Combined intraarterial and intravenous thrombolysis for severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombolysis in patients with acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is an uncommon but fatal cause of stroke worldwide. Endovascular treatments could be life-saving in patients who don't treat with anticoagulants as a mainstay of treatment. Currently, there is no consensus considering the safety, efficacy, and also selected approaches of endovascular intervention for these patients. This systematic review evaluates the literature on endovascular thrombolysis (EVT) in CVST patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted through PubMed and Scopus databases between 2010 and 2021, with additional sources identified through cross-referencing. The primary outcomes were the safety and efficacy of EVT in CVST, including catheter-related and non-catheter-related complications, clinical outcomes, and radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies comprising 339 patients were included. Most of the patients presented with headaches (86.72%) and/or focal neurologic deficits (45.43%) (modified Rankin Scale of 5 in 55.88%). Acquired coagulopathy and/or consuming estrogen/progesterone medication were the most frequent predisposing factors (45.59%). At presentation, 68.84% had multi-sinus involvement, and 28.90% had venous infarcts and/or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The overall complication rate was 10.3%, with a 2.94%, 1.47%, and 1.17% rate of ICH, herniation, and intracranial edema, respectively. The complete and partial postoperative radiographic resolution was reported in 89.97% of patients, increasing to 95.21% during the follow-up. Additionally, 72.22% of patients had no or mild neurologic deficit at discharge, rising to 91.18% at the last follow-up. The overall mortality rate was 7.07%.

CONCLUSIONS

EVT can be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with refractory CVST or contraindications to systemic anticoagulation.

Endovascular thrombectomy for severe cerebral venous thrombosis: A comprehensive meta-analysis assessing safety and efficacy

BACKGROUND

Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT) has traditionally been treated medically with systemic anticoagulation. Recent advances in endovascular therapy (EVT) may represent an alternative treatment to medical therapy for CSVT. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the use of EVT for CSVT.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included studies that reported outcomes following EVT for CSVT. The primary outcome of interest was rate of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. Secondary outcomes of interest were rates of complete, partial, and failed recanalization, mortality, and new or expansion of hematoma. We calculated pooled rates (%) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies with 682 patients were included. Rate of mRS 0-2 was 82.6% (95% CI, 75.3%-88.0%). Rate of complete recanalization was 60.9% (95% CI, 49.1%-71.5%), rate of partial recanalization was 34.2% (95% CI, 24.1%-45.9%), and rate of failed recanalization was 5.4% (95% CI, 3.1%-9.2%). Rate of mortality was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.1%-10.8%), and rate of new hematoma or expansion of hematoma was 5.1% (2.9%-8.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, EVT for CSVT was associated with favorable rates of mRS 0-2 and recanalization. Furthermore, EVT was associated with a promising safety profile. Future prospective, comparative studies are warranted to assess EVT for CSVT.

Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Vein and Venous Sinus Thrombosis—A Systematic Review

Background: Cerebral venous sinus or vein thromboses (SVT) are treated with heparin followed by oral anticoagulation. Even after receiving the best medical treatment, numerous patients experience neurological deterioration, intracerebral hemorrhage or brain edema. Debate regarding whether endovascular treatment (EVT) is beneficial in such severe cases remains ongoing. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence supporting the use of EVT for SVT on the basis of case presentations, with a focus on patient selection, treatment strategies and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This systemic literature review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective observational data analyzing five or more patients. Follow-up information (modified Rankin scale (mRS)) was required to be provided (individual patient data). Results: 21 records (n = 405 patients; 1 RCT, 20 observational studies) were identified. EVT was found to be feasible and safe in a highly selected patient cohort but was not associated with an increase in good functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) in RCT data. In observational data, good functional outcomes were frequently observed despite an anticipated poor prognosis. Conclusion: The current evidence does not support the routine incorporation of EVT in SVT treatment. However, in a patient cohort prone to poor prognosis, EVT might be a reasonable therapeutic option. Further studies determining the patients at risk, choice of methods and devices, and timing of treatment initiation are warranted.

