1
|
Rothmund M, Sodergren S, Rohde G, de Rojas T, Paratico G, Albini G, Mur J, Darlington AS, Majorana A, Riedl D. Updating our understanding of health-related quality of life issues in children with cancer: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures and qualitative studies. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:965-976. [PMID: 36152110 PMCID: PMC9510324 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03259-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a key concept in pediatric oncology. This systematic review aims to update the conceptual HRQOL model by Anthony et al. (Qual Life Res 23(3):771-789, 2014), covering physical, emotional, social and general HRQOL aspects, and to present a comprehensive overview of age- and disease-specific HRQOL issues in children with cancer. METHODS Medline, PsychINFO, the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and the COSMIN database were searched (up to 31.12.2020) for publications using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and qualitative studies in children with cancer (8-14-year) or their parents. Items and quotations were extracted and mapped onto the conceptual model for HRQOL in children with cancer mentioned above. RESULTS Of 2038 identified studies, 221 were included for data extraction. We identified 96 PROMS with 2641 items and extracted 798 quotations from 45 qualitative studies. Most items and quotations (94.8%) could be mapped onto the conceptual model. However, some adaptations were made and the model was complemented by (sub)domains for 'treatment burden', 'treatment involvement', and 'financial issues'. Physical and psychological aspects were more frequently covered than social issues. DISCUSSION This review provides a comprehensive overview of HRQOL issues for children with cancer. Our findings mostly support the HRQOL model by Anthony et al. (Qual Life Res 23(3):771-789, 2014), but some adaptations are suggested. This review may be considered a starting point for a refinement of our understanding of HRQOL in children with cancer. Further qualitative research will help to evaluate the comprehensiveness of the HRQOL model and the relevance of the issues it encompasses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Rothmund
- Division of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Gudrun Rohde
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, Kristiansand and Sorlandet Hospital, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
- Division of Psychiatry, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | | | - Gloria Paratico
- Department of Oral Medicine and Paediatric Dentistry, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giorgia Albini
- Department of Oral Medicine and Paediatric Dentistry, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Johanna Mur
- Division of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Alessandra Majorana
- Department of Oral Medicine and Paediatric Dentistry, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - David Riedl
- Division of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lassen RB, Abild CB, Kristensen K, Kristensen LJ, Hørlück JT, Jensen AL. Involving children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in health care: a qualitative study of the use of patient-reported outcomes. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:20. [PMID: 36862233 PMCID: PMC9981819 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00564-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Within pediatric health care services, Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) regarding the patient's health status are mainly used for research purposes in a chronic care setting. However, PROs are also applied in clinical settings in the routine care of children and adolescents with chronic health conditions. PROs have the potential to involve patients because they 'place the patient at the center' of his or her treatment. The investigation of how PROs are used in the treatment of children and adolescents and how this use can influence the involvement of these patients is still limited. The aim of this study was to investigate how children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) experience the use of PROs in their treatment with a focus on the experience of involvement. RESULTS Employing Interpretive Description, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with children and adolescents with T1D. The analysis revealed four themes related to the use of PROs: Making room for conversation, Applying PROs under the right circumstances, Questionnaire structure and content, and Becoming partners in health care. CONCLUSIONS The results clarify that, to some extent, PROs fulfill the potential they promise, including patient-centered communication, detection of unrecognized problems, a strengthened patient-clinician (and parent-clinician) partnership, and increased patient self-reflection. However, adjustments and improvements are needed if the potential of PROs is to be fully achieved in the treatment of children and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caroline Bruun Abild
- grid.154185.c0000 0004 0512 597XSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kurt Kristensen
- grid.154185.c0000 0004 0512 597XSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark ,grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lene Juel Kristensen
- grid.154185.c0000 0004 0512 597XSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Annesofie Lunde Jensen
