patients (89%). All patients showed clinical improvement. Complete biochemical remission was achieved in three patients (50% of procedures in which total resection was anticipated feasible). Biochemistry improved in five and was unchanged in one patient. No permanent complications occurred. At six months, optimal outcome (preoperative intended goal achieved without permanent complications) was achieved in six (67%) patients and an intermediate outcome (goal not achieved, but no complications) in the other three patients. CONCLUSIONS In patients with persisting acromegaly without a clear surgical target on MRI, FET-PET/MRICR is a new tracer to provide additional information to aid decision-making by the multidisciplinary pituitary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leontine E H Bakker
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Pituitary Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J T Verstegen
- Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Pituitary Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Diandra C Manole
- Department of Neuroendocrinology, National Institute of Endocrinology CI Parhon, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Huangling Lu
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Iris C M Pelsma
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark C Kruit
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Berit M Verbist
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Annenienke van de Ven
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Idris Ghariq
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter R van Furth
- Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Pituitary Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke R Biermasz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Pituitary Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lenka M Pereira Arias-Bouda
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Constantinescu SM, Duprez T, Bonneville JF, Maiter D. How often should we perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the follow-up of pituitary adenoma? ANNALES D'ENDOCRINOLOGIE 2024; 85:300-307. [PMID: 38604408 DOI: 10.1016/j.ando.2024.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the examination of choice for diagnosing and monitoring pituitary adenoma (also known as pituitary neuroendocrine tumor or PitNET), whether treated or not. However, repeating the examination too often (and sometimes unnecessarily) is costly, and worrying data on tissue accumulation (brain, bone, etc.) of gadolinium atoms dissociated from their carrier molecule (chelator) have led European authorities to ban contrast agents based on linear chelators of gadolinium, which are particularly susceptible to rapid dissociation, in favor of chemically more stable macrocyclic chelators. It is therefore important to determine the optimal frequency for pituitary MRI monitoring in order to safely assess the natural history or therapeutic response of pituitary adenomas. The aim of this article is to summarize the most recent data on optimal follow-up intervals depending on the type, size and location of the pituitary tumor and the clinical situation in general, in order to generate monitoring algorithms to guide clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thierry Duprez
- Department of Neuroradiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Dominique Maiter
- Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haberbosch L, MacFarlane J, Koulouri O, Gillett D, Powlson AS, Oddy S, Halsall DJ, Huynh KA, Jones J, Cheow HK, Spranger J, Mai K, Strasburger CJ, Mannion RJ, Gurnell M. Real-world experience with 11C-methionine positron emission tomography in the management of acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 2024; 190:307-313. [PMID: 38482632 DOI: 10.1093/ejendo/lvae028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND L-[methyl-11C]-methionine-positron emission tomography (Met-PET) is a potentially important imaging adjunct in the diagnostic workup of pituitary adenomas, including somatotroph tumors. Met-PET can identify residual or occult disease and make definitive therapies accessible to a subgroup of patients who would otherwise require lifelong medical therapy. However, existing data on its use are still limited to small case series. Here, we report the largest single-center experience (n = 61) in acromegaly. METHODS A total of 189 cases of acromegaly were referred to our national Met-PET service in the last 12 years. For this analysis, we have reviewed outcomes in those 61 patients managed exclusively by our multidisciplinary team (single center, single surgeon). Referral indications were as follows: indeterminate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n = 38, 62.3%), occult residual (n = 14, 23.0%), (radio-)surgical planning (n = 6, 9.8%), and occult de novo tumor (n = 3, 4.9%). RESULTS A total of 33/61 patients (54.1%) underwent PET-guided surgery. Twenty-four of 33 patients (72.7%) achieved complete biochemical remission following (re-)surgery. Insulin-like growth factor 1 levels were reduced to <2 × upper limit of normal (ULN) in 6 of the remaining 9 cases, 3 of whom achieved levels of <1.1 × ULN compared with mean preoperative levels of 2.4 × ULN (SD 0.8) for n = 9. Only 3 patients developed single new hormonal deficits (gonadotropic/thyrotropic insufficiency). There were no neurovascular complications after surgery. CONCLUSION In patients with persistent/recurrent acromegaly or occult tumors, Met-PET can facilitate further targeted intervention (surgery/radiosurgery). This led to complete remission in most cases (24/33) or significant improvement with comparatively low risk of complications. L-[methyl-11C]-methionine-positron emission tomography should therefore be considered in all patients who are potential candidates for further surgical intervention but present no clear target on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linus Haberbosch
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN), Berlin 10117, Germany
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - James MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Olympia Koulouri
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Gillett
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew S Powlson
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Sue Oddy
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - David J Halsall
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin A Huynh
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Jones
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Heok K Cheow
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Joachim Spranger
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN), Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Knut Mai