Balloon-Assisted Thrombectomy and Intrasinus Urokinase Thrombolysis for Severe Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

Background: Current clinical guidelines recommend systemic anticoagulation as the initial treatment for severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). However, anticoagulation alone does not always dissolve large and extensive CVSTs in some patients. Here, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of balloon-assisted thrombectomy and intrasinus urokinase thrombolysis in our retrospective study of a series of 23 patients with CVST. Methods: We reviewed the clinical, radiological, and outcome data of all patients. Complete recanalization was defined as all the occluded sinuses were recanalized on digital subtraction angiography or Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography. Partial recanalization was defined as the complete recanalization of one sinus but persistent occlusion of other sinuses, or partial recanalization of one or more sinuses. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to represent the clinical outcome. Results: From May 2017 to November 2019, a total of 23 patients were treated with balloon-assisted thrombectomy and intrasinus urokinase thrombolysis. A total of 84 venous sinuses were involved, ≥3 sinuses were involved in 20 (87%) patients. Among them, 21 (91%) patients achieved technical success. Complete and partial recanalization were obtained in 17 (81%) and 4 (19%) patients at 6 months follow-up, respectively. All 21 patients had mRS scores of 0 (18) or 1 (3). Conclusions: Our case series shows that balloon-assisted thrombectomy combined with intrasinus urokinase thrombolysis and activated partial thromboplastin time-regulated systemic anticoagulation is safe and effective in treating severe CVST.

Mechanical Thrombectomy with Intraoperative Local Thrombolysis Versus Mechanical Thrombectomy with Continuous Thrombolysis for Treatment of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Systematic Review of 82 Cases

OBJECTIVE

The first-line treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is systemic anticoagulation. However, patients with severe or a clinically worsening condition might benefit from mechanical thrombectomy (MT) combined with intraoperative thrombolysis (IOT) or MT with continuous thrombolytic infusion (CTI). The present study compared the efficacy and safety of these 2 endovascular therapeutic methods by performing a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

The present systematic review was conducted to identify all cases of CVST treated with MT+IOT or MT+CTI/MT+IOT+CTI reported in PubMed and Ovid. The recanalization rates, outcomes, operation-related complications, sequelae, and postoperative hemorrhage rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies, including 82 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Alone, MT+IOT was performed in 42 patients (51%), and MT+CTI/MT+IOT+CTI was performed in 40 patients (49%). Overall, outcomes data were available for 69 patients, of whom 57 (82%) had had a good outcome and 12 (18%) had had a poor outcome or had died. Recanalization data were available for 68 patients. Of these patients, 28 (41%) had had complete recanalization, 40 (59%) had had partial, and no patient had had no recanalization. Operation-related complications occurred in 5 patients (6%), and 3 patients (4%) developed postoperative intracerebral hemorrhage. However, no significant differences were found in the recanalization rate or prognosis between the MT+IOT and MT+CTI/MT+IOT+CTI groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from our review suggest that MT with local thrombolysis is relatively safe, with no significant differences in efficacy and safety between MT+IOT alone and MT+CTI/MT+IOT+CTI. However, randomized controlled studies are required to provide a definitive answer on its use for CVST.

Cortical vein thrombosis in adult patients of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis correlates with poor outcome and brain lesions: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Cortical vein thrombosis (CVT) receives little attention in adult patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). This study aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological features of adult CVST patients with concomitant CVT.

METHODS

From May 2009 to May 2016, we recruited 44 adult CVST patients (diagnosed within 1 month of onset; 33.8 ± 14.0 years of age, 28 males). CVT was primarily confirmed using computed tomography venography and magnetic resonance imaging sequence of contrast enhanced three dimensions magnetization prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo. Patients with concomitant CVT were divided into the CVT group; otherwise, the patients were placed into the non-CVT group. The clinico-radiological characteristics were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The CVT group included 27 patients (61.4%), and the non-CVT group included 17 patients (38.6%). Seizure (63.0% versus 11.8%), focal neurological deficits (44.4% versus 5.9%), and consciousness disorders (33.3% versus 0) occurred more frequently in the patients in the CVT group than in those of the non-CVT group (P < 0.05). The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge was higher for the CVT group patients (median 2, range 1-4) than for the non-CVT group patients (median 0, range 0-4) (P < 0.001). Venous infarction (63.0% versus 11.8%), parenchymal hemorrhage (40.7% versus 5.9%), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (22.2% versus 0) were identified more frequently in the CVT group than in the non-CVT group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that concomitant CVT is a common finding in adult patients with CVST and is associated with severe clinical manifestations, poor short-term outcomes, and brain lesions.

