Religiosity in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a cross-country comparison

Advances and research priorities in the respiratory management of ALS: Historical perspectives and new technologies

Respiratory involvement has been identified as a cardinal feature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) since its earliest descriptions in the 19th century. Since these initial reports, considerable research has been undertaken to clarify the pathophysiology and progression rates associated with respiratory compromise and effective management strategies have been developed. Clinical trials routinely incorporate respiratory measures as study end points, non-invasive ventilation is now widely used in the home setting, cough-assist techniques are commonly used, advanced neurophysiology techniques and wearable technologies have been integrated into respiratory monitoring protocols, and palliative guidelines have been developed to effectively manage respiratory distress. Despite the widespread implementation of these interventions, epidemiology studies are inconsistent and some studies suggest that survival in ALS has not improved significantly with the introduction of these measures. The outcomes of diaphragmatic pacing trials have been disappointing, advanced neurophysiology techniques are not routinely utilised, spinal and brainstem imaging are not commonly undertaken and significant geographical differences exist in proceeding to tracheostomy. The worldwide COVID pandemic has given impetus for remote monitoring, connected devices, video-consultations, and timely vaccinations in ALS; lessons that are invaluable long after the pandemic. Respiratory monitoring and management in ALS is a swiftly evolving facet of ALS care with considerable quality of life benefits.

Health-related quality of life across disease stages in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: results from a real-world survey

BACKGROUND

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is characterized by a rapid disease course, with disease severity being associated with declining health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in persons living with ALS (pALS). The main objective of this study was to assess the impact of disease progression on HRQoL across King's, Milano-Torino Staging (MiToS), and physician-judgement clinical staging. Additionally, we evaluated the impact of the disease on the HRQoL of care partners (cALS).

METHODS

Data were sourced from the Adelphi ALS Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a cross-sectional survey of neurologists, pALS and cALS presenting in a real-world clinical setting between July 2020 and March 2021 in Europe and the United States.

RESULTS

Neurologists (n = 142) provided data for 880 pALS. There were significant negative correlations between all three clinical staging systems and EuroQol (European Quality of Life) Five Dimension Five Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) utility scores and visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings. Although not all differences were significant, 5-item Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire (ALSAQ-5) scores showed a stepwise increase in HRQoL impairment at each stage of the disease regardless of the staging system. At later stages, high levels of fatigue and substantial activity impairment were reported. As pALS disease states progressed, cALS also experienced a decline in HRQoL and increased burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Across outcomes, pALS and cALS generally reported worse outcomes at later stages of the disease, highlighting an unmet need in this population for strategies to maximise QoL despite disease progression. Recognition and treatment of symptoms such as pain and fatigue may lead to improved outcomes for pALS and cALS.

Coping as a resource to allow for psychosocial adjustment in fatal disease: results from patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Background

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal disorder, which imposes a severe emotional burden on patients. Appropriate coping mechanisms may alleviate this burden and facilitate wellbeing, with social support known to be a successful coping strategy. This observational study aimed to determine the interplay of general coping traits of hope for success and fear of failure, coping behavior of social activity, and patients' wellbeing.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, patients with ALS from a clinical-epidemiological registry in Southwestern Germany were interviewed regarding coping traits (achievement-motivated behavior: hope for success and fear of failure), coping behavior of social activity, and psychosocial adjustment, determined using measures of depressiveness, anxiety [both measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)], and quality of life [Anamnestic Comparative Self-Assessment (ACSA)]. Demographics, clinical [ALS Functional Rating Scale revised version (ALSFRS-R)], and survival data were recorded.

Results

A total of 868 patients [60.70% male patients, mean age: 64.70 (±10.83) years, mean ALSFRS-R: 37.36 ± 7.07] were interviewed. Anxiety in patients was found to be associated with a high fear of failure. In contrast, a generally positive attitude in patients exemplified in high hopes for success was associated with better wellbeing. Finally, coping behavior of social activity explained up to 65% of the variance of depressiveness among the patients with ALS.

Conclusion

In this study, we present evidence that the wellbeing of patients with ALS is not an immediate fatalistic consequence of physical degradation but rather determined by coping traits and behavior, which may be trained to substantially increase the wellbeing of patients with ALS.