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN), Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Christian J Strasburger
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN), Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Richard J Mannion
- Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Petersenn S, Fleseriu M, Casanueva FF, Giustina A, Biermasz N, Biller BMK, Bronstein M, Chanson P, Fukuoka H, Gadelha M, Greenman Y, Gurnell M, Ho KKY, Honegger J, Ioachimescu AG, Kaiser UB, Karavitaki N, Katznelson L, Lodish M, Maiter D, Marcus HJ, McCormack A, Molitch M, Muir CA, Neggers S, Pereira AM, Pivonello R, Post K, Raverot G, Salvatori R, Samson SL, Shimon I, Spencer-Segal J, Vila G, Wass J, Melmed S. Diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society international Consensus Statement. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2023; 19:722-740. [PMID: 37670148 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-023-00886-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
This Consensus Statement from an international, multidisciplinary workshop sponsored by the Pituitary Society offers evidence-based graded consensus recommendations and key summary points for clinical practice on the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Epidemiology and pathogenesis, clinical presentation of disordered pituitary hormone secretion, assessment of hyperprolactinaemia and biochemical evaluation, optimal use of imaging strategies and disease-related complications are addressed. In-depth discussions present the latest evidence on treatment of prolactinoma, including efficacy, adverse effects and options for withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy, as well as indications for surgery, preoperative medical therapy and radiation therapy. Management of prolactinoma in special situations is discussed, including cystic lesions, mixed growth hormone-secreting and prolactin-secreting adenomas and giant and aggressive prolactinomas. Furthermore, considerations for pregnancy and fertility are outlined, as well as management of prolactinomas in children and adolescents, patients with an underlying psychiatric disorder, postmenopausal women, transgender individuals and patients with chronic kidney disease. The workshop concluded that, although treatment resistance is rare, there is a need for additional therapeutic options to address clinical challenges in treating these patients and a need to facilitate international registries to enable risk stratification and optimization of therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Petersenn
- ENDOC Center for Endocrine Tumors, Hamburg, Germany.
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | | | | | - Andrea Giustina
- San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Philippe Chanson
- Université Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Monica Gadelha
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Yona Greenman
- Tel Aviv-Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mark Gurnell
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ken K Y Ho
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Ursula B Kaiser
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Niki Karavitaki
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Maya Lodish
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Hani J Marcus
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ann McCormack
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Molitch
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Alberto M Pereira
- Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Kalmon Post
- Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gerald Raverot
- Department of Endocrinology, Reference Centre for Rare Pituitary Diseases HYPO, "Groupement Hospitalier Est" Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | | | | | - Ilan Shimon
- Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
| | | | - Greisa Vila
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - John Wass
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gillett D, MacFarlane J, Bashari W, Crawford R, Harper I, Mendichovszky IA, Aloj L, Cheow H, Gurnell M. Molecular Imaging of Pituitary Tumors. Semin Nucl Med 2023; 53:530-538. [PMID: 36966020 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
Tumors of the pituitary gland, although mostly benign adenomas, are a cause of significant morbidity and even excess mortality due to local compressive effects (eg visual loss, hypopituitarism) and unregulated hormone secretion (eg acromegaly or Cushing Disease). Surgery, radiotherapy, and medical management (sometimes in combination) may be needed to mitigate the effects of tumor expansion and endocrine dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a central role in treatment planning for most patients. However, it does not always reliably identify the site(s) of primary or recurrent disease, especially where post-treatment remodeling results in indeterminate anatomical appearances. In these contexts, molecular imaging is a potential game-changer, allowing precise localization of sites of active disease and enabling safe and effective targeted intervention when patients would otherwise be consigned to expensive life-long medication. For pituitary and parasellar imaging, PET is the preferred modality due to its superior spatial resolution and sensitivity compared with SPECT, and an array of PET radioligands have been studied in different pituitary adenoma (PA) subtypes. While 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is widely available, significant heterogeneity in tumoral uptake has limited its use. Instead, ligands targeting specific molecular pathways relevant to PA biology (eg somatostatin or dopamine receptor expression, amino acid uptake) are increasingly preferred and are beginning to find application in routine clinical practice. In addition, novel approaches to distinguish adenomatous tissue from normal gland (eg through comparison of images obtained with different radiotracers) and increase confidence that a suspected abnormal focus is indeed pathological (eg through subtraction imaging) have been proposed. It is likely therefore that molecular imaging will continue to find increasing application in the management of pituitary tumors just as it already does in other endocrine disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gillett
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| | - James MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Waiel Bashari
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rosy Crawford
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ines Harper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luigi Aloj