- grid.154185.c0000 0004 0512 597XSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark ,grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lassen RB, Abild CB, Kristensen K, Kristensen LJ, Jensen AL. Patient-reported outcome instruments for assessing the involvement of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in their treatment: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2023; 21:609-616. [PMID: 36170118 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-22-00105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to identify available patient-reported outcome instruments used to assess the involvement of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in their treatment. Specifically, this review will examine the content, structure, and application of these instruments. INTRODUCTION It is considered meaningful to involve children and adolescents living with a chronic health condition, such as type 1 diabetes, in their own treatment. Despite a growing interest in patient involvement within pediatric health care, including the use of patient-reported outcomes, only a few patient-reported outcome instruments have been developed and are used to evaluate the experiences of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes of being involved in their own treatment. INCLUSION CRITERIA This scoping review will examine patient-reported outcome instruments used to assess the experiences of children and adolescents (11 to 18 years of age) with type 1 diabetes of being involved in their own care. Patient-reported outcome instruments measuring parents' or clinicians' experiences of involvement will be excluded. METHODS The proposed review will follow JBI guidelines and all stages will involve 2 or more reviewers. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, JSTOR, and MedNar will be searched without limitations on the year or language of publication. Literature that is not written in English will be translated. Data extraction, charting, and analysis will be guided by a template developed for this review that focuses on the content, structure, and application of the patient-reported outcome instruments. Any modifications to the extraction template will be detailed in the review, and data will be presented in a descriptive format.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caroline Bruun Abild
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kurt Kristensen
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Annesofie Lunde Jensen
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rothmund M, Meryk A, Rumpold G, Crazzolara R, Sodergren S, Darlington AS, Riedl D. A critical evaluation of the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures assessing health-related quality of life in children with cancer: a systematic review. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:2. [PMID: 36656407 PMCID: PMC9851583 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00540-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With increasing survival rates in pediatric oncology, the need to monitor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is becoming even more important. However, available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been criticized. This review aims to systematically evaluate the content validity of PROMs for HRQOL in children with cancer. METHODS In December 2021, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed. PROMs were included if they were used to assess HRQOL in children with cancer and had a lower age-limit between 8 and 12 years and an upper age-limit below 21 years. The COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs was applied to grade evidence for relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility based on quality ratings of development studies (i.e., studies related to concept elicitation and cognitive interviews for newly developed questionnaires) and content validity studies (i.e., qualitative studies in new samples to evaluate the content validity of existing questionnaires). RESULTS Twelve PROMs were included. Due to insufficient patient involvement and/or poor reporting, the quality of most development studies was rated 'doubtful' or 'inadequate'. Few content validity studies were available, and these were mostly 'inadequate'. Following the COSMIN methodology, evidence for content validity was 'low' or 'very low' for almost all PROMs. Only the PROMIS Pediatric Profile had 'moderate' evidence. In general, the results indicated that the PROMs covered relevant issues, while results for comprehensiveness and comprehensibility were partly inconsistent or insufficient. DISCUSSION Following the COSMIN methodology, there is scarce evidence for the content validity of available PROMs for HRQOL in children with cancer. Most instruments were developed before the publication of milestone guidelines and therefore were not able to fulfill all requirements. Efforts are needed to catch up with methodological progress made during the last decade. Further research should adhere to recent guidelines to develop new instruments and to strengthen the evidence for existing PROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Rothmund
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, University Clinic of Psychiatry II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria ,grid.5771.40000 0001 2151 8122Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andreas Meryk
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gerhard Rumpold
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, University Clinic of Psychiatry II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Roman Crazzolara
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Samantha Sodergren
- grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anne-Sophie Darlington
- grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - David Riedl
- grid.5361.10000 0000 8853 2677Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, University Clinic of Psychiatry II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria ,grid.489044.5Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Srour MK, Tadros AB, Sevilimedu V, Nelson JA, Cracchiolo JR, McCready TM, Silva N, Moo TA, Morrow M. Who Are We Missing: Does Engagement in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Breast Cancer Vary by Age, Race, or Disease Stage? Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7964-7973. [PMID: 36149608 PMCID: PMC10328095 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12477-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are used to assess value-based care. Little is known as to whether PROM response in breast cancer reflects the diverse patient population. The BREAST-Q, a validated measure of satisfaction and quality of life, and Recovery Tracker, a postoperative assessment tool, are PROM routinely delivered to all patients undergoing breast surgery at our institution. Here we determine whether response to PROM differs by age, race, language, or disease stage. METHODS All patients who had a breast operation between January 2020 and July 2021 were requested to complete the BREAST-Q and Recovery Tracker. Non-responders did not complete the PROM at any timepoint; responders completed 1 or more. Primary outcomes included rates of non-response versus response overall. RESULTS Of 6374 patients identified, 5653 (88.7%) responded to either PROM [4366/4751 (91.9%) BREAST-Q; 2746/3384 (81.1%) Recovery Tracker]. On univariate analysis, non-responders were older (60 years versus 55 years, p < 0.001) and more often non-English speaking (p < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (p = 0.031), and Black race (p < 0.001), versus responders. On multivariate analysis, non-responders were significantly more often Black race and non-English speaking (p < 0.001). Non-English speakers were significantly less responsive among all ethnicities and races except Black race. Although breast cancer stage did not reach significance for response, patients with malignant disease and those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy responded more often. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate high patient engagement using 2 different PROM following breast surgery, but suggest that PROM results may not reflect the experience of the entire breast cancer population. Care process changes based solely on PROM should consider these findings to ensure that the views of the entire spectrum of patients with breast cancer are represented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa K Srour
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Audree B Tadros
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer R Cracchiolo
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Taylor M McCready
- Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Silva
- Department of Strategy and Innovation, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tracy-Ann Moo
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The predictive trifecta? Fatigue, pain, and anxiety severity forecast the suffering profile of children with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:2081-2089. [PMID: 34661748 PMCID: PMC8919269 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06622-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatigue, pain, and anxiety, symptoms commonly experienced by children with cancer, may predict pediatric symptom suffering profile membership that is amenable to treatment. METHODS Three latent profiles (Low, Medium, and High symptom suffering) from 436 pediatric patients undergoing cancer care were assessed for association with three single-item symptoms and socio-demographic variables. RESULTS Pediatric-PRO-CTCAE fatigue, pain, and anxiety severity scores at baseline were highly and significantly associated with the Medium and High Suffering profiles comprised of PROMIS pediatric symptom and function measures. The likelihood of membership in the Medium Suffering group was 11.37 times higher for patients who experienced fatigue severity than those with did not, while experience of pain severity increased the likelihood of the child's membership in the Medium Suffering profile by 2.59 times and anxiety by 3.67 times. The severity of fatigue increased the likelihood of presence in the High Suffering group by 2.99 times while pain severity increased the likelihood of the child's membership in the High Suffering profile by 6.36 times and anxiety by 16.75 times. Controlling for experience of symptom severity, older patients were more likely to be in the Higher or Medium Suffering profile than in the Low Suffering profile; no other socio-demographic or clinical variables had a significant effect on the latent profile classification. CONCLUSION Clinician knowledge of the strong association between fatigue, pain, and anxiety severity and suffering profiles may help focus supportive care to improve the cancer experience for children most at risk from time of diagnosis through treatment.
Collapse
|
7
|
Weaver MS, Jacobs SS, Withycombe JS, Wang J, Greenzang KA, Baker JN, Hinds PS. Profile Comparison of Patient-Reported and Proxy-Reported Symptoms in Pediatric Patients With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e221855. [PMID: 35348712 PMCID: PMC8965635 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The variability in individual symptom and adverse event reporting between pediatric patient-reports and proxy-reports is widely reported. However, the question of whether symptom profiles based on reports from children with cancer and their caregivers are similar or disparate have not yet been studied. OBJECTIVE To compare proxy symptom reports with patient self-reports to assess alignment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A multicenter cohort study was conducted from October 2016 to December 2018 from data collected at 9 pediatric cancer centers. Participants were a convenience sample of family caregivers or proxies of children aged 7 to 18 years who had received disease-directed oncology treatment in the form of chemotherapy for at least 1 month. Data were analyzed identifying clusters of individuals (ie, latent profiles) based on various responses (ie, indicators) in August 2021. EXPOSURES The children of proxy participants received upfront chemotherapy. Children and proxies completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys at 2 time points: within 72 hours preceding treatment initiation and following the course of chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The latent profile analysis methods were applied to caregiver-proxy reports of PROMIS Pediatric symptom and function measures (anxiety, depressive symptoms, pain interference, fatigue, psychological stress, and physical function-mobility). The instrument categorized respondents as high symptom suffering, medium symptom suffering, and low symptom suffering (hereafter, high, medium, and low symptom groups, respectively). RESULTS Of 580 approached proxies, 431 (368 [85.00%] were female) identified as legal guardians of children aged 7 to 18 years with a first cancer diagnosis (mean [SD] age, 13.03 [3.40] years; 235 [54.65%] were male). Proxy reports of children's experiences based on the 5 proxy PROMIS measures comprised 3 distinct symptom profiles. The most common proxy assessments of children's experiences were the moderate symptom groups (45.7% [197 of 431]) and the low symptom groups profiles (40.1% [173 of 431]). A high symptom groups profile emerged which represented 14.2% (61 of 431) of proxy assessments. The number of profiles and observed distribution of profile membership was similar between child and proxy reports. Proxy reports of individual symptoms generally recorded higher scores than child reports; however, no significant difference was observed between proxies and child profile model results for the PROMIS measures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this cohort study suggest that, at the level of symptom severity profile, proxy caregiver reports may approximate the children's reports and may serve as a guide to care when the child is not able to self-report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meaghann S. Weaver
