The 4G/5G polymorphism in the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene is not associated with HELLP syndrome

Association of plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 (-675 4G/5G) polymorphism with pre-eclampsia: systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Excessive generation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 (PAI-1) is implicated in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia and related conditions. The PAI-1 (-675 4G/5G) promoter polymorphism (rs1799889) affects transcriptional activity and is a putative genetic risk factor for pre-eclampsia. The aim of this study was identify, appraise and synthesise the available evidence for the association of the PAI-1 (-675 4G/5G) polymorphism with pre-eclampsia.

METHODS

Systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of genetic association studies.

RESULTS

We found 12 eligible genetic association studies in which a total of 1511 women with pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or HELLP syndrome and 3492 controls participated. The studies were generally small (median number of cases 102, range 24 to 403) and underpowered to detect plausible association sizes. Meta-analysis of all of the studies detected statistically significant gene-disease associations in the recessive [pooled odds ratio 1.28 (95% confidence interval 1.09, 1.50); population attributable risk 7.7%] and dominant [pooled odds ratio 1.21 (95% confidence interval 1.01, 1.44); population attributable risk 13.7%] models. We did not find evidence of statistical heterogeneity, funnel plot asymmetry or small study bias.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the fibrinolytic pathway regulated by the PAI-1 gene may contribute to the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia and related conditions. This association, if confirmed in larger genetic association studies, may inform research efforts to develop novel interventions or help to prioritise therapeutic targets that merit evaluation in randomised clinical trials.

[Hereditary thrombophilias and placental-mediated pregnancy complications in the II./III. trimester]

Placental-mediated pregnancy complications (PmC) like preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction and placental abruption are common causes of fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. The high prevalence of hereditary thrombophilias in case-control studies associated with pathological morphological findings of the placenta in these cases gave evidence for the association between hereditary thrombophilias and PmC. However, data from the literature are inconsistent, since subsequent prospective cohort studies could not demonstrate significant associations between inherited thrombophilia and PmC. Because of the multifactorial aetiology of PmC it may be difficult to prove, that hereditary thrombophilias are independent risk factors for PmC. Current guidelines do not recommend screening for inherited thrombophilias in patients with previous PmC. Evidence from current in vitro studies have shown, that heparin has beneficial non-anticoagulatory effects on trophoblast invasion. Retrospective case-control studies and recently published randomised controlled cohort studies have shown, that prophylactic administration of low-molecular-weight heparin (LWH), started in early pregnancy, may lead to a significant reduction in the incidence of PmC in subsequent pregnancies in patients with and without hereditary thrombophilias and previous PmC.

CONCLUSION

Large, well-designed multicenter studies are needed to elucidate the role of hereditary thrombophilias in cases of PmC and to confirm the benefit of LWH for subsequent pregnancy outcomes.

Association between the SERPINE1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G insertion/deletion promoter polymorphism (rs1799889) and pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The SERPINE1 -675 4G/5G promoter region insertion/deletion polymorphism (rs1799889) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia (PE), but the genetic association has been inconsistently replicated. To derive a more precise estimate of the association, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. This study conformed to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus and HuGE Literature Finder literature databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the allelic comparison (4G versus 5G) and genotypic comparisons following the co-dominant (4G/4G versus 5G/5G and 4G/5G versus 5G/5G), dominant (4G/4G+4G/5G versus 5G/5G) and recessive (4G/4G versus 4G/5G+5G/5G) genetic models. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified by I(2) statistics and publication bias was appraised with funnel plots. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the robustness of meta-analysis findings. Meta-analysis of 11 studies involving 1297 PE cases and 1791 controls found a significant association between the SERPINE1 -675 4G/5G polymorphism and PE for the recessive genetic model (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13-1.64, P = 0.001), a robust finding according to sensitivity analysis. A low level of between-study heterogeneity was detected (I(2) = 20%) in this comparison, which may be explained by ethnic differences. Funnel plot inspection did not reveal evidence of publication bias. In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive examination of the available literature on the association between SERPINE1 -675 4G/5G and PE. Meta-analysis results support this polymorphism as a likely susceptibility variant for PE.

Bedeutung von Polymorphismen für venöse und arterielle Thrombosen

Die Polymorphismen der thrombozytären Glykoproteine Ia-IIa (GP Ia C807T) und HPA-1a/1b (GP IIIa T1565C), des Fibrinolyseinhibitors PAI-1 675 4G/5G sowie der Methylentetrahydrofolatreduktase MTHFR C677T werden immer wieder als Risikofaktoren für arterielle und venöse Thrombembolien diskutiert. Ihr prädiktiver Wert für das Auftreten von thrombembolischen Ereignissen ist jedoch aufgrund einer widersprüchlichen Datenlage unklar. Nach derzeitigem Kenntnisstand gehen die genannten Polymorphismen nicht gesichert mit einem erhöhten Thrombembolierisiko einher. Daher ist ihre Untersuchung zurzeit weder in der arteriellen noch in der venösen Thrombophiliediagnostik indiziert. Aufgrund der hohen Prävalenzen dieser genetischen Merkmale bedarf es weiterer Untersuchungen, um die Grenzen zwischen Confoundereffekt und Risikofaktor zu definieren.