Stent retriever thrombectomy combined with local thrombolytic therapy for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A case report

The present study reports the effect of successful treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) with stent retriever thrombectomy combined with local thrombolytic therapy. Medical records of 29 patients were retrospectively analyzed following a diagnosis of CVST with magnetic resonance venography (MRV) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Systemic anticoagulation was the initial treatment in all patients following admission. In group A, stent retriever thrombectomy combined with local thrombolytic therapy was performed on 14 patients who met the criteria of endovascular therapy. Stent-assisted angioplasty was also performed when patients presented with venous sinus stenosis. A total of 15 patients in group B received systemic anticoagulant treatment. Subsequently, warfarin was administered orally for 3 to 12 months as a continuous anticoagulant therapy. International normalized ratio was monitored when patients were receiving anticoagulant therapy. Additionally, clinical presentation, decision to escalate therapy, recanalization, Glasgow Coma Scale, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the clinical outcome was assessed. A total of 14 patients (9 female patients, 5 male patients), with ages ranging from 17 to 57 years, met the criteria of endovascular therapy. The clinical symptoms of 12 patients had improved after receiving endovascular therapy and only 2 patients suffered from intracranial hemorrhage following the procedure. Complete recanalization of venous sinus was exhibited in 10/14 (71.4%) patients in group A when compared with 1/15 (6.7%) patients in group B. mRS were improved in the 12-month follow-up in groups A and B when compared with that at admission. In the present study, patients with acute CVST treated with stent retriever thrombectomy combined with local thrombolytic therapy had a favorable outcome. To conclude, the present study provides a treatment option in treating CVST, particularly for patients that present with evident cortical venous outflow stasis or deteriorate neurology, despite appropriate anticoagulant therapy.

Endovascular treatments for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is an uncommon but potentially fatal condition. CVST usually occurs young adults with a female predominance. The current mainstay for treating CVST is anticoagulation with heparin. However, more aggressive interventions, endovascular treatment as an example, may be indicated in selected patients who are non-responsive to heparin and other anticoagulants. Endovascular approaches include catheter-based local chemical thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty and mechanical thrombectomy, all of which may rapidly recanalize the occluded venous sinus, restore the blood flow, reduce the increased intracranial pressure, and subsequently relieve the corresponding symptoms. However, as an invasive strategy, endovascular procedures per se may cause complications, such as intracranial hemorrhage, vessel dissection and pulmonary embolization, which may substantially decrease the benefit-risk ratio of the treatment. Due to the rareness of the condition and the limited indication of this invasive strategy, safety and efficacy of endovascular procedures in treating CVST are less feasible to be evaluated in large randomized clinical trails. Therefore, the evidences for justifying this treatment strategy are largely derived from case reports, cohort studies and clinical observations.

Beyond the time window of intravenous thrombolysis: standing by or by stenting?

Intravenous administration of tissue plasminogen activator within 4.5 h of symptom onset is presently the 'golden rule' for treating acute ischemic stroke. However, many patients miss the time window and others reject this treatment due to a long list of contraindications. Mechanical embolectomy has recently progressed as a potential alternative for treating patients beyond the time window for IV thrombolysis. In this paper, recent progress in mechanical embolectomy, angioplasty, and stenting in acute stroke is reviewed. Despite worries concerning the long-term clinical outcomes and increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage, favorable clinical outcomes may be achieved after mechanical embolectomy in carefully selected patients even 4.5 h after stroke onset. Potential steps should be prepared and attempted in these patients whose opportunity for recovery will elapse in a flash.

Thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: an update

Stroke is a major cause of mortality and morbidity, and thrombolysis has served as a catalyst for major changes in the management of acute ischaemic stroke. Intravenous alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) is the only approved thrombolytic agent at present indicated for acute ischaemic stoke. While the licensed time window extends to 3h from symptom onset, recent data suggest that the trial window can be extended up to 4.5 h with overall benefit. Nonetheless, 'time is brain' and every effort must be made to reduce the time delay to thrombolysis. Intracranial haemorrhage is the major complication associated with thrombolysis, and key factors increasing risk of haemorrhage include increasing age, high blood pressure, diabetes and stroke severity. Currently, there is no direct evidence to support thrombolysis in patients >80 years of age, with a few case series indicating no overt harm. Identification of viable penumbra based on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging may allow future extension of the time window. Adjuvant transcranial Doppler ultrasound has the potential to improve reperfusion rates. While intra-arterial thrombolysis has been in vogue for a few decades, there is no clear advantage over intravenous thrombolysis. The evidence base for thrombolysis in specific situations (e.g. dissection, pregnancy) is inadequate, and individualized decisions are needed, with a clear indication to the patient/carer about the lack of direct evidence, and the risk-benefit balance. Patient-friendly information leaflets may facilitate the process of consent for thrombolysis. This article summarizes the recent advances in thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Key questions faced by clinicians during the decision-making process are answered based on the evidence available.