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska, Omaha
- National Center for Ethics in Healthcare, Washington, DC
| | | | | | - Jichuan Wang
- Division of Biostatistics & Study Methodology, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Katie A. Greenzang
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Justin N. Baker
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Pamela S. Hinds
- Department of Nursing Science, Professional Practice and Quality, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC
- Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple symptoms occur in children receiving cancer therapy. Decreased steps per day may be associated with burdensome symptoms. OBJECTIVE To evaluate associations between self-reported symptoms (pain interference, anxiety, depressive symptoms, psychological stress, and fatigue) and function (physical function-mobility and physical activity) and cumulative symptom count with steps per day. METHODS Five sites enrolled English-speaking children, 8 to 17 years, receiving treatment for a first cancer diagnosis. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys were administered before (T1) and after (T2) a course of chemotherapy. Garmin VivoFit 3 (Garmin International, Olathe, KS) accelerometers were worn 7 days prior to each data point. Univariate changes in scores over time were evaluated with dependent-sample t tests. Pearson correlations examined associations between PRO domains and step count. Multivariable mixed-effect models examined associations between steps and PROs. RESULTS Participants' (n = 65) steps per day decreased during treatment (4099 [T1] and 3135 [T2]; P < .01), with larger reductions observed during hospitalization and in younger children compared with adolescents. Steps significantly correlated with PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) Pediatric physical activity and physical function-mobility. Decreased steps per day were associated with increased fatigue and cumulative symptom count. CONCLUSIONS In children and adolescents with cancer, steps per day can serve as an indicator of fatigue, cumulative symptom count, physical activity, and physical functioning-mobility. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Child self-reports of physical activity and physical function are valid during cancer therapy and should be captured. In the absence of self-report, decreasing step count may prompt additional assessments related to fatigue or cumulative symptom count and trigger early interventions to support physical activity and physical function-mobility.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hinds PS, Weaver MS, Withycombe JS, Baker JN, Jacobs SS, Mack JW, Maurer SH, McFatrich M, Pinheiro LC, Reeve BB, Wang J. Subjective Toxicity Profiles of Children in Treatment for Cancer: A New Guide to Supportive Care? J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 61:1188-1195.e2. [PMID: 33096220 PMCID: PMC8055722 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Children and adolescents with cancer experience treatment-related, subjective adverse events (AEs). Identifying distinct groups of patients who predictably experience higher prevalence of AEs could guide patient care. OBJECTIVES Study aims were to 1) identify groups of children and adolescents reporting AEs using the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Ped-PRO-CTCAE); 2) determine whether demographic and clinical characteristics predict AE group membership; and 3) examine whether AE group membership was related to the distal outcome of psychological stress. METHODS Four hundred seventy-seven patients self-reported AEs via the Ped-PRO-CTCAE at T1 (beginning of treatment) and the PROMIS Pediatric Psychological Stress measure at T2 (7-28 days later). Latent class analysis was conducted to identify groups of patients and the relationships of the groups with demographic and clinical characteristics, and with stress. RESULTS Three distinct a priori unknown AE groups were identified (high AE prevalence, moderate AE prevalence, and low AE prevalence). Females, blacks, patients with high psychological stress, and patients more recently diagnosed were more likely to be in the high AE prevalence group. Gender, age, race, and time since diagnosis were associated with psychological stress. CONCLUSION Children with cancer are heterogeneous in experiencing subjective AEs. Gender, race, and time since diagnosis were significantly associated with higher subjective AE prevalence that may lead to psychological stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela S Hinds
- Department of Nursing Science, Professional Practice and Quality, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA; Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
| | - Meaghann S Weaver
- Division of Pediatric Palliative Care, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA; Division of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | | | - Justin N Baker
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Shana S Jacobs
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Hospital, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Center for Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Scott H Maurer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Molly McFatrich
- Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura C Pinheiro
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jichuan Wang
- Division of Biostatistics and Study Methodology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA; Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|