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gillett D, Marsden D, Crawford R, Ballout S, MacFarlane J, van der Meulen M, Gillett B, Bird N, Heard S, Powlson AS, Santarius T, Mannion R, Kolias A, Harper I, Mendichovszky IA, Aloj L, Cheow H, Bashari W, Koulouri O, Gurnell M. Development of a bespoke phantom to optimize molecular PET imaging of pituitary tumors. EJNMMI Phys 2023; 10:34. [PMID: 37261547 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00552-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Image optimization is a key step in clinical nuclear medicine, and phantoms play an essential role in this process. However, most phantoms do not accurately reflect the complexity of human anatomy, and this presents a particular challenge when imaging endocrine glands to detect small (often subcentimeter) tumors. To address this, we developed a novel phantom for optimization of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the human pituitary gland. Using radioactive 3D printing, phantoms were created which mimicked the distribution of 11C-methionine in normal pituitary tissue and in a small tumor embedded in the gland (i.e., with no inactive boundary, thereby reproducing the in vivo situation). In addition, an anatomical phantom, replicating key surrounding structures [based on computed tomography (CT) images from an actual patient], was created using material extrusion 3D printing with specialized filaments that approximated the attenuation properties of bone and soft tissue. RESULTS The phantom enabled us to replicate pituitary glands harboring tumors of varying sizes (2, 4 and 6 mm diameters) and differing radioactive concentrations (2 ×, 5 × and 8 × the normal gland). The anatomical phantom successfully approximated the attenuation properties of surrounding bone and soft tissue. Two iterative reconstruction algorithms [ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM); Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL)] with a range of reconstruction parameters (e.g., 3, 5, 7 and 9 OSEM iterations with 24 subsets; BPL regularization parameter (β) from 50 to 1000) were tested. Images were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively by eight expert readers. Quantitatively, signal was the highest using BPL with β = 50; noise was the lowest using BPL with β = 1000; contrast was the highest using BPL with β = 100. The qualitative review found that accuracy and confidence were the highest when using BPL with β = 400. CONCLUSIONS The development of a bespoke phantom has allowed the identification of optimal parameters for molecular pituitary imaging: BPL reconstruction with TOF, PSF correction and a β value of 400; in addition, for small (< 4 mm) tumors with low contrast (2:1 or 5:1), sensitivity may be improved using a β value of 100. Together, these findings should increase tumor detection and confidence in reporting scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gillett
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Daniel Marsden
- Clinical Engineering, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Rosy Crawford
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Safia Ballout
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - James MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Merel van der Meulen
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Bethany Gillett
- East Anglian Regional Radiation Protection Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Nick Bird
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Sarah Heard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Andrew S Powlson
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Thomas Santarius
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Richard Mannion
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Angelos Kolias
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Ines Harper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Luigi Aloj
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Waiel Bashari
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Olympia Koulouri
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chevalier B, Jannin A, Espiard S, Merlen E, Beron A, Lion G, Vantyghem MC, Huglo D, Cortet-Rudelli C, Baillet C. Pituitary adenoma & nuclear medicine: Recent outcomes and ongoing developments. Presse Med 2022; 51:104144. [PMID: 36334843 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2022.104144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
In order to explore pituitary adenoma (PA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the cornerstone. However, there are some limitations and MRI can be non-conclusive. The development of additional imaging modalities like nuclear medicine explorations may help to confirm PA diagnosis, guide management and follow up. Nuclear medicine uses radiopharmaceuticals for imaging with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), or positron emission tomography (PET), coupled to CT scan. Radiopharmaceuticals products target specific cellular elements which allow to explore several biological pathways. Nuclear medicine may also be used for therapeutic purposes and recent developments of approach based on Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) for treatment of aggressive PA and pituitary carcinoma will be reviewed. Several radiotracers have been studied in the context of PA, and the aim of this paper is to discuss their respective performances and clinical interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Chevalier
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France; University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | - Arnaud Jannin
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France; University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; University of Lille, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Stephanie Espiard
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France; University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; INSERM U1190, European Genomic Institute for Diabetes, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Emilie Merlen
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Amandine Beron
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Georges Lion
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Marie-Christine Vantyghem
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France; University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; INSERM U1190, European Genomic Institute for Diabetes, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Damien Huglo
- University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France; INSERM U1189 OncoTHAI, avenue Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Christine Cortet-Rudelli
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Clio Baillet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Lille University Hospital, F-59000